专家表示，我国作为海洋渔业大国和《北太平洋公海渔业资源养护和管理公约》成员国，中国海警派舰艇赴北太平洋开展渔业执法巡航，对我国参与全球海 洋治理、保护公海渔业资源具有重要意义。自参与北太平洋公海渔业执法以来，中国海警以专业高效的行动，为推动全球渔业资源可持续发展做出了有力贡 献。 杨霄：我们坚持在国际水域履行国际义务，开展海洋执法活动，在这个过程中我们提升了自己的执法能力，也建立了国际合作的渠道平台，通过这些活动向 国际社会展现了我们在远洋执法的能力。 今天（10月10日）上午，中国海警海门舰和洋山舰组成的舰艇编队圆满完成2025年北太平洋公海渔业执法巡航任务，顺利返港。这是中国海警在北太平洋公 海开展的第10次巡航。此次巡航历时31天，航程17500余海里，航时1409小时。 巡航期间，舰艇编队根据联合国大会相关决议和《北太平洋公海渔业资源养护和管理公约》有关规定，加大公海渔业法律法规和养护管理措施宣传，加强作 业渔船巡查监管，做好北太渔委会注册渔船信息核对。共观察记录各国渔船69艘，登临检查10艘，有效履行了国际公约义务，维护了北太平洋渔业生产秩 序。 中国现代国际关系研究院海洋问题专家杨霄：这些活动其实 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of high-quality development of the marine economy as a strategic task for achieving the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation, guided by Xi Jinping's important speeches and policies [2][3][10]. Group 1: Major Goals of Marine Economic Development - The goal is to promote high-quality development of the marine economy, which is a crucial part of the socialist cause with Chinese characteristics and a significant strategic task for national rejuvenation [3][4]. - The focus is on a development path characterized by planning, policy support, technological advancement, industrial strength, ecological protection, and cooperative prosperity [3][4]. Group 2: Important Principles for Marine Economic Development - The development should emphasize innovation-driven growth, efficient collaboration, industrial upgrading, harmony between humans and the sea, and win-win cooperation [4][5]. - These principles align with the new development philosophy and are essential for advancing the marine economy [4]. Group 3: Key Tasks for Marine Economic Development - Key tasks include enhancing top-level design, improving independent innovation capabilities in marine technology, strengthening marine industries, and protecting marine ecological environments [5][6]. - The tasks also involve deep participation in global marine governance and addressing significant theoretical and practical issues in building a marine power [5][9]. Group 4: Achievements in Marine Economy - The marine economy has become a vital part of the national economy, with a marine production value exceeding 10.5 trillion yuan in 2024, and an estimated 5.1 trillion yuan in the first half of 2025, reflecting a growth rate of approximately 5.8% [6][7]. - Significant progress has been made in marine resource exploration, with major discoveries in oil and gas fields, and advancements in marine strategic emerging industries [7][8]. Group 5: Enhancing Marine Technology and Innovation - The establishment of major marine research platforms and the development of advanced marine technologies are prioritized, including breakthroughs in deep-sea resource exploration and marine energy utilization [8][11]. - The focus is on cultivating a skilled workforce and fostering innovation in marine science and technology [11][12]. Group 6: Marine Ecological Protection and Global Governance - Continuous efforts are being made to strengthen marine ecological protection, including the establishment of marine protected areas and restoration projects [8][13]. - Active participation in global marine governance is highlighted, with collaborations with over 50 countries and international organizations to promote sustainable marine practices [9][13].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the importance of high-quality development of the marine economy, focusing on innovation-driven growth, efficient collaboration, industrial upgrading, harmonious human-ocean relationships, and cooperative win-win strategies [1][2][3] - The national marine production value is projected to exceed 10 trillion yuan in 2024, marking a 5.9% increase from the previous year, accounting for 7.8% of the GDP [1] - Coastal provinces are actively promoting the marine economy as a key growth driver, with several provinces implementing policies to support high-quality marine economic development [1] Group 2 - The global marine landscape is undergoing significant changes, with major economies intensifying their focus on marine strategies, leading to increased competition [2] - Strengthening and expanding the marine industry is identified as a core pathway to achieve high-quality marine economic development and enhance national strategic resource reserves and global competitiveness [2] - There is a strong emphasis on transforming traditional marine industries, fostering emerging industries, and integrating marine and digital economies to elevate the supply chain towards high-end, intelligent, and green development [2] Group 3 - A coordinated approach between land and sea is essential for the effective development of marine resources, requiring comprehensive planning and steady progress [3] - The establishment of a collaborative and efficient policy framework is necessary to support marine economic development, encouraging private investment and participation from specialized enterprises [3] - Active participation in global marine governance and cooperation in marine scientific research and disaster prevention is crucial for enhancing China's influence in international marine rule-making [3]

