《中国经营报》记者获悉，近日，金地集团（600383.SH）进行组织架构调整，涉及总部、区域、城市 公司层面。 此轮调整始于总部层面，包括合并原工程管理中心与成本管理中心，成立"工程与成本管理中心"，新设 供应链管理中心，新增"综合审议工作小组"等。此后，金地集团对区域及地区公司进行整合，将现有的 5个区域公司精简为4个大区公司，同时把原来的城市公司整合为10个地区公司。上述调整伴随一系列人 事变动。 高管职责分工方面亦有所调整，总裁李荣辉分管集团供应链管理中心、财务资金中心、产业管理中心； 高级副总裁陈长春卸任北方大区公司董事长职务，回归集团分管投资管理中心、开发管理公司；高级副 总裁郝一斌回归一线，任北方大区公司董事长，并分管集团信息科技中心、稳盛投资基金；高级副总裁 韦传军不再分管稳盛投资基金；高级副总裁王南分管设计管理中心、营销管理中心，不再分管企划运营 中心、美国公司。 7月26日，金地集团公布新一轮组织架构调整方案，设立华南大区、北方大区、华东大区、中西部大 区，以及包括深圳地区公司、广州地区公司、北京地区公司、天津地区公司、东北地区公司、上海地区 公司在内的10个地区公司。人事方面较为显著的变动 ...

丨证券研究报告丨 行业研究丨行业周报丨房地产 [Table_Title] 如何看待反内卷对地产的间接影响？ ——房地产行业周度观点更新 报告要点 [Tablary] 地产行业属性与传统产能概念差别很大，直接出台相关反内卷政策的概率不高，但也会受到一 些间接影响。反内卷一定程度上将缓和物价下行压力，有助于降低实际利率，但可能对生产、 就业和收入等总量数据造成一定压力。关键还是需求端扩张性政策的配合，既提升居民就业和 收入预期，反内卷又降低实际利率，如此方能更有效地提振地产需求；但如果没有收入提升预 期，物价的提升反而会压制实际可支配收入，提振地产需求依赖总需求扩张引致的良性通胀， 而非供给侧优化之下的成本上涨。 分析师及联系人 [Table_Author] SAC：S0490520040001 SAC：S0490525060001 SFC：BUV416 刘义 侯兆熔 请阅读最后评级说明和重要声明 %% %% %% %% research.95579.com 1 [Table_Title 如何看待反内卷对地产的间接影响？ 2] ——房地产行业周度观点更新 核心观点 止跌回稳的政策目标一定程度上对市场预期有所提振， ...

量价回落，波动加剧 [Table_Industry] 房地产 ——中国城市运行周期跟踪（2025.Q2） | [姓名table_Authors] | 电话 | 邮箱 | 证书编号 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 涂力磊(分析师) | 021-23185710 | tulilei@gtht.com | S0880525040101 | | 谢皓宇(分析师) | 010-83939826 | xiehaoyu@gtht.com | S0880518010002 | | 白淑媛(分析师) | 021-38675923 | baishuyuan@gtht.com | S0880518010004 | 本报告导读： 2025 年 Q2 整体市场表现出成交量疲软、价格企稳但缺乏趋势以及库存上涨、去化 压力增大的特点。 投资要点： 房地产《确立无风险时代，相信未来》2025.07.17 房地产《城市发展存量提质，更新收储蓄势待 发》2025.07.16 房地产《第 28 周成交暂时回落，温和复苏趋势不 变》2025.07.14 房地产《房地双收，加速去库》2025.07.09 请务必阅读正文之后 ...

