来源：环球网 【环球网报道 记者 陈全 实习生 聂希子】据英国媒体《卫报》报道，近年来，编程俱乐部逐渐开始在该 国中小学中流行。正如20世纪初出生的人从未经历过没有飞机的世界、Z世代自幼生活在社交媒体之中 一样，这些孩子生来就成为了"AI原住民"。然而，在一些孩子正在学习这项可能改变世界的技术的同 时，专家担心，如果缺乏系统性的教育，大量人群可能会被这股浪潮甩在身后，进而失去能力与话语 权。 树莓派基金会（Raspberry Pi Foundation）首席执行官、数字教育慈善机构负责人菲利普·科利甘（Philip Colligan）警告称，社会可能出现一次"巨大分裂"：一部分人将掌握人工智能的运作原理并驾驭它们， 这使得他们能够应对AI在住房、社会福利、卫生健康、刑事司法及金融决策中扮演着日益重要的角色 的挑战；而另一部分人则可能沦为"AI文盲"，面临丧失社会主动权的风险。 科利甘在接受《卫报》采访时表示，为避免社会分化，AI素养必须像阅读和写作一样，成为全民教育 的基本组成部分。"如果儿童之间出现巨大分裂，一部分人理解并掌握这些核心知识，因此能够维护自 身权益，而另一部分人却不具备这种能力，那将非常危险。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article argues that there is no single best AI chatbot, and users should select different tools for different tasks based on their performance in practical applications [4][5]. Group 1: AI Chatbot Performance - ChatGPT, despite its popularity, has never ranked above second in various tests against other chatbots [6]. - Anthropic's Claude chatbot outperformed ChatGPT in writing tasks, demonstrating better emotional expression and consideration [7]. - Google's AI mode is preferred for research and quick answers due to its ability to conduct multiple searches and provide timely information [7]. Group 2: Limitations of AI Tools - Many chatbots struggle with basic knowledge questions, indicating their reliance on text and limitations in image recognition [10][11]. - AI tools often provide seemingly immediate answers but lack the ability to express uncertainty, leading to incorrect responses [11]. - The performance of AI chatbots in practical scenarios often falls short of human standards, with most scoring between 50% and 65% in tests [10]. Group 3: Recommendations for Effective Use - Users are encouraged to provide detailed information when querying chatbots to improve the quality of responses [12]. - Custom instructions can be added to chatbots to request clarification when prompts are vague, enhancing interaction quality [12]. - Continuous evaluation and testing of AI tools are necessary to adapt to their evolving capabilities and limitations [13].

陈楸帆是科幻圈少见的"跨界者"。作为科幻作家，他被媒体誉为"中国的威廉·吉布森"，从关注电子垃 圾议题的《荒潮》到与李开复合著、预演技术图景的《AI未来进行式》，获得全球华语科幻星云奖、 中国科幻银河奖、世界奇幻科幻翻译奖等奖项。他还曾在谷歌、百度等科技巨头任职，在高校担任教 职，这些经历塑造了他直视技术内核的冷峻视角。 坐在记者面前的他，温和内敛，语速平缓，乍看之下很难将他与笔下那些充满赛博异化的科幻场景联系 起来。但随着对话深入，一种理性的热情与幽默便显露出来。谈及为何专注于"近未来"的叙事体系，他 自嘲"缺乏刘慈欣那种宏远的视野"，因此更偏爱书写在有生之年就能被验证的未来场景。对他而言，这 种与现实短兵相接的创作，甚至带有一种坐等被"啪啪打脸"的独特快感。 在他看来，在AI让一切变得"唾手可得"的时代，人类只有主动保留思考的艰难与肉身的痛感，才能守住 某种不可替代性。 以下为核心要点： 1."科幻现实主义"的生存状态正成为现实。 3.对于企业来说，我们需要的是具备极高"AI素养"的超级个体。 4.在未来，人类可能会实现某种形式的"长生不老"，或者成为"数据生命"。 以下是陈楸帆的自述（经过删减整理）： ...

