AI播客：换个方式听新闻 下载mp3 音频由扣子空间生成 据七位知情人士透露，由特朗普任命、指控其政敌存在抵押贷款欺诈的官员，在提交刑事举报时绕过了 其所在机构的监察长，违背了旨在防止联邦官员为党派目的滥用权力的规定。 今年早些时候，联邦住房金融局（FHFA）局长比尔·普尔特（Bill Pulte）对包括美联储理事莉萨·库克 （Lisa Cook）在内的目标人物提起刑事举报，指控他们涉嫌抵押贷款相关犯罪。然而，普尔特违背标 准流程，未通过该机构内部监督部门（通常负责此类举报提交），而是直接请求司法部调查库克及另外 两名知名官员。 "这些举报并非来自监察长办公室（OIG），"其中一位知情人士提及该部门时表示，"这让那里的人感 到意外。" 普尔特的指控，是特朗普政府持续寻求对总统政治与政策上的"敌人"提起刑事指控的核心环节。上个 月，这场行动导致前联邦调查局（FBI）局长被提起刑事诉讼。在库克一案中，法律专家批评普尔特的 此举是为了将美联储这一对美国经济至关重要的独立机构中的高级政策制定者赶下台——而特朗普正日 益试图让美联储屈从于其意志。 特朗普称这些调查聚焦于"正义"，而非政治目标。在前FBI局长被起诉后，他 ...

萨科齐在离开法庭时回应称，这一裁决"对国家法治的破坏极为严重"，并质疑司法公正。他表示："我 会承担起我的责任，将服从法庭传唤。如果他们一定要我坐牢，我就会去坐牢，但我会昂着头进去。我 是无辜的。" 执政阵营对此事保持沉默，爱丽舍宫、总理府及执政党均未公开表态。据一位部长顾问透露，政府内部 对判决感到震惊与困惑，但尚未形成统一立场或对外发声策略。 与此同时，萨科齐的律师已提出上诉，并寻求缩短其实际被监禁时间。尽管已提起上诉，依据法国一项 特殊的司法规定，萨科齐仍须在未来数周内开始服刑，可能面临电子脚镣等替代刑罚。 该判决在法国政坛引发强烈反响。左翼阵营视其为法治的胜利，支持司法独立。法国《世界报》评论 称，审判传递出"无人可凌驾于法律之上"的信号。相反，右翼与极右翼阵营普遍声援萨科齐，部分共和 党议员要总统马克龙行使特赦权，并批评PNF缺乏中立性。曾因类似案件被判刑的极右翼国民联盟领导 人勒庞也指责PNF存在"政治倾向"。 【环球时报驻法国特派记者 尚凯元】法国前总统萨科齐因被指控在2007年总统竞选期间非法收受利比 亚前领导人卡扎菲提供的资金，近日被巴黎刑事法院判定犯有"共谋罪"，被判处5年监禁。这意味着萨 ...

这是7月21日在巴西首都巴西利亚拍摄的雅伊尔·博索纳罗（中）的资料照片。新华社发（卢西奥·塔沃拉摄） 另外，巴西卫生部长亚历山大·帕迪利亚19日宣布取消访美计划，原因是美方对他进行签证限制。泛美卫生组织定于9月底至10月初在华盛顿召开 会议。帕迪利亚原计划陪同巴西总统卢拉先赴纽约参加第80届联合国大会，再前往华盛顿参加这次会议。然而美国政府发放的签证仅允许帕迪利 亚前往纽约，并只能在下榻的酒店与联合国总部之间有限区域内活动。 这是7月29日在美国首都华盛顿拍摄的美国财政部大楼。新华社记者胡友松摄 美国财政部22日宣布，依据《全球马格尼茨基人权问责法》制裁巴西联邦最高法院法官亚历山大·德莫赖斯的妻子维维安娜·巴尔西·德莫赖斯以及 与她有关联的一家金融机构。 本月11日，巴西最高法院宣布博索纳罗策划政变罪名成立，判处他入狱27年零3个月。审理此案的5名法官中，德莫赖斯等4人认定博索纳罗有 罪。 早在案件审理过程中，美方就已向巴方施压，宣判后又称德莫赖斯把司法"武器化""政治化"和"压制言论自由"。德莫赖斯已于7月遭美方制裁。 路透社22日援引美国政府一名高级官员的话报道，美方还吊销了巴西总检察长若热·梅西亚斯和另 ...

