抽纸、卷纸、湿纸、乳霜纸……生活里，纸巾是一种高频消费品。曾经"一卷卫生纸满足全家所 需"，如今"专纸专用"成了日常。"专纸专用"会助长浪费吗？如何看待纸品消费升级与反对浪费的关 系？前段时间，我们在"人民日报评论"微信公众号发起征稿，邀请读者朋友共同探讨这一话题。本期大 家谈，我们选刊3篇来稿，聊一聊对促进消费与反对浪费的思考。——编者 关键是供需适配 北京朝阳区沈晟 吸附力强的厨房纸、具有消毒功能的卫生湿巾、餐桌常备的面巾纸……细数下来，家中使用的纸品 已有七八种。从以前"够用就行"，到现在更注重场景适配，用纸的变化，是生活品质提升的体现，也是 消费升级的映照。 消费升级了，并不意味着浪费多了。比如，以前清理厨房油污，抽纸一张不够用，要叠好几张，也 容易破，弄得手上沾满油污；而如今，质量好的厨房纸，一张就能解决问题，用纸量减少了不说，体验 也得到升级。事实上，消费升级，并非量的堆砌，而在于质的提升，这有利于达到节约资源、减少浪费 的效果；提倡节约，也并非要抑制合理需求、降低生活品质，而是反对无用消耗、铺张浪费。从这个角 度来看，纸品的消费升级与反对浪费，并不矛盾。 让消费升级与反对浪费有机统一，关键是实现 ...

——编 者 关键是供需适配 抽纸、卷纸、湿纸、乳霜纸……生活里，纸巾是一种高频消费品。曾经"一卷卫生纸满足全家所需"，如 今"专纸专用"成了日常。"专纸专用"会助长浪费吗？如何看待纸品消费升级与反对浪费的关系？前段时 间，我们在"人民日报评论"微信公众号发起征稿，邀请读者朋友共同探讨这一话题。本期大家谈，我们 选刊3篇来稿，聊一聊对促进消费与反对浪费的思考。 实际上，节约的反义词从来都是浪费，而不是消费。产品品质更高，更能实现物尽其用之效。就拿乳霜 纸来说，虽然价格比普通纸巾贵，但韧性更足、不易破，还柔软。以前感冒时擦鼻子，要拿两三张纸， 后来用了乳霜纸，一次一张就够，浪费少了，也不用担心鼻子被磨得生疼。 勤俭节约精神永不过时。拒绝铺张浪费，不是要拒绝消费升级，而是要实现物尽其用。如今，市场上出 现"小包纸巾"，正是在提高纸品质量基础上，鼓励节俭用纸，实现减量不减品质。既追求生活品质，也 发扬勤俭节约精神，就能更好实现促进消费与反对浪费的统一。 绿色也是竞争力 湖南长沙市 李 婕 北京朝阳区 沈 晟 吸附力强的厨房纸、具有消毒功能的卫生湿巾、餐桌常备的面巾纸……细数下来，家中使用的纸品已有 七八种。从以前"够 ...

Core Points - The implementation of the revised "Regulations on Strict Economy and Opposition to Waste in Party and Government Agencies" has led to observable changes in behavior and practices within these institutions [1][2][3] - The emphasis on frugality is rooted in historical context, highlighting the importance of maintaining a clear and focused mission rather than succumbing to extravagance [2] - The regulations aim to optimize resource allocation, ensuring that necessary expenditures are maintained while eliminating unnecessary and extravagant spending [3][4] Summary by Sections - **Implementation Changes** - Observations from grassroots research indicate a shift towards simpler and more efficient dining practices among officials, reflecting the new regulations [1] - **Historical Context and Philosophy** - The article draws parallels between current practices and historical examples, emphasizing that frugality is not about deprivation but about commitment to core values and missions [2] - **Resource Allocation and Efficiency** - The regulations clarify that opposing waste does not mean cutting essential spending; rather, it focuses on eliminating ineffective expenditures, with a projected 5% reduction in "three public" expenses by 2025 [3] - Increased spending in social security, education, and health sectors indicates a positive reallocation of resources, enhancing public welfare [3] - **Public Perception and Commitment** - The commitment to frugality is seen as a way to gain public trust and support, reinforcing the idea that responsible governance leads to improved living conditions for the populace [4]