"在AI时代，我们要做有灵魂的教师。"香港中文大学教育学院课程与教学系主任尹弘飚教授表示，AI时 代的人类学习，要尤其注重勇气、好奇心、想象力、创造力、共情力和德性的培养，为此教师应保持谦 逊的人本主义，以感性为情感支柱，以德性为伦理支柱，以韧性为意志支柱，从而更好地应对当前的技 术变化。 南京师范大学教师教育学院院长、江苏省教育家精神研究中心主任冯建军教授指出："技术越是强大， 我们越需要教育家精神来回应'教育为何存在''人何以成其为人'这些根本性命题。"他强调，要清醒认识 AI之"所能"与"不能"，以教育家精神守护教育的本质，在人与技术关系重构中以教育家精神捍卫人的主 体性，同时要以教育家精神培育"应变之根"，应对未来不确定性的挑战。(完) 中新网东莞12月20日电 (记者 许青青)由华南师范大学主办的第七届粤港澳大湾区师德师风建设学术研 讨会19日在东莞举行。研讨会以"数智时代的为师之道：教育家精神引领下的师德重塑"为主题，来自粤 港澳大湾区及其他全国各地的近500位教育行政人员、教育院校专家学者、中小学校长等，共同围绕数 智时代的教育家精神建设、教师数字素养培育、数智时代的师德评价、区域师德师风协同机 ...

Core Insights - The UNESCO's 2025 Digital Learning Week focused on "Artificial Intelligence and Future Education," highlighting the importance of AI literacy among educators to prepare students for the AI era [1][4][16] - Huang Xiang, principal of Zhongshan Hongke Future School, emphasized that AI literacy should be a fundamental skill for all teachers, akin to reading and writing, to foster a responsible understanding of technology among students [8][16] Group 1: AI Literacy in Education - The roundtable discussion at the event gathered global education leaders to address the integration of AI literacy into K-12 education systems, stressing that AI education goes beyond technical skills to include ethical considerations and critical thinking [6][4] - Huang proposed that the core of digital literacy lies not in technology itself but in empowering teachers to critically engage with AI, ensuring they can guide students effectively [6][10] Group 2: Curriculum Development - Zhongshan Hongke Future School plans to introduce a comprehensive AI literacy curriculum covering principles, applications, ethics, and interdisciplinary approaches, making it a mandatory course for all students [12][10] - The curriculum aims to develop critical skills such as problem sensitivity, creativity across disciplines, and adaptability to uncertainty, positioning the school as a pioneer in mandatory AI education in the Greater Bay Area [12][10] Group 3: Ethical Considerations - The school emphasizes the importance of embedding ethical dimensions into teacher development, focusing on cultivating judgment rather than merely imparting AI knowledge [10][12] - Practical learning methods, such as project-based learning and ethical debates, will be employed to engage students in discussions about technology's societal impacts [10][12] Group 4: Global Collaboration - Huang expressed the desire to connect global wisdom to contribute to Chinese education, positioning the school as a bridge to share international experiences while showcasing local practices in AI education [14][16] - The collaborative approach is seen as essential, as no single country can address the educational challenges posed by AI alone, advocating for shared governance in education [14][16]

Group 1 - The era of rapid growth has ended, leading to a market reshuffle where effective management becomes crucial for companies [1][2] - Companies face challenges in maintaining management effectiveness amidst increasing complexity and scale, leading to inefficiencies in collaboration and execution [2][4] - The essence of management involves understanding basic principles and integrating management with business operations to achieve economic performance [5][16] Group 2 - Effective self-management is foundational for leading others, requiring managers to combat personal inertia and ensure fair decision-making [7][8] - Over-management can lead to organizational decline, as it often stems from promoting individuals unsuitable for management roles, resulting in ineffective practices [8][9] - The misuse of management tools can occur when they are applied without understanding their context or exceeding the team's actual needs [9][11] Group 3 - The three major pitfalls in management include complacency due to status, arrogance from results, and indulgence in power, which can lead to organizational dysfunction [14][15] - Companies must prioritize customer value, strengthen internal capabilities, and uphold humanistic principles to thrive in a rational market [27][28] - The management process should focus on creating value for customers while balancing efficiency with long-term success [32][34] Group 4 - The rigidity of established processes can hinder organizational agility, necessitating a balance between structured processes and innovative practices [20][22] - The prevalence of PPT culture in organizations often leads to inefficiencies, as it distracts from genuine engagement and problem-solving [23][24] - Effective meetings should have clear objectives and focus on actionable decisions rather than becoming mere formalities [26][24] Group 5 - The future of management requires a broader knowledge base beyond traditional management theories, incorporating insights from sociology and humanities [29][34] - Emphasizing human values and individual recognition is essential for fostering a motivated and cohesive team environment [28][29] - Effective management is not merely about efficiency but about valuing people and creating meaningful customer experiences [34][32]

