Investment Rating - The report maintains a recommendation for the banking industry [3] Core Insights - The report provides a comprehensive analysis of the asset-liability structure and interest margin changes of 42 A-share listed banks during the "14th Five-Year Plan" period, highlighting a shift towards corporate loans on the asset side and a stronger retail focus on the liability side [12][14] - The asset-liability structure indicates a significant increase in the proportion of corporate loans, rising from 57.02% to 63.22% from the end of 2020 to mid-2025, while the proportion of demand deposits decreased from 41.94% to 30% [12][14] - The report notes a decline in both asset yield and interest margin, with the yield on interest-earning assets dropping from 4.43% to 3.32% and the net interest margin decreasing from 2.23% to 1.53% during the same period [14][15] Summary by Sections Overall Asset-Liability Structure and Interest Margin Changes - The asset-liability structure shows an increase in loan-to-earning asset ratio from 54.19% to 56.49%, with corporate loans making up a larger share of total loans [14][15] - The average yield on interest-earning assets decreased significantly, with the loan yield falling from 5.34% to 3.82% [15] - The net interest margin for listed banks remains higher than that of commercial banks, despite a decline [14][15] Changes in Each Banking Sector's Asset-Liability Structure and Interest Margin - City commercial banks experienced a more significant increase in the proportion of corporate loans, with their interest margin narrowing less compared to other banks [18] - The report highlights that the proportion of deposits in interest-bearing liabilities for state-owned banks decreased, while it increased for rural commercial banks [18] - The decline in interest-bearing liabilities' cost rate was most pronounced in city commercial banks, leading to a smaller reduction in their interest margin [18]

北京商报讯(记者孟凡霞周义力)9月28日，国家金融监督管理总局青岛监管局发布《关于姜兵青岛银行 （002948）行长助理任职资格的批复》，核准姜兵担任青岛银行行长助理的任职资格。 ...

1. Report Industry Investment Rating No information about the report industry investment rating is provided in the given content. 2. Core Viewpoints of the Report - External environment factors such as interest rate fluctuations, bond supply - demand, and policy orientation jointly impact bond investment returns. In H1 2025, the bond investment of 42 listed banks showed certain characteristics in scale, structure, and profit and loss, but there are still challenges in maintaining stable returns in the future [1]. - The overall bond investment scale of 42 listed banks expanded steadily in H1 2025. There were differences in the investment structure among different types of banks, with state - owned banks and city commercial banks having stable growth in the bond allocation portfolio, while joint - stock banks and rural commercial banks increased their efforts in the bond trading portfolio. The bond investment portfolio generally presented a pattern of "stable foundation and flexible gain" [1]. - The coupon income of 42 listed banks was generally stable in H1 2025 but showed a slight year - on - year decline. The fair value change loss was significant, and the investment income increased. However, the bond investment of the banking industry still faces pressure to maintain stable returns [1]. 3. Summary According to the Table of Contents 3.1 42 Listed Banks' Bond Investment Volume - **Overall Bond Investment Scale: Steady Expansion**: In H1 2025, the total scale of the three types of bond - type financial assets of 42 listed banks showed a steady expansion trend. The growth of debt investment - type financial assets measured at amortized cost was relatively slow, while the growth of trading financial assets measured at fair value and included in current profits and losses was relatively large, indicating that banks increased the proportion of trading positions [9]. - **Differentiated Bond Investment Distribution Structures among Different Bank Types**: In H1 2025, state - owned banks and city commercial banks showed stable growth in the bond allocation portfolio, which may be related to their participation in the primary - market issuance of important national and regional bond varieties. Joint - stock banks and rural commercial banks slightly weakened their bond allocation power but significantly increased their efforts in the bond trading portfolio, showing a differentiated feature of "stable allocation by large banks and prominent trading flexibility by small and medium - sized banks" [13]. - **Bond Investment Allocation Tilted towards Government - Related Bonds**: In H1 2025, commercial banks increased their allocation of government - related bonds, with an average month - on - month increase of about 10% for state - owned banks, joint - stock banks, and city commercial banks, and a slightly smaller increase for rural commercial banks. The allocation of financial bonds and other bonds was differentiated. All banks held a relatively large scale of government - related bonds, followed by financial bonds and credit - related bonds [18]. - **Correlation between Financial Asset Types and Bond Variety Structures**: The banking industry maintained a stable growth of interest - rate bonds in the bond allocation portfolio and increased the allocation of credit bonds, while the allocation of financial bonds was relatively weak. In the bond trading portfolio, interest - rate bonds and financial bonds were the core varieties, with a more significant increase than credit bonds, showing a "stable foundation and flexible gain" pattern [22]. 3.2 42 Listed Banks' Bond Investment Profit and Loss - **Coupon Income: Generally Stable and Still the Main Source of Income**: In H1 2025, the total coupon income of 42 listed banks decreased slightly year - on - year. Although the scale of held - to - maturity bonds increased, the decline in the coupon rate of newly issued bonds led to a decrease in coupon income. In the future, coupon income is still expected to be the main source of bond investment income for commercial banks [26]. - **Fair Value Change Loss: Losses in the Trading Level**: In H1 2025, the total fair value change loss of 42 listed banks decreased significantly year - on - year, indicating that it was difficult to obtain capital gains through short - term trading in the volatile bond market, and there were floating losses in bond trading [28]. - **Investment Income: Growth in All Bank Types**: In H1 2025, the actual investment income of 42 listed banks in the bond field increased significantly year - on - year. Although the book value appreciation of bond - type trading financial assets and other debt investment - type financial assets was not as good as that of the previous year, banks could still increase their investment income by selling floating - profit old bonds and waiting for the maturity of high - coupon bonds [31]. 3.3 Attribution and Summary - **External Environment Driving Factors: Interest Rate Fluctuations, Bond Supply - Demand, and Policy Orientation Jointly Impact Bond Investment Returns**: In H1 2025, the "more adjustments and fewer opportunities" bond market environment led to a general decline in the prices of existing bonds, resulting in a significant year - on - year decline in the fair value change loss of listed banks' bond investment. The supply of national bonds, local government bonds, and policy - based financial bonds increased, but the coupon rate of newly issued bonds decreased, leading to a decline in coupon income. Regulatory policies indirectly affected bond investment performance [35]. - **Banking Industry's Bond Investment Pressure and Future Outlook** - Overall Income Shows a Positive Trend but There Are Still Hidden Concerns: In H1 2025, the actual bond investment income of 42 listed banks increased slightly year - on - year, but the coupon income faced downward pressure in the interest - rate downward cycle, and it was more difficult to obtain spread income through band trading. Since H2 2025, the "stock - strong and bond - weak" pattern has emerged, and the loss caused by fair value change will be more obvious [3]. - Different Bank Types Show Differentiated Performance, and State - owned Banks' Pressure Is Relatively Controllable: State - owned banks can maintain a certain profit - making ability in the low - interest - rate volatile bond market due to their advantages in bond allocation and trading portfolios. Joint - stock banks, city commercial banks, and rural commercial banks are more vulnerable, and they may increase their capital allocation in the equity market, commodity market, and related structured fixed - income products in the future [3].

