非银行金融 2025 年 08 月 22 日 行业点评 新单量价双升，友邦 25H1 业绩稳增 强于大市（维持） 行情走势图 相关研究报告 【平安证券】行业半年度策略报告-非银行金融-高 质量发展引领价值重估，头部公司更具韧性——非 银金融行业 2025 年中期策略报告-强于大市 20250701 【平安证券】行业点评-非银行金融-国有险企长周 期考核再加强，助力长期稳健投资-强于大市 20250713 【平安证券】行业点评-非银行金融-人身险预定利 率再下调，分红险具备比较优势-强于大市 20250727 证券分析师 事项： 友邦保险发布 2025 半年报，25H1 年化新保费 49.42 亿美元（YoY+8%，按固 定汇率，下同）、NBV 约 28.38 亿美元（YoY+14%，扣除资本要求等、归母口 径）、NBVM 约 57.7%（YoY+3.4pct），EV约 708.53 亿美元（YoY+0%）。宣派 中期股息增加 10%至每股 0.49 港元。 平安观点： 中国内地与中国香港业务双轮驱动，新单与 NBV 增长具备韧性。 1）中国内地业务表现稳健。中国内地 25H1 年化新保费小幅下滑至 12.68 ...

"通过举牌投资方式，险资能够有效平滑股价波动对当期利润报表的影响。"他告诉记者。IFRS9规 定，保险公司持股比例逾5%的股票可计入FVOCI账户（以公允价值计量且其变动计入其他综合收 益的金融资产）。保险公司通过举牌投资，就可以将高股息上市公司持仓纳入FVOCI账户，令相 关投资不会显著影响保险公司利润报表，对平滑险资利润波动有着显著作用。 记者多方了解到，今年险资频频举牌银行保险板块H股的另一个重要考量，是在低利率与资产荒双 重环境下重构资产配置。 在低利率环境下，海外保险行业的资产配置策略出现四大调 整，分别是拉长债券久期、信用下沉、增配股票与增持另类资 产。当前境内保险行业正借鉴海外保险资金资产配置经验，努 力构建适合国内市场的多元资产配置策略，包括通过FVOCI账 户增持红利资产（高股息上市公司等），满足自身资产负债匹 配、现金流管理及平滑利润波动的需要。 作者：陈植 封图：图虫创意 8月以来，险资举牌金融板块上市公司依旧动作频频。 8月8日，平安资管买入中国太保H股110万股，每股交易均价32.28港元，总持股数量达1.38亿股， 占中国太保已发行H股股份的5%，触发举牌。 8月11日，中国平安买 ...

业内专家支招:三大应对策略助您从容应对 预定利率即将下调至2.0%,对普通人买保险的影响重大。中国保险行业协会近期明确普通型人身保险产 品预定利率研究值为1.99%,已连续两个季度低于现行2.5%上限,正式触发调整机制。中国人保、中国人 寿等多家险企公告,新备案保险产品预定利率上限将降至2.0%,分红型为1.75%,万能型最低保证利率为 1.0%。现行高利率产品预计于8月31日停售,各公司将在两个月内完成新旧产品切换。 预定利率是保险公司在设计产品时预设的投资回报率,直接影响消费者投保后的收益水平与保费成本。 预定利率越高,年金险未来可领取金额越多,重疾险等保障型产品保费越低。此次利率下调旨在应对潜在 利差损风险,匹配市场利率下行趋势,防范行业系统性风险,保障消费者长远利益。 利率下调带来三大影响:普通人的 "钱袋子" 将受这些冲击 储蓄型保险收益显著缩水。业内人士指出,预定利率是计算年金险未来领取金额的重要基础,一旦下调,同 样保费未来领取养老金将明显减少。增额终身寿险等储蓄型产品现金价值增长放缓,长期财富增值效应 减弱,影响养老储备、子女教育金规划家庭的收益预期。 保障型保险保费面临上涨。从过往情况来看, ...

Core Insights - The insurance industry has reported its investment performance for the first half of the year, with 135 companies disclosing their financial investment yield and comprehensive investment yield [1][2] - The average financial investment yield for these companies is approximately 1.97%, while the average comprehensive investment yield is about 2.22% [1][2] Financial Investment Yield - The financial investment yield has shown a year-on-year increase, with a median of 1.72% and 92% of companies reporting yields below 3% [2] - The increase in financial investment yield is attributed to the decline in long-term interest rates, which has positively impacted the prices of held-to-maturity assets [2] Comprehensive Investment Yield - The comprehensive investment yield has decreased year-on-year, with a median of 1.91% and 87% of companies reporting yields below 3% [2] - The decline is influenced by market volatility affecting equity assets and risks associated with certain non-standard assets [2] Performance by Company Type - Life insurance companies generally outperform property insurance companies in terms of investment yields, with life insurers achieving an average financial investment yield of 2.15% and a comprehensive yield of 2.54% [3] - The highest financial investment yield recorded was 22.15% by Fubon Property Insurance, while the highest comprehensive yield was 22.53% [3] Strategies for Improvement - Experts suggest that insurance companies should optimize asset structures, diversify profit sources, and enhance asset-liability matching to improve investment yields and mitigate interest spread loss risks [4][5] - Specific recommendations include adjusting product structures and pricing rates in response to declining interest rates, as well as exploring new development models to meet customer needs [4][5]