Core Viewpoint - Over 70% of surveyed university students express a desire to enhance research and development technology to reduce "AI hallucinations" [10] Group 1: AI Hallucination Awareness - 97% of surveyed students have encountered instances of AI providing incorrect or false information [1] - 57.63% of respondents reported errors in data or case citations when using AI, while 55.03% faced incorrect academic references [2] - 12.66% of respondents are very concerned about AI hallucinations, and 48.67% are somewhat concerned and cautious in their usage [8] Group 2: Impact on Academic Integrity - AI-generated false historical facts can significantly disrupt academic research, as highlighted by students who experienced fabricated citations and misattributed events [4][5] - 57.70% of respondents believe AI hallucinations lead to errors in assignments or papers, while 52.29% waste time verifying information [4] Group 3: Recommendations for Improvement - 74.26% of respondents wish to enhance R&D technology and optimize algorithm models, while 63.79% want to improve manual review and user feedback mechanisms [10] - Students advocate for AI tools to provide source transparency, similar to academic papers requiring citation of references [10]

Group 1 - The core message emphasizes the importance of lifelong learning and adapting to change in a rapidly evolving world, particularly in the context of AI and technology [5][9][13] - The speakers encourage graduates to embrace their passions and pursue careers that ignite their interests, rather than conforming to external expectations [21][23] - The necessity of building personal networks and relationships is highlighted as a critical factor for success in an AI-driven environment [10][11] Group 2 - The speakers advocate for proactive engagement with new technologies, suggesting that graduates should learn to leverage AI as a tool for enhancing their careers [9][10] - The importance of making conscious choices in life, such as prioritizing kindness over talent, is discussed as a means to shape a fulfilling life story [17][18] - The idea of challenging the status quo and being open to innovation is presented as essential for personal and professional growth [21][23]

Core Viewpoint - AI video generation technology is emerging as a new bridge connecting ancient and modern cultures, revitalizing historical memories and enhancing cultural exchange [4][5]. Group 1: Technology and Cultural Impact - AI video generation allows for immersive experiences of historical events, transforming static historical narratives into engaging, dynamic presentations [4]. - The technology effectively bridges the gap created by time and space, enabling contemporary audiences to "experience" significant historical moments [4]. - This innovative approach to cultural dissemination is particularly beneficial for young students, making history more captivating and accessible [5]. Group 2: Democratization of Content Creation - The advancement of digital technology has lowered the barriers to content creation, allowing ordinary individuals to participate in historical storytelling [5]. - Users are no longer just passive consumers but active creators and disseminators of historical and cultural content, enriching the narrative landscape [5]. Group 3: Challenges and Concerns - There are concerns regarding the potential for misinformation, as some AI-generated content may misrepresent historical facts, leading to misconceptions among younger audiences [6]. - The need for societal progress in understanding and regulating AI technology is emphasized, with educational systems beginning to incorporate AI literacy into their curricula [7]. Group 4: Positive Applications of Technology - Successful applications of AI technology in cultural contexts include reviving historical scenes in museums and enhancing visitor engagement through interactive experiences [7]. - Examples include the use of AI to recreate historical events in various museums, demonstrating the potential for technology to foster innovative cultural preservation [7].