| 项目类别 | 数据指标 | 最新 | 环比 数据指标 | 最新 | 环比 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 期货市场 | 郑州尿素主力合约收盘价(日,元/吨) | 1761 | -12 郑州尿素9-1价差(日,元/吨) | 65 | -5 | | | 郑州尿素主力合约持仓量(日,手) | 231078 | 5951 郑州尿素前20名净持仓 | 12090 | 371 | | | 郑州尿素交易所仓单(日,张) | 6619 | -235 | | | | 现货市场 | 河北(日,元/吨) | 1850 | 0 河南(日,元/吨) | 1850 | -10 | | | 江苏(日,元/吨) | 1900 | 0 山东(日,元/吨) | 1870 | 0 | | | 安徽(日,元/吨) | 1890 | 0 郑州尿素主力合约基差(日,元/吨) | 109 | 12 | | | FOB波罗的海(日,美元/吨) | 355 | 0 FOB中国主港(日,美元/吨) | 360 | 0 | | 产业情况 | 港口库存(周,万吨) | 20.5 | 0.2 企业库存(周,万吨 ...

尿素2025年6月报： 回归供需季节性 长江期货股份有限公司交易咨询业务资格：鄂证监期货字【2014】1号 产业服务总部 | 能化产业服务中心 张英 执业编号：F03105021 投资咨询号：Z0021335 2025-06-03 目 录 01 尿素行情回顾 05 复合肥及工业需求分析 02 尿素产能产量分析 06 尿素及肥料出口分析 03 尿素成本利润分析 07 尿素库存水平分析 04 尿素农业需求分析 08 尿素后市展望 01 尿素5月行情回顾 受出口信息持续影响，5月上旬尿素价格高位震荡，下旬回归实际供需矛盾，尿素产销转弱，价格高位回落，接近出口 调整前运行区间。5月30日尿素09合约收盘于1773元/吨，较上月底下调84元/吨，尿素河南市场价格1880元/吨，较 上月底下调26元/吨。 尿素09合约期货价格（元/吨） 1050 1550 2050 2550 3050 3550 中国尿素(小颗粒)日度均价（元/吨） 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 资料来源：同花顺，长江期货能化产业服务中心 02 尿素基差与价差 价差：5月尿素9-1价格整体呈现走弱趋势，5月30日9-1价差70元/吨， ...

Morning session notice 更多精彩内容请关注格林大华期货官方微信 格林大华期货研究院 证监许可【2011】1288 号 2025 年 6 月 3 日星期二 研究员： 吴志桥 从业资格：F3085283 交易咨询资格：Z0019267 联系方式：15000295386 | 板块 | 品种 | 多（空） | 推荐理由 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | | | | 【行情复盘】 周五尿素主力合约 2509 期价下跌 18 元至 1773 元/吨，华中主流地区尿素现货价格 下跌 10 元至 1850 元/吨，多头持仓增加 10651 手至 18.36 万手，空头持仓增加 7278 手至 17.18 万手。 【重要资讯】 1、供应方面，尿素行业日产 20.46 万吨，较上一工作日减少 0.02 万吨，较去年同 | | | | | 期增加 3.12 万吨；开工 88.96%，较去年同期 80.07%提升 8.89%。 | | | | | 2、库存方面，中国尿素企业总库存量 98.06 万吨，较上周增加 6.32 万吨，环比增 | | | | 加 | 6.89%。尿素港口库存 ...