本行及董事会全体成员保证公告内容的真实、准确和完整，没有虚假记载、误导性陈述或者重大遗漏。 特别提示： 1.2025年第一次临时股东大会、2025年第一次A股类别股东大会及2025年第一次H股类别股东大会（以 下合称"本次股东大会"）均无否决提案的情形。 2.本次股东大会均不涉及变更以往股东大会已通过的决议。 一、会议召开情况 （一）召开时间 1.现场会议召开时间：2025年9月26日（星期五） 2.网络投票时间：通过深圳证券交易所交易系统进行网络投票的时间为2025年9月26日9:15-9:25，9:30- 11:30和13:00-15:00；通过互联网投票系统投票的时间为2025年9月26日9:15-15:00。 （二）会议地点：山东省青岛市崂山区秦岭路6号青岛银行总行 （三）召开方式：采取现场投票与网络投票相结合的方式 （四）召集人：青岛银行股份有限公司（以下简称"本行"）董事会 ■ （二）2025年第一次A股类别股东大会 ■ （三）2025年第一次H股类别股东大会 ■ （五）主持人：本行董事长景在伦先生 （六）本次股东大会的召开符合《中华人民共和国公司法》等有关法律、行政法规、部门规章及《青岛 银行股 ...

北京商报讯（记者 孟凡霞 周义力）9月26日，青岛银行发布2025年第一次临时股东大会、2025年第一次 A股类别股东大会及2025年第一次H股类别股东大会决议公告，会议审议通过了《关于青岛银行股份有 限公司不再设置监事会的议案》。 ...

香港交易及結算所有限公司及香港聯合交易所有限公司對本公告的內容概不負責，對其準確性 或完整性亦不發表任何聲明，並明確表示，概不對因本公告全部或任何部份內容而產生或因倚 賴該等內容而引致的任何損失承擔任何責任。 承董事會命 青島銀行股份有限公司* 景在倫 董事長 中國山東省青島市 2025年9月26日 Bank of Qingdao Co., Ltd.* 青 島 銀 行 股 份 有 限 公 司 * （ 於 中 華 人 民 共 和 國 註 冊 成 立 的 股 份 有 限 公 司 ） （H股股份代號：3866） 海外監管公告 本公告乃根據《香港聯合交易所有限公司證券上市規則》第13.10B條作出。 如下公告已於深圳證券交易所網站刊登，僅供參閱。 特此公告。 於本公告日期，董事會包括執行董事景在倫先生、吳顯明先生、陳霜女士及 劉鵬先生；非執行董事周雲傑先生、Rosario Strano先生、譚麗霞女士、Giamberto Giraldo先生及鄧友成先生；獨立非執行董事邢樂成先生、張旭先生、張文礎先 生、杜寧先生及范學軍先生。 * 青島銀行股份有限公司並非一家根據銀行業條例（香港法例第155章）之認可機構，並不受 限於 ...

