5月1日，针对长和港口交易，香港《大公报》网站发布题为《执迷不悟必将碰得头破血流》的评论文 章，全文如下： 长和出售港口事件，外交部和国家市场监督管理总局先后发声，表达了中央的强烈关切和严正警示。但 长和却对此充耳不闻，执迷不悟，如果决意一条路走到黑，最终结果必将会碰得头破血流。 3月初相关交易曝光后，政府和民众均表达了强烈的关切和批评，指出交易会对国家安全和利益带来严 重威胁。但相关企业一方面利用公关手段散布烟雾弹混淆视听，另一方面变换手法继续推进与美方的交 易，完全置国家安全和重大利益于不顾。 何去何从，长和应当作出明智的抉择。 中央的态度自始至终都是非常清晰的。4月27日，国家市场监督管理总局再度就交易表态，指出"交易各 方不得采取任何方式规避审查，未获批准前，不得实施集中，否则将承担法律责任"；4月28日，外交部 发言人表示高度关注相关交易，"希望有关各方谨慎行事"。 国家两大部门集中表态，并作出"两个不得"的明确指令，是前所未有的严重警示，话已讲得够清楚了！ 当前美国发动的关税战，是意图扼杀中国发展的全方位战争，从某种意义上说中美两国正处于你死我活 的"战争状态"，美国是我们最大的敌人，"它不是要我 ...

这回，李嘉诚是真的栽了。 市监总局直接放狠话：交易各方不得规避审查，未经批准，集中交易一律暂停，谁敢乱来，依法办！什 么意思？很简单：李嘉诚也好，贝莱德也罢，地中海航运集团也好——一个都别想玩垄断！ 李嘉诚想一次性甩卖全球43个海外港口，换一大笔现金走人，彻底跑路？想得美！ 市监总局这个动作，直接把李嘉诚最后一点侥幸心理敲碎了。因为李嘉诚这边，还在不停地暗搓搓搞小 动作，想搞"金蝉脱壳"——把旗下的长和集团拆成小块，企图蒙混过关。 怎么个拆法？把长子李泽钜名下的电讯盈科等产业，一分为二，直接打包送去英国伦敦上市。 一边做拆分，一边转资产。拆出来的公司名字一换，股权一分，反垄断的帽子就想摘掉。反正，留在李 嘉诚名下的是"合法"的，搬到李泽钜名下的，又是"独立"的——想得太美了！ 更绝的是，李泽钜本身还不是中国国籍，弄走的大多是海外资产。尤其是欧洲的电信资产，比如英国最 大的电信公司，都被李家收割到手。一操作下来，大量财富可以偷偷转移，反垄断审查直接被架空。 但很遗憾，国家早看穿了。 北美、拉美、欧洲、中东、东南亚、澳洲……只要是重要节点，几乎都有他的码头。 李嘉诚的盘子有多大？ 一是房地产，遍地开花，从内地到香 ...

以下文章来源于牲产队 ，作者牲产队长 牲产队 . 挣工分，磨洋工，舒服一会儿是一会儿 作者：牲产队长 来源：牲产队（ID：gh 9adbf3261554） 这一次，李嘉诚的港口交易真要黄了。 市监总局直接要求，交易各方不得采取任何方式规避审查，未获批准前，不得实施集中，否则将 承担法律责任。啥意思呢？这就是打明牌了。李嘉诚也好，贝莱德也罢，还是新引入的地中海航 运集团，都不得垄断全球航运权。李嘉诚想一次性甩卖 43 个海外港口，套现跑路，是彻底搞不 成了。 这时候，为什么市监总局要发出这个信号？主要就在于，李嘉诚不甘心，始终还是想卖。而且， 长和集团在想办法，对抗反垄断审查，想玩一招 " 金蝉脱壳 " 之计。就在市监总局对长和集团 发起反垄断调查后，长和集团就宣布，要对旗下资产进行拆分。怎么拆分呢？把长子李泽钜旗下 的电讯盈科等产业，独立拆分，远赴英国伦敦上市。 为什么要拆分？一个是，规避反垄断调查。你说它垄断了，它马上拆分，变成一个个小公司。家 族产业一部分留在李嘉诚旗下，另一部分就转移给长子李泽钜。而李泽钜呢？既不是中国人，带 走的也不是中国资产，而是长和旗下的海外资产。尤其是电信产业，主要都位于欧洲。像 ...