观点：政策左右 南华尿素产业链数据周报20250602 尿素周报观点 供应：本周期部分企业检修：兖矿鲁南化工。本周期恢复的企业：江苏晋煤恒盛化工、云南大为制氨、安徽泉盛化 工。下周尿素日产量将在 20.5万吨附近。 张博（Z0021070） 尿素区域现货流通图 2 库存：截至2025年5月28日，中国尿素企业总库存量98.06 万吨，环比+6.32 万吨，中国主要港口尿素库存统计 20.5 万吨，环比+0.2 万吨。 需求：农业方面，麦收开展之后玉米肥追肥有启动预期，当前启动迹象暂不明显，仅零星跟进为主。工业方面，复 合肥开工有减弱迹象，后续生产结束，对尿素消耗有下降预期，出口方面，后续厂检有开展表现，短期内对市场心 态有提振作用。 现货：本周日山东1810（09基差-37），河南1800（09基差-47） 策略观点：假期内氮肥协会发布对6月的各区域的尿素出厂指导价建议为5月底各区域的加权平均值，最高价为指导 价基础上浮100元，协会规定在作出调整之前不得擅自突破最高价。受此影响山东尿素工厂收单转好，现货调涨。预 计尿素价格短期呈现震荡运行的格局。基本面来看，在国内基本面与政策共同抑制下，尿素上方空间较为有限 ...

Investment Rating - The report maintains a "Buy" rating for specific companies in the agricultural chemicals sector, including Yangnong Chemical and Runfeng Co., while recommending "Hold" for others like Haier and Guangxin Co. [20] Core Insights - The recent explosion incident has tightened the supply-demand dynamics for K-amine and other intermediates, which is expected to accelerate the recovery of the pesticide industry and potentially drive up nitrocellulose prices [5][12] - The agricultural chemicals sector is gradually returning to rationality, with high-priced inventories being depleted and procurement demand recovering, although supply-side pressures remain [5][12] - The report highlights the potential for stricter safety and environmental regulations following the recent incidents, which could further enhance the agricultural chemicals industry's cyclical recovery [5][12] Industry Dynamics - Current macroeconomic judgments indicate that oil prices are under pressure due to geopolitical factors and OPEC+ production increases, while coal prices are expected to decline in the medium to long term [6] - The chemical industry is experiencing a gradual recovery in PPI, with April's chemical industry PPI showing a year-on-year decline of 3.2% [8] - The report notes that the recent explosion at a chemical facility has led to increased prices for K-amine and related products, with recommendations to focus on companies like Hongyang and Lier Chemical [5][12] Chemical Product Prices and Trends - The report provides detailed pricing trends for various chemical products, including a stable price for urea at 1830 RMB/ton and fluctuations in pesticide prices, with some herbicides seeing price increases [12][22] - The report indicates that the price of nitrocellulose has risen significantly, with export prices increasing from 2.06 USD/kg in October 2021 to 4.75 USD/kg in April 2025 [5][12] Company Recommendations - Specific companies are highlighted for investment based on their market positions and growth potential, including Yangnong Chemical, Runfeng Co., and others in the agricultural chemicals sector [20] - The report suggests monitoring companies with mature nitrochemical processes, such as Yangnong Chemical and Guangxin Co., due to expected regulatory changes [5][12]

尿素日报 | 2025-05-30 印度新一轮尿素招标发布 市场分析 价格与基差：2025-05-29，尿素主力收盘1784元/吨（-6）；河南小颗粒出厂价报价：1860 元/吨（0）；山东地区小 颗粒报价：1880元/吨（+0）；江苏地区小颗粒报价：1900元/吨（+0）；小块无烟煤660元/吨（+0），山东基差：96 元/吨（+6）；河南基差：76元/吨（+6）；江苏基差：116元/吨（+6）；尿素生产利润413元/吨（+0），出口利润491 元/吨（-15）。 供应端：截至2025-05-29，企业产能利用率89.83%（0.08%）。样本企业总库存量为98.06 万吨（+6.32），港口样本 库存量为20.50 万吨（+0.20）。 需求端：截至2025-05-29，复合肥产能利用率40.09%（+2.52%）；三聚氰胺产能利用率为62.98%（-3.51%）；尿素 企业预收订单天数5.88日（-0.06）。 印度新一轮尿素招标发布，国内尿素出口由于尚处于法检阶段，暂未有大量集港需求，国内尿素参与可能性较低。 上游煤制尿素与天然气制尿素开工率均有提升，产量依旧高位运行，新增产能持续释放，尿素厂内库存小 ...

