Performance Highlights - Tencent Holdings (00700.HK) reported Q3 revenue of 192.87 billion yuan, a year-on-year increase of 15% and a quarter-on-quarter increase of 5%. Net profit reached 63.13 billion yuan, up 19% year-on-year and 13% quarter-on-quarter [2] - Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corporation (00981.HK) achieved Q3 sales revenue of 2.38 billion USD, a quarter-on-quarter increase of 7.8% and a year-on-year increase of 9.7%. Gross margin improved to 22.0%, up 1.6 percentage points quarter-on-quarter [3] - JD Group (09618.HK) reported Q3 total revenue of 299.06 billion yuan, a year-on-year increase of 14.85%, while net profit decreased by 55.03% to 5.28 billion yuan [4] - JD Logistics (02618.HK) recorded Q3 revenue of 55.08 billion yuan, a year-on-year increase of 24.1%, with operating profit rising by 125.3% to 1.24 billion yuan [5] - Bilibili (09626.HK) achieved Q3 net revenue of 7.69 billion yuan (1.08 billion USD), a year-on-year increase of 5%, and turned a profit with a net profit of 469 million yuan (65.9 million USD) [6] Company News - Heng Rui Medicine (01276.HK) received clinical trial approval for its drug, with similar products expected to generate global sales of approximately 11.04 billion USD in 2024 [7] - China Pacific Insurance (02601.HK) reported that for the first ten months, life insurance premium income reached 241.32 billion yuan, a year-on-year increase of 9.9% [8] - Zhong An Online (06060.HK) reported total original insurance premium income of approximately 29.82 billion yuan for the first ten months, a year-on-year increase of 5.18% [9] Buyback Activities - Yongsheng Services (01995.HK) plans to repurchase up to approximately 173 million shares, accounting for about 10% of the issued share capital [12] - Kintor Pharmaceutical (02171.HK) intends to repurchase up to approximately 25.46 million shares [13] - China Feihe (06186.HK) spent 87.86 million HKD to repurchase 20 million shares at prices ranging from 4.37 to 4.40 HKD [14]

Core Viewpoint - ZhongAn Online (06060) reported a total original insurance premium income of approximately RMB 29.822 billion for the first ten months of 2025, representing a year-on-year growth of 5.18% [1] Company Summary - The total original insurance premium income for ZhongAn Online reached approximately RMB 29.822 billion [1] - The year-on-year growth rate of the insurance premium income is 5.18% [1]

Core Viewpoint - ZhongAn Online (06060.HK) announced that the total original insurance premium income for the period from January 1, 2025, to October 31, 2025, is approximately RMB 29.822 billion [1] Summary by Relevant Categories - **Company Performance** - The total original insurance premium income for ZhongAn Online is projected to be around RMB 29.822 billion for the specified period [1]

（於中華人民共和國註冊成立的股份有限公司，並以「ZA Online Fintech P & C」在香港經營業務） 香港交易及結算所有限公司及香港聯合交易所有限公司對本公告的內容概不負責，對其準確性或完 整性亦不發表任何聲明，並明確表示，概不對因本公告全部或任何部分內容而產生或因倚賴該等內 容而引致的任何損失承擔任何責任。 眾安在綫財產保險股份有限公司 ZHONGAN ONLINE P & C INSURANCE CO., LTD.* 中國上海，2025年11月13日 （股份代號：6060） 於本公告日期，本公司董事會包括兩名執行董事姜興先生及李高峰先生，五名非執行董事歐亞平先 生、史良洵先生、張爽先生、歐晉羿先生及尹海先生，以及四名獨立非執行董事歐偉先生、鄭慧恩 女士、陳詠芝女士及蔡朝暉先生。 關於保費收入的公告 * 僅供識別及以「ZA Online Fintech P & C」在香港經營業務 承董事會命 眾安在綫財產保險股份有限公司 董事長 尹海 眾安在綫財產保險股份有限公司（「本公司」）於二零二五年一月一日至二零二五年十 月三十一日所獲得的原保險保費收入總額約為人民幣29,822百萬元。上述資料按照 中華 ...

