教育培训
Search documents
过线即上985:考研保过不离“骗”和“坑”
Xin Lang Cai Jing· 2025-12-30 18:07
(来源:千龙网) 任何所谓"保过"承诺,都涉嫌虚假宣传。 "过国家线就能上985,考不过全额退款"。据新京报报道,2026年全国硕士研究生招生考试刚刚落下帷 幕,考研机构就已经开始招生宣传。 这种所谓"保过"套路其实也不新鲜,几乎每年考研季都会出现。这种套路之所以屡禁不止,部分原因是 考研培训产业扩张太快、机构良莠不齐、市场体量庞大,极易"藏污纳垢",监管却又很难即时覆盖到每 一个角落。 另外则是一些考生也存在侥幸心理,其背后动机也不言而喻:试图"走捷径"。尤其是报道中提到,在职 考研培训成"保过"套路重灾区,是因为不少"打工人"工作繁忙、无暇备考,故而更容易动起"走捷径"的 心思,最终被营销噱头所"收割"。 因此,对于这类所谓"保过""内部指标"之类的违规宣传、欺诈合同,相关部门应当强化打击。值得注意 的是,2024年12月,教育部就会同中央网信办、公安部联合开展查处涉研考违法有害信息专项工作,重 点查处各类营销噱头、考试作弊等行为。 类似的专项行动,显然也有常态化的必要。同时,这些培训机构的主要营销渠道依然是网络,一些明显 违规的字眼成为噱头,作为负有审核之责的平台显然难辞其咎。平台必须进一步承担起审核义 ...
昂立教育:公司回购股份的目的已实现
Zheng Quan Ri Bao Wang· 2025-12-30 13:46
Core Viewpoint - The company has successfully achieved the purpose of its share repurchase program and will proceed with the subsequent disposal of the repurchased shares as per the terms outlined in the repurchase report [1] Group 1 - The company responded to investor inquiries on its interactive platform regarding the share repurchase [1] - The company disclosed its plan for the reduction of repurchased shares in an announcement dated July 16, 2025 [1] - Future updates on the reduction of repurchased shares will be provided through official company announcements [1]
呼和浩特赛罕区市监局通报“崇政教育”在营销广告中涉及不当内容:责令终止营销活动并立案调查
Xin Lang Cai Jing· 2025-12-30 00:29
来源:呼和浩特市赛罕区市场监督管理局 近日,我局关注到网络平台反映"崇政教育"在营销广告中涉及不当内容,迅速依法介入调查。经核查, 该广告内容涉嫌违反《中华人民共和国广告法》有关规定,已责令该机构立即终止营销活动,并依法立 案调查,最终处理结果将及时公布。 情况通报 赛罕区市场监督管理局 2025年12月30日 ...
思考乐教育根据股份奖励计划购买合共10万股
Zhi Tong Cai Jing· 2025-12-29 11:05
思考乐教育(01769)发布公告,于2025年12月29日,根据计划规则及信托契据,受托人已于市场上购入 合共10万股股份(股份购买),乃为获选参与者的利益以信托方式持有。 ...
东方时尚:公司股票被继续实施其他风险警示
3 6 Ke· 2025-12-29 10:34
Core Viewpoint - The company, Dongfang Shishang, faces significant financial challenges as its internal control effectiveness for the fiscal years 2023 and 2024 received a negative audit opinion, indicating potential risks to its ongoing operations [1] Financial Performance - For the fiscal years 2022 to 2024, the company's net profit before and after deducting non-recurring items is negative, raising concerns about its financial health [1] - The audit report for 2024 highlights uncertainties regarding the company's ability to continue as a going concern [1] Stock and Risk Warnings - The company's stock continues to be subject to additional risk warnings due to the aforementioned financial issues [1] - If the court accepts the company's restructuring application, the stock will face delisting risk warnings [1] Operational Status - Currently, the company is operating normally and is working on improving its internal controls [1] - The resolution of non-operating fund occupation issues by the controlling shareholder and related parties is expected to lift the relevant risk warnings by August 2025 [1]
营销费占营收55%,AI教育是救命稻草还是烧钱游戏?