Core Insights - The article emphasizes the importance of encouraging consumption while opposing waste, highlighting the need for a balanced approach to economic growth and sustainability [1][6]. Group 1: Consumer Behavior and Economic Growth - The article discusses the case of a drone enthusiast who, taking advantage of a trade-in policy, invested in a drone setup, reflecting a shift towards effective demand and quality supply in the consumer market [2]. - The growth of the civil drone industry in China is noted as a significant contributor to the low-altitude economy, creating new job opportunities and promoting high-quality employment [2]. - The article stresses that encouraging consumption and opposing waste leads to more effective growth, aligning with sustainable economic development [2]. Group 2: Green Consumption - A case study of an electric vehicle owner illustrates the benefits of green consumption, where participation in a vehicle-to-grid program can yield financial returns while reducing carbon emissions [3]. - The shift towards green products is highlighted, with policies supporting green consumption becoming increasingly influential in consumer choices [3]. - The article argues that opposing waste is not about reducing consumption but about enhancing the quality of life and meeting the growing demands for better living standards [3]. Group 3: Cultural Consumption - The article highlights the rising trend of cultural consumption, with increased attendance at performances and events, indicating a shift in consumer preferences towards experiences rather than material goods [4]. - The growth in ticket sales and cultural events reflects a change in consumer behavior, where value is placed on quality experiences [4]. - The integration of culture and commerce is seen as a new landscape for consumption, fostering regional development and enhancing local brands [4]. Group 4: Government Spending and Social Welfare - The article presents a case of local government spending in Zhejiang, where a significant portion of the budget is allocated to social welfare rather than extravagant expenditures, reflecting a commitment to improving citizens' lives [5]. - The increase in social spending by 21.1% year-on-year indicates a focus on investing in people and enhancing public welfare [5]. - The government's approach to fiscal responsibility is framed as a means to build public trust and ensure that resources are directed towards meaningful social initiatives [5].

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights Xi Jinping's experiences as a farmer in Liangjiahe during the 1960s and 1970s, emphasizing his commitment to agricultural development and food security, which continues to influence his policies today [1][2][10]. Group 1: Personal Experience and Leadership - Xi Jinping worked alongside villagers in Liangjiahe, engaging in various agricultural tasks and quickly becoming a strong labor force [1]. - In December 1972, he sold 59 jin (approximately 29.5 kg) of sorghum for 5.19 yuan, reflecting the challenging agricultural conditions of the time [2][3]. - After joining the Communist Party in 1974, he led efforts to build an irrigation dam, increasing arable land and grain production from 109,465 jin in 1971 to 179,946 jin in 1974 [2][6]. Group 2: Emphasis on Food Security - Xi Jinping's experiences as a farmer instilled a deep respect for food and the labor of farmers, leading to a strong advocacy for reducing food waste [6][8]. - He has consistently highlighted the importance of food security, noting that despite improvements, there are still significant issues with food loss at various stages of the supply chain [10][11]. - National statistics indicate that China's grain production has exceeded 1.4 trillion jin in 2024, marking a significant achievement in food security [9]. Group 3: Advocacy for Reducing Food Waste - Xi Jinping has raised awareness about food waste, citing that over 22.7% of food is lost annually, equating to approximately 9.2 billion jin, which could feed 190 million people for a year if recovered [11]. - He has initiated campaigns like the "Clean Plate Campaign" to promote food conservation and has emphasized the need for a culture of frugality [11][12]. - His personal anecdotes about food conservation reflect a broader commitment to instilling values of thriftiness and respect for agricultural labor within society [7][12].

Group 1 - The core issue of expired food safety is highlighted, emphasizing the need for clear definitions and regulations to protect consumers and maintain market order [1][2] - The Beijing Municipal Market Supervision Administration has issued guidelines to clarify the definition of "near-expiry" food, improve labeling, and manage inventory effectively [1] - The lack of a unified standard for near-expiry food has led to consumer confusion and potential health risks, necessitating regulatory measures to prevent expired food from being sold [1] Group 2 - The market for near-expiry food in China is expanding, reflecting a growing awareness of rational consumption and waste reduction [2] - Effective management of near-expiry food requires strict adherence to rules by merchants and manufacturers, as well as proactive regulatory oversight to prevent expired products from being misrepresented [2] - Proper circulation of near-expiry food can reduce waste and provide consumers with cost-effective options, promoting a culture of rational consumption [2]