Core Viewpoint - The incident involving the high rebate scheme of Baibaokun, incubated by ZhongAn Insurance, has led to significant financial implications and ongoing investigations, with ZhongAn Insurance distancing itself from the operational management of Baibaokun [1][2]. Group 1: Company Actions - ZhongAn Insurance announced the complete transfer of shares in Baibaokun's operating company, Baibao (Shanghai) Technology Co., Ltd., following the high rebate incident [1]. - The company stated that it had not participated in the actual management of Baibao and had not received operational feedback since 2023 [1]. - ZhongAn Insurance is currently monitoring the investigation by law enforcement, claiming to be a victim in this situation [1]. Group 2: Business Model and User Impact - Baibaokun attracted customers through a model involving "purchase rights + excessive returns of JD.com gift cards + high points rewards," but is currently unable to fulfill promised returns [2]. - Users reported that the total amount involved in the Baibaokun incident could exceed 100 million yuan, although this figure has not been independently verified [2]. - The operational company, Baibao, was established in April 2021, with a registered capital of approximately 12.16 million yuan and a paid-in capital of 6.92 million yuan [2].

Group 1 - Chery Automobile issued an apology following an incident during a test at Tianmen Mountain, where a vehicle crashed into a guardrail due to a safety failure, highlighting insufficient risk assessment and detail management in the testing process [2][3] - The incident has sparked widespread discussion online, with Chery committing to repair the damage and take responsibility for the aftermath [3] Group 2 - The extradition of She Zhijiang, a leader of a cross-border gambling and fraud group, back to China was completed, with the group operating 239 illegal gambling websites and involving over 2.7 trillion yuan [6] - Luckin Coffee's CEO announced preparations for a relisting on the US stock market, indicating a strategic move to regain market presence [7] Group 3 - Microsoft plans to leverage its access to OpenAI's custom chip technology to enhance its internal chip development efforts, with a long-term agreement allowing access to OpenAI's models until 2032 [11] - Xiaomi has recruited former DeepSeek researcher Luo Fuli to lead its AI model team, aiming to develop advanced AI technologies [12] Group 4 - A significant Bitcoin money laundering case in the UK resulted in a sentence of 11 years and 8 months for a Chinese woman involved in laundering approximately 61,000 Bitcoins, valued at nearly 50 billion pounds [15] - ByteDance terminated a researcher from its large model team due to multiple leaks, emphasizing the importance of confidentiality in tech development [16] Group 5 - The "Baibaojun" high-return investment scheme by ZhongAn Insurance faced backlash after failing to deliver promised returns, with the company stating it had divested from the scheme and is now a victim of the situation [29] - New regulations for coronary heart disease insurance reimbursement in China are set to significantly reduce patient financial burdens, expected to save over 12 billion yuan annually [31]

Core Viewpoint - The recent "Baibaojun high rebate incident" has led to significant developments for ZhongAn Insurance, including the transfer of all shares of Baibao Company, the operator of Baibaojun, by its subsidiary ZhongAn Technology [2][3]. Group 1: Company Actions - ZhongAn Insurance announced that it has transferred all shares of Baibao Company, which operates Baibaojun, following the high rebate incident [2]. - The company stated that it had not participated in the actual management of Baibao Company and had only invested through an intangible asset evaluation [2]. - ZhongAn Technology decided to exit Baibao Company in 2024 and signed a share transfer agreement in May 2025 [2]. Group 2: Incident Details - The Baibaojun platform utilized a model of "purchasing rights + excess return of JD.com gift cards + high reward points" to attract customers, but it is currently unable to fulfill promised returns [3]. - Reports suggest that the amount involved in the Baibaojun incident may exceed 100 million yuan, although this figure has not been independently verified [3]. - Baibao Company was established in April 2021, with a registered capital of approximately 12.16 million yuan and a paid-in capital of 6.92 million yuan [3].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the recent "high rebate" incident involving Baibaojun, which was incubated by Zhong'an Insurance, and highlights the company's response and the ongoing investigation into the matter [3][4]. Group 1: Company Response - Zhong'an Insurance announced that its subsidiary, Zhong'an Technology, has transferred all shares of Baibao Company, the operator of Baibaojun, following the incident [3]. - The company stated that it had not participated in the actual management of Baibao Company and had not received operational feedback since 2023 [3]. - Zhong'an Insurance claims to be a victim in this situation and is monitoring the investigation by law enforcement [3]. Group 2: Incident Details - The Baibaojun platform attracted customers through a model involving "purchase rights + excessive returns of JD.com gift cards + high reward points," but it has failed to deliver promised returns [4]. - Users reported that the total amount involved in the Baibaojun incident could exceed 100 million yuan, although this figure has not been independently verified [4]. - Baibao Company was established in April 2021, with a registered capital of approximately 12.16 million yuan and only eight insured individuals in 2024 [4]. Group 3: Industry Analysis - Industry insiders suggest that the platform may have initially operated on a revenue-sharing model with partners but later shifted to a high-rebate scheme resembling a Ponzi scheme [5].