Group 1 - The U.S. government revoked the U.S. visa of Brazilian Health Minister Padilha's family member as part of sanctions against Brazil [1][3] - Padilha described the visa revocation of his 10-year-old daughter as "astonishingly absurd" and an act of "diplomatic abuse" [1][3] - The actions taken by the Trump administration are seen as an attempt to assist former Brazilian President Bolsonaro in evading judicial sanctions related to a failed coup attempt in 2022 [3] Group 2 - Trump views Bolsonaro as a political ally and has criticized Brazil's judicial system since returning to the White House [3] - Brazilian President Lula has repeatedly stated that the independence of Brazil's judicial process cannot be interfered with or threatened [3] - Following the Supreme Court's ruling against Bolsonaro, U.S. Secretary of State Rubio indicated that the U.S. would respond accordingly, which Brazil's Foreign Ministry deemed an inappropriate threat [3]

Core Points - The Brazilian Federal Supreme Court convicted former President Bolsonaro of attempting to overthrow the democratic system, sentencing him to 27 years and 3 months in prison, marking a historic ruling in Brazil's judicial history [1][3] - The conviction stems from Bolsonaro's alleged conspiracy with seven political allies to disrupt the power transition after losing the 2022 presidential election to Lula [3] - Following the ruling, Bolsonaro is currently under house arrest, and his legal team plans to appeal to the full Supreme Court [3] Reactions and Implications - Former U.S. President Trump publicly supported Bolsonaro, criticizing the ruling as "very bad" and drawing parallels to perceived political persecution in the U.S. [4] - U.S. Secretary of State Rubio threatened a response to Bolsonaro's conviction, labeling it as political persecution, while Brazil's Foreign Ministry defended its judicial process as evidence-based [4][6] - Brazilian President Lula expressed indifference to potential U.S. sanctions related to Bolsonaro's trial, asserting that the U.S. should not interfere in Brazil's judicial matters [5][6]

Core Points - The Brazilian government has rejected threats from the U.S. following the sentencing of former President Bolsonaro to 27 years and 3 months in prison for conspiracy to commit a coup [1][3][4] - U.S. Secretary of State Rubio criticized the Brazilian Supreme Court's ruling, labeling it as "political persecution" and indicated that the U.S. would respond accordingly [3][4] - Bolsonaro is the first former president in Brazil's history to be convicted for conspiracy to commit a coup, following the violent protests by his supporters on January 8, 2023 [4] Summary by Sections - **U.S. Response**: Rubio's comments on social media condemned the Brazilian government's actions and suggested a U.S. response to the ruling against Bolsonaro [3] - **Brazil's Defense**: The Brazilian Foreign Ministry quickly countered Rubio's statements, asserting the country's commitment to defending its sovereignty against foreign threats [3] - **Judicial Context**: The conviction of Bolsonaro comes after a series of investigations into the January 8 riots, which were instigated by his supporters following the election of Lula [4] - **Political Implications**: Trump's demand for Brazil to halt judicial investigations into Bolsonaro and the imposition of a 40% tariff on Brazilian products have sparked significant backlash from the Brazilian government and public opinion [4]

Core Viewpoint - The International Criminal Court (ICC) condemned the recent sanctions imposed by the United States as a blatant attack on an independent judicial institution [1][2] Group 1: ICC's Response - The ICC issued a statement expressing strong opposition to the U.S. sanctions against two judges and two deputy prosecutors [1] - The ICC emphasized its commitment to support its staff and victims of atrocities, continuing to operate within the legal framework established by its member states [1] Group 2: U.S. Sanctions Details - The U.S. State Department announced sanctions against two ICC judges and two deputy prosecutors due to their decisions to authorize investigations into U.S. personnel in Afghanistan and to issue arrest warrants for Israeli officials [1] - This marks the second round of sanctions by the U.S. against the ICC in over a year, following previous sanctions related to the ICC's actions against Israeli leaders [2]

