财通证券股份有限公司 可转债转股进展暨股份变动公告 本公司董事会及全体董事保证本公告内容不存在任何虚假记载、误导性陈 述或者重大遗漏，并对其内容的真实性、准确性和完整性承担法律责任。 重要内容提示： 1.自2021年6月16日至2025年9月30日期间，公司A股可转债累计转股金额为 582,000元，累计转股数量为49,149股，占可转债转股前公司已发行股份总数 （3,589,000,000股）的0.0014%。 | | | 转债代码：113043 转债简称：财通转债 2.截至 2025 年 9 月 30 日，公司尚未转股的可转债金额为 3,799,418,000 元， 占可转债发行总量的 99.9847%。 3.自 2025 年 7 月 1 日至 2025 年 9 月 30 日期间，公司 A 股可转债转股数量 为 1,600 股。 一、可转债发行上市概况 （一）可转债发行情况 经中国证券监督管理委员会（以下简称"中国证监会"）《关于核准财通证券 股份有限公司公开发行可转换公司债券的批复》（证监许可〔2020〕2927 号）核 准，财通证券股份有限公司（以下简称"公司"）于 2020 年 12 月 10 日公 ...

Core Viewpoint - The report from Caitong Securities highlights Lens Technology as a leading provider of one-stop precision manufacturing solutions for the entire industry chain of smart terminals, driven by technological innovation and intelligent manufacturing [1] Group 1 - Lens Technology is positioned as a key player in the global mid-to-high-end smartphone brand market, with projected revenue for 2024 [1]

Core Insights - The "Second Sina Finance Golden Unicorn Best Investment Advisor Selection" is currently underway, aiming to identify outstanding investment advisors and enhance the investment advisory IP construction [1] - The competition includes various categories such as stock simulation trading, ETF simulation trading, public fund simulation allocation, and social service evaluation, with over 10,000 investment advisors participating [1] ETF Simulation Trading Rankings - Liu Lichao from Dongguan Securities achieved the highest monthly return of 34.52% in the ETF simulation trading for September [2] - The second place was secured by She Wenzhi from Xiangcai Securities with a return of 24.66%, followed by Zhou Yang from Guoxin Securities with a return of 22.61% [2] - Other notable performers include Fan Chunqing from Nanjing Securities (19.86%) and Yang Yun from Zhongtai Securities (19.66%) [2][3] Performance Metrics - The top 10 investment advisors in the ETF simulation trading all reported returns above 16%, indicating strong performance in the simulated trading environment [2][3] - The rankings reflect a competitive landscape among investment advisors, showcasing their ability to generate significant returns in a simulated setting [1][2]

Group 1 - The core point of the news is that CATL's stock price increased by 5.19% to 422.87 CNY per share, with a trading volume of 11.551 billion CNY and a market capitalization of 1,928.986 billion CNY as of October 9 [1] - CATL is primarily engaged in the research, production, and sales of power batteries and energy storage batteries, with its products applied in various sectors including passenger vehicles, commercial vehicles, and energy storage systems [1] - The company's revenue composition includes 73.55% from power battery systems, 15.88% from energy storage systems, 4.41% from battery materials and recycling, and 1.88% from battery mineral resources [1] Group 2 - From the perspective of fund holdings, CATL is a top ten holding for a fund managed by Caitong Securities Asset Management, which reduced its holdings by 2,500 shares in the second quarter [2] - The fund, Caitong Asset Management Xinyi Mixed A, has a current scale of 20.39 million CNY and has achieved a year-to-date return of 24.46% [2] - The fund manager, Li Jing, has a tenure of 3 years and 343 days, with the best fund return during this period being 100.74% [3]

