国庆假期刚结束，今年"双11"促销已登场。10月8日，"大疆预告降价已购买消费者退货维权"上了微博 热搜。据悉，大疆近日在淘宝、京东等官方店铺预告了多款产品从10月9日开始降价。 此次降价，大疆很多产品降幅达千元，这引发了已高价入手的消费者不满甚至维权。消费者草莓（化 名）表示，"我是9月29日买的，10月3日才收到货，要么退货退款，要么退补差价。"幸运的是经过一番 波折，草莓如愿以偿获补差价。不过有些消费者还在与商家沟通。 10月9日，大疆公司向新京报贝壳财经记者表示，本次价格调整是大疆为"双11"推出的常规促销安排， 将不断优化相关的服务与沟通机制。 随着，越来越多企业入局无人机领域，大疆或将面临增长压力。不过，降价促销也引发消费纠纷。北京 市康达律师事务所律师韩骁表示，大疆的降价行为本质上是行使法定定价自主权的商业决策，符合法律 对企业经营行为的基本要求。 韩骁提到，若有消费者能举证证明在购买前咨询客服近期是否会降价，客服作出无降价计划、不参与促 销活动等明确承诺，而后续短期内即大幅降价，以致消费者高价购买，商家或构成价格欺诈。 有消费者刚买就降价七百元甚至千元，大疆千元级降价促销意欲何为 近日，大疆在 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the investigation of a hotel in Jingdezhen, Jiangxi Province, which raised its prices from around 90 yuan to approximately 1000 yuan during the National Day holiday, highlighting public reactions and regulatory responses [3][4]. Summary by Sections Price Increase Incident - The hotel in question listed prices between 970 to 1059 yuan per room for the holiday, a significant increase from the usual 90 yuan [4]. - The hotel staff explained that the high price was not the final charge, as customers could adjust the price based on actual conditions upon check-in, with an estimated final price of around 500 to 600 yuan [4]. Regulatory Response - The local market supervision bureau announced an investigation into the hotel for allegedly violating the Price Law of the People's Republic of China [3][5]. - The Price Law allows for market-driven pricing for most goods and services, with only a few exceptions where government pricing is applicable [5]. Public Reaction - Many consumers expressed support for the hotel’s pricing strategy, arguing that as long as prices are clearly marked, there should be no issue with price increases during peak times [3][6]. - The public's mixed reactions indicate a disconnect between regulatory actions and consumer perceptions, with some feeling that the enforcement was excessive [7]. Legal Framework and Future Considerations - The Price Law outlines eight types of "unfair pricing behavior," but the specific violations by the hotel were not clearly identified in the regulatory announcement [6]. - The current Price Law, established in 1997, is seen as outdated, and a draft for its revision has been released for public feedback, aiming to clarify definitions and enforcement standards [7].

Core Viewpoint - The public reaction to the price increase of a hotel during the National Day holiday reflects a complex relationship between consumers, businesses, and regulatory authorities, where consumers do not oppose price hikes but resist regulatory interventions perceived as excessive or unjustified [1][4]. Group 1: Price Increase Context - A hotel in Jingdezhen, Jiangxi Province, raised its room prices from approximately 90 yuan to between 970 and 1059 yuan during the National Day holiday, a tenfold increase [2]. - The hotel staff explained that the high price listed online was not the final price, as consumers could adjust the payment based on actual pricing upon check-in, which was expected to be around 500 to 600 yuan [2]. Group 2: Regulatory Framework - The current Price Law allows for market-driven pricing for most goods and services, with only a few exceptions where government pricing is applicable [3]. - The law outlines eight types of "unfair pricing behavior," including market manipulation and price gouging, but the specific violations by the hotel were not clearly identified in the regulatory notice [3]. Group 3: Public Sentiment and Regulatory Actions - Many consumers expressed support for the hotel’s pricing strategy, arguing that as long as prices are clearly marked, businesses should have the right to set prices based on market conditions [1][4]. - The regulatory actions taken by the Jingdezhen market supervision authority were met with skepticism, as the public perceived a lack of clear justification for the enforcement measures [4]. Group 4: Legislative Considerations - The existing Price Law, enacted in 1998, is seen as outdated, with calls for revisions to address ambiguities and inconsistencies in enforcement [5][6]. - A draft amendment to the Price Law has been released for public consultation, aiming to clarify standards for identifying unfair pricing practices [6].

Core Viewpoint - The recent implementation of the "Kunming City Network Booking Taxi Operation Service Management Implementation Rules" introduces a market-adjusted pricing mechanism for ride-hailing services, with the potential for government-guided pricing to address issues arising from rapid market expansion and price disparities across regions [2][4]. Pricing Mechanism - Ride-hailing prices vary significantly between large cities and smaller towns, with examples showing that in Shanghai, the fare is 1.8 yuan/km during normal hours, while in smaller cities like Handan, it can reach 2.6 yuan/km [3]. - The presence of limited platforms in smaller cities often leads to higher prices due to lack of competition, while larger cities benefit from multiple platforms and competitive pricing [3]. Government Intervention - The new rules allow for government intervention when market pricing fails, aiming to protect the rights of drivers and ensure fair pricing [4][5]. - The government-guided pricing could help stabilize the market, which has seen a decline in driver income and service quality due to aggressive price competition [4][5]. Market Dynamics - The current market pricing system is criticized for leading to low profit margins for platforms, with projections indicating an average profit margin of less than 3% for major platforms in 2024 [5]. - The need for a balance between market-driven pricing and government intervention is emphasized, as unchecked market dynamics can lead to safety concerns and decreased customer satisfaction [5][6]. Proposed Solutions - Suggestions include establishing a "credit rating system" for platforms, implementing a tiered penalty system for violations, and utilizing big data to monitor pricing fluctuations [6][7]. - A proposed framework for government-guided pricing includes a base price determined by local income and operational costs, with a flexible range allowing for adjustments based on demand [7]. Stakeholder Collaboration - The importance of a collaborative approach among drivers, platforms, and government is highlighted, advocating for labor contracts and a fatigue warning system to protect driver rights [7]. - Direct negotiation between drivers and passengers has shown positive results, with a reported 40% decrease in complaints, indicating the effectiveness of optimized mechanisms [7].

Core Viewpoint - The Hainan Provincial Development and Reform Commission is proposing to deregulate the pricing of baggage packing and storage services at airports, allowing for market-driven pricing in response to the operational conditions of these services and practices in other provinces and cities [1] Group 1 - The initiative aims to deepen price reform and enhance the delegation of power in the aviation sector [1] - The proposal is based on the operational status of baggage packing and storage services in Hainan Province [1] - Other provinces and cities have already implemented similar deregulation for airport extension service charges [1]