Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the recent developments in the securities industry regarding the ability of brokerages to sell insurance and bank wealth management products, highlighting regulatory changes and potential impacts on the industry [2][4][10]. Summary by Sections Regulatory Changes - On July 11, the China Securities Association (中证协) released the "28 Measures for High-Quality Development of the Securities Industry," which emphasizes enhancing communication with relevant departments to allow more compliant brokerages to obtain licenses for selling bank wealth management and insurance products [2][4]. - The Financial Regulatory Bureau also issued the "Financial Institutions Product Appropriateness Management Measures," which will take effect on February 1, 2026, establishing a regulatory foundation for brokerages to expand into these new sales areas [2][3]. Historical Context - The ability for brokerages to sell financial products, including insurance, was first established in the "Regulations on the Management of Securities Companies' Agency Sales of Financial Products" issued by the CSRC in November 2012 [5]. - Despite the long-standing regulations, the actual scale of insurance agency business has been limited, leading to a lack of focus on this area within the industry [7]. Industry Impact and Future Prospects - The renewed focus on brokerage sales of diverse products is seen as a potential shift from "single securities services" to "comprehensive wealth management," indicating a systemic adjustment in business models [8][10]. - The article suggests that the new regulatory environment could lead to more brokerages entering the insurance and bank wealth management product sales market, although this will require careful observation and compliance with regulatory standards [9][10]. Challenges and Opportunities - Brokerages face challenges in adapting to the different sales models and regulatory requirements associated with bank wealth management and insurance products, necessitating enhanced training for sales personnel and improvements in compliance systems [9][10]. - The potential for brokerages to tap into the growing demand for personal and commercial pension products is highlighted, as these products are becoming key components of a multi-tiered pension system [11]. - The article also notes that the integration of investment advisory and insurance advisory services could create new opportunities for wealth management, particularly in addressing the needs of high-net-worth clients [12]. Conclusion - The push for brokerages to obtain licenses for selling bank wealth management and insurance products represents a significant opportunity for the industry to evolve and meet diverse investor needs, with regulatory support aimed at fostering this transition [10][16].

与传统的固定收益类型产品相比，分红险具备更灵活的"成本 调节机制"，因而在降低负债成本、缓释利差风险方面，展现 出明显优势。 作者： 姜鑫 封图：图虫创意 2025年6月28日下午，客户拎着包急匆匆离开座位要去接孩子放学，李玲望着手中的咖啡无奈地 笑了笑，这一单又有点悬。 李玲是一位保险代理人，她这次见面的客户是一位年轻妈妈。由于存款利率下降，银行理财、货币 基金收益也不达预期，客户考虑配置一些理财型的保险产品。 李玲说，从利率走低的明显趋势，到家庭财富保值增值的挑战增加，再到保险产品的刚兑和收益优 势，客户都能理解。但当提到分红险的平滑机制和不同产品的复杂的利益演示时，客户却皱起了眉 头。 分红险是指保险公司在每个会计年度结束后，将上一会计年度该类分红保险的可分配盈余，按一定 的比例、以现金红利或增值红利的方式，分配给客户的一种人寿保险。在目前市场上销售产品中有 分红型寿险、分红型养老险和分红型两全险等产品，也有保险公司推出了分红型重疾险。 李玲的感受是，与3.50%的预定利率产品切换时的市场热度相比，当下的客户比较冷静。 自去年下半年起，李玲所在的保险公司进行了产品调整，无论是可以享受税收优惠的个人养老金 ...

国民养老保险的业绩崩塌与其单一的销售渠道紧密相关。年报显示，其原保费收入前五的产品——包括国 民福寿双全B款两全保险、国民美好生活B01款养老年金保险等，全部依赖银保渠道销售。业内估算，银保 渠道贡献了其传统险保费收入的绝对大头，业务命脉高度系于股东银行的销售推力。 尽管公司宣称已拓展至21家合作银行，并在APP设立个人养老金专区，但多元渠道对保费的支撑尚未在财报 中显现。"被股东银行喂饭"的增长模式未变，线上化能力存疑。一旦银行渠道策略调整或市场竞争加剧， 这一根基或将动摇。 从"开业即盈利"的明星企业，到单季度净利润暴跌90%的困局，国民养老保险股份有限公司（下称"国民养 老保险"）的业绩轨迹画出了一道陡峭的抛物线。 国民养老保险成立于2022年3月22日，当年即实现保险业务收入2.92亿元，净利润0.44亿元，成为"开业即盈 利"的明星企业。2023年，又以保险业务收入11.19亿元284.54%的增速、净利润3.15亿元542.9%的增速惊艳 市场。 好花美丽不常开！进入2024年，尤其是第四季度，国民养老保险这颗明星陨落了！保险业务收入降至4.2亿 元，环比骤降70%；净利润仅剩0.1亿元，不足前三 ...