昨天，发生了哪些财经大事？ 市场监管总局回应 李嘉诚旗下长和港口交易 4月27日消息，日前，市场监管总局新闻发言人就长和港口交易事回答了记者提问。 有记者问：据《华尔街日报》4月16日报道，长和出售海外港口将分拆为两个交易继续进 行，国家市场监督管理总局对此有何评论？ 答：我们高度关注有关交易，将依法进行审查。交易各方不得采取任何方式规避审查，未获 批准前，不得实施集中，否则将承担法律责任。 中纪委通报三河招牌改色事件 金价巨震！多家银行警告 纽约商品交易所6月黄金期价，继周一首次收于每盎司3400美元整数关口上方，周二盘中 一度突破每盎司3500美元整数关口，触及每盎司3509.9美元的历史新高。随着市场避险情 绪的降温，当天收盘出现小幅回落，仍收于每盎司3400美元上方。 随后在周三，金价出现大幅回落。由于市场避险情绪显著降温、大量资金获利了结。此外，美国财政 部周三拍卖的700亿美元5年期国债结果整体较为理想，部分资金重返债市，加剧了金价下行压力，多 重因素致使国际金价周三大跌3.66%。 周五，在美元走强的影响下，以美元计价的金价因此承压，当天收盘，纽商所6月黄金期价报每盎司 3298.40美元，较前 ...

这笔复杂且具有战略意义的交易由于美国和中国之间的政治及贸易争端而陷入困境。阿庞特家族与 美国资产管理公司贝莱德（BlackRock）合作推动此交易，交易分为两部分：巴拿马港口和其他港 口。 知情人士透露，谈判正在并行进行，而将巴拿马港口从交易中剥离最终将要求各方达成新的协议。 贝莱德（BlackRock）和地中海航运公司（MSC）联合体以及和记黄埔（Hutchison）目前正处于一 个为期145天的独家谈判期，尚未签署最终协议。 导 语 ：阿庞特家族与贝莱德合作推动此交易，交易分为"巴拿马港口"和"其他港口"两部分。 据知情人士透露，掌控地中海航运公司（MSC）的意大利富翁吉安卢吉·阿庞特（Gianluigi Aponte）和他的儿子迭戈·阿庞特（Diego Aponte）正在商讨，将交易中的两座巴拿马港口剥离，继 续推进与和记黄埔（CK Hutchison）达成的228亿美元港口收购协议。 阿庞特父子计划继续推进交易的大部分内容，涉及五大洲41个港口的码头建设和运营，同时解决关 于巴拿马运河两座港口的争议。 贝莱德首席执行官拉里·芬克（Larry Fink）上周表示，这笔交易仍然被视为一个整体，包括巴拿马 ...

Core Viewpoint - The company, Panama Ports Company (PPC), has publicly responded to accusations from the Panamanian government regarding alleged violations during the renewal of its operating concession, asserting that it has complied with legal requirements and has made significant investments in the region [1][2]. Group 1: Company Response to Allegations - PPC refuted claims that it underpaid $300 million during its previous concession period and failed to share 10% of profits with the government, stating that it has invested a total of 1.695 billion Balboas, exceeding its initial commitment [1][2]. - The company highlighted that it signed an additional agreement with the Panamanian government in 2005, which required an investment of over 1 billion Balboas, and it has confirmed this investment through audits [1][2]. Group 2: Financial Contributions and Compliance - PPC has paid a total of 126 million Balboas in dividends to the Panamanian government, equivalent to 12.6 million USD, and noted that the government has not received dividends from other port operators [2]. - The company has contributed 668 million Balboas in taxes and has generated at least 5.9 billion Balboas for the local economy through its port operations [2]. - PPC emphasized that its renewal of the concession in 2021 was fully compliant with legal standards and requirements [2].

Group 1 - The company Energy International Investments (00353) plans to acquire 100% of the issued share capital of Xunli Chuangtou Co., Ltd. for a consideration of HKD 300 million, on a debt-free basis, through its indirect wholly-owned subsidiary Mission Achiever Limited [1] - Upon completion of the acquisition, the target company will become a wholly-owned subsidiary of the company, allowing it to control 85% of Shun Dong Port's ordinary shares, enhancing its operational control [1] - Shun Dong Port is a key operating subsidiary of the company, holding two sea area usage rights covering approximately 31.59 hectares in Dongying Port, Shandong Province, China, for land reclamation and construction purposes [1] Group 2 - The acquisition is seen as a valuable opportunity to increase the company's ordinary shareholding in Shun Dong Port, enabling it to retain more profits for distribution to shareholders and receive a larger share of dividends [2] - The acquisition will elevate the company's ordinary shareholding to over two-thirds, enhancing control over Shun Dong Port and streamlining decision-making processes related to capital increases or amendments to the company's articles of association [2] - This strategic move aligns with the company's business objectives and facilitates timely implementation of its strategic plans [2]

