Group 1 - The Ministry of Education announced the results for the 2024 undergraduate program approvals, with a total of 1,839 new program points added, 157 programs adjusted, 2,220 programs discontinued, and 1,428 programs revoked, indicating a significant optimization of academic programs [2][3] - Among the new programs, engineering saw the highest addition with 940 new points, followed by science with 193, agriculture with 46, and medicine with 16, making up 65% of the total new programs [2] - The artificial intelligence program was the most added, with 91 new points, accounting for approximately 5% of all new programs, involving both "Double First-Class" and non-"Double First-Class" universities [2][3] Group 2 - Other notable new programs included smart construction, big data management, smart manufacturing engineering, robotics engineering, and integrated circuit design, each with over 30 new points [3] - The updated directory also included 29 new programs, with low-altitude technology and engineering being the most popular, offered by six universities [3] Group 3 - In Shandong province, 58 universities added a total of 182 new program points, with 152 being actual new programs, and the most added program was integrated circuit design [4][5] - Shandong's universities have a unique focus, with only 5 new artificial intelligence programs added, as the province has already established a strong foundation in this area since 2018 [5] Group 4 - Nationwide, 49 universities adjusted the duration of some five-year programs to four years, primarily in landscape architecture and urban planning [6] - This adjustment aligns with the Ministry of Education's initiative to optimize program structures and talent cultivation in response to new development patterns [6][7]

Core Viewpoint - Gansu Province has issued measures to accelerate the integrated development of education, technology, and talent, aiming to enhance innovation capabilities and establish a robust talent pool by 2030 [1][2]. Group 1: Education and Talent Development - The measures emphasize the importance of deep integration between education, technology, and talent to cultivate a large-scale, well-structured, and high-quality innovative talent team [2]. - Universities will be categorized into research-oriented, application-oriented, and skill-oriented types, promoting differentiated development in fields such as science, engineering, agriculture, and medicine [2][3]. Group 2: Technology Transfer and Innovation - The measures aim to break through technology transfer barriers by encouraging universities and research institutions to lead joint efforts in tackling fundamental technology challenges [3]. - A mechanism will be established to allow technology transfer revenues to support further research, promoting a "try before you pay" model for small and medium enterprises [3]. Group 3: Corporate Involvement - Companies are encouraged to establish talent funds and collaborate with universities for commissioned training, creating "school-in-factory" and "factory-in-school" models [4]. - By 2025, the number of corporate experts in the provincial technology evaluation expert database is expected to exceed 1,000, with over 75% of major provincial technology projects led or significantly participated in by enterprises [4][5]. Group 4: Policy Support and Financial Incentives - By 2025, Gansu Province plans to allocate 150 million yuan from state-owned capital revenues to support technological innovation, alongside tax incentives for high-tech enterprises [5]. - The measures will explore various incentive mechanisms for state-owned enterprises, including profit-sharing and market-oriented salary systems [5]. Group 5: Ecosystem for Innovation - The measures outline a comprehensive approach to create a favorable ecosystem for integrated development, focusing on resource coordination, project management, and financial support [6][7]. - New talent utilization models such as "technology vice presidents" and "industry professors" will be supported, with plans to recruit over 1,200 high-level talents by 2025 [7].