大宗商品研究所 能源化工研发报告 尿素 6 月报 2025 年 5 月 30 日 【尿素月报】供需双旺，尿素宽幅震荡 第一部分 前言摘要 供应端：进入 6 月份，随着主流区域尿素出厂价格止跌，而当前原料无烟煤价格弱 势，当前尿素行业整体利润维持稳定，晋城地区 6800K 无烟小块出厂价 960 元/吨，阳 泉无烟块煤价格 800 元/吨，榆林沫煤延续下跌态势，5800 大卡含税出厂价大跌至 470 元/吨，烟块煤 6200 大卡含税出厂价大跌至 490 元/吨，尿素现货价格区间震荡，固定床 工艺生产完全利润 170 元/吨；水煤浆工艺生产利润位置 300 元/吨，气流床工艺利润 520 元/吨，预计 6 月份，随着国煤价平稳，尿素出厂价底部有支撑，预计利润将会维持。 进入 6 月份，国内西南、西北气头检修装置满产运行，煤头检修装置恢复，同时 4 月底 江苏恒盛顺利投产，尿素日均产量将进一步攀升，截至 5 月底，国内尿素日均产量高达 20.3 万吨附近，国内供应整体持续宽松为主，预计 6 月份国内尿素日均产量将维持在 20 万吨附近。 需求端：进入 6 月份，国内刚性需求仍有一定释放，东北地区春耕备肥基本结束， ...

Agricultural Products Market - The national edible agricultural product market price decreased by 0.4% compared to the previous week [1] - The average wholesale price of six types of fruits slightly declined, with watermelon, citrus, and banana decreasing by 6.7%, 1.9%, and 0.6% respectively [1] - The average wholesale price of 30 types of vegetables was 4.13 yuan per kilogram, down by 1.0%, with eggplant, green beans, and cucumber decreasing by 5.5%, 3.8%, and 3.1% respectively [1] - Meat wholesale prices showed slight fluctuations, with pork priced at 20.60 yuan per kilogram, down by 0.5%, while lamb remained stable and beef increased by 0.2% [1] - Wholesale prices of grain and oil showed a stable increase, with flour, rapeseed oil, and peanut oil rising by 0.2%, 0.1%, and 0.1% respectively [1] - Aquatic product wholesale prices slightly increased, with carp, crucian carp, and grass carp rising by 1.5%, 1.5%, and 1.1% respectively [1] Production Materials Market - The wholesale prices of finished oil products slightly decreased, with 92 gasoline, 95 gasoline, and 0 diesel dropping by 2.2%, 2.1%, and 1.7% respectively [2] - Rubber prices showed a slight decline, with synthetic rubber and natural rubber decreasing by 0.9% and 0.6% respectively [2] - Coal prices experienced minor decreases, with coking coal, No. 2 smokeless lump coal, and thermal coal priced at 962 yuan, 1165 yuan, and 753 yuan per ton, down by 0.9%, 0.4%, and 0.3% respectively [2] - Steel prices generally decreased, with rebar, ordinary high-speed wire rod, and channel steel priced at 3451 yuan, 3659 yuan, and 3666 yuan per ton, all down by 0.4% [2] - Non-ferrous metal prices mainly declined, with zinc and copper decreasing by 0.7% and 0.6%, while aluminum increased by 0.3% [2] - Fertilizer prices slightly receded, with urea and compound fertilizer decreasing by 0.2% and 0.1% respectively [2] - Basic chemical raw material prices showed slight fluctuations, with methanol and polypropylene decreasing by 1.6% and 0.4%, while sulfuric acid remained stable and soda ash increased by 0.3% [2]