Group 1: Company Overview - CK Hutchison Holdings Limited (长江和记实业有限公司) has not publicly responded following the missed signing date for the port transaction originally set for April 2 [1] - The company announced on March 4 its intention to sell a series of port operations, including those at the Panama Canal, to a consortium led by BlackRock for a total price of $22.765 billion [1][6] - The port division of CK Hutchison operates 293 berths across 53 ports in 24 countries, handling a total throughput of 82.1 million TEUs in 2023 [6] Group 2: Market Reaction - Following the announcement of the port transaction, BlackRock's stock price fell by 8.16% from March 4 to April 3 [2] - CK Hutchison's stock price also declined by 14.94% during the same period, transitioning from an upward trend to a downward one [2] Group 3: Regulatory Scrutiny - The Chinese National Market Supervision Administration announced it would review the port transaction to ensure fair market competition and protect public interests [8][9] - Reports indicated that CK Hutchison and BlackRock would not sign any agreements during the week of March 31 to April 6, as they sought a reasonable solution in communication with the Hong Kong government [9] Group 4: Technological Developments - On April 3, Li Ka-shing publicly endorsed the Histotripsy technology for cancer treatment, which is being introduced in Singapore through a collaboration with Temasek [3][4] - The technology has shown significant results in Hong Kong, with 50 liver cancer patients successfully treated since its introduction [4]

Group 1 - The core issue revolves around the $22.8 billion port deal between CK Hutchison Holdings and BlackRock, which has been delayed due to antitrust and national security reviews initiated by China's State Administration for Market Regulation [1][3] - The ports involved, Balboa and Cristobal, control 6% of global trade and are crucial for 21% of Chinese shipping, making the deal a significant geopolitical concern [3] - The Chinese government has expressed strong opposition to the deal, indicating it could harm China's legitimate interests, thus setting a political tone for the situation [3][6] Group 2 - CK Hutchison's response to the situation reveals underlying anxiety, as the company denied rumors of splitting its telecom assets but left room for future actions, interpreted as a strategy for risk isolation [5] - The company's stock fell by 3.54% following the announcement of the review, resulting in a market value loss of HKD 78.1 billion, and its projects in mainland China faced cooperation freezes [5] - Internal family divisions have emerged, with the second son, Li Ka-shing's son, distancing himself from CK Hutchison, indicating a pessimistic outlook on the situation [5] Group 3 - The regulatory scrutiny has expanded beyond the transaction itself to CK Hutchison's global asset structure, creating a dilemma where the company risks triggering severe consequences if it proceeds or defaults on the deal [6] - BlackRock, managing $10 trillion in assets, faces a dual challenge as it is involved in significant investments in China while also being perceived as a geopolitical player in this transaction [7] Group 4 - In response to U.S. containment strategies, China is accelerating the development of alternative trade routes, such as ports in Peru and Brazil, which could divert 30% of the cargo volume from the Panama Canal [8] - The ongoing U.S.-China tensions, particularly in the semiconductor sector, highlight the potential repercussions of the port deal, with significant implications for U.S. companies if China escalates its response [9] Group 5 - The situation reflects the broader challenges faced by multinational capital in a de-globalizing world, where business decisions intersect with national interests and responsibilities [10]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the implications of Li Ka-shing's decision to delay the sale of port assets in Panama by his company, CK Hutchison Holdings, in response to pressure from the Chinese government, highlighting the intersection of business operations and geopolitical tensions between the U.S. and China [1][2][3]. Group 1: Company Actions and Reactions - CK Hutchison Holdings is reportedly postponing the signing of any agreements related to the sale of the Panama ports, indicating a potential compromise under pressure from the Chinese government [3][4]. - The company may seek to communicate and collaborate with the Chinese government to address concerns, possibly by adding "national security clauses" to the transaction [5]. - There is a possibility that CK Hutchison could redesign the transaction structure to reduce political sensitivity, although the core issue remains the strategic value of the port assets [5][6]. Group 2: Geopolitical Implications - If BlackRock gains control of the Panama ports, it could leverage this position to impose delays or additional charges on Chinese shipping, impacting China's supply chain efficiency [8]. - U.S. control over the Panama ports would enhance its influence in global trade and geopolitics, potentially undermining China's position in the region [8][9]. - The strategic location of the Panama ports would allow the U.S. to strengthen its military presence in Latin America, further complicating China's efforts to establish alternative trade routes [9].