数据显示，财通证券资管旗下1只基金重仓兆丰股份。财通资管先进制造混合发起式A（021985）二季 度持有股数22.47万股，占基金净值比例为4.54%，位居第十大重仓股。根据测算，今日浮盈赚取约 117.07万元。 10月9日，兆丰股份涨5.03%，截至发稿，报108.81元/股，成交3528.33万元，换手率0.32%，总市值 111.27亿元。 资料显示，浙江兆丰机电股份有限公司位于浙江省杭州市萧山经济技术开发区桥南区块兆丰路6号，成 立日期2002年11月28日，上市日期2017年9月8日，公司主营业务涉及汽车轮毂轴承单元的研发、生产和 销售。主营业务收入构成为：轮毂轴承单元95.64%，分离轴承2.87%，材料、租赁等1.11%，其他零部 件0.38%。 从基金十大重仓股角度 财通资管先进制造混合发起式A（021985）基金经理为徐竞择。 截至发稿，徐竞择累计任职时间360天，现任基金资产总规模3.86亿元，任职期间最佳基金回报 92.19%， 任职期间最差基金回报91.45%。 风险提示：市场有风险，投资需谨慎。本文为AI大模型自动发布，任何在本文出现的信息（包括但不 限于个股、评论、预测、图表、指 ...

Global Asset Performance - Global stock indices mostly rose during the holiday week, with the MSCI global index up 0.8%, and Taiwan and Korea indices leading with gains of 3.6% each [2][5] - The US stock market saw slight increases in major indices, with the Nasdaq, Dow Jones, and S&P 500 rising by 0.5%, 0.8%, and 0.4% respectively [5][7] - In the bond market, US Treasury yields declined, while government bond yields in several other countries also fell [10][12] - The US dollar index decreased by 0.1% to 97.7, while the offshore RMB slightly depreciated by 0.1% to 7.14 [16][18] Overseas Economic Developments Monetary Policy in the US and Europe - There is a divergence in views regarding potential interest rate cuts by the Federal Reserve, with some officials advocating caution [18][20] - The European Central Bank's president indicated that the impact of tariffs on inflation is lower than expected, with inflation in the Eurozone remaining stable at around 2% [20][36] US Economic Indicators - The ADP report indicated a decrease of 32,000 jobs in September, with the leisure and hospitality sector seeing the largest declines [22][24] - The ISM non-manufacturing PMI fell to 50%, indicating weak business activity and continued pressure on employment [24][26] - The US housing market shows signs of recovery, with new home sales increasing by 20.5% month-on-month, although home prices remain under pressure [29][31] Government Shutdown Impact - The US government shutdown, which began on October 1, may last over a week, affecting the release of key economic data [27][31] - Historical data suggests that government shutdowns can slightly impact GDP growth, with estimates indicating a reduction of 0.1-0.2 percentage points per week [31][34] Commodity Market Trends - Global commodity prices, excluding oil, generally rose, with LME tin leading the gains at 4.2% [14][16] - Precious metals also saw increases, with COMEX gold up 2.7% and silver up 3.9% during the holiday week [14][16] Regional Economic Insights - Eurozone inflation remains stable, with a CPI increase to 2.2% in September, driven mainly by service costs [36][37] - Japan's political landscape is shifting with the election of the first female president of the ruling party, who is expected to continue a conservative policy approach [37]

Core Viewpoint - Zhejiang Securities Regulatory Bureau issued a warning letter to Caitong Securities and its assistant general manager, Qian Bin, due to management deficiencies related to overseas subsidiaries [2][3] Group 1: Regulatory Issues - Caitong Securities failed to establish an effective tracking system for decision-making and evaluation of outcomes for overseas subsidiaries [3] - The company did not have a robust risk management mechanism for overseas subsidiaries [3] - Some nominated directors of overseas subsidiaries did not meet the required qualifications [3] Group 2: Financial Performance - Caitong Hong Kong reported a revenue of HKD 46.73 million in the first half of 2025, representing a year-on-year increase of 180.36% [3] - The net profit for Caitong Hong Kong reached HKD 14.21 million, marking a turnaround from a loss in the previous year [3] - The company achieved significant results in overseas securities business through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Caitong Hong Kong, in the first half of 2025 [3] Group 3: Business Developments - Caitong Hong Kong received approvals for three major breakthroughs in cross-border business at the beginning of the year, including a securities trading code in Vietnam and permission from the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission to conduct certificate of deposit and virtual asset ETF brokerage trading [3]

