Core Points - Jinmoly Co., Ltd. experienced a 5.02% decline in stock price, trading at 15.53 yuan per share with a total market capitalization of 50.109 billion yuan as of October 10 [1] - The company primarily engages in molybdenum mining, smelting, and deep processing, with 90.14% of its revenue derived from molybdenum products, 8.73% from commodity trading, and 1.14% from other sources [1] Company Overview - Jinmoly Co., Ltd. was established on May 16, 2007, and went public on April 17, 2008 [1] - The company is located in Xi'an High-tech Industrial Development Zone, Shaanxi Province, China [1] Shareholder Information - Among the top ten circulating shareholders, a fund under China Europe Fund, specifically the China Europe Dividend Enjoyment Flexible Allocation Mixed A (004814), entered the list in the second quarter, holding 6.2835 million shares, which is 0.19% of the circulating shares [2] - The estimated floating loss for this fund today is approximately 5.1525 million yuan [2] Fund Performance - The China Europe Dividend Enjoyment Flexible Allocation Mixed A (004814) was established on April 19, 2018, with a current scale of 5.06 billion yuan [2] - Year-to-date return for the fund is 39.85%, ranking 2427 out of 8166 in its category, while the one-year return is 38.08%, ranking 2378 out of 8014 [2]

Core Viewpoint - The AI Fund, China Europe Dividend Enjoyment Flexible Allocation Mixed A (004814), reported a profit of 359 million yuan in Q2 2025, with a weighted average profit per fund share of 0.1336 yuan, and a net asset value growth rate of 8.22% for the period [2] Fund Performance - As of July 18, the fund's unit net value was 1.905 yuan, with a three-month net value growth rate of 14.13%, ranking 16 out of 82 in its category [3] - The fund's six-month net value growth rate was 20.09%, ranking 6 out of 82, and the one-year growth rate was 22.31%, also ranking 6 out of 77 [3] - Over the past three years, the fund achieved a net value growth rate of 41.31%, ranking 2 out of 57 [3] - The fund's Sharpe ratio over the past three years was 0.7644, ranking 4 out of 57 [8] - The maximum drawdown over the past three years was 19.38%, with the largest single-quarter drawdown occurring in Q1 2020 at 19.96% [10] Fund Holdings and Strategy - As of June 30, the fund maintained an average stock position of 91.42% over the past three years, compared to the category average of 84.99% [13] - The fund's top ten holdings as of Q2 2025 included Zijin Mining, New China Life Insurance, China Life Insurance, China Ping An, Construction Bank, Zhongjin Gold, Ningbo Bank, China National Heavy Duty Truck Group, China Gold International, and SANY Heavy Industry [17] - The fund manager expressed optimism about the stability and certainty of the Chinese economy, focusing on undervalued assets in both Hong Kong and A-shares, while also highlighting risks from Western debt and geopolitical conflicts [2]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the significant reforms introduced in the public fund industry through the "Action Plan for Promoting High-Quality Development of Public Funds," emphasizing the importance of performance benchmarks and the need for a more rational setting of these benchmarks to improve fund performance [2][6][12]. Summary by Sections Performance Benchmarks - The document highlights the critical role of performance benchmarks for public funds, which serve as a standard for fund managers to achieve and exceed [6][7]. - Most funds currently use indices like CSI 300, CSI 800, and CSI 500 as benchmarks, with nearly half of active funds benchmarked against the CSI 300 [7]. Fund Performance Analysis - Recent data indicates that only 30% of funds have outperformed their benchmarks over the past three years, with nearly 50% of products underperforming by more than 10% [12]. - The average excess return relative to benchmarks has been negative in recent years, with a notable decline in the proportion of funds outperforming benchmarks from 2020 to 2024 [13][14]. Active Fund Management Challenges - Continuous outperformance is challenging, especially during market downturns, where only about 20% of active funds managed to outperform their benchmarks from 2022 to 2024 [14]. - A study identified only 46 funds (2.2% of the sample) that consistently outperformed their benchmarks over five years, with 25 of these having a combined scale of over 1 billion [17]. Fund Manager Performance - The article lists funds that have consistently outperformed their benchmarks over five years, noting that many of these funds are managed by well-regarded fund managers [21][22]. - The performance of fund managers is evaluated not only on returns but also on their ability to control drawdowns, with some funds experiencing significant drawdowns despite strong returns [23][24]. Notable Fund Managers - The article mentions specific fund managers who have successfully managed funds that consistently outperform benchmarks, highlighting their investment philosophies and strategies [25][36]. - It also discusses the impact of fund manager changes on fund performance, particularly in the context of recent departures of notable managers [29][33]. Conclusion on Fund Evaluation - The article concludes that while outperforming benchmarks is a key metric for evaluating fund performance, it should not be the sole criterion, as other factors such as risk management and drawdown control are equally important [44].