Core Viewpoint - Shanxi Province has introduced six new documents aimed at enhancing talent development and integration to support economic growth and modernization efforts, aligning with the directives from the Party's recent congresses and provincial meetings [1][2]. Group 1: Talent Policy Framework - The six new documents include measures to promote the integration of talent with innovation, industry, finance, and education, emphasizing a comprehensive approach to talent development [1][2]. - Specific measures include the implementation of a talent-sharing initiative among schools, research institutions, and enterprises, as well as the establishment of a cooperative platform to support the integration of the four chains [2]. Group 2: Sector-Specific Talent Initiatives - The "Flexible Introduction of High-Level Talent" document outlines a structured approach to attract high-level talent in key sectors such as education, healthcare, and state-owned enterprises, detailing qualifications and management processes [3]. - The "1513 Action Plan for Rural Talent Revitalization" aims to build a robust rural talent pool, focusing on development, governance, and policy support to facilitate rural modernization [3]. Group 3: Cultural and Tourism Talent Development - The measures for strengthening the cultural and tourism talent workforce include 19 specific actions aimed at enhancing talent acquisition, training, and utilization to support the growth of the cultural tourism industry [3]. - The document on reforming the cultural heritage talent development system proposes 16 initiatives to improve talent allocation, attract high-level professionals, and enhance training in the cultural sector [4].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the shift in graduate education at Anhui University of Technology (AHT) from traditional on-campus training to practical market-oriented training through collaboration with industry partners [1][3]. Group 1: Collaboration with Industry - AHT has established 21 provincial-level joint training bases with companies like Chery New Energy Automobile Technology Co., Ltd. and Guoxuan High-Tech Co., Ltd., employing 289 industry mentors [3]. - The university has implemented a dual-mentor system, enhancing the training of master's students by integrating theoretical and practical learning [3][4]. Group 2: Dual-Track Curriculum - AHT's dual-track curriculum includes both theoretical courses and practical industry-oriented courses, designed in collaboration with companies like Anhui Andekeming Electronic Materials Technology Co., Ltd. [4]. - Students are required to complete at least six months of project work in the industry, with their theses based on real projects from these companies [4]. Group 3: Practical Applications and Outcomes - The collaboration has led to successful outcomes, with three out of six joint-trained master's students choosing to stay with their company after completing their projects [4]. - AHT's computer science students have developed a big data platform for the beef cattle industry, creating over 300,000 yuan in economic benefits and generating numerous job opportunities [6]. - The partnership with Tongling Nonferrous Metals Group has resulted in research projects that directly contribute to production processes, with 15 graduates taking on core roles in the company [8]. Group 4: Future Directions - AHT aims to build a new educational ecosystem that integrates education, talent, industry, and innovation chains, focusing on deepening cooperation with leading enterprises and research institutions [8].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article emphasizes the urgent need for humanities education to adapt to the digital age and integrate with artificial intelligence (AI) to meet societal demands [1][2][8] - The Ministry of Education and other authorities have issued guidelines to support the integration of language disciplines with AI, promoting the development of interdisciplinary talents [1][2] - The transformation of humanities education is not a one-way integration with technology but a mutual reconstruction of human values and digital civilization [2][8] Group 2 - Various universities are exploring the integration of humanities education with intelligent technology, such as Nanjing University and Shandong University, which are developing innovative talent training models [4][5] - The concept of a "Knowledge Factory" has been proposed to connect humanities students with AI enterprises, providing opportunities for practical experience in AI model training [6][7] - The demand for interdisciplinary talents is increasing as AI technology accelerates, highlighting the unique role of humanities graduates in understanding and applying AI principles [5][6] Group 3 - Humanities education traditionally focuses on critical thinking and humanistic qualities but often neglects digital skills, which are becoming essential in the AI era [6][7] - Recommendations for humanities students include developing cross-disciplinary technical skills, mastering data analysis, and learning AI application logic [7] - The article suggests that the evolution of humanities education will continue to adapt to societal changes, ensuring the enduring relevance of humanistic inquiry and values [8]

"AI学习中心为我量身定制学习方案，我再也不用大海捞针一般盲目探索了。"申诚泰说。学校开设的项 目制课程学习，涉及控制理论、电路设计等知识，申诚泰对它们很陌生。AI学习中心根据需求，为他 制定个性化的学习路线，帮助他快速补齐知识短板。 原标题：哈尔滨工程大学为师生送上"AI大礼包" "'小橙'你好，麻烦为我推荐一些人工智能方向的课程吧。"这是近日哈尔滨工程大学（以下简称"哈工 程"）学生通过智能助手"AI小橙"获取课程资源的一幕。 哈工程相关负责人介绍，学校打造的教育资源云平台2.0版，涵盖AI教学中心、AI学习中心、AI督导中 心以及"AI小橙"等4大组件，通过54个大模型为"教—学—评"全流程提供智能化支持，是学校为师生准 备的"AI大礼包"。 助"教"：提供"一站式"服务 "请针对软件工程、电气自动化等专业方向，推荐一些与刚体静力学和变形体静力学知识相关的工程案 例。"哈工程航天与建筑工程学院教师何晓在AI教学中心提问几秒后，便得到了涉及建筑、医疗、机械 等不同领域的6个案例。 "AI就像一个思维的'放大镜'，帮助我们拓展教学思路。"何晓介绍，她所教授的"力学、材料与结构"是 学校开设的五门工程教育平台 ...

新华社北京5月6日电 近期，特朗普政府与哈佛等美国高校之间龃龉不断。美国教育部5日称，哈佛大学 未能按照此前联邦政府提出的要求进行改革，联邦政府将不再对其提供新的资助。 麦克马洪说，此前联邦政府要求哈佛进行"符合常识的改革"，政府的优先事项并未改变。这封信意味着 哈佛大学不会再获得新的联邦资助，哈佛可以成为一所完全依赖私立资金的机构，仰仗其庞大的捐赠基 金运营并从众多富裕校友那里筹集资金。 哈佛大学方面回应说，政府对哈佛大学的要求将对学校形成"前所未有且不正当的控制"。哈佛大学一名 发言人说："哈佛大学将继续反对政府的非法过度干预，这些干预行为旨在扼杀让美国人更安全、更有 保障的研究和创新。" 哈佛：将继续反对政府"过度干预" 美国教育部长琳达·麦克马洪5日晚在社交媒体平台X上发布一封写给哈佛大学校长艾伦·M·加伯的信。她 在信中说，哈佛大学"系统性"违反联邦法律，"嘲弄"了美国高等教育体系。她指责哈佛大学被左派人士 运营，成为"一个党派的政治倡导组织"。 麦克马洪说，哈佛邀请"参与暴力行为、对美国表现出蔑视"的外国学生到校园里来。她还指出，哈佛财 务状况不佳、管理不善。 包括普林斯顿大学和布朗大学在内的10 ...