Xi Niu Cai Jing· 2025-12-29 09:29
Core Viewpoint - The education industry is undergoing a transformation driven by AI technology, with major players like TAL Education, Fenbi, and Zuoyebang investing heavily in "AI + Education" to find new growth opportunities. However, this transformation is accompanied by high costs and compliance issues, raising questions about whether AI is a genuine solution or merely a temporary capital story [2][9]. Group 1: AI Transformation Challenges - Many education companies are experiencing a paradox of "increased revenue without increased profit," primarily due to high marketing expenses rather than significant investments in AI research and development [2][9]. - For instance, TAL Education's marketing expenses surged by 50.5% to $177.7 million in Q1 of FY2026, accounting for 30.9% of its revenue, indicating a heavy reliance on customer acquisition costs [2]. - Fenbi's financial performance is even more concerning, with a revenue decline of 8.5% to 1.492 billion yuan and a net profit drop of 18.34% to 227 million yuan, despite claims of reallocating IPO funds towards AI development [3][9]. Group 2: Market Dynamics and Growth - The AI learning machine market is experiencing significant growth, with its size projected to increase from 12.917 billion yuan in 2021 to 27.072 billion yuan by 2024, reflecting a compound annual growth rate of 27.97% [4]. - Leading companies in this market, such as Zuoyebang and iFLYTEK, hold a combined market share of 82.3%, with Zuoyebang leading at 28.5% [5]. Group 3: Ethical and Quality Concerns - Issues such as false advertising and product defects are prevalent, with consumers reporting misleading claims about features and services, undermining trust in these educational products [5][7]. - The focus on using AI learning machines as tools for monetization rather than as vehicles for educational value raises ethical concerns, potentially leading to a decline in content quality and user experience [7][9]. Group 4: Long-term Outlook - The integration of AI in education has inherent potential for personalized learning and reducing barriers to quality education, but current practices reveal significant strategic, technical, and ethical shortcomings [8][10]. - The future challenge for education companies lies not in storytelling about AI but in rebuilding the fundamental value of education across technical, content, and ethical dimensions [10].
2万报中公不过包退班却退费难
Xin Jing Bao· 2025-12-29 09:09
"感觉挺生气的,我是觉得中公教育名气比较大,觉得不会坑人,没想到退费这么难。"莫同学无奈说 道。截至发稿,莫同学依旧没有等到她的退款。 上海有思律师事务所执行主任陈晓婷提到,相关案例在法律上主要有三层风险,一是广告法层面的虚假 宣传风险,二是民事纠纷中的欺诈或者重大误解风险,三是消费者保护法律项下的不公平格式条款风 险。 "机构关于'保过'的销售承诺,明显属于虚假宣传,并违反《中华人民共和国广告法》相关规定。"陈晓 婷表示,《中华人民共和国广告法》第二十四条明确规定,教育、培训广告不得含有对升学、通过考 试、获得学位学历或者合格证书的保证性承诺;不得明示或者暗示有相关考试机构或者其工作人员、考 试命题人员参与教育、培训。#揭秘考研保过套路#全文↓ 莫同学于2024年在中公教育报名了21300元的"考研协议班",承诺考不过可以重修或退款。考研结果公 布后,没有考过的莫同学于2025年5月向机构申请退费。按照合同规定,机构应该在确认后的45个工作 日内退还约定的7000元费用。 7月份,已经超过合同约定时间,莫同学却迟迟没有收到退款。在莫同学的反复催促下,退费服务人员 却表示"退费打款时间没办法和您承诺""近期公 ...
