Investment Rating - The report maintains a positive long-term outlook for the insurance sector, indicating a strong continuity in market performance despite recent fluctuations [2][12][16]. Core Insights - The financial sector experienced a mixed performance this week, with the non-bank financial index down by 1.45%, underperforming the CSI 300 index by 0.83 percentage points. The insurance sector saw a decline of 4.02%, while the brokerage sector decreased by 0.61% [1][10]. - The insurance sector's performance is driven by two main factors: policy support leading to economic recovery and liquidity easing combined with a strong stock market. The report suggests a shift from liquidity-driven growth to a focus on macro policy support and economic recovery expectations [2][13][16]. - The brokerage sector is expected to benefit from new regulations that enhance investment management quality, with a recommendation to focus on larger, undervalued firms and those involved in mergers and acquisitions [3][18]. - The banking sector is facing a slight decline, but there are signs of recovery in profitability for leading banks, with recommendations to focus on banks with high dividend yields and those expected to benefit from market conditions [19][21]. Summary by Sections Insurance Sector - The insurance sector's recent decline is attributed to short-term market sentiment and liquidity changes, but the long-term outlook remains positive due to strong support from both the liability and asset sides [2][12][16]. - Key recommendations include focusing on companies like China Pacific Insurance, China Ping An, China Life (H), and China Taiping, with a specific recommendation for New China Life [4][16]. Brokerage Sector - The brokerage sector's performance is slightly better than the overall market, with a focus on the new guidelines from the regulatory body that aim to improve fund management quality [3][17]. - Recommended firms include Guotai Junan, Huatai Securities, and others, particularly those with strong merger and acquisition prospects [4][18]. Banking Sector - The banking sector has shown a decline but is expected to stabilize, with recommendations to focus on banks with high earnings elasticity and strong dividend yields [19][21]. - Specific banks to watch include Hangzhou Bank, Ningbo Bank, and others, with a focus on those that have previously been undervalued [4][21].

股票研究 /[Table_Date] 2026.01.23 票 研 究 主动基金环比持平，被动基金增持 [Table_Industry] 商业银行 | [姓名table_Authors] | 电话 | 邮箱 | 登记编号 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 马婷婷(分析师) | 021-23185608 | matingting@gtht.com | S0880525100001 | | 陈惠琴(分析师) | 021-38676666 | chenhuiqin@gtht.com | S0880525100003 | 本报告导读： 25Q4 主动基金对银行持仓比例环比持平于 1.9%，被动基金持仓比例环比+1.6pct 至 7.0%，其中宁波银行、兴业银行、中国银行、建设银行等获主动基金增配。 25Q4 基金对银行持仓点评 投资要点： [Table_Summary] 2025 年四季度基金重仓持股情况披露（主动基金包括普通股票型、 偏股混合型、灵活配置型，被动基金包括被动指数型、指数增强型）： [Table_Report] 相关报告 商业银行《国有大行投放力度较大，不良压力或 企稳》20 ...

Investment Rating - The industry investment rating is "Buy" [2] Core Insights - The report provides a comprehensive analysis of 127 regional banks in Jiangsu Province, highlighting their asset and liability structures, profitability, and asset quality [6][18] - Jiangsu's regional banks have shown a significant increase in asset growth, with major city commercial banks growing at 19.4%, surpassing the growth of listed city commercial banks at 14.2% [24][26] - The report indicates that the loan-to-asset ratio for city commercial banks is projected to reach 48.4% in 2024, reflecting a gradual increase in lending activities [30] - Jiangsu's regional banks exhibit better return on assets (ROA) compared to listed banks, with city commercial banks outperforming by 16 basis points and rural commercial banks by 9 basis points [6][42] - The asset quality of Jiangsu's regional banks is superior to that of listed banks, with lower non-performing loan ratios and higher provision coverage ratios [6][42] Summary by Sections 1. Economic Structure of Jiangsu Province - Jiangsu Province is focusing on new industrialization and strategic emerging industries, with significant contributions from cities like Nanjing and Suzhou [13][14] 2. Overview of 127 Regional Banks in Jiangsu - The report categorizes the banks into city commercial banks, rural commercial banks, and others, with a total of 127 banks established between 2006 and 2015 [18][20] 3. Asset/Liability Structure - The asset growth of major city commercial banks is accelerating, while rural commercial banks are experiencing a decline in growth rates [24][26] - The loan-to-asset ratio for city commercial banks is expected to increase to 48.4% by 2024, indicating a shift towards more lending [30] 4. Profitability - Jiangsu's regional banks have a higher ROA compared to listed banks, with city commercial banks showing a 16 basis point advantage [6][42] 5. Asset Quality/Capital Levels - Jiangsu's regional banks maintain a lower non-performing loan ratio compared to listed banks, with city commercial banks having a 30 basis point lower ratio [6][42]

