THIS DOCUMENT IS IMPORTANT AND REQUIRES YOUR IMMEDIATE ATTENTION 此乃要件 請即處理 IF YOU ARE IN ANY DOUBT AS TO ANY ASPECT OF THIS FORM OR AS TO THE ACTION TO BE TAKEN, YOU SHOULD CONSULT YOUR LICENSED SECURITIES DEALER OR REGISTERED INSTITUTION IN SECURITIES, BANK MANAGER, SOLICITOR, PROFESSIONAL ACCOUNTANT OR OTHER PROFESSIONAL ADVISER. 閣下如對此表格任何方面或應採取之行動有任何疑問，應諮詢 閣下之持牌證券交易商或註冊證券機構、銀行經理、律師、專業會計師或其他專業顧問。 LONGFOR GROUP HOLDINGS LIMITED 龍湖集團控股有限公司 (Incorporated in the Cayman Islands with limited liability) （於開曼群島註冊 ...

閣下如 對本通函各方面或將採取之行動 有任何疑問，應諮詢 閣下的持牌證券交 易商或註冊證券機構、銀行經理、律師、專業會計師或其他專業顧問。 閣下如已 將名下之 龍湖集團控股有限公司 股份全部 售出或轉讓，應立即將本通函 及隨附的選擇表格交予買主或承讓人，或經手出售或轉讓的銀行、持牌證券交易 商或註冊證券機構或其他代理商，以便轉交買主或承讓人。 香港交易及結算所有限公司及香港聯合交易所有限公司對本通函之內容概不負 責，對其準確性或完整性亦不發表任何聲明，並明確表示，概不對因本通函全部 或任何部份內容而產生或因倚賴該等內容而引致的任何損失承擔任何責任。 本通函的資料乃遵照上市規則而刊載，旨在提供有關本公司的資料；董事願就本 通函共同及個別地承擔全部責任。董事於作出一切合理查詢後確認，就其所知及 所信，本通函所載資料在各重大方面均屬準確及完整，並無誤導或欺詐成分，且 並無遺漏任何其他事項，令致本通函或當中所載任何陳述產生誤導。 任何海外股東如在香港以外任何地區收到本通函及╱或選擇表格，概不可視之為 參與以股代息計劃之邀約，除非本公司可在毋須遵照有關司法權區之任何登記或 其他規定或手續的情況下合法向其作出該等邀約。任 ...

Group 1 - The Hang Seng Index has experienced a decline of 0.94% after a period of weak consolidation [1] - The real estate sector has been the worst performer, with significant declines in major companies such as Hang Lung Properties down 2.22%, China Resources Land down 2.27%, and Sun Hung Kai Properties down 2.19% [3] - The banking sector also faced losses, with a drop of 1.54%, particularly in China Merchants Bank which fell by 2.38% [3] Group 2 - The oil sector showed some resilience, initially rising by 1.05% before settling at a 0.35% increase, with CNOOC Services up 3.35% [3] - Other oil-related stocks like Sinopec and PetroChina experienced slight declines despite the overall sector's positive movement [3]

Group 1 - The Hang Seng Index opened high and maintained a strong performance throughout the day, closing up 1.94% [1] - The Hang Seng Tech Index saw significant gains, closing up 3.14%, with notable increases from NIO (up 15.17%), ASMPT (up 7.6%), Baidu (up 6.25%), and NetEase (up 6.04%) [3] - The property sector experienced a volatile session, initially rising 4.71% before closing up 2.72%, with Beike up 6.04% and Longfor Group up 5.22% [3] Group 2 - The banking sector showed resilience, closing up 0.28% after a recovery, with China Merchants Bank rising 2.69% and Postal Savings Bank up 2.16%, while Chongqing Rural Commercial Bank fell sharply by 3.14% [3] - The oil sector opened high but closed slightly down by 0.03%, with China National Chemical Corporation down 1.39% and China Petroleum down 0.4%, while CNOOC saw a slight increase of 0.53% [3]