Core Viewpoint - The recent penalties imposed on three brokerage firms highlight the ongoing compliance and internal control issues within the industry, emphasizing the need for stronger risk management practices as regulatory scrutiny intensifies [2][3][5]. Group 1: Penalties and Compliance Issues - Three brokerage firms, CITIC Securities, CITIC Jiantou, and Caitong Securities, were penalized within a short span, indicating a systemic issue in compliance execution across various business segments [2][3]. - CITIC Jiantou was penalized for failing to ensure timely disclosure of significant operational changes by its client, Yangguang Zhongke, which faced production halts [5][6]. - CITIC Securities received a warning for allowing unqualified personnel to sell funds, reflecting a common issue in the industry where performance pressures lead to compliance lapses [9][11]. - Caitong Securities was cited for inadequate control over its overseas subsidiary, highlighting the complexities and risks associated with cross-border operations [11][12]. Group 2: Specific Cases and Implications - Yangguang Zhongke, under CITIC Jiantou's supervision, failed to disclose production stoppages that could severely impact its operational viability, raising concerns about the brokerage's oversight responsibilities [5][6][7]. - The issues faced by CITIC Securities are indicative of a broader trend where firms struggle to maintain compliance amidst high sales pressures, leading to repeated violations [9][11]. - Caitong Securities' problems stem from insufficient risk management frameworks for its overseas subsidiaries, suggesting a need for enhanced governance structures in international operations [11][12].

Core Viewpoint - The recent penalties imposed on three brokerage firms highlight the ongoing compliance and internal control issues within the industry, emphasizing the need for stronger risk management practices as regulatory scrutiny intensifies [2][4]. Group 1: Penalties and Compliance Issues - Three brokerage firms, CITIC Securities, CITIC JianTou, and Caitong Securities, were named for compliance failures within a short period from September 23 to September 26 [1][4]. - CITIC JianTou was penalized for failing to ensure timely disclosure of significant operational changes by its client, Yangguang Zhongke, which faced production halts [1][6]. - CITIC Securities received a warning for allowing unlicensed personnel to sell funds, reflecting a common issue in the industry where performance pressures lead to compliance lapses [9][10]. - Caitong Securities was cited for inadequate control over its overseas subsidiary, indicating a lack of effective risk management in cross-border operations [12][13]. Group 2: Specific Cases and Implications - The issues faced by CITIC JianTou are particularly concerning as they relate to a New Third Board company that has faced multiple operational challenges, including production stoppages that were not disclosed [6][7]. - The penalties against CITIC Securities highlight a broader industry problem where unqualified employees are permitted to engage in fund sales due to staffing pressures [9][10]. - Caitong Securities' situation underscores the complexities of managing overseas subsidiaries, where insufficient oversight can lead to significant compliance risks [12][13].

Core Viewpoint - The recent penalties imposed on three brokerage firms highlight the ongoing weaknesses in compliance execution and internal controls within the industry, necessitating stronger risk management foundations as regulatory scrutiny intensifies [2][4]. Group 1: Penalties and Compliance Issues - Three brokerage firms, CITIC Securities, CITIC Jiantou, and Caitong Securities, were penalized by local securities regulatory authorities within a short span, indicating a systemic issue in compliance across various business segments [2][3]. - CITIC Jiantou was penalized for failing to fulfill its continuous supervision responsibilities regarding its client, Yangguang Zhongke, which did not disclose significant operational changes during a critical period [4][5]. - CITIC Securities faced a warning for allowing unqualified personnel to sell funds, reflecting a common issue in the industry where performance pressures lead to compliance shortcuts [6][7]. Group 2: Specific Cases and Implications - Yangguang Zhongke, under CITIC Jiantou's supervision, experienced multiple production halts without timely disclosure, raising concerns about the brokerage's oversight responsibilities [5][6]. - The penalties against CITIC Securities are indicative of a broader trend where firms overlook compliance in favor of meeting sales targets, particularly in the context of limited qualified personnel [6][7]. - Caitong Securities was cited for inadequate control over its overseas subsidiaries, highlighting the complexities and risks associated with cross-border operations and the need for robust risk management frameworks [7][8].