Investment Rating - The report maintains a "Positive" outlook on the non-bank financial industry, indicating an expectation for the sector to outperform the overall market [3][6]. Core Insights - The insurance sector has shown a significant increase, with the Shenwan Insurance II Index rising by 3.20%, outperforming the CSI 300 Index by 0.83 percentage points. Notably, Ping An Insurance has increased its stake in China Pacific Insurance (H) and China Life Insurance (H), triggering regulatory notifications [3][6]. - The report highlights a resurgence in insurance companies' acquisitions of peers, with 32 announcements made in 2024, the highest since 2016. As of August 14, 2025, 14 insurance institutions have made 24 acquisition announcements, involving 20 listed companies [3][6]. - The report emphasizes the positive implications of declining long-term interest rates and the entry of long-term capital into the market, suggesting a favorable environment for insurance companies [3][6]. Summary by Sections Market Review - The CSI 300 Index closed at 4,202.35 with a weekly change of +2.4%, while the non-bank index closed at 2,079.34 with a change of +6.5%. The brokerage, insurance, and diversified financial sectors reported changes of +8.2%, +3.2%, and +4.5%, respectively [6][10]. Non-Bank Industry Insights - The report notes that as of August 15, 2025, the 10-year government bond yield was 1.75%, with a weekly increase of 2.62 basis points. The insurance sector's performance is closely tied to these interest rate movements [13][19]. - The report also mentions that the average daily trading volume in A-shares has increased significantly, indicating a robust market environment for brokers [19][39]. Investment Recommendations - For the insurance sector, the report recommends focusing on undervalued stocks, specifically China Life (H), China Pacific Insurance, New China Life, Ping An, China Property & Casualty, and China Re [3][6]. - In the brokerage sector, the report suggests three investment themes: strong comprehensive institutions benefiting from improved competition, brokers with significant earnings elasticity, and firms with strong international business capabilities [3][6].

Investment Rating - The report maintains an "Overweight" rating for the insurance sector, indicating a positive outlook compared to the overall market performance [4][6]. Core Insights - The recent increase in insurance capital's stake in insurance companies, particularly China Ping An's acquisition of China Pacific Insurance (H), signals a renewed interest in the sector's investment value [3][4]. - The insurance sector has seen a surge in stake acquisitions, with 32 announcements in 2024, the highest since 2016, reflecting a growing trend among insurance companies to invest in listed firms [4]. - The report highlights a significant improvement in the cost of new liabilities for insurance companies, with a notable decrease in the new liability costs across major firms, which is expected to positively impact valuations [5][6]. Summary by Sections Stake Acquisition Trends - China Ping An increased its stake in China Pacific Insurance (H) to 5.04%, marking the second instance of insurance capital acquiring insurance companies since 2015 [3][4]. - In 2024, insurance companies have made 24 stake acquisitions involving 20 listed companies, indicating a strong trend in the sector [4]. Financial Performance Metrics - The average interest spread for listed insurance companies from 2017 to 2024 shows positive performance, with China Ping An at 323 basis points, China Pacific at 259 basis points, and others following [5]. - The new liability costs for major insurance firms have improved significantly, with China Ping An at 2.42%, China Life at 2.43%, and China Pacific at 2.60%, reflecting effective cost management [5]. Dividend and Valuation Insights - The insurance sector exhibits both aggressive growth potential and high dividend characteristics, with expected dividend yields ranging from 1.6% to 5.3% for listed firms [6]. - The report suggests focusing on undervalued stocks for potential valuation recovery, recommending companies like China Pacific, China Life, and others for investment consideration [6].

