Summary of Key Points Core Viewpoint - On August 13, the total net inflow of cross-border ETFs reached 906 million yuan, with a cumulative net inflow of 20.62 billion yuan over the past five trading days, indicating strong investor interest in these funds [1]. Fund Inflows - A total of 40 cross-border ETFs experienced net inflows on August 13, with the top performer being the GF CSI Hong Kong Stock Connect Non-Bank ETF (513750), which saw an increase of 528 million shares and a net inflow of 906 million yuan [1][3]. - The GF CSI Hong Kong Stock Connect Non-Bank ETF had a latest scale of 14.879 billion yuan, reflecting a 1.78% increase in value [3]. Fund Outflows - Conversely, 50 cross-border ETFs recorded net outflows on the same day, with the leading outflow being the E Fund China Concept Internet 50 ETF (513050), which saw a reduction of 309 million shares and a net outflow of 454 million yuan [4][5]. - The E Fund China Concept Internet 50 ETF had a latest scale of 33.942 billion yuan, with a 4.06% increase in value despite the outflow [5]. Performance Overview - The top 10 ETFs by net inflow included several funds focused on technology and healthcare sectors, indicating a trend towards these industries among investors [3][5]. - The top 10 ETFs by net outflow highlighted a mix of technology and healthcare funds, suggesting a potential shift in investor sentiment or profit-taking in these areas [4][5].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the report indicates that the construction materials and coal industries performed well during the period, with the Shanghai Composite Index rising by 1.67% and the Shenzhen Component Index increasing by 2.33% [2][9] - In the recent 12 periods, the comprehensive and pharmaceutical industries showed strong performance, suggesting potential investment opportunities in these sectors [9] - Active equity funds focusing on electronics and coal industries also demonstrated superior performance during this period [14] Group 2 - Among various fund types, actively managed stock funds increased by 1.55%, while mixed funds rose by 1.63%, and bond funds saw a slight decline of 0.16% [2] - The average return of convertible bond funds was notably high at 12.46% year-to-date, indicating a strong performance in this category [17] - QDII funds, particularly those focused on Asia-Pacific and emerging markets, led the performance with an increase of 2.56% during the period [19][21]

1. Report Industry Investment Rating No relevant content provided. 2. Core Viewpoints of the Report - In the week from July 21 - July 25, 2025, ETF funds had the highest average weekly increase of 2.40%. Other types of funds ranked by average weekly returns from high to low were: quantitative funds (2.25%), active equity funds (1.76%), QDII funds (1.12%), FOF funds (0.65%), bond funds (-0.04%), and REITs funds (-1.87%) [2][8]. - Year - to - date, QDII funds led with an average return of 18.73%, followed by REITs funds (16.80%), active equity funds (13.86%), quantitative funds (12.69%), ETF funds (12.46%), FOF funds (6.94%), and bond funds (1.68%) [8]. 3. Summary According to the Table of Contents 3.1 Cross - Category Fund Product Return Overview - This week, ETF funds had the highest average weekly increase of 2.40%, followed by quantitative funds (2.25%), active equity funds (1.76%), QDII funds (1.12%), FOF funds (0.65%), bond funds (-0.04%), and REITs funds (-1.87%) [2][8]. - Year - to - date, QDII funds had an average return of 18.73%, REITs funds 16.80%, active equity funds 13.86%, quantitative funds 12.69%, ETF funds 12.46%, FOF funds 6.94%, and bond funds 1.68% [8]. 3.2 Active Equity Funds - **Performance of Major Broad - based Indexes in A - share and Hong Kong Markets**: This week, all major broad - based indexes in the A - share market rose, with the overall increase lower than last week. The Science and Technology Innovation 50 Index had the best performance with a 4.63% increase, followed by the CSI 500 Index (3.28%), and the SSE 50 Index had the smallest increase of 1.12%. In the Hong Kong market, major broad - based indexes also rose, with the increase lower than last week. The Hang Seng Index and Hang Seng Tech Index increased by 2.27% and 2.51% respectively [12]. - **Performance of Shenwan Primary Industry Indexes**: Most Shenwan primary industry indexes rose this week. The building materials, coal, and steel industry indexes performed relatively well, with weekly increases of 8.20%, 7.98%, and 7.67% respectively. The public utilities, communication, and banking industry indexes performed weakly, with weekly increases of - 0.27%, - 0.77%, and - 2.87% respectively [15]. - **Overview of High - performing Active Equity Funds**: The average weekly return of active equity funds was 1.76%. Jinxin Industry Preferred Hybrid A had the best performance with a weekly return of 11.66%. High - performing funds mostly held stocks in the electronics, non - ferrous metals, and coal industries [17]. - **Overview