Core Insights - The article emphasizes the transformation of the real estate industry towards high-quality development, with a focus on the concept of "good housing" as a strategic shift from scale expansion to quality cultivation [1][3][10] - The collaboration between the China Real Estate Association, experts, and Dragon Lake Group aims to define and explore the standards and paths for "good housing" [1][3] Group 1: Industry Transformation - The "good housing" concept is defined by four key standards: safety, comfort, green, and intelligence, which serve as a framework for real estate companies [3][5] - The Secretary-General of the China Real Estate Association praised Dragon Lake's practices in "good housing" construction, suggesting that the industry should learn from their example [3][5] - Experts highlighted the need for a balanced approach in enhancing living comfort while efficiently utilizing land resources, indicating that Dragon Lake has a responsibility to lead the industry in this regard [3][5] Group 2: Product Innovation - Dragon Lake's projects, "Guancui" and "Yuhujing," have set benchmarks in Chongqing's market, achieving significant sales figures, with Yuhujing generating 620 million yuan in its first opening, setting a record for high-end projects in the region [6][8] - Approximately 60% of Yuhujing's sales came from repeat purchases or recommendations from existing owners, indicating strong brand loyalty and market acceptance [8] - The projects are recognized as national reference models for "good housing," showcasing their innovative approaches to urban living [6][10] Group 3: Urban Development - Dragon Lake's approach to "good housing" extends beyond individual projects, actively participating in urban living upgrades across over 100 cities in China [10] - The company integrates various functions such as real estate development, commercial investment, and property management to create a comprehensive ecosystem that enhances urban life [10] - The projects in Chongqing not only provide high-quality housing but also contribute to regional commercial vitality and lifestyle improvements, demonstrating a commitment to urban renewal [10]

Report Industry Investment Rating - Not provided in the content Core Viewpoints of the Report - After two consecutive weeks of adjustment in the bond market since mid - August, the decline has exceeded the previous round in late July, resulting in a certain degree of cost - effectiveness. Currently, the strategy should prioritize liquidity. There are opportunities in 3 - 5 - year bank secondary capital bonds after adjustment, and it is also advisable to participate in the sinking of weak - quality urban investment bonds with a maturity of 1 - 3 years. However, the ultra - long - term strategy may not be a good choice due to high market uncertainty [3][36] Summary by Relevant Catalogs 1. Market Adjustment and Bond Performance - Since mid - August, the bond market has been continuously adjusting for two weeks, especially last week's adjustment exceeding expectations. Credit bonds declined synchronously, and the decline of major maturity varieties was higher than that of interest rates. The stock - bond "seesaw" effect continued, with the Shanghai Composite Index hitting a new high, and the bond market being insensitive to fundamental indicators, resulting in a continuous decline and rising yields [1][9] - From August 18 to 22, 2025, the yields of 1Y, 2Y, 3Y, 4Y, and 5Y treasury bonds increased by 0.4BP, 3.2BP, 9.7BP, 8.1BP, and 3.8BP respectively. The yields of AAA medium - and short - term notes with the same maturities increased by 4.9BP, 6.6BP, 5.8BP, 7.6BP, and 4.6BP respectively, and the yields of AA+ medium - and short - term notes increased by 4.9BP, 6.6BP, 7.8BP, 6.6BP, and 5.6BP respectively [9][10] - The market of ultra - long - term credit bonds weakened synchronously, with most of the declines exceeding those of the same - maturity interest - rate bonds. The decline of highly liquid ultra - long - term secondary and perpetual bonds was the lowest, while the decline of ultra - long - term urban investment bonds with the poorest liquidity was relatively large. The yields of AAA/AA+ 10Y medium - term notes increased by 6.00BP and 7.00BP respectively, and the yields of AAA/AA+ 10Y urban investment bonds increased by 13.01BP and 11.00BP respectively. The yield of AAA - 10Y bank secondary capital bonds increased by 6.69BP, while the yield of 10Y treasury bonds increased by 3.53BP [11][12] 2. Performance of Secondary and Perpetual Bonds - The market of secondary and perpetual bonds weakened synchronously, but the "volatility amplifier" feature was not obvious. The declines of 1Y - 5Y were similar to those of general credit bonds, and the decline gap in the ultra - long - term part was also close to that of ultra - long - term credit bonds. Currently, the part of the curve with a maturity of 3 years and above is still 25BP - 35BP away from the lowest yield point since 2025. Compared with the sharp decline at the end of July, the yield points of bonds with a maturity of over 3 years have reached new highs, and the adjustment amplitude is higher than that of the sharp decline at the end of July [2][16] - In terms of active trading, the sentiment was the most pessimistic in the second week of August. Although the market was still adjusting last week, the marginal sentiment of secondary and perpetual bonds improved. From August 11 to 15, the proportion of low - valuation transactions of secondary and perpetual bonds was 5.00%, 0.00%, 100.00%, 5.00%, and 0.00% respectively, and the average trading duration was 0.74 years, 1.02 years, 3.81 years, 1.53 years, and 1.12 years respectively. From August 18 to 22, the proportion of low - valuation transactions was 0.00%, 100.00%, 17.07%, 100.00%, and 100.00% respectively, and the average trading duration was 0.65 years, 4.73 years, 1.03 years, 5.66 years, and 3.30 years respectively [2][18] 3. Institutional Behavior - Public funds and other trading desks continued to sell, but it was more of a portfolio rebalancing rather than a full - scale reduction. At the same time, allocation desks such as wealth management and insurance institutions moderately bought during the adjustment. Public funds reduced their holdings of secondary bonds of national and joint - stock banks with a maturity of 3 - 5 years, with the total selling scale in the past two weeks approaching 20 billion, but they also increased their holdings of secondary capital bonds with a maturity of 1 - 3 years. Public funds were not very willing to sell their core assets such as weak - quality urban investment bonds [3][29] - Allocation desks such as bank wealth management and insurance institutions bought opportunistically after the sharp decline in the bond market, but they were also cautious about the maturity, mainly focusing on varieties with a maturity of 3 years and below. Since August, the increase in the liability side of wealth management products has been limited, and the demand is not strong, but it is not a full - scale redemption [3][29] 4. Performance of Credit Bond ETF Products - Credit bond ETF products performed poorly during the market adjustment in the past two weeks, with weak scale growth and net - value performance. In terms of scale change, the weekly scale of credit benchmark market - making ETF products has shrunk for two consecutive weeks since the market adjustment in the second week of August, and the weekly scale of science and technology innovation ETF products has been significantly weaker in August than in July. In terms of unit net - value change, the unit net values of the above two types of credit bond ETFs have suffered losses for two consecutive weeks, and the loss scale increased last week. In addition, the average turnover rate of the above two types of credit bond ETFs dropped to a new low last week [33]