证券之星消息，1月23日城商行板块较上一交易日下跌1.01%，上海银行领跌。当日上证指数报收于 4136.16，上涨0.33%。深证成指报收于14439.66，上涨0.79%。城商行板块个股涨跌见下表： | 代码 | 名称 | 收盘价 | 涨跌幅 | 成交量(手) | 成交额(元) | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 002948 | 青岛银行 | 4.52 | 2.49% | 108.02万 | 4.86亿 | | 601963 | 重庆银行 | 10.44 | 1.75% | 13.53万 | 1.41亿 | | 600928 | 西安银行 | 3.69 | 0.54% | 22.19万 | 8174.14万 | | 601997 | 豊阳银行 | 5.83 | 0.52% | 22.43万 | 1.31亿 | | 002936 | 郑州银行 | 1.91 | 0.00% | 88.24万 | 1.69亿 | | 001227 | 兰州银行 | 2.32 | 0.00% | 53.68万 | 1.25亿 | | 601577 | 长沙银行 | 9.37 | ...

证券之星消息，1月22日城商行板块较上一交易日上涨0.8%，青岛银行领涨。当日上证指数报收于 4122.58，上涨0.14%。深证成指报收于14327.05，上涨0.5%。城商行板块个股涨跌见下表： | 代码 | 名称 | 主力净流入(元) | 主力净占比 游资净流入(元) | | 游资净占比 散户净流入(元) | | 散户净占比 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 600919 江苏银行 | | 2.02亿 | 13.49% | -1.14 Z | -7.60% | -8827.44万 | -5.89% | | 600926 杭州银行 | | 7317.50万 | 6.96% | -6483.11万 | -6.17% | -834.39万 | -0.79% | | 601169 | 北京银行 | 5714.07万 | 7.81% | -159.29万 | -0.22% | -5554.78万 | -7.59% | | 6000000 | 南京银行 | 3295.77万 | 4.44% | 2708.43万 | 3.65% | -6004 ...

Investment Rating - The report provides a "Buy" rating for all major banks analyzed, indicating a positive outlook for the banking sector [7]. Core Insights - The digital renminbi has entered its 2.0 era, transitioning from a central bank liability (M0) to a commercial bank liability (M1), allowing it to earn interest and be included in deposit insurance and reserve requirements [6][14]. - This transformation positions China as the first economy to offer interest on its central bank digital currency (CBDC), fundamentally altering its monetary attributes and creating a new financial paradigm in the digital economy [27]. - The digital renminbi's interest-bearing feature enhances user motivation to hold it, shifting its perception from a mere payment tool to a viable store of value, thus promoting its integration into everyday financial activities [27][28]. Summary by Sections 1. Digital Renminbi 2.0 Era - The digital renminbi (e-CNY) is now classified as a digital deposit currency, which can earn interest and is managed under a new regulatory framework [14]. - Major state-owned banks have begun offering interest on digital renminbi wallet balances, marking a significant shift in its utility and appeal [14][27]. 2. Development Progress and Application Status - The development of the digital renminbi began in 2014, with significant milestones including pilot tests in various cities and the establishment of a comprehensive operational framework by 2025 [32][33]. - As of November 2025, the digital renminbi has processed 34.8 billion transactions amounting to 16.7 trillion yuan, with extensive coverage across multiple provinces and cities [37]. 3. Global CBDC Development Trends - The report identifies three main trends in global CBDC development: active retail CBDC initiatives, innovation in payment systems, and cautious approaches in some countries like the U.S. [6]. - China's proactive stance in developing its CBDC positions it favorably in the global digital economy landscape, particularly in cross-border trade applications [30].