Core Viewpoint - The recent comprehensive reduction of the predetermined interest rates for life insurance products is leading to a wave of product discontinuations in the market, with companies proactively switching to lower-rate products to optimize their liabilities [1][2][3]. Group 1: Product Discontinuation - Many insurance products have been discontinued recently, with some experiencing "lightning" stoppages, such as a dividend-type life insurance with a guaranteed rate of 2.0% being pulled from the market within two hours of notification [2]. - Several insurance companies have announced the discontinuation of multiple products and adjustments to the maximum predetermined interest rates for new filings, with ordinary insurance products set at 2.0%, dividend products at 1.75%, and universal insurance products at 1.0% [2]. - The recent adjustments reflect a non-symmetrical reduction in predetermined interest rates, with ordinary and universal products down by 50 basis points and dividend products down by 25 basis points [2]. Group 2: Market Dynamics - The insurance market has shown a relatively calm atmosphere prior to the recent rate reductions, contrasting with previous instances where speculation around product discontinuation was rampant [3]. - Regulatory measures have been strictly enforced to control sales misguidance, contributing to a more rational consumer behavior and reducing the anxiety surrounding product discontinuation [3]. Group 3: Product Strategy - Insurance companies are actively promoting the transformation towards dividend insurance products, with many updating a significant number of their offerings to highlight the advantages of these products in the new interest rate environment [4]. - The predetermined interest rate for dividend products is strategically set lower than that of other types, enhancing their relative appeal, especially as the potential investment returns could exceed those of traditional products [4][5]. - The risk-sharing mechanism of dividend products helps alleviate the pressure of interest rate differentials for insurance companies, allowing for greater investment flexibility [5]. Group 4: Diversification Opportunities - While dividend insurance is currently favored, there is a call for product diversification to avoid excessive competition in a single market segment [5]. - Companies are encouraged to explore three areas for diversification: health insurance products that align with aging demographics, integration with the pension industry, and the development of specialized insurance products in collaboration with public resources [5].

Group 1: Report Industry Investment Rating - No relevant content provided Group 2: Core Viewpoints of the Report - The market overestimates the credit risk of Zhonghua Property Insurance, and there is significant downward potential for the yield of its capital supplementary bonds, making them highly cost - effective. This is due to its strong shareholder background as a pure central - enterprise subsidiary, its leading market share with strong competitiveness, the turnaround in underwriting profitability, and the relatively low risk of interest rate spread loss for property insurance companies [2] Group 3: Summary by Directory 1. Controlling Shareholder with Strong Strength and Diverse Board for Stable Operation - **1.1 State - owned Holding Dominant, Controllable Related - Party Transaction Risks** - As of March 2025, Zhonghua United Property Insurance's registered capital was 1.464 billion yuan, with Zhonghua United Insurance Group holding 87.93%. The actual controller is Orient Asset. As of March 2025, all related - party transaction indicators met regulatory requirements [2][7] - **1.2 Stable and Experienced Management, Diverse Board for Stable Operation** - As of July 13, 2025, the company's board consisted of 9 directors. Since 2024, the chairman and general manager have remained unchanged. Board members' experiences cover multiple fields, which is conducive to the company's stable operation [12][14] 2. Underwriting End: Steady Development of Auto Insurance and Expansion of Agricultural Insurance Growth Pole - **2.1 Auto Insurance as the Main Product, Steady Increase in Agricultural Insurance Premium Income** - In 2024, the company's annual insurance business income was 6.8151 billion yuan, with a year - on - year growth of 4.39%. The top three products were auto insurance, agricultural insurance, and short - term personal insurance, with original premium incomes of 2.9323 billion yuan (43.05% of total premium income), 1.8081 billion yuan (26.54%), and 1.3315 billion yuan (19.55%) respectively. The proportion of non - auto insurance business income increased from 34.87% in 2021 to 37.41% in 2024 [16][17] - **2.2 Agent Channels as the Main Sales Channel, Declining Premium Contribution of Direct Sales and Broker Channels** - In 2024, the insurance agency, direct sales, and brokerage business revenues were 3.5112 billion yuan, 2.7147 billion yuan, and 0.5892 billion yuan respectively, accounting for 51.52%, 39.83%, and 8.64% of the total. The agency channel's income increased significantly, while the direct sales and brokerage channels' incomes decreased [22] 3. Investment End: Fixed - Income Investments as the Main Allocation, Decreasing Proportion of Equity Assets - From 2022 to 2024, the company's investment portfolio (cash and investment assets before impairment provisions) increased from 5.0543 billion yuan to 5.763 billion yuan, with a compound annual growth rate of 6.78%. In 2024, fixed - income investments accounted for 76.85%. The company optimized its investment structure in 2024, reducing the scale and proportion of equity assets [25][32] 4. Initial Signs of Underwriting Profit Recovery, Steady Progress in Capital and Liquidity Management - **4.1 Initial Success in Underwriting Profit Recovery, Pressured Investment Income** - From 2022 to 2024, the company's operating income increased from 5.5609 billion yuan to 6.3186 billion yuan, with a compound annual growth rate of 6.60%. In 2024, the net profit attributable to the parent company increased by 41.21% year - on - year to 0.95 billion yuan. The underwriting profit increased from - 0.214 billion yuan in 2023 to 0.452 billion yuan in 2024 [36][42] - **4.2 Capital Supplement Boosts Comprehensive Solvency, Robust Liquidity Risk Management** - In 2024, the company's core solvency ratio was 137.37%, and the comprehensive solvency ratio was 227.84%. At the end of the first quarter of 2025, the comprehensive solvency ratio was 236.88%, and the core solvency ratio was 145.67%. The company's liquidity risk was low, and its assets could meet cash - flow payment needs [49][56] 5. Facing Multiple Pressures and Challenges, Actively Adjusting Strategies for Stable Operation - **5.1 Frequent Penalties, Credit Insurance "Explosions", Rating Downgrades: Multiple Pressures on Zhonghua Property Insurance** - The company has been involved in events such as the credit guarantee insurance business of the P2P platform Houben Finance and the Luckin Coffee financial fraud case. It has also received many regulatory penalties in recent years. In 2024, Fitch downgraded the company's rating [60][61] - **5.2 Flexible Use of Reinsurance Strategies, Optimization of Cost Control** - In 2024, the company's reinsurance cession premium was 0.571 billion yuan, accounting for 8.38% of the total insurance business income. The company's comprehensive expense ratio decreased from 26.56% in 2022 to 23.04% in 2024, and the comprehensive cost ratio also decreased [63][70] 6. How to Evaluate the Investment Value of Zhonghua Property Insurance's Capital Bonds? - The company's existing capital tools amount to 8 billion yuan, all of which are paying interest normally, and there have been no historical default events. The spread of the company's long - remaining - term capital supplementary bonds is higher than the industry average, and there is significant downward potential for the yield, indicating high cost - effectiveness [73][75]