of Industry - specific Active Equity Funds**: The average weekly return of industry - specific active equity funds was 1.51%, slightly weaker than the overall level of active equity funds. Cyclical industry funds performed brightly this week, with an average return of 4.86%. TMT industry funds had an average weekly return of 2.12%, ranking second. Pharmaceutical industry funds had a relatively weak performance with an average weekly return of - 0.15%. The average returns of other three types of industry funds were: mid - stream manufacturing (1.87%), consumption (1.56%), and financial real estate (1.35%) [19]. - **Overview of Non - industry Active Equity Funds**: The average weekly return of non - industry funds was 1.78%, slightly better than the overall level of active equity funds. The value - style funds significantly outperformed this week, with an average weekly return of 2.43%. The average returns of the other two styles were: growth (1.33%) and balanced (1.80%) [22]. 3.3 Quantitative Funds - **Overview of Quantitative Fund Returns**: The average weekly return of quantitative funds was 2.25%. Huabao CSI Rare Metals Theme A had the highest weekly return of 10.92%. In terms of strategy types, index - enhanced funds had the best performance with an average weekly return of 2.47%. The average weekly returns of the other two types were: active quantitative (2.21%) and stock long - short (0.10%) [24]. - **Overview of Returns of Major Index - enhanced Quantitative Funds**: Among index - enhanced quantitative funds this week, funds tracking the CSI 500 Index performed best, with an average return of 3.18%. The average weekly returns of funds tracking the CSI 300, CSI 1000, and Guozheng 2000 Indexes were 1.75%, 2.42%, and 2.31% respectively. In terms of excess returns, the proportion of funds achieving positive excess returns was 54.13%, similar to last week. Funds tracking the Guozheng 2000 Index had the highest average excess return of 0.19%. The average weekly excess returns of funds tracking the other three indexes were: CSI 300 Index (0.06%), CSI 500 Index (- 0.10%), and CSI 1000 Index (0.06%) [26]. 3.4 Bond Funds - **Performance of Major Bond Indexes**: This week, major bond market indexes declined overall. The CSI Aggregate Bond Index fell 0.49% to close at 260.12, the CSI Treasury Bond Index fell 0.59% to 246.44, and the CSI Credit Bond Index fell 0.37% to 213.20 [28]. - **Performance of Convertible Bond Indexes**: This week, the CSI Convertible Bond Index rose 2.14% to close at 463.57, with the weekly trading volume increasing by 14.16%. The median convertible bond price rose 1.66% to 129.66, and the median conversion premium rate rose 0.93% to 26.77% [30]. - **Overview of Bond Fund Returns**: The average weekly return of bond funds was - 0.04%. Galaxy Zhaoyi 6 - month Holding Hybrid A had the best performance with a weekly return of 9.26%. High - performing bond funds were mostly hybrid bond - type, convertible bond - type, and partial - debt hybrid - type [32]. - **Overview of Pure - bond Fund Returns**: The average weekly return of pure - bond funds was - 0.27%. The returns of short - term and medium - long - term pure - bond funds were - 0.10% and - 0.30% respectively. Fullgoal Dingli Pure Bond Three - month Regular Open Bond - type Initiated Fund performed relatively best, with an average weekly return of 1.43% [34]. - **Overview of Hybrid Bond Fund Returns**: The average weekly return of hybrid bond funds was 0.16%. The return of hybrid bond - type first - level funds was - 0.06%, and that of hybrid bond - type second - level funds was 0.32%. Hongta Hongtu Shengshang One - year Regular Open Bond A performed best, with an average weekly return of 5.92% [36]. - **Overview of Partial - debt Hybrid and Flexible Allocation Bond Fund Returns**: The average weekly return of partial - debt hybrid bond funds was 0.33%, and that of flexible allocation bond funds was 0.19%. Galaxy Zhaoyi 6 - month Holding Hybrid A performed best, with a weekly return of 9.26% [38]. - **Overview of Convertible Bond Fund Returns**: The average weekly return of convertible bond funds was 2.37%. Huashang Convertible Bond A performed best, with an average weekly return of 5.69% [41]. 3.5 ETF Funds - **Overview of ETF Fund Fund Flows**: This week, ETF funds had a net inflow of 2.007 billion yuan, a 96.43% decline from the previous week. Except for bond - type and cross - border ETFs, which had net inflows, other types of ETFs had net outflows. Bond - type ETFs had a net inflow of 9.969 billion yuan, a 86.41% decline from the previous week. Commodity - type ETFs had a net outflow of 5.544 billion yuan, about 3.5 times the change from the previous week. Stock - type ETFs had a net outflow of 4.496 billion yuan. Among them, scale - index ETFs had the largest outflow of 14.341 billion yuan, with a 49.48% change from the previous week [43]. - **Overview of ETF Funds with Top Net Inflows by Index**: Among the tracked indexes, ETFs