临期食品是食品安全的薄弱环节。如果界定模糊、销售无序，其结果将是消费者吃亏，商家失信， 市场失序。 近日，北京市市场监督管理局发布相关工作指引和风险提示，通过界定标准、明确标识、限量备 货，精准施策，着力保障临期食品安全。上述工作指引聚焦临期食品界定不清晰、管理不规范等问题， 明确不同保质期食品"临期"界定标准，指导农村食品经营单位通过设置销售专区、优化食品标识、及时 处置过期食品等方式，加强临期食品管理。这是市场监管的优化，也为食品安全筑牢了防线。 长期以来，临期食品界定缺乏统一标准，让消费者心里没底。一些商家将其与正常食品混售，不标 识、不提醒，导致消费者在不知情的情况下买到临近过期的食品，甚至有商家涂改日期销售过期食品。 更有一些不法商家将临期过期食品涂改日期后销往食品安全管理薄弱的农村地区，威胁消费者健康。只 有明确了不同保质期食品的临界点，让监管有据、经营有法、消费可知，才能从制度层面堵住临期食品 变为问题食品的漏洞。 近年来，我国临期食品市场规模不断扩大，折射出理性消费和反对浪费观念的日渐深化。市场要有 序发展，必须守好安全底线。治理临期食品乱象，关键要让规则长出"牙齿"。商家要守住底线，不 打" ...

Core Viewpoint - The revised "Regulations on Strict Economy and Opposition to Waste by Party and Government Agencies" emphasizes the importance of frugality and reducing waste, reinforcing the commitment of the Chinese Communist Party to lead by example in living a frugal lifestyle [1][3][5]. Group 1: Regulations and Principles - The new regulations highlight that party and government agencies must lead by example in frugality, which is now a key principle in the revised regulations [3][5]. - The regulations aim to lower costs of public activities, scientifically allocate financial resources, and establish a long-term mechanism for promoting frugality and opposing waste [5][11]. - The revised regulations include stricter rules on budget management, travel, public reception, and resource conservation, with 33 prohibitions and 62 restrictions, increasing accountability and discipline [11][12]. Group 2: Historical Context and Political Commitment - The emphasis on frugality is rooted in the party's historical commitment to saving resources, dating back to the revolutionary era [7][9]. - The party's commitment to frugality is seen as a promise to the public, reflecting a political ethos of self-discipline and public service [3][9]. - The regulations are viewed as a significant step in the party's self-reform and a response to past issues of waste and corruption [9][11]. Group 3: Economic Implications - The reduction in "three public" expenditures in recent years indicates a trend towards greater fiscal responsibility, with a budget decrease of 0.5 billion yuan in 2024 and over 300 million yuan in 2025 [5][12]. - The savings from frugality can be redirected to improve public welfare, with over 70% of the national budget now allocated to social welfare [16][18]. - The initiative aims to enhance government efficiency and effectiveness, allowing public servants to focus on solving real issues for the populace [11][18].

Group 1 - The core idea of the article emphasizes the balance between promoting consumption and opposing waste, suggesting that rational consumption can coexist with efforts to reduce waste [1][3][4] - Consumption is crucial for economic growth, contributing 52% to GDP growth in the first half of the year, an increase of 7.5 percentage points compared to the previous year [2] - The article advocates for a sustainable and quality-focused consumption model that contrasts with wasteful spending, aligning with traditional values of thrift and resource conservation [3][4] Group 2 - The article addresses concerns that opposing waste might suppress consumption, clarifying that it encourages more meaningful and rational spending rather than less spending [3] - Initiatives like "small portion meals" and "shared resources" are highlighted as examples of how anti-waste measures can enhance consumption efficiency and promote a green economy [3] - The government's commitment to frugality and anti-waste policies is reinforced by new regulations aimed at fostering a culture of saving and responsible spending [4]

Group 1 - Company signed a lease termination agreement with Wukesong Cultural and Sports Center, effective July 31, 2025, due to inability to fulfill the original contract [1] - The company will incur a loss of approximately 2.1092 million yuan due to the early termination of the lease, which will impact the annual profit for 2025 [2] - The company is required to pay a total of 1,026,260.42 yuan to Wukesong Cultural and Sports Center after offsetting the unreturned deposit [1] Group 2 - The monthly rental cost for the office space at Huaxi LIVE Center is 228,600 yuan, which is considered high [2] - The decision to terminate the lease is aligned with the company's response to national policies promoting frugality and cost-saving measures [2] - Although the early termination will result in short-term losses, it is expected to lead to long-term savings on rental costs, positively impacting the company's development [2]

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of strict management of training expenses in government departments to promote frugality and oppose waste, aligning with the central government's regulations and guidelines [1][4]. Summary by Sections Notification Requirements - The notification prohibits unnecessary out-of-province training and mandates that any such training for senior officials must receive approval from the Provincial Organization Department [2]. - It encourages a shift from "going out" for training to "bringing in" trainers, with a preference for using internal venues for training sessions [2]. Training Expense Management - Training programs should be streamlined, with a focus on reducing duration where possible, and strict control over single-topic training [3]. - The use of training funds for non-training related expenses, such as hospitality or fixed asset purchases, is strictly forbidden [3]. - Training accommodations should primarily be standard rooms, and meals should not include high-end dishes or alcohol [3]. Implementation of Regulations - The article highlights the need for all regions and departments to understand and implement the revised regulations on frugality and waste reduction, which are crucial for the image of the party and the success of national initiatives [4]. - It calls for timely reporting of significant situations and suggestions related to the implementation of these regulations to the central government [4].

Core Viewpoint - The revised "Regulations on Strict Economy and Opposition to Waste by Party and Government Agencies" emphasizes the importance of frugality and anti-waste measures as a political task, reinforcing institutional constraints to ensure adherence to these principles across all public activities [1][2]. Group 1: Implementation and Impact - The revision of the regulations serves as a reminder for party leaders to view waste issues with a higher political stance, linking waste to the party's image and the success of national endeavors [2]. - The regulations require integration into various aspects of financial management, procurement, investment, travel, and other activities, mandating strict adherence from all party leaders [2][3]. - The emphasis on accountability for wasteful practices, such as extravagant spending and "performance projects," aims to eliminate any leniency towards violations of the regulations [2]. Group 2: Economic Context and Resource Management - In the current economic environment, local departments are encouraged to implement the regulations to promote significant savings through optimized fiscal expenditure and resource allocation [3]. - The regulations advocate for the efficient use of resources like energy, water, and office supplies, promoting practices such as sharing and reallocating existing assets to enhance resource utilization [3]. - State-owned enterprises and institutions are urged to follow the regulations, contributing to sustainable development and overall resource efficiency, thereby supporting a green and low-carbon economic transition [3]. Group 3: Social Responsibility and Public Welfare - Party and government agencies are expected to lead by example in practicing frugality, which is intended to improve the living standards of the public [3]. - Strict enforcement of the regulations and effective supervision are seen as essential to prevent waste, thereby enhancing public welfare through every act of saving [3].