Investment Rating - The report maintains an "Overweight" rating for the insurance industry [2] Core Insights - The average duration gap in the insurance industry is approximately -7 years, with a trend of widening expected post-2024, particularly in the life insurance sector [5][21] - Large insurance companies generally maintain a duration gap around -5 years, while small to medium-sized insurers exhibit a widening gap, indicating a disparity in asset-liability management [5][21] - The report emphasizes the importance of managing duration gaps to mitigate interest rate risks and reinvestment risks, especially in a low-interest-rate environment [5][21] Summary by Sections 1. Introduction: Duration Gap in Insurance Asset-Liability Matching - Duration gap refers to the difference between asset duration and liability duration, categorized into various types [9] - The report highlights the increasing duration gap due to the issuance of long-term savings products by life insurers [9][10] 2. Calculation of Duration Gap and Industry Data Statistics - The average duration gap for life insurance companies from 2020 to 2022 was -6.67 years, -6.57 years, and -6.28 years, respectively [21] - The report identifies a trend where over 65% of companies have seen their duration gaps widen, with many experiencing an increase of over 2 years [23][26] 3. Significance and Measures for Duration Gap Management - Effective duration gap management is crucial for balancing asset-liability management in insurance companies [5] - Suggested measures to narrow the duration gap include increasing allocations to long-term bonds, developing long-term equity investments, and adjusting product structures to enhance liability duration [5][21] 4. Investment Recommendations - The report suggests focusing on companies like New China Life, Ping An, AIA, China Life, China Pacific, and PICC, which are well-positioned to benefit from the dual dividend attributes of insurance stocks [5][21]

Core Viewpoint - The financial industry is undergoing a value reassessment during the interest rate down cycle, with significant differences in the underlying logic of banks, insurance, and brokerage firms [2][6]. Group 1: Banking Sector - The banking sector is facing three main concerns: declining interest margins, potential bad debts, and future credit demand post-economic restructuring [7]. - The net interest margin for listed banks has been on a downward trend, currently around 1.5%, which may not cover operational costs and potential bad debts [7]. - Despite concerns about bad debts, the asset quality of banks has been gradually improving, with non-performing loan ratios decreasing over the years [9]. - The real estate sector's downturn has raised concerns about banks' bad debts, but recent policy changes have restored some market confidence [9]. - There is a significant disparity in the performance and asset quality among different banks, with some achieving over 10% annual profit growth while others face negative growth [12][13]. Group 2: Insurance Sector - The insurance industry is influenced by stock market performance, policy sales, and long-term bond interest rates, with a strong correlation observed historically [19][20]. - The current low interest rate environment poses a risk of interest margin loss for insurance companies, but recent improvements in policy sales are noted [23]. - The aging population is expected to drive insurance demand growth, and the suppressed demand during the pandemic is gradually being released [29]. Group 3: Brokerage Sector - Mergers and acquisitions are expected to be a key theme for the brokerage sector this year, alongside a recovery in market trading volume [32]. - The brokerage business may face challenges in proprietary trading, particularly in bond investments, which have contributed significantly to profits in the past [32]. - The potential for a revival in IPO activities is being closely monitored, especially in the Hong Kong market [32].