苏州大学科技商学院揭牌
Su Zhou Ri Bao· 2025-12-29 00:29
Core Viewpoint - The establishment of the eighth Advanced Talent Training Program at Suzhou University aims to foster innovation-driven development and cultivate interdisciplinary talents in technology, industry, management, and innovation [1]. Group 1: Event Overview - The opening ceremony of the Advanced Talent Training Program took place at Suzhou University, attended by key officials including the Deputy Mayor and the University President [1]. - The program is designed to enhance collaboration among government, industry, academia, and finance, creating a supportive ecosystem for innovation [1]. Group 2: Achievements and Initiatives - Over the past three years, Suzhou Technology Business School has trained more than 4,000 high-level technology innovation talents [2]. - Notable industry mentors were appointed during the event, including leaders from global think tanks and investment firms [2]. - The event also marked the launch of the Spark Venture Capital Fund Manager Training Program and the signing of the fifth batch of the Qiji Research Fund [2].
下午闭店 中午才通知老师“不用来了”!不缺会员不差钱 多家教培机构突然关门 直接失联!消费者:里面还有2万多元
Mei Ri Jing Ji Xin Wen· 2025-12-28 15:14
Core Viewpoint - A new type of "professional closure" fraud has emerged in the education and training sector, leading to the shutdown of several institutions despite their financial viability and student enrollment [1][6]. Group 1: Incident Overview - The Shanghai police recently uncovered a contract fraud case involving a group of "professional closure" criminals, resulting in the arrest of four suspects and the dismantling of a malicious closure gang [1][8]. - The case involves three educational training institutions with a total amount of over 1 million yuan involved [1][9]. Group 2: Modus Operandi - The suspects, Gu and Han, claimed to have extensive experience and resources in the training industry but closed down institutions shortly after taking over, leaving students with unused course hours and financial losses [3][5]. - They employed tactics such as exaggerating the potential of the institutions and creating a facade of operational difficulties to force employees out and facilitate closure [9][10]. Group 3: Financial Impact - Gu and Han illegally appropriated over 1 million yuan intended for the operation of the institutions, using it to pay off personal debts and maintain a high standard of living, which ultimately led to the closure of the institutions [9][12]. - The original owners of the institutions were misled into transferring ownership, believing they were selling to legitimate operators, while Gu and Han concealed their financial instability [9][12]. Group 4: Law Enforcement Response - The Shanghai police have initiated a crackdown on the "professional closure" phenomenon, collaborating with market regulation and industry authorities to address malicious closures in various sectors, including education and fitness [13]. - The police have also reported a rise in investment scams disguised as innovative financial concepts, prompting further investigations and actions against such illegal activities [13].
下午闭店,中午才通知老师“不用来了”!不缺会员不差钱,多家教培机构突然关门,直接失联!消费者:里面还有2万多元
Mei Ri Jing Ji Xin Wen· 2025-12-28 09:14
Core Viewpoint - A new type of "professional closure" fraud has emerged in the education training sector, leading to the closure of several institutions despite having substantial revenue and student enrollment. This scheme involves individuals who manipulate the closure process for personal gain, resulting in significant financial losses for the original owners and students [1][6]. Group 1: Incident Overview - The Shanghai police have uncovered a contract fraud case involving a group of "professional closure" criminals, leading to the arrest of four suspects and the dismantling of a malicious closure gang [1][7]. - The case involves three education training institutions with a total fraud amount exceeding 1 million yuan [1][8]. Group 2: Modus Operandi - The suspects, Gu and Han, claimed to have extensive experience in the training industry but closed the institutions shortly after taking over, leaving students with unused course hours and financial losses [3][5]. - They employed tactics such as exaggerating their capabilities and creating a facade of operational difficulties to force employees out and facilitate the closure of the institutions [8][9]. Group 3: Financial Impact - Gu and Han illegally appropriated over 1 million yuan intended for the operation of the institutions, using the funds for personal debts and high consumption, which led to the eventual shutdown of the institutions [14][15]. - The original owners were misled into transferring their institutions under the pretense of confidentiality, only to find that the new operators had no intention of maintaining operations [8][14]. Group 4: Law Enforcement Response - The police have initiated a crackdown on the "professional closure" phenomenon, collaborating with market regulators to address malicious closures in various sectors, including education, fitness, and beauty [15]. - The suspects have been charged with contract fraud, and the investigation is ongoing to address the broader implications of such fraudulent activities in the industry [15].