Core Points - The Brazilian Federal Supreme Court judge Alexandre de Moraes ordered former President Jair Bolsonaro to be placed under house arrest for violating previous preventive measures by using social media accounts to incite attacks on the Supreme Court and support foreign interference in Brazil's judicial system [1][2] - Moraes emphasized the need for stricter measures against Bolsonaro to prevent further criminal actions [2] - Bolsonaro is prohibited from using social media directly or indirectly, and any attempts to circumvent this ban could lead to arrest [3] - The court found Bolsonaro guilty of coercing and obstructing justice, as well as endangering national sovereignty, leading to restrictions including electronic monitoring and house arrest during specific hours [4] - Bolsonaro and his associates have been accused of attempting to influence U.S. sanctions against Brazilian officials and interfering with the work of Brazil's constitutional court [4] - The U.S. President announced a 50% tariff on Brazil and demanded an end to the judicial investigation against Bolsonaro, which has drawn strong backlash from the Brazilian government [4] - Bolsonaro has denied charges of plotting a coup after losing the 2022 presidential election, claiming to be a victim of political persecution [5] - The Brazilian Supreme Court is processing criminal charges against Bolsonaro and others for their alleged roles in a coup attempt to prevent the inauguration of President Lula [7] - The Brazilian Electoral Court has barred Bolsonaro from running for office until 2030, disqualifying him from the 2026 presidential election [9]

Core Points - The Brazilian Federal Supreme Court has ordered former President Jair Bolsonaro to be placed under house arrest due to violations involving the use of social media to incite attacks on the court and support foreign interference in Brazil's judicial system [1][2] - Bolsonaro is prohibited from using social media directly or indirectly, and must wear an electronic ankle monitor while under house arrest [2] - The court has indicated that Bolsonaro's actions necessitate stricter measures to prevent further offenses [1][2] Legal Proceedings - Bolsonaro faces multiple charges, including attempting to instigate a coup and participating in armed criminal organizations, with potential sentences exceeding 40 years if all charges are upheld [3][5] - The Supreme Court had previously planned to hear all testimonies by June 13, but expedited the process, completing it by June 10 [3] - The investigation into the January 8 events, where Bolsonaro supporters stormed government buildings, has led to serious legal repercussions for Bolsonaro and his associates [5] Political Context - The U.S. government has been involved, with reports of Bolsonaro's family attempting to influence U.S. sanctions against Brazilian officials, which has drawn criticism from the Brazilian government [2] - Brazilian President Lula has firmly rejected U.S. interference in domestic affairs, emphasizing the importance of national sovereignty and judicial independence [2] - Bolsonaro has been barred from running for any elections until 2030, disqualifying him from the 2026 presidential election [7]

Core Points - The U.S. has imposed a 40% tariff on Brazil, raising the total tariff to 50%, alongside sanctions against Brazilian Supreme Court Justice Demorais, indicating a significant escalation in diplomatic tensions between the two countries [1][5] - Brazilian President Lula criticized the U.S. for interfering in Brazil's judicial matters and opposed the sanctions against Demorais, asserting Brazil's sovereignty [1][6] Tariff and Trade Impact - The new tariffs do not apply to many of Brazil's major exports to the U.S., such as commercial aircraft, energy products, and orange juice, with over 40% of Brazilian exports exempt from tariffs [3] - The U.S. is projected to have a trade surplus of $7 billion with Brazil in 2024, indicating that Brazil is not a trade deficit country for the U.S. [3] Sanctions Against Demorais - The U.S. Treasury announced sanctions against Demorais, freezing his assets and prohibiting financial transactions with U.S. citizens and companies, citing his role in what they termed "witch hunts" against U.S. interests [4][5] - Demorais has been accused of human rights violations and political persecution related to former President Bolsonaro's legal troubles [4][5] Brazilian Government's Response - The Brazilian government views the U.S. trade measures as politically motivated and an infringement on its sovereignty, with officials asserting the need to maintain judicial independence [5][6] - Brazil's Foreign Minister reiterated the country's willingness to negotiate on tariff issues but emphasized that Bolsonaro's judicial case should not be part of those discussions [7] Political Context - Former President Trump has criticized the Brazilian judiciary's actions against Bolsonaro, framing them as a threat to U.S. national security and foreign policy [5] - Lula has indicated that if Trump's threats materialize, Brazil is considering retaliatory tariffs on certain U.S. products [7]