券商可以卖保险和银行理财产品了？这个熟悉又陌生的问题掀起了讨论热潮。 7月11日，中证协在行业内最新发布的"证券业高质量发展28条"中明确提到，将加强与相关 部门单位的沟通协调，稳步推动更多合规风控有效的券商取得银行理财、保险产品销售牌照， 更好满足投资者多样化的投资需求。 同在当天，金融监管总局发布《金融机构产品适当性管理办法》，对金融产品销售的适当性管 理提出系统性规范要求，这也为券商若进一步拓展银行理财、保险代销业务筑牢了规则根基， 《办法》定于2026年2月1日起施行。 图为金融监管总局发布《金融机构产品适当性管理办法》内文。 种种表述都指向了券商将拓宽代销产品品类这一话题，这在行业引起广泛讨论。 记者了解来 看，这并非新业务。 早在证监会2012年11月出台的《证券公司代销金融产品管理规定》中就明确提到，允许券商 代销经国家有关部门（如银保监会、证监会等）批准发行的金融产品，包括保险产品（如投资 联结保险、年金保险等）以及商业银行理财产品。尤其是保险代销业务，文件一出，券商销售 保险业务正式开闸，不少券商向保险监管机构申请代理保险业务资质。 根据上述《规定》，申请保险兼业代理资格实行"一司一证"，券 ...

这次见面，李玲花了很多时间介绍分红险，她的"弹药库"里的保险产品都带着分红的功能和一个万能账户（保险公司推出的一种兼具保障和投资理财功能的 灵活账户）。 随着利率下行、产品监管趋严以及防范利差损风险，保险公司正纷纷发力分红险。这不是分红险第一次站在保险行业产品的"C位"。2000年前后，存款利率 快速下行，保险公司推出分红险，此后这一险种凭借稳健优势迎来快速发展，保费占比在2011年一度超过九成，呈现"一险独大"。 经济观察报 记者 姜鑫 2025年6月28日下午，客户拎着包急匆匆离开座位要去接孩子放学，李玲望着手中的咖啡无奈地笑了笑，这一单又有点悬。 李玲是一位保险代理人，她这次见面的客户是一位年轻妈妈。由于存款利率下降，银行理财、货币基金收益也不达预期，客户考虑配置一些理财型的保险产 品。 去年下半年以来，李先生多次参与不同保险公司关于主打分红险的培训。在成为一名保险经纪人之前，李先生工作于一家大型保险公司的银保渠道，当时也 会有分红险销售任务，因此他对分红险颇为了解。但他团队中的伙伴，则经历了一个艰难的转变过程。 利率周期轮回，分红险能否重拾昔日荣光？ 一线卖力推介 由于公司的增额终身寿险产品已经下架， ...

本次主题直播活动是天津保险业践行金融工作政治性、人民性、履行社会责任的重要举措。通过直播这种受众广泛、 互动性强的新媒体形式，更直接、更有效地将保险知识和风险提示送达消费者身边。未来，天津保险业将持续联合各 方力量，创新宣传形式，常态化开展金融知识普及教育，努力营造安全、放心、健康的保险消费环境，让保险真正成 为服务天津市民美好生活的坚实保障。 直播中，天津市众和金融消费者权益保护中心的负责人以及在津保险机构的6位保险从业人员就金融消费者日常生活 中最关切、最易产生困惑的保险问题进行解答，就"代理退保"黑产的运作模式、惯用话术及其给金融消费者带来的风 险，向观众传授了识别和防范此类非法活动的有效方法；围绕个人年金产品的特点、功能、领取方式以及如何根据自 身需求进行科学配置，帮助观众理解年金险如何为未来的品质养老生活提供稳定、持续的现金流补充，助力实现"老 有所养、老有所依"的美好愿景；针对年轻人生活方式差异化的特点，探讨了如何科学配置保险方案，引导年轻人树 立正确的风险管理和保险规划意识，以合理的投入为奋斗的青春保驾护航；聚焦天津专属城市定制型商业医疗保险 ——"天津惠民保"，清晰阐释了"惠民保"作为基本医保 ...

中国平安 20250710 摘要 中国平安 2025 年一季度寿险业务营业利润增长约 5%，全年预计维持 稳健，分红政策与营业利润挂钩，虽 2023 年盈利下滑，但每股分红仍 同比增长，连续三年未下降分红金额，预计未来几个季度净利润保持稳 健增长，分红维持稳定。 平安集团进行了寿险管理层调整，石伟玉任总经理，蔡挺任副董事长， 分管代理人及个险渠道发展，整体业务由蔡挺领导，实行矩阵式管理， 子公司向郭晓超汇报，新寿险基本法旨在稳定代理人队伍，提高产能， 二季度销售情况理想，三季度业绩好的代理人将获津贴和奖励。 2025 年一季度 NBV 增速达 35%，银保渠道增长迅猛，占比超 30%， 个险保持正增长，银保渠道战略调整效果显著，翻倍以上增长，二季度 银保趋势强劲，个险司庆版分红年金销售良好，NBEV margin 大幅提 升，预计全年 NBEV 将实现正增长。 2025 年一季度产险净利润下滑，因投资端受利率上行影响导致债券浮 亏，二季度利率回落，该因素影响减弱，承保端改善将带动盈利向好， 尽管去年投资收益基数较高，今年利润趋势难预测，但总体状态良好。 中国平安 2025 年的分红政策是否会有变化？在营业利润 ...