Core Viewpoint - The recent bond issuance by prestigious universities like Harvard, Stanford, and MIT reflects a shift in their credit risk perception, as their bond trading spreads are now closer to AA-rated corporate bonds rather than AAA-rated levels [1][7]. Group 1: Bond Issuance and Financial Strategy - Several top universities are entering the bond market to enhance liquidity amid increasing operational pressures and uncertainties stemming from federal funding freezes [2][6]. - MIT plans to issue taxable bonds, with the aim of providing additional flexibility to advance its mission [1]. - The issuance of bonds can provide immediate cash for university operations and capital investments, especially in a declining interest rate environment [3]. Group 2: Credit Ratings and Market Concerns - The trading spreads of bonds from Harvard and other elite institutions have widened, indicating a potential downgrade in credit risk perception, despite no current indications from rating agencies to lower their ratings [7]. - The difference between AAA and AA ratings is subtle, with a downgrade potentially leading to higher borrowing costs for these institutions [7]. - Rating agencies have noted an increase in credit risk for these universities, particularly if federal funding pressures continue [7]. Group 3: Government Relations and Funding Challenges - The relationship between the Trump administration and universities has become strained, with federal funding being frozen as a leverage for reform [2][6]. - Harvard has faced significant funding cuts, with approximately $2.26 billion in federal funding frozen, leading to legal actions against the government [6]. - The financial strategies of universities are increasingly focused on enhancing liquidity through various means, including bank credit lines and commercial paper programs [8].

Core Viewpoint - The U.S. Department of Education has announced that Harvard University will no longer receive new federal funding due to its failure to implement required reforms, which the Secretary of Education, Linda McMahon, claims constitutes a systematic violation of federal law [1][2]. Group 1: Federal Government's Actions - The federal government has accused Harvard of operating as a partisan political advocacy organization and has criticized its management and financial status [1]. - The Trump administration previously demanded meaningful governance reforms from Harvard, threatening to freeze $2.2 billion in federal funding and $60 million in contract funds if the university did not comply [1][2]. - Harvard has filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration, alleging that the government is attempting to manipulate the university's academic decisions through funding freezes [2]. Group 2: Harvard University's Response - Harvard University has rejected the Trump administration's demands for reforms, maintaining its stance against the accusations of systemic violations and mismanagement [1]. - The university's financial model may shift to rely entirely on private funding, leveraging its substantial endowment and wealthy alumni for operational support [1].

Core Viewpoint - The departure of Matthias Doepke from Northwestern University highlights the growing concerns among academics regarding the current academic environment in the U.S., particularly under the Trump administration's policies that have increasingly targeted international students and scholars [4][9][18]. Group 1: Academic Environment - Doepke expressed that the academic atmosphere in the U.S. has shifted significantly, with a decline in the welcoming nature towards international students and scholars compared to when he first arrived [8][24]. - The tightening of policies under the Trump administration has led to reduced research funding and stricter scrutiny of international students and faculty, resulting in visa revocations and deportations [9][10][17]. - The uncertainty surrounding visa statuses has created a climate of fear among international scholars, making it difficult for them to pursue academic careers in the U.S. [22][31]. Group 2: Personal Experience and Decision - Doepke, who has lived in the U.S. for over 30 years and became a citizen in 2014, decided to leave due to the current environment not being conducive for raising a family and pursuing research [5][3]. - He has taken a position at the London School of Economics (LSE) and has expressed that many scholars are contemplating leaving the U.S., although practical challenges make it difficult for them to do so quickly [12][30]. - The decision to leave was influenced by a combination of factors, including concerns about the safety of his family and the overall academic culture shifting towards a less supportive environment for scientific exploration [11][16][21]. Group 3: Future Implications - The trend of scholars leaving the U.S. could lead to a significant loss of talent, as many may choose to pursue opportunities in Canada, Europe, or other regions with more favorable academic environments [31][34]. - Doepke noted that the current situation may deter future generations of international students from pursuing their studies in the U.S., as the opportunities that once existed are diminishing [24][25]. - The potential rise of other countries, such as China, as new centers for research and development could reshape the global academic landscape if the U.S. continues to lose its appeal [29].