香港交易及結算所有限公司及香港聯合交易所有限公司對本公告之內容概不負責，對其 準確性或完整性亦不發表任何聲明，並明確表示，概不對因本公告全部或任何部份內容 而產生或因倚賴該等內容而引致之任何損失承擔任何責任。 Bank of Qingdao Co., Ltd.* * H 3866 於2025年9月26日舉行之2025年第一次臨時股東大會、 2025年第一次A股類別股東大會及 2025年第一次H股類別股東大會 投票表決結果 青島銀行股份有限公司（「本行」）欣然宣佈本行於2025年9月26日（星期五）上午9時正於中 國山東省青島市嶗山區秦嶺路6號依次舉行2025年第一次臨時股東大會（「臨時股東大 會」）、2025年第一次A股類別股東大會（「A股類別股東大會」）及2025年第一次H股類別股 東大會（「H股類別股東大會」）（統稱「該等會議」）。該等會議採用現場投票（適用於本行A 股股東及H股股東）與網絡投票（僅適用於本行A股股東）相結合的方式召開。 茲提述本行日期為2025年9月8日的通函（「通函」）。除文義另有所指外，本公告所用的詞 彙與通函所界定者具有相同涵義。 該等會議出席情況 出席臨時股東大會的股東及授權代表 ...

2025 年第一次临时股东大会、 2025 年第一次 A 股类别股东大会及 2025 年第一次 H 股类别股东大会决议公告 本行及董事会全体成员保证公告内容的真实、准确和完整，没有虚假记载、误导性陈 述或者重大遗漏。 特别提示： 证券代码：002948 证券简称：青岛银行 公告编号：2025-037 青岛银行股份有限公司 （一）召开时间 1.现场会议召开时间：2025年9月26日（星期五） 2.网络投票时间：通过深圳证券交易所交易系统进行网络投票的时间为 2025 年 9 月 26 日 9:15-9:25，9:30-11:30 和 13:00-15:00；通过互联网投票系统投票的时 间为 2025 年 9 月 26 日 9:15-15:00。 （二）会议地点：山东省青岛市崂山区秦岭路 6 号青岛银行总行 1.2025年第一次临时股东大会、2025年第一次A股类别股东大会及2025年第 一次H股类别股东大会（以下合称"本次股东大会"）均无否决提案的情形。 2.本次股东大会均不涉及变更以往股东大会已通过的决议。 一、会议召开情况 （三）召开方式：采取现场投票与网络投票相结合的方式 （四）召集人：青岛银行股份有限公 ...

Core Viewpoint - The banking sector is experiencing a rise in stock prices despite market conditions, driven by recent adjustments in deposit rates by local small and medium-sized banks to alleviate pressure on their liabilities and improve net interest margins [1] Group 1: Stock Performance - Chongqing Rural Commercial Bank (03618) increased by 4.62%, reaching HKD 6.12 [1] - Qingdao Bank (03866) rose by 1.88%, reaching HKD 4.34 [1] - China Construction Bank (00939) saw a 1.1% increase, reaching HKD 7.38 [1] - Bank of China (03988) grew by 0.96%, reaching HKD 4.21 [1] Group 2: Deposit Rate Adjustments - Since September, the number of local small and medium-sized banks reducing deposit rates has been increasing [1] - On September 25, several banks, including Henan Luoyang Rural Commercial Bank, announced reductions in RMB deposit rates, with the maximum cut reaching 35 basis points [1] - The purpose of these adjustments is to alleviate pressure on the liability side and mitigate the negative impact of narrowing net interest margins [1] Group 3: Market Outlook - China Galaxy Securities indicates that the adjustment of the 14-day reverse repurchase operation aims to enhance the position of the 7-day reverse repurchase policy rate, improving liquidity management precision [1] - The benefits for small and medium-sized banks from these changes are expected to be less significant compared to larger banks [1] - Continued positive factors in the banking fundamentals, along with increased consumer policies, suggest potential mid-term performance improvements and a possible turning point [1] - The focus remains on the effectiveness of policies, retail business demand, risk improvement, and reform measures [1] - The institution maintains a positive outlook on the banking sector's valuation and continues to recommend investment in this area [1]