保交付依然是2025年楼市的重要工作之一。 近日，中指研究院发布的《2025上半年中国房地产企业交付规模排行榜》显示，2025年上半年，55家房地产企业累计交付房屋超过50万套，其中15家企业 交付房屋超万套。 《每日经济新闻》记者注意到，与去年同期相比，新房交付已过高峰期，房企交付套数普遍下降，包括绿地集团、融创中国、建业集团等房企的交付规模 下降超50%，"保交付"压力持续减轻。 "随着销售高峰期项目陆续交付，'保交付'进入新的阶段。"上海易居房地产研究院副院长严跃进接受每经记者微信采访时表示，一方面，交付工作仍是房 企履行主体责任的核心内容；另一方面，行业交付高峰已过，压力持续减轻，下一步谋求发展是企业经营的新重心。 交付量普遍回落，部分房企降幅超50% 行业保交付的压力正在趋缓。 亿翰智库监测数据显示，今年上半年，上榜企业交付量普遍下滑，部分房企如绿地集团、融创中国、建业集团等交付套数降幅超50%。位列交付榜前三位 的企业分别是碧桂园、保利发展和中海地产，交付套数分别是75000套、65000套和42155套，企业间交付量差异明显。排名前十位的房企交付总套数为 38.08万套，占50家房企总交付套数的 ...

Report Industry Investment Rating No information regarding the industry investment rating is provided in the given content. Core Viewpoints of the Report - In the volatile market, credit bonds outperformed interest - rate bonds. Interest - rate bond yields slightly declined, while credit bond yields dropped more significantly. Credit spreads mostly decreased slightly, with the 3Y variety showing a relatively larger decline [2][5]. - Urban investment bond spreads generally compressed slightly. Spreads of external ratings AAA, AA +, and AA platforms decreased by 1BP respectively. Spreads also declined when classified by administrative levels [2][9][15]. - Most industrial bond spreads decreased. Central and state - owned enterprise real - estate bond spreads declined, mixed - ownership real - estate bond spreads decreased, and private - enterprise real - estate bond spreads increased. Spreads of coal, steel, and chemical bonds also decreased [2][18]. - The yields of secondary and perpetual bonds followed the decline of certificates of deposit, with the short - to - medium - term performing relatively strongly [2][21]. - The excess spreads of 5Y industrial bonds and 3Y urban investment bonds slightly decreased [2][24]. Summary by Directory 1. Credit Bonds Outperformed Interest - Rate Bonds in the Volatile Market - Interest - rate bond yields slightly declined. The yields of 1Y, 5Y, and 7Y China Development Bank bonds decreased by 2BP, 1BP, and 1BP respectively, while the 3Y and 10Y remained flat [2][5]. - Credit bond yields dropped more significantly. The yields of 1Y, 3Y, 5Y, 7Y, and 10Y credit bonds decreased to varying degrees [2][5]. - Credit spreads mostly decreased slightly, with the 3Y variety showing a relatively larger decline. Rating spreads and term spreads showed obvious differentiation [5]. 2. Urban Investment Bond Spreads Slightly Compressed - By external ratings, the spreads of AAA, AA +, and AA platforms decreased by 1BP respectively, with different changes in different regions [9]. - By administrative levels, the spreads of provincial, municipal, and district - level platforms decreased by 2BP, 1BP, and 1BP respectively, with different changes in different regions [15]. 3. Most Industrial Bond Spreads Decreased - Real - estate bonds: Central and state - owned enterprise real - estate bond spreads decreased by 2 - 4BP, mixed - ownership real - estate bond spreads decreased by 1BP, and private - enterprise real - estate bond spreads increased by 7BP [2][18]. - Other industrial bonds: The spreads of AAA, AA +, and AA coal bonds decreased by 2BP, 2BP, and 1BP respectively; the spreads of AAA and AA + steel bonds decreased by 2BP and 4BP respectively; and the spreads of all levels of chemical bonds decreased by 3BP [2][18]. 4. The Yields of Secondary and Perpetual Bonds Followed the Decline of Certificates of Deposit, with the Short - to - Medium - Term Performing Relatively Strongly - 1Y secondary and perpetual bonds: Yields decreased by 2 - 3BP, and spreads compressed by 1 - 2BP [21]. - 3Y secondary and perpetual bonds: The yields of secondary capital bonds decreased by 2BP, and spreads decreased by 2 - 3BP; the yields of perpetual bonds decreased by 3 - 4BP, and spreads decreased by 3 - 4BP [21]. - 5Y secondary and perpetual bonds: The yields of secondary capital bonds decreased by 1 - 2BP, and spreads compressed by 0 - 1BP; the yields of AA + and above perpetual bonds decreased by 1BP, and spreads increased by 1BP, while the yields of AA perpetual bonds decreased by 4BP, and spreads decreased by 2BP [21]. 5. The Excess Spreads of 5Y Industrial Bonds and 3Y Urban Investment Bonds Slightly Decreased - AAA 3Y industrial perpetual bond excess spreads remained at 3.82BP, at the 1.32% quantile since 2015; 5Y industrial perpetual bond excess spreads decreased by 0.86BP to 7.65BP, at the 4.18% quantile since 2015 [24]. - Urban investment AAA 3Y perpetual bond excess spreads decreased by 0.65BP to 3.75BP, at the 0.29% quantile; urban investment AAA 5Y perpetual bond excess spreads increased by 0.09BP to 10.21BP, at the 10.93% quantile [24]. 6. Credit Spread Database Compilation Instructions - Market - wide credit spreads, commercial bank secondary and perpetual spreads, and industrial/urban investment perpetual bond credit spreads are calculated based on ChinaBond medium - and short - term notes and ChinaBond perpetual bond data. Historical quantiles are since the beginning of 2015 [28]. - Industrial and urban investment bond credit spreads are compiled and statistically analyzed by Cinda Securities R & D Center, with historical quantiles since the beginning of 2015 [28]. - Specific calculation methods and sample selection criteria are provided, including how to calculate spreads, which samples to select, and which samples to exclude [31].