Core Viewpoint - Longfor has successfully completed the repayment of two medium-term notes, totaling over 3.6 billion yuan, as part of its strategy to reduce debt and optimize its debt structure [1][2][3] Group 1: Debt Repayment Details - On August 26, Longfor completed payments for "22 Longfor Expansion MTN001" and "22 Longfor Expansion MTN002," with total principal and interest of 1.5495 billion yuan and 2.0523 billion yuan respectively [1] - The total issuance amount for "22 Longfor Expansion MTN001" was 1.5 billion yuan with an interest rate of 3.30%, while "22 Longfor Expansion MTN002" had an issuance amount of 2 billion yuan and an interest rate of 3.00% [1] - Longfor has now fully repaid all bonds due in 2023 [1] Group 2: Debt Management Strategy - Longfor's management has emphasized the importance of reducing overall debt levels and optimizing the debt structure, with 2025 being a critical year for debt conversion [1] - The company aims to steadily decrease its debt scale while ensuring timely bank financing and repayment [1] - Longfor has been actively repaying debts since July, including the repayment of 1.766 billion yuan for "22 Longfor 04" and 5.225 billion yuan for "20 Longfor Expansion MTN001B" [2] Group 3: Financial Health and Outlook - After the recent repayments, Longfor has cumulatively repaid approximately 14.5 billion yuan in bonds this year [3] - DBS Bank noted that optimizing the balance sheet and maintaining cash flow for debt repayment are key operational focuses for Longfor, indicating positive progress in its financial health [3] - Following the repayment of December's syndicated loans, Longfor is expected to clear its recent foreign debt [3]