Core Viewpoint - Liu Guo Chemical plans to raise up to 800 million yuan through a private placement to invest in a 280,000 tons/year battery-grade refined phosphoric acid project, with a total investment of 1.194 billion yuan and a payback period of 6.55 years [1][9]. Company Overview - Liu Guo Chemical primarily engages in the production and sales of phosphate fertilizers and fine chemical products, being one of the largest integrated manufacturers in East China [5]. - The company has production capacities of 450,000 tons/year for monoammonium phosphate, 640,000 tons/year for diammonium phosphate, 300,000 tons/year for urea, and 1,550,000 tons/year for compound fertilizers [5]. Industry Context - Since 2014, China's phosphate fertilizer usage has declined from 8.4534 million tons to 5.3630 million tons in 2023, reaching a recent low due to government policies promoting modern agriculture and controlling traditional fertilizer usage [5]. - Phosphate and compound fertilizers are the main revenue sources for the company, generating sales revenues of 2.680 billion yuan and 2.183 billion yuan respectively, accounting for 42.88% and 34.93% of total revenue as of December 31, 2024 [5]. Financial Performance - The company's operating revenue has continuously declined from 7.549 billion yuan in 2022 to 6.251 billion yuan in 2024 [6]. - The net profit attributable to the parent company has also decreased significantly from 237 million yuan in 2021 to 2.3 million yuan in 2023, with a slight recovery to 2.5 million yuan in 2024 [6]. - The gross profit margin fell from 14.85% in 2021 to 8.05% in 2023, with a minor recovery to 9.36% in 2024 [6]. Strategic Shift - In response to ongoing pressures in the traditional fertilizer business, the company is transitioning towards high-value sectors, specifically producing and selling battery-grade refined phosphoric acid [8]. - The planned fundraising will significantly enhance the company's refined phosphoric acid production capacity, aligning with the growing demand from the rapidly developing electric vehicle and energy storage industries [9]. Market Dynamics - The refined phosphoric acid is a core raw material for lithium iron phosphate batteries, which are experiencing high growth in demand [9]. - However, the industry faces challenges with an oversupply of lithium iron phosphate battery capacity, leading to project terminations by other companies in the sector [10].

Core Viewpoint - The World Bank's report on commodity cycles post-COVID-19 indicates a significant shift in the frequency and volatility of commodity price cycles, suggesting a new era in commodity market dynamics [1][42]. Group 1: Commodity Price Cycles - Over the past 55 years, 27 types of commodities have experienced an average of 14 turning points, approximately every four years [37]. - The average duration of booms is 38 months, while recessions last an average of 52 months, indicating that recessions tend to last longer than booms [29][37]. - The average amplitude of price changes during booms and recessions is roughly similar, suggesting symmetrical price volatility [29][37]. Group 2: Historical Price Fluctuations - The study identifies three distinct periods of commodity price fluctuations: 1970-1985, 1986-2001, and 2002-2024, each characterized by different dynamics and influencing factors [8][12][41]. - The first period (1970-1985) was marked by significant volatility due to supply shocks, particularly in the energy market, with an average boom duration of 31 months and a longer recession period [8][12]. - The second period (1986-2001) exhibited more stability, with longer average durations for both booms (47 months) and recessions (56 months), attributed to technological advancements and market liberalization [12][41]. - The third period (2002 onwards) saw a resurgence in volatility driven by demand shocks from emerging markets, with shorter average durations for both booms (35 months) and recessions (46 months) [13][41]. Group 3: Post-Pandemic Commodity Behavior - Since 2020, the average duration of boom phases has decreased to 24 months, and recession durations have halved to 23 months, indicating a significant compression of the commodity cycle [16][42]. - The amplitude of price increases during booms has intensified, averaging 113%, while the severity of price declines during recessions has decreased to 79% [17][42]. - Various factors, including macroeconomic shocks, geopolitical tensions, and climate-related disruptions, have contributed to the observed deviations from historical commodity price patterns [17][19][42]. Group 4: Long-Term Trends and Structural Changes - The global energy transition is driving sustained demand for key minerals like lithium, copper, and nickel, exerting upward pressure on their prices [19][20]. - Increasingly frequent extreme weather events are heightening supply risks, particularly for agricultural commodities, which remain highly sensitive to climate conditions [19][20]. - The slowdown of global integration has led to increased geopolitical fragmentation, marked by trade barriers and sanctions, which disrupt commodity markets and contribute to price volatility [20][42].