Core Viewpoint - The revised "Regulations on Strict Economy and Opposition to Waste by Party and Government Agencies" emphasizes the importance of frugality and reducing waste, reinforcing the commitment of the Chinese Communist Party to lead by example in living a frugal lifestyle [1][3][5]. Group 1: Regulations and Principles - The new regulations highlight that party and government agencies must lead by example in frugality, which is now a key principle in the revised regulations [3][5]. - The regulations aim to lower costs of public activities, scientifically allocate financial resources, and establish a long-term mechanism for promoting frugality and opposing waste [5][11]. - The revised regulations include stricter rules on budget management, travel, public reception, and resource conservation, with 33 prohibitions and 62 restrictions, increasing accountability and discipline [11][12]. Group 2: Historical Context and Political Commitment - The emphasis on frugality is rooted in the party's historical commitment to saving resources, dating back to the revolutionary era [7][9]. - The party's commitment to frugality is seen as a promise to the public, reflecting a political ethos of self-discipline and public service [3][9]. - The regulations are viewed as a significant step in the party's self-reform and a response to past issues of waste and corruption [9][11]. Group 3: Economic Implications - The reduction in "three public" expenditures in recent years indicates a trend towards greater fiscal responsibility, with a budget decrease of 0.5 billion yuan in 2024 and over 300 million yuan in 2025 [5][12]. - The savings from frugality can be redirected to improve public welfare, with over 70% of the national budget now allocated to social welfare [16][18]. - The initiative aims to enhance government efficiency and effectiveness, allowing public servants to focus on solving real issues for the populace [11][18].

Group 1 - The core idea of the article emphasizes the balance between promoting consumption and opposing waste, suggesting that rational consumption can coexist with efforts to reduce waste [1][3][4] - Consumption is crucial for economic growth, contributing 52% to GDP growth in the first half of the year, an increase of 7.5 percentage points compared to the previous year [2] - The article advocates for a sustainable and quality-focused consumption model that contrasts with wasteful spending, aligning with traditional values of thrift and resource conservation [3][4] Group 2 - The article addresses concerns that opposing waste might suppress consumption, clarifying that it encourages more meaningful and rational spending rather than less spending [3] - Initiatives like "small portion meals" and "shared resources" are highlighted as examples of how anti-waste measures can enhance consumption efficiency and promote a green economy [3] - The government's commitment to frugality and anti-waste policies is reinforced by new regulations aimed at fostering a culture of saving and responsible spending [4]

Group 1 - Company signed a lease termination agreement with Wukesong Cultural and Sports Center, effective July 31, 2025, due to inability to fulfill the original contract [1] - The company will incur a loss of approximately 2.1092 million yuan due to the early termination of the lease, which will impact the annual profit for 2025 [2] - The company is required to pay a total of 1,026,260.42 yuan to Wukesong Cultural and Sports Center after offsetting the unreturned deposit [1] Group 2 - The monthly rental cost for the office space at Huaxi LIVE Center is 228,600 yuan, which is considered high [2] - The decision to terminate the lease is aligned with the company's response to national policies promoting frugality and cost-saving measures [2] - Although the early termination will result in short-term losses, it is expected to lead to long-term savings on rental costs, positively impacting the company's development [2]

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of strict management of training expenses in government departments to promote frugality and oppose waste, aligning with the central government's regulations and guidelines [1][4]. Summary by Sections Notification Requirements - The notification prohibits unnecessary out-of-province training and mandates that any such training for senior officials must receive approval from the Provincial Organization Department [2]. - It encourages a shift from "going out" for training to "bringing in" trainers, with a preference for using internal venues for training sessions [2]. Training Expense Management - Training programs should be streamlined, with a focus on reducing duration where possible, and strict control over single-topic training [3]. - The use of training funds for non-training related expenses, such as hospitality or fixed asset purchases, is strictly forbidden [3]. - Training accommodations should primarily be standard rooms, and meals should not include high-end dishes or alcohol [3]. Implementation of Regulations - The article highlights the need for all regions and departments to understand and implement the revised regulations on frugality and waste reduction, which are crucial for the image of the party and the success of national initiatives [4]. - It calls for timely reporting of significant situations and suggestions related to the implementation of these regulations to the central government [4].