Core Viewpoint - Longfor has successfully completed the repayment of two medium-term notes totaling over 3.6 billion yuan, demonstrating its commitment to debt reduction and financial stability [1][3]. Group 1: Debt Repayment Details - On August 26, Longfor completed payments for "22 Longfor Expansion MTN001" and "22 Longfor Expansion MTN002," totaling 3.6 billion yuan, with principal and interest amounts of 1.5495 billion yuan and 2.0523 billion yuan respectively [1]. - The total issuance amount for "22 Longfor Expansion MTN001" was 1.5 billion yuan with a bond rate of 3.30% and a term of 3 years; "22 Longfor Expansion MTN002" had an issuance amount of 2 billion yuan with a coupon rate of 3.00% and a maturity date of November 30 [1]. - Following these repayments, Longfor has settled all its bond maturities for the year, amounting to approximately 14.5 billion yuan in total bond principal and interest repayments [3]. Group 2: Debt Management Strategy - Longfor's management has emphasized the importance of reducing overall debt levels and optimizing the debt structure, with 2025 identified as a critical year for debt conversion [1]. - The company aims to steadily decrease its total debt while ensuring timely bank financing without delays or extensions, and to enhance its financing structure by increasing long-term debt and controlling short-term debt [1]. - Since July, Longfor has been actively working on debt reduction, including the repayment of various bonds and loans, indicating a focused strategy on financial health [2].

Core Viewpoint - Longfor Group has successfully completed the payment of two medium-term notes totaling over 3.6 billion yuan, fulfilling its debt obligations for the year [1] Group 1: Debt Payment Details - The total amount for the two payments is over 3.6 billion yuan, which includes 1.5495 billion yuan for the "22 Longfor Expansion MTN001" and 2.0523 billion yuan for the early repayment of "22 Longfor Expansion MTN002" [1] - "22 Longfor Expansion MTN001" has a total issuance amount of 1.5 billion yuan with an interest rate of 3.30% and a maturity of 3 years [1] - "22 Longfor Expansion MTN002" has a total issuance amount of 2 billion yuan with a coupon rate of 3.00% and a maturity date of November 30 [1] Group 2: Overall Debt Management - With these payments, Longfor Group has cumulatively repaid approximately 14.5 billion yuan in bond principal and interest this year [1] - All bonds due this year have now been fully repaid by Longfor Group [1]

Market Overview - In the week of August 18-24, 2025, the Kunming real estate market saw an increase in both transaction volume and prices, with a total of 4 projects supplying approximately 53,300 square meters, a 23% increase week-on-week [1] - Total transactions reached about 72,700 square meters, marking a 32% week-on-week increase, with an average transaction price of approximately 12,674 yuan per square meter, up 7% from the previous week [1] Key Projects - Longfor Tianjing achieved remarkable sales, topping the sales charts with a sales amount of approximately 131 million yuan, selling 73 units at an average price of about 15,088 yuan per square meter, and a unit price of approximately 1.79 million yuan [3] - The project recorded sales of about 410 million yuan on its opening day, featuring new unit types ranging from 89 to 235 square meters, and is noted for its high space efficiency and attractive design features [3][6] Competitive Landscape - The market remains polarized, with high-end properties like Bangtai Guanyun and Longfor Shanhai Yuanzhu continuing to perform well, achieving sales amounts of approximately 55 million yuan and 26 million yuan, with average prices around 18,836 yuan and 18,941 yuan per square meter respectively [6] - Conversely, affordable housing projects such as Bangtai Yingyue and Bangtai Huayuan City are also selling well, with average transaction prices of approximately 8,182 yuan and 4,725 yuan per square meter [6] New Supply and Demand - The newly launched Zhongtong Lian Dashushan project in Chenggong New City successfully sold 110 units with a take-up rate of 64%, offering units priced between 10,200 and 11,500 yuan per square meter [7] - The project is recognized for its high efficiency in space utilization, with some units achieving a remarkable 252% usable area ratio [7][10] Educational Infrastructure Development - The Longjie Village urban renewal project includes plans for a new primary school, with a total planned area of approximately 27,001.14 square meters [10][12] - The Guandu Ancient Town project is also set to include educational facilities, with a total land area of about 67.68 acres, aimed at enhancing local educational resources [12][14]