Core Viewpoint - The 2025 Marine Cooperation Development Forum aims to enhance global marine governance and promote sustainable development of marine cities through various dialogues and collaborations [1][3][4] Group 1: Forum Highlights - The forum will feature a dialogue among mayors of marine cities, focusing on the theme "Ocean Makes Cities Better," with segments including guest speeches, promotional releases, mayor sharing, and business dialogues [1] - Over 300 distinguished guests from more than 20 countries and regions, including mayors or representatives from marine cities in France, South Korea, and Kenya, will participate in discussions on urban governance, marine technology, and ecological protection [3] - The forum will introduce the "Global Blue Partnership Qingdao Initiative," aiming to establish a blue economy development alliance and promote a comprehensive cooperation platform involving policy dialogue, technology transfer, industry connection, and financial support [4]

Group 1 - The project in Taizhou, Zhejiang, transforms marine plastic waste into low-carbon, environmentally friendly raw materials, benefiting fishermen and companies while promoting sustainable marine waste management [1] - This initiative provides a Chinese solution to marine pollution and has been awarded the "Earth Guardian Award" by the United Nations Environment Programme [1] - China's deep participation in global marine governance helps address governance deficits and enhances international discourse power, showcasing the responsibilities of a major power [1] Group 2 - China's emphasis on global marine governance is reflected in national strategies, as highlighted in the recent Central Financial Committee meeting, which called for deeper involvement in global marine governance and cooperation in blue economy [1] - The COAST toolkit, developed by Chinese research teams, offers free access to marine big data and advanced modeling for coastal cities, facilitating disaster warning and ecological management [2] - The international value of China's solutions is recognized, with the COAST toolkit aiding "Global South" countries in understanding marine resources and sharing data and technology [2] Group 3 - Technological empowerment plays a crucial role in coastal ecological governance and biodiversity protection, with marine observation technology being vital for maintaining marine rights and environmental protection [3] - China's advancements in marine technology, such as the successful deployment of a comprehensive observation buoy system in the South China Sea, fill gaps in deep-sea observation technology [3] - The integration of technology and ecology is shaping a new chapter in marine governance, with China actively contributing to international discussions and solutions [3]

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the intersection of global ocean governance and peace, advocating for the inclusion of peace-building dimensions in current international ocean cooperation and governance practices [1][4]. Group 1: Ocean Governance and Peace - The paper argues that the ocean has been undervalued as a potential mechanism for peace-building within existing governance frameworks and academic research [2]. - It highlights the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) as a core case, establishing judicial and mediation mechanisms for peaceful negotiations over maritime rights [2]. Group 2: Ocean Decade Initiatives - The Ocean Decade has significant potential for peace-building, aiming to promote sustainable development through systematic scientific solutions, emphasizing global cooperation and inclusive governance [3]. - Various initiatives led by the ocean research institute, such as the coastal city sustainable development toolkit, integrate ocean big data and advanced technologies to foster peace [3]. Group 3: Recommendations for Future Research - The article suggests formally incorporating "Peaceful Oceans" as the eighth expected outcome of the Ocean Decade, reflecting the ocean's role in global peace governance [4]. - It calls for interdisciplinary research on "Oceans and Peace," encouraging collaboration between ocean scientists and peace researchers to transform the ocean's peace potential into institutional guarantees and actionable pathways [4].

Core Points - The third United Nations Ocean Conference will be held in Nice, France from June 9 to 13, 2025, co-hosted by France and Costa Rica, with approximately 15,000 representatives from various sectors gathering to discuss global ocean governance [6] - The conference adopted a political declaration titled "Our Ocean, Our Future: Unite to Take Urgent Action" and established the "Nice Ocean Action Plan" with over 800 voluntary commitments from countries and relevant entities [6] - The conference featured numerous side events, including 135 in the main area and over 300 in surrounding areas, focusing on various topics related to ocean sustainability [8] Industry Insights - The Chinese delegation actively participated in discussions on marine ecology, technology, financing, climate change, biodiversity protection, marine pollution, fisheries, and food security, showcasing China's achievements in ecological civilization and marine power [7] - The conference highlighted the importance of data sharing for global ocean welfare, with significant contributions from China in developing marine data products and technologies [11][12] - The "Blue Partnership" initiative was emphasized as a collaborative approach to marine ecological protection and restoration, with successful case studies presented from multiple countries [14][15] Technological Developments - China introduced several marine technology products, including the global ocean fusion dataset (CGOF 1.0) and a deep-sea digital twin system, aimed at enhancing marine data sharing and predictive capabilities [11][12] - The COAST tool, designed for sustainable coastal development, was launched to provide visualized products and services for various marine-related sectors [12] Collaborative Efforts - The conference facilitated bilateral talks and partnerships aimed at expanding global blue partnerships and enhancing cooperation on marine issues [8] - The importance of marine spatial planning was discussed as a key tool for sustainable blue economy development, with China sharing its extensive experience in this area [17]