tracking the Shanghai 30 - year Treasury Bond, CSI 30 - year Treasury Bond Wealth Index, and AAA Sci - tech Innovation Bonds had the top net inflows, with 5.272 billion yuan, 3.673 billion yuan, and 3.483 billion yuan respectively. Among equity indexes, ETFs tracking the Hong Kong Securities and Hong Kong Stock Connect Internet Index had the top total net inflows, with 3.762 billion yuan and 3.705 billion yuan respectively [47]. - **Overview of ETF Funds with Top Net Outflows by Index**: This week, the tracked indexes with top net outflows included bond - type, equity - type, and commodity - type indexes. ETFs tracking the Shanghai Market - made Corporate Bonds had a total net outflow of 2.717 billion yuan. Among equity indexes, ETFs tracking the CSI A500, Science and Technology Innovation Composite Index, and Science and Technology Innovation 50 Index had total net outflows of 6.737 billion yuan, 1.583 billion yuan, and 1.512 billion yuan respectively. ETFs tracking the SGE Gold 9999 Index had a total net outflow of 4.777 billion yuan [48]. - **Overview of ETF Funds with Top Net Inflows**: This week, the ETFs with top net inflows were mostly bond - type ETFs. The 30 - year Treasury Bond ETF Boshi had the largest net inflow of 5.272 billion yuan, followed by the Hong Kong Securities ETF with a net inflow of 3.762 billion yuan. Among theme - index ETFs, the Steel ETF and Chemical ETF also had top net inflows [51]. - **Overview of ETF Funds with Top Net Outflows**: This week, the Yinhuari ETF had the largest net outflow of 3.798 billion yuan. Among scale - index ETFs, the CSI A500ETF Invesco had a relatively large net outflow of 3.252 billion yuan. Among bond - type ETFs, the Short - term Financing ETF had a net outflow of 1.266 billion yuan [53]. - **Overview of High - performing ETF Fund Returns**: This week, the average change of ETF funds was 2.40%. The Rare Metals ETF Fund had the highest weekly increase of 11.80%, mainly driven by the tightening global supply of rare metals and increased demand in the new energy field, which pushed up the sector price. High - performing ETF funds were mostly theme - index ETFs, with investment themes such as rare metals and rare earths. In addition, among industry - index ETFs, the Rare Metals ETF Fund also had a top increase of 9.74% [55]. 3.6 FOF Funds This week, the average return of FOF funds was 0.65%. Guotai Industry Rotation Stock (FOF - LOF) A had the best performance with a weekly return of 7.97%. In terms of types, stock - type FOF funds performed best, with an average return of 2.91%. The average returns of the other two types were: hybrid FOF (0.69%) and bond - type FOF (0.01%) [57]. 3.7 QDII Funds This week, the overall average return of QDII funds was 1.12%. Huaxia Nomura Nikkei 225ETF had the highest weekly return of 5.02%. The average returns of different types of QDII funds were: stock - type (1.39%), hybrid (0.79%), bond - type (0.07%), and other types (0.55%) [59]. 3.8 REITs Funds This week, the average change of REITs funds was - 1.87%. Boshi Jinkai Science and Industry Park REIT had the best performance with a weekly change of 8.49% [61].

Group 1 - The Japanese Ministry of Finance has requested the Chinese government to relax capital controls, aiming to increase the Qualified Domestic Institutional Investor (QDII) investment quota, which would facilitate more funds flowing into Japanese stock ETFs [2][5] - The request was prompted by the temporary suspension of trading for the "Huaxia Nomura Nikkei 225 ETF" in January 2024, which highlighted the high demand for Japanese stocks among Chinese investors [3][5] - China's trade surplus reached a record high of $992.1 billion in 2024, creating excess funds domestically, while the real estate market remains sluggish and the domestic stock market is underperforming [5] Group 2 - The expansion of the QDII quota is seen as beneficial for China, as it would provide more investment opportunities abroad, especially in Japanese and Western securities, amidst a declining economic growth rate [5][6] - There is a strong desire among Chinese asset management companies for the QDII quota to be increased, as it would allow them to better manage investor orders and avoid significant price deviations in Japanese stock ETFs [3][5] - However, the process of expanding the QDII quota is expected to be cautious due to past experiences of capital outflows and the need to prevent significant depreciation of the Renminbi [6]

上海的股价显示屏（Reuters） 日方提出要求的契机是2024年1月华夏野村日经225ETF一度暂停交易。日本财务省预期，QDII投资额度 得以扩大，流入日股ETF的资金也将随之增加。与购买土地或企业并购不同，投资日股ETF的经济安保 风险较低…… 日本经济新闻（中文版：日经中文网）于5月13日获悉，日本财务省已向中国政府提出放宽资本管制的 要求。中国房地产市场低迷和经济停滞导致有魅力的投资标的减少，贸易顺差带来的资金在中国国内过 剩。此举意在敦促中国扩大海外证券投资额度，促使资金流向日本股市等。 出于稳定人民币汇率等目的，中国实施严格的资本管制，国内银行及资产管理公司不能随意投资海外股 票和债券。仅允许符合一定条件的QDII在分配的投资额度内进行海外投资。 中国国家外汇管理局的数据显示，4月底的QDII额度上限总计为1677.89亿美元，2024年6月底以来一直 保持不变。 日方提出要求的契机是2024年1月在A股上市的日本股票ETF（交易所交易基金）"华夏野村日经 225ETF"一度暂停交易。在中国的个人投资者中，日本股票的人气过于旺盛，交易价格大幅高于基准价 格（每份的净值）。价格暴跌可能会导致投资者 ...