最近博格在私域(XQ)里发了征集稿，毕竟私域已经运营快10年了。 要求：不限时间，不限字数，不限金额 主要是不同时点加入私域的朋友，一起聊聊投资感受，也是对自己投资的一个回顾总结。 投稿人：卡卡（化名），以下为投稿内容，所有内容没有作任何修改。 大概是15、16年吧，我还在读研究生。 知乎日报里看到了XX老师写的投资理财相关文章，文章中用简单的模型量化了投资开始时间点、投资收益率对一个人财富的巨大影响，让我感 受到人力资本增值的不可持续性和投资理财的重要性。这算是我的投资理财启蒙了，之后我积极学习各类投资理财知识，对躺着赚钱、复利奇 迹、定投十年赚十倍等表述乐此不疲。 虽然后来证明想通过投资暴富真的很难，但这段时间还算有体系的学习为我后续的投资生涯提供了很大助力。 16年2月我第一次试水偏股基金。 定投了两支基金，一支是XX合润，一支是XX沪深300，用了支付宝智能定投策略，根据500日均线低了多投，高了少投。大概10个月赚了百分之 20左右清仓了。 --------------------------------- | 买入产品 | 兴全合润分级混合 > | | --- | --- | | 买入金额 ● | ...

Core Viewpoint - The recent departures of prominent fund managers, including Zhang Kun and Bao Wuke, signal a potential shift in the public fund industry, raising concerns about whether public funds are becoming a "training ground for private equity" [3][4]. Group 1: Departure of Fund Managers - Bao Wuke, a notable fund manager with over 15 years of experience and an annualized return of approximately 15.5%, has officially announced his departure from the public fund sector [5][11]. - The market interpreted Bao Wuke's recent actions, such as appointing new fund managers, as indicative of his impending exit, which was confirmed over the weekend [3][4]. - The trend of high-performing fund managers leaving the public sector has raised questions about the future of public funds and their ability to retain talent [4]. Group 2: Performance and Management Transition - Bao Wuke managed a total of 16.2 billion yuan across eight funds before his departure, with the majority of his funds being handed over to three experienced managers, including Liu Su, Zhang Zhongwei, and Zou Lihua [11][12]. - Liu Su, who has 13 years of experience, is known for a balanced investment style, while Zhang Zhongwei, with over nine years of experience, is recognized for a growth-oriented approach focused on technology stocks [28][20]. - The performance of the funds under Bao Wuke's management has been strong, with a total return exceeding 380% over the past decade, indicating a solid track record that the new managers will need to uphold [5][11]. Group 3: Investment Styles and Strategies - Bao Wuke's investment strategy emphasized low volatility and steady returns, focusing on high-barrier companies with reasonable valuations [7][8]. - In contrast, Zhang Zhongwei's investment philosophy is centered on capturing growth in technology sectors, with a significant portion of his portfolio allocated to TMT (Technology, Media, Telecommunications) stocks [24][27]. - Liu Su's approach is more balanced, with a diversified portfolio that includes sectors like food and beverage and pharmaceuticals, aiming for stable long-term growth [30][28].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the significant reforms introduced in the public fund industry through the "Action Plan for Promoting High-Quality Development of Public Funds," emphasizing the importance of performance benchmarks and the need for a more rational setting of these benchmarks to improve fund performance [2][6][12]. Summary by Sections Performance Benchmarks - The document highlights the critical role of performance benchmarks for public funds, which serve as a standard for fund managers to achieve and exceed [6][7]. - Most funds currently use indices like CSI 300, CSI 800, and CSI 500 as benchmarks, with nearly half of active funds benchmarked against the CSI 300 [7]. Fund Performance Analysis - Recent data indicates that only 30% of funds have outperformed their benchmarks over the past three years, with nearly 50% of products underperforming by more than 10% [12]. - The average excess return relative to benchmarks has been negative in recent years, with a notable decline in the proportion of funds outperforming benchmarks from 2020 to 2024 [13][14]. Active Fund Management Challenges - Continuous outperformance is challenging, especially during market downturns, where only about 20% of active funds managed to outperform their benchmarks from 2022 to 2024 [14]. - A study identified only 46 funds (2.2% of the sample) that consistently outperformed their benchmarks over five years, with 25 of these having a combined scale of over 1 billion [17]. Fund Manager Performance - The article lists funds that have consistently outperformed their benchmarks over five years, noting that many of these funds are managed by well-regarded fund managers [21][22]. - The performance of fund managers is evaluated not only on returns but also on their ability to control drawdowns, with some funds experiencing significant drawdowns despite strong returns [23][24]. Notable Fund Managers - The article mentions specific fund managers who have successfully managed funds that consistently outperform benchmarks, highlighting their investment philosophies and strategies [25][36]. - It also discusses the impact of fund manager changes on fund performance, particularly in the context of recent departures of notable managers [29][33]. Conclusion on Fund Evaluation - The article concludes that while outperforming benchmarks is a key metric for evaluating fund performance, it should not be the sole criterion, as other factors such as risk management and drawdown control are equally important [44].

Group 1 - Midea Group (000333.SZ) released its 2024 annual report on March 29, 2025, with 1,673 institutional investors disclosing holdings of 4.481 billion shares, accounting for 58.53% of the total share capital [1] - The top ten institutional investors hold a combined 50.12% of Midea Group's shares, with a slight decrease of 0.44 percentage points compared to the previous quarter [1] Group 2 - In the public fund sector, 103 funds increased their holdings, with a holding increase ratio of 0.13%, while 203 funds decreased their holdings, with a decrease ratio of 0.54% [2] - A total of 385 new public funds were disclosed this period, while 911 funds were not disclosed compared to the previous quarter [2] - Foreign investment sentiment showed a decrease in holdings from one foreign fund, Hong Kong Central Clearing Limited, with a reduction ratio of 0.21% [2]