Core Viewpoint - The real estate industry is facing significant challenges in the first half of 2025, with a notable performance divergence among listed companies, as many report substantial losses while a few manage to turn profits [1][2]. Group 1: Overall Performance - As of July 17, 2025, 61 listed real estate companies have disclosed their mid-year performance forecasts, with a total expected loss ranging from 342.56 billion to 464.97 billion [1]. - Out of these, 24 companies anticipate profits while 37 expect losses, indicating that 60% of the companies are projected to report losses [1][2]. - The overall trend shows a decline in performance, with companies like China Vanke and Greenland Holdings shifting from profit to loss, while others like Joy City and Urban Construction Development have managed to turn losses into profits [1][2]. Group 2: Companies Turning Profits - In the first half of 2025, 24 companies are expected to achieve profits totaling between 68.68 billion and 80.16 billion, with 12 companies successfully reversing previous losses [2][3]. - Urban Construction Development is projected to report a net profit of 4.4 billion to 6.54 billion, marking a year-on-year increase of up to 575.14% [3][7]. - Other companies that have turned profitable include Zhongzhou Holdings, City Investment Holdings, and Joy City, showcasing resilience in a challenging market [2][3]. Group 3: Companies Reporting Losses - Among the 37 companies forecasting losses, 13 are expected to report their first-ever losses, including Shahe Co., Xiangjiang Holdings, and Greenland Holdings [8][11]. - The total expected loss for these companies ranges from 422.72 billion to 533.64 billion, with Vanke leading with a projected loss of 100 billion to 120 billion [8][11]. - Other notable companies with significant losses include Jindi Group, which anticipates a loss of 34 billion to 42 billion, and Xinda Real Estate, expecting a loss of 35 billion to 39 billion [11][12]. Group 4: Market Outlook - The overall real estate market is still in an adjustment phase, but signs of stabilization are emerging, particularly in first-tier and some strong second-tier cities [14]. - Analysts suggest that the second half of 2025 may present a turning point for the industry, with potential recovery driven by policy adjustments and improved buyer confidence [13][14]. - The top 100 real estate companies reported a total sales amount of 18,364.1 billion, a year-on-year decline of 11.8%, but the rate of decline is narrowing [13].