Group 1 - Shanghai Rural Commercial Bank successfully issued the 2025 Financial Bonds (First Phase) with a total scale of RMB 30 billion and a fixed interest rate of 1.70% [1] - The funds raised from the financial bonds will be used to meet asset-liability allocation needs, enhance funding sources, and support credit investment to promote the development of the real economy [1] - The bonds were recorded on July 8, 2025, and completed issuance on July 10, 2025 [1] Group 2 - Shanghai Rural Commercial Bank successfully issued the 2025 Green Financial Bonds (First Phase) with a total scale of RMB 40 billion and a fixed interest rate of 1.67% [3] - The funds raised from the green bonds will be entirely allocated to green industry projects, focusing on increasing credit investment in energy-saving and environmental protection industries, clean production industries, clean energy industries, and green upgrades of infrastructure [3] - The bonds were recorded on July 8, 2025, and completed issuance on July 10, 2025 [3]

Core Viewpoint - The current management of Jiaoda Onlly is pursuing accountability for former executives involved in a controversial insurance refund scheme, emphasizing the need for legal action and transparency [2][5][7]. Group 1: Allegations and Evidence - The Shanghai Securities Regulatory Bureau issued a warning letter indicating that Jiaoda Onlly had issues with the disclosure of executive compensation in the 2016 and 2018 annual reports [5]. - Former executives, including Yang Guoping, allegedly used company funds to purchase group insurance and subsequently refunded the premiums to their personal accounts, totaling approximately 3.79 million yuan in 2017 and 1.28 million yuan in 2018 [6][7]. - The current management has submitted new evidence, including reports from third-party firms, indicating that the actions of former executives may constitute embezzlement and violate legal regulations [7][8]. Group 2: Legal Actions and Financial Impact - Since March 2023, Jiaoda Onlly's current management has initiated multiple lawsuits against former executives, discovering that their actions resulted in a loss of approximately 21 million yuan in principal and interest [8][9]. - The company has reported difficulties in obtaining original documents related to the insurance transactions, which complicates the investigation [9]. - The management plans to apply for administrative review following the police's refusal to file a case based on the initial report [9]. Group 3: Corporate Governance and Shareholder Dynamics - The current management asserts that the pursuit of accountability from former executives is unrelated to the ongoing power struggle within the company, which began in 2022 [10][14]. - As of the first quarter of 2025, Shanghai Yunjian Industrial Development Co., Ltd. and its affiliates hold over 30% of Jiaoda Onlly's shares, while Dazhong Transportation holds 14.48% [15]. - The chairman of Jiaoda Onlly, Ji Min, emphasized that the accountability measures align with the interests of Dazhong Transportation as a shareholder [17].

Core Viewpoint - The current management of Jiaoda Onlly is committed to holding former executives accountable for their alleged misconduct involving insurance purchases and refunds, which have resulted in significant financial losses for the company [6][9][21]. Summary by Sections Background of the Case - The Shanghai Securities Regulatory Commission issued a warning letter indicating that Jiaoda Onlly had issues with the disclosure of executive compensation in its 2016 and 2018 annual reports [5]. - The current management revealed that former executives, including Yang Guoping, used company funds to purchase group insurance and subsequently refunded the premiums to their personal accounts [5][6]. Details of the Insurance Transactions - In October 2016, Jiaoda Onlly transferred 3.8 million yuan to Tianan Life for group insurance premiums, with the insured being former executives [8]. - In November 2017, Yang Guoping signed for a refund of 1.0936 million yuan, with a total of 3.7924 million yuan refunded to five former executives [8]. - In January 2018, the company paid a total of 12.84 million yuan for another group insurance policy, with refunds occurring in January 2019 totaling 1.584 million yuan to the same group of executives [8]. Legal and Compliance Issues - The management stated that these transactions were not disclosed publicly and lacked proper decision-making processes, including board resolutions and contract approvals [9]. - Legal opinions indicated that the actions of the former executives potentially violated laws regarding the misappropriation of company assets, constituting a crime of embezzlement [9][11]. Current Management Actions - Since March 2023, the current management has initiated legal actions against the former executives, discovering that their actions resulted in a loss of 21 million yuan in principal and interest [11]. - The management has reported the case to the police and submitted additional evidence, although they faced challenges in obtaining some information due to the covert nature of the transactions [13][14]. Shareholder Dynamics - The current management emphasized that their pursuit of accountability is aligned with the interests of their major shareholder, Dazhong Transportation, which holds a significant stake in Jiaoda Onlly [21]. - As of the first quarter of 2025, the major shareholders include Shanghai Yun Jian Industrial Development Co., which holds over 30% of the shares, while Dazhong Transportation holds 14.48% [19][21].