Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the performance of public funds in the A-share market, particularly focusing on the "Double Ten Funds," which are those that have been established for over 10 years and have an annualized return exceeding 10% since inception. It emphasizes the importance of these funds in providing stable returns amidst market volatility [4][5]. Fund Performance Overview - As of August 19, 2025, there are 2,629 public fund products established for over 10 years, with only 377 (approximately 14.13%) achieving an annualized return above 10%. Over 95% of these funds are equity funds, primarily investing in the stock market [4][6]. - The top 30 "Double Ten Funds" have an annualized return threshold of approximately 13.37%, with the majority being equity funds. Huashang Fund has the most products listed, with four funds making the top 30 [5][6]. Notable Funds - Two funds from Huashang Fund, namely Huashang New Trend Preferred Mixed Fund and Huashang Advantage Industry Mixed Fund, have annualized returns exceeding 20% and reached historical highs in August [8][9]. - The Huashang New Trend Preferred Mixed Fund, with a scale of approximately 4.469 billion, has an annualized return of 18.62% and a cumulative return of 1,087.40% since its inception [9][10]. - The Huashang Advantage Industry Mixed Fund, with a scale of approximately 4.055 billion, has an annualized return of 18.15% and a cumulative return of 967.55% since its inception [9][10]. Historical Highs - A total of 38 "Double Ten Funds" reached historical highs in net value since August, with the majority being equity funds. Notably, Dachen Fund has a large-cap fund, Dachen Gaoxin Stock A, which is the only "Double Ten Fund" with a scale exceeding 10 billion that reached a historical high [11][14].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the performance of public funds in the A-share market, highlighting that many funds have reached historical highs in net value, particularly in May 2025, amidst a generally stable market environment [3][4]. Group 1: Fund Performance Overview - As of the end of May 2025, 3,315 public fund products (established for over one year) reached historical highs in net value, accounting for approximately 16.21% of the total [3]. - Among these, bond funds comprised 2,305, mixed funds 640, and stock funds 163 [3]. Group 2: Top Performing Funds in the Last Year - In the category of equity funds (with over 60% of net value in stock investments), 173 funds displayed performance over the past year, with a threshold for the top 20 exceeding 71% [4]. - The top five funds in terms of one-year returns are from Huaxia Fund, CITIC Construction Investment Fund, Huitianfu Fund, Jingshun Great Wall Fund, and Wanjia Fund [5]. Group 3: Top Performing Funds in the Last Three Years - For funds with performance data over the last three years, 80 funds qualified, with a threshold for the top 20 exceeding 51% [17]. - The top five funds in this category are from Huaxia Fund, Huitianfu Fund, Wanjia Fund, and Guangfa Fund, with Huaxia Fund having two products in the top five [18]. Group 4: Top Performing Funds in the Last Five Years - In the five-year performance category, 38 funds qualified, with a threshold for the top 20 close to 70% [28]. - The top five funds are from Jinyuan Shun'an Fund, Huaxia Fund, Dachen Fund, and Chuangjin Hexin Fund, with Dachen Fund having two products listed [29]. Group 5: Notable Fund Details - The fund "CITIC Construction Investment North Exchange Selected Two-Year Open Mixed A" has a scale of approximately 1.90 billion yuan and a one-year return of nearly 148%, ranking second [10]. - The fund "Huitianfu North Exchange Innovation Selected Two-Year Open Mixed A" has a scale of about 4.53 billion yuan and a one-year return of approximately 132%, ranking third [14]. - The fund "Jinyuan Shun'an Yuanqi Flexible Allocation Mixed" has a scale of about 11.62 billion yuan and a five-year return of 293.55%, ranking first [35].

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of long-term performance in mutual funds, highlighting the "Double Ten Funds" which have been established for over 10 years and have an annualized return exceeding 10% [3][4]. Group 1: Market Context - Since the peak of the A-share market in June 2015, major indices have shown significant declines, with the Shanghai Composite Index down 26.18%, the Shenzhen Component Index down 33.19%, and the ChiNext Index down 31.84% [3]. - In contrast, U.S. stock indices have doubled, with the Nasdaq Index increasing by over 253% during the same period, while gold prices rose approximately 172.66% [3]. Group 2: Fund Performance - As of April 30, 2025, there are 2,238 mutual funds that have been established for over 10 years, with only 264 funds (approximately 11.80%) achieving an annualized return above 10% [3]. - Among the 264 "Double Ten Funds," 137 are equity funds, 61 are flexible allocation funds, 18 are standard equity funds, 18 are balanced funds, and 16 are QDII funds [3]. Group 3: Top Performing Funds - The top-performing fund over the past decade is the "Guotai Nasdaq 100 ETF (QDII)" managed by Guotai Fund, with a cumulative return of 393.36% and an annualized return of 17.67% [7]. - The second-best fund is the "Dacheng Gaoxin Stock A" managed by Liu Xu, with a cumulative return of 335.04% and an annualized return of 16.19% [7]. Group 4: Fund Categories - In the category of active equity funds, there are 155 funds, with the top 20 funds having a cumulative return threshold of nearly 145% [9]. - The top 5 funds in this category include products from Jiao Yin Shi Luo De Fund, Dacheng Fund, and Huashan Fund [9]. Group 5: Flexible Allocation Funds - Among the 61 flexible allocation funds, the top two are managed by Huashan Fund, with the leading fund achieving a cumulative return of 356.80% [12][13]. Group 6: QDII Funds - The "Jia Shi American Growth Stock" fund is highlighted as a top-performing QDII fund, with a cumulative return exceeding 266% [18].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the significant reforms introduced in the public fund industry through the "Action Plan for Promoting High-Quality Development of Public Funds," emphasizing the importance of performance benchmarks and the need for a more rational setting of these benchmarks to improve fund performance [2][6][12]. Summary by Sections Performance Benchmarks - The document highlights the critical role of performance benchmarks for public funds, which serve as a standard for fund managers to achieve and exceed [6][7]. - Most funds currently use indices like CSI 300, CSI 800, and CSI 500 as benchmarks, with nearly half of active funds benchmarked against the CSI 300 [7]. Fund Performance Analysis - Recent data indicates that only 30% of funds have outperformed their benchmarks over the past three years, with nearly 50% of products underperforming by more than 10% [12]. - The average excess return relative to benchmarks has been negative in recent years, with a notable decline in the proportion of funds outperforming benchmarks from 2020 to 2024 [13][14]. Active Fund Management Challenges - Continuous outperformance is challenging, especially during market downturns, where only about 20% of active funds managed to outperform their benchmarks from 2022 to 2024 [14]. - A study identified only 46 funds (2.2% of the sample) that consistently outperformed their benchmarks over five years, with 25 of these having a combined scale of over 1 billion [17]. Fund Manager Performance - The article lists funds that have consistently outperformed their benchmarks over five years, noting that many of these funds are managed by well-regarded fund managers [21][22]. - The performance of fund managers is evaluated not only on returns but also on their ability to control drawdowns, with some funds experiencing significant drawdowns despite strong returns [23][24]. Notable Fund Managers - The article mentions specific fund managers who have successfully managed funds that consistently outperform benchmarks, highlighting their investment philosophies and strategies [25][36]. - It also discusses the impact of fund manager changes on fund performance, particularly in the context of recent departures of notable managers [29][33]. Conclusion on Fund Evaluation - The article concludes that while outperforming benchmarks is a key metric for evaluating fund performance, it should not be the sole criterion, as other factors such as risk management and drawdown control are equally important [44].