Group 1 - Gindai Group has experienced a decline for five consecutive trading days, with a cumulative drop of -7.28% [1] - Gindai Group, founded in Shenzhen in 1988 and listed on the Shanghai Stock Exchange in 2001, has developed into a comprehensive listed company focusing on real estate development and related diversified businesses [1] - Two funds under Xingquan Global Fund have entered the top ten shareholders of Gindai Group, both being new additions in the first quarter of this year [1] Group 2 - The two funds are Xingquan Business Model Mixed (LOF) A and Xingquan New Vision Open Mixed, with year-to-date returns of 6.58% and 6.12% respectively [1] - Xingquan Business Model Mixed (LOF) A ranks 2604 out of 4519 in its category, while Xingquan New Vision Open Mixed ranks 939 out of 2296 [1]

Core Viewpoint - The performance forecasts of real estate companies indicate a mixed recovery, with some companies turning losses into profits while others continue to face significant losses [1][3]. Group 1: Company Performance - As of July 17, 2025, 25 real estate companies listed on A-shares have disclosed their half-year performance forecasts, with 10 companies, including Poly Developments and Binjiang Group, reporting profits [1][3]. - Poly Developments leads with a forecasted net profit of 27.35 billion yuan, although this represents a decline compared to previous years [3]. - Binjiang Group is noted for its impressive profit growth, with an expected net profit increase of 40.01% to 69.98%, attributed to a higher volume of property deliveries [5][6]. Group 2: Profitability Trends - Among the 25 companies, 15 are expected to report losses, with notable companies like Kinka Real Estate and Financial Street showing potential for reduced losses in the upcoming period [3][4]. - Companies such as China Communications Real Estate and Greenland Holdings have seen their losses increase, while others like Jin Di Group have reported significant losses due to reduced sales and asset impairment provisions [4][5]. Group 3: Market Dynamics - The real estate market is experiencing a recovery driven by policy support, with significant increases in land sales and new housing transactions in cities like Beijing [7][8]. - The focus on high-quality product offerings and understanding consumer needs is emphasized as critical for companies to enhance their market competitiveness [8].

Group 1 - The company, through its subsidiary Vision Century Investments (China) Limited, provides a guarantee for a loan of up to RMB 57.5 million to Link JV Holdings Limited, with a maximum guarantee amount of RMB 28.75 million [1][2][3] - The loan is intended to support the development of a project located in Shanghai, with a loan term of up to 12 months [1][2] - The guarantee falls within the authorized limit approved by the company's board and shareholders, which allows for a total guarantee amount of up to RMB 10 billion [1][2][3] Group 2 - The company has a total external guarantee balance of RMB 17.991 billion, which accounts for 30.47% of the company's audited net assets attributable to shareholders for 2024 [3] - The guarantees provided to subsidiaries amount to RMB 12.779 billion, while guarantees to joint ventures and associates total RMB 5.212 billion [3] - There are no overdue guarantees reported by the company [3]

证券代码：600383 证券简称：金地集团 公告编号：2025-029 金地（集团）股份有限公司 科 学 筑 家 担保对象及基本情况 | | 被担保人名称 本次担保金额 | Link JV 28,750 | Holdings Limited 万元 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 担保对象 | 实际为其提供的担保余额 | 28,750 | 万元 | | | 是否在前期预计额度内 | 是 | | | | 本次担保是否有反担保 | 否 | | 关于为上海项目公司融资提供担保的公告 本公司董事会及全体董事保证本公告内容不存在任何虚假记载、误导性陈述 或者重大遗漏，并对其内容的真实性、准确性和完整性承担法律责任。 重要内容提示： 累计担保情况 | 对外担保逾期的累计金额（万元） | 0 | | --- | --- | | 截至本公告日上市公司及其控股子 公司对外担保总额（万元） | 1,799,081.40 | | 对外担保总额占上市公司最近一期 经审计净资产的比例（%） | 30.47 | 一、担保情况概述 （一） 担保的基本情况 金地（集团）股份有限公司（以下简称"公司"）之子公司 Gl ...