Core Viewpoint - The incident involving the high rebate scheme of Baibaojun, incubated by ZhongAn Insurance, has led to significant financial implications and legal investigations, with ZhongAn Insurance confirming its exit from the operation of Baibaojun [1][2]. Group 1: Company Actions - ZhongAn Insurance announced that its subsidiary, ZhongAn Technology, has transferred all shares of Baibao Company, the operator of Baibaojun [1]. - The legal representative and actual controller of Baibao Company is Li Xuefeng, who previously served as the CTO of ZhongAn Technology [2]. - ZhongAn Insurance stated that it has not participated in the actual management of Baibao Company and has been a victim in this situation, monitoring the ongoing police investigation [1]. Group 2: Business Model and User Impact - Baibaojun attracted customers through a model of "purchasing rights + excessive return of JD.com gift cards + high points rewards," but is currently unable to fulfill promised returns [2]. - Users reported that the total amount involved in the Baibaojun incident may exceed 100 million yuan, although this figure has not been independently verified [2]. - The operational model of Baibaojun has been likened to a high-rebate Ponzi scheme, diverging from its initial profit-sharing model with partners [2].

Core Insights - The highest short-selling ratios were observed for Lenovo Group-R, Li Ning-R, and JD Health-R, all at 100.00% [1] - The top three companies by short-selling amount were Alibaba-SW, Tencent Holdings, and Xpeng Motors, with amounts of 2.028 billion, 1.373 billion, and 1.113 billion respectively [1] - The highest deviation values were recorded for SenseTime-WR, Lenovo Group-R, and Kuaishou-WR, with values of 39.79%, 32.17%, and 30.02% respectively [1] Short-Selling Ratio Rankings - Lenovo Group-R had a short-selling amount of 1.6136 million with a ratio of 100.00% and a deviation of 32.17% [2] - Li Ning-R reported a short-selling amount of 23.8 thousand with a ratio of 100.00% and a deviation of 21.97% [2] - JD Health-R had a short-selling amount of 16.8 thousand with a ratio of 100.00% and a deviation of 26.39% [2] - The short-selling ratio for SenseTime-WR was 93.15% with a short-selling amount of 851.7 thousand and a deviation of 39.79% [2] Short-Selling Amount Rankings - Alibaba-SW led with a short-selling amount of 2.028 billion, a ratio of 17.38%, and a deviation of 2.52% [2] - Tencent Holdings followed with a short-selling amount of 1.373 billion, a ratio of 16.18%, and a deviation of -0.71% [2] - Xpeng Motors had a short-selling amount of 1.113 billion, a ratio of 12.34%, and a deviation of -3.96% [2] Short-Selling Deviation Rankings - SenseTime-WR had the highest deviation value of 39.79% with a short-selling amount of 851.7 thousand and a ratio of 93.15% [2] - Lenovo Group-R followed with a deviation of 32.17%, a short-selling amount of 1.6136 million, and a ratio of 100.00% [2] - Kuaishou-WR recorded a deviation of 30.02% with a short-selling amount of 107.84 thousand and a ratio of 79.04% [2]