Core Viewpoint - The Ministry of Natural Resources has showcased 15 representative marine ecological protection and restoration cases, highlighting successful experiences across various coastal regions in China, aimed at promoting sustainable marine environments and enhancing ecological product value [1] Group 1: Marine Ecological Protection and Restoration Cases - The selected cases cover diverse marine ecological units, including estuaries, bays, and islands, and involve typical ecosystems such as mangroves, coral reefs, seagrass beds, and salt marshes [1] - The central government emphasizes the need for comprehensive marine ecological environment protection and the implementation of key sea area management [1] - Local governments are adopting a systematic approach to marine ecological restoration, focusing on land-sea coordination and precise strategies [1] Group 2: Specific Regional Initiatives - Jinzhou City has initiated a marine ecological restoration project, clearing 1,181 hectares of aquaculture ponds and restoring 1,597 hectares of salt marsh vegetation, leading to a 30.8% increase in domestic tourism to 48.396 million visitors in 2024 [2] - Tangshan's Caofeidian District has developed a comprehensive restoration technology system for seagrass beds, restoring 938 hectares and increasing biodiversity index by 42.3% [3] - Zhoushan City has implemented measures to address severe land-based pollution and has transformed traditional fishing ports into multifunctional ports, enhancing ecological conditions [3] Group 3: Overall Trends and Challenges - The shift in marine ecological protection is moving from single-factor quality improvement to overall ecological environment quality enhancement [5] - Despite significant achievements in marine ecological restoration, challenges remain in pollution prevention and the establishment of long-term mechanisms for beautiful bays [7] - Experts suggest a transition from pollution control to collaborative governance of marine environments and ecosystems, emphasizing the importance of public satisfaction and happiness in ecological initiatives [8]

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes that the United States is abusing the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) rules, acting as a speculator and a disruptor of international maritime order [1][2]. Group 1: U.S. Actions and Attitudes - The U.S. has not joined UNCLOS but frequently references it to criticize other countries' compliance while seeking to benefit from its provisions without fulfilling its responsibilities [2]. - The U.S. disregards collective international efforts under UNCLOS, opting for unilateral development of deep-sea resources and politicizing issues like undersea cables [2][3]. - The U.S. opposes the United Nations' 2030 Sustainable Development Agenda and has shown a lack of engagement in international marine governance, including not participating in significant conferences [3]. Group 2: Regional Implications - The U.S. is seen as a disruptor of peace and stability in the South China Sea, misinterpreting UNCLOS to justify military presence and infringing on the sovereignty of other nations [3][4]. - The U.S. undermines regional cooperation efforts aimed at maintaining peace and friendship in the South China Sea, creating distrust among neighboring countries [3]. Group 3: China's Position - China, as a contracting party to UNCLOS, commits to upholding the spirit of the convention and fulfilling its obligations, opposing selective application and misuse of dispute resolution procedures [5]. - China calls for all nations to practice multilateralism and work together towards sustainable development goals, promoting a shared maritime community [6].

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese representative at the UN criticized the United States for ignoring international trends and engaging in unilateral hegemony, urging the US to play a constructive role in global ocean governance [1]. Group 1: US Criticism - The US, as a non-signatory of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), frequently invokes the convention to assert its rights while refusing to fulfill corresponding obligations, positioning itself as a rule opportunist [1]. - The US is accused of undermining international maritime order by unilaterally developing resources in international seabed issues, thus acting as a disruptor of global ocean governance [1]. - The US is seen as a destabilizing force in the South China Sea, frequently conducting military provocations under the guise of "freedom of navigation," which damages relations between China and ASEAN countries [3]. Group 2: Call for Action - The Chinese representative emphasized the need for the international community to uphold the integrity and authority of UNCLOS, urging judicial bodies to respect national sovereignty and act strictly within their mandates to prevent the abuse of dispute resolution mechanisms [5].