Market Overview - The city commercial bank sector experienced a decline of 0.55% on January 21, with Chongqing Bank leading the drop [1] - The Shanghai Composite Index closed at 4116.94, up 0.08%, while the Shenzhen Component Index closed at 14255.12, up 0.7% [1] Individual Stock Performance - Ningbo Bank closed at 28.88, with an increase of 1.16% and a trading volume of 432,300 shares, amounting to a transaction value of 1.246 billion [1] - Chongqing Bank closed at 10.25, down 1.82%, with a trading volume of 106,800 shares and a transaction value of 110 million [2] - Other notable performers include Xiamen Bank, which closed at 7.13, down 1.66%, and Chengdu Bank, which closed at 15.72, down 1.38% [2] Capital Flow Analysis - The city commercial bank sector saw a net inflow of 508 million from institutional investors, while retail investors experienced a net outflow of 566 million [2] - The capital flow for individual stocks indicates that Hangzhou Bank had a net inflow of 158 million from institutional investors, while it faced a net outflow of 86.5 million from retail investors [3] - Shanghai Bank also saw a net inflow of 107 million from institutional investors, with a net outflow of 121 million from retail investors [3]

证券日报网讯 1月20日，青岛银行（002948）在互动平台回答投资者提问时表示，本行历来高度重视对 股东的投资回报，近五年间本行平均现金分红比例高于行业平均水平，给投资者带来了稳定的投资回 报。本行公司章程及《青岛银行股份有限公司2024年-2026年股东回报规划》约定每年以现金方式向普 通股股东分配的利润不低于当年实现的归属于本行普通股股东的可分配利润的20%，目的也是为股东提 供持续、稳定、合理的投资回报。银行分红决策是平衡股东回报与长期稳健发展的复杂过程，需综合考 量监管要求、资本充足率、盈利能力、战略规划、股东回报、宏观经济及同业比较等诸多因素。下一步 公司会在综合平衡多方面因素的基础上，合理规划分红比例。 ...

Core Insights - The city commercial bank sector experienced a rise of 1.35% on January 20, with Chengdu Bank leading the gains [1] - The Shanghai Composite Index closed at 4113.65, down 0.01%, while the Shenzhen Component Index closed at 14155.63, down 0.97% [1] Stock Performance - Chengdu Bank (601838) closed at 15.94, up 3.10% with a trading volume of 606,000 shares and a transaction value of 9.56 billion [1] - Chongqing Bank (601963) closed at 10.44, up 2.96% with a trading volume of 133,800 shares and a transaction value of 138 million [1] - Other notable performers include: - Changsha Bank (601577): closed at 9.36, up 2.41% [1] - Qilu Bank (601665): closed at 5.48, up 2.05% [1] - Beijing Bank (601169): closed at 5.32, up 1.92% [1] - Qingdao Bank (002948): closed at 4.30, up 1.90% [1] - Xiamen Bank (601187): closed at 7.25, up 1.54% [1] - Shanghai Bank (601229): closed at 9.79, up 1.35% [1] - Nanjing Bank (601009): closed at 10.56, up 1.34% [1] - Hangzhou Bank (600926): closed at 15.24, up 1.20% [1] Capital Flow - The city commercial bank sector saw a net inflow of 266 million from institutional investors, while retail investors experienced a net outflow of 42.84 million [1] - Detailed capital flow for selected banks includes: - Shanghai Bank (601229): net inflow of 1.051 billion from institutional investors, with net outflows from retail and speculative investors [2] - Hangzhou Bank (600926): net inflow of 90.48 million from institutional investors, with significant outflows from retail and speculative investors [2] - Nanjing Bank (601009): net inflow of 26.57 million from institutional investors, with outflows from retail investors [2] - Other banks also showed varying levels of net inflows and outflows [2]

Group 1 - The A-share market saw a significant increase in bank stocks, with Qilu Bank rising nearly 2% and several other banks, including Changshu Bank and Chongqing Rural Commercial Bank, increasing by over 1% [1] - The total market capitalization of Qilu Bank is 33.7 billion, while Changshu Bank has a market cap of 23.8 billion [2] - Year-to-date performance shows that Qilu Bank has decreased by 4.70%, while Changshu Bank has increased by 1.99% [2] Group 2 - Other banks that experienced gains include Yunnan Rural Commercial Bank (1.46%), CITIC Bank (1.30%), and Shanghai Bank (1.04%) [2] - The total market capitalization of CITIC Bank is 434 billion, and it has a year-to-date performance of 1.30% [2] - Despite the gains, many banks still show negative year-to-date performance, such as Shanghai Bank (-3.37%) and China Bank (-5.58%) [2]