过程管控是确保目标落地的重要保障。该行制定前台营销工作对照表，将支行长、客户经理的营销任务 细化到每月、每周、每日，以清单化管理推动营销质效提升；召开重点业务推进会，对36家前台机构目 标任务逐一拆解，围绕贷款余额、理财代销等核心指标压实责任；建立营销管控专刊通报机制，按周公 布工作进展，以严格督导确保季度任务圆满完成。 在服务实体经济的道路上，该行亮点纷呈。一方面，持续加大民营企业支持力度，通过优惠利率、机关 部室推荐、公私联动等政策传导，实现民营企业客户数增长65户，贷款余额增长1.44亿元，用实际行动 缓解民企"融资难、融资贵"问题，践行"民企有呼、金融有应"的服务承诺。另一方面，创新存量抵押贷 款续贷模式，针对不同违约概率客户分类施策，为到期客户批量制定续贷方案，有效缓解企业资金周转 压力，让"金融温度"温暖每一位市场主体。 金融为民无止境，服务实体再出发。下一步，滨海农商银行将继续坚守金融本源，以更精准的服务、更 有力的举措，当好实体经济的"服务员"、企业发展的"助推器"，为地方经济高质量发展贡献更多金融力 量。 李雪峰 金融是实体经济的血脉，服务实体是金融机构的初心使命。今年以来，滨海农商银行锚定 ...

期货行业应"以合规为基，以创新为翼" 9月12日，中国证监会发布修订后的《期货公司分类评价规定》（下称《规定》）。《规定》的出台， 旨在引导期货行业转向高质量发展。《规定》在指标设计上显著强化了对服务产业客户、服务国家战略 目标的引导。本次修订将标题由《期货公司分类监管规定》调整为《期货公司分类评价规定》，标志着 监管核心从刚性的外部约束转向科学的综合评价与正向激励，其目的是推动期货公司由"被动守规"的底 线思维转变为"主动争优"的价值创造思维，将监管要求内化为提升综合竞争力的自觉行动。 扣分机制更清晰、更合理。《规定》明确了扣分原则上以生效的监管措施等法律文件为依据，减少了主 观判断空间，使扣分标准更加客观、透明。同时，消除了重复扣分的情形，对于因同一违规事项分别对 期货公司和人员采取监管措施的，《规定》将"择其重者扣分"，而非叠加扣分。此外，还合理设置了扣 分梯度，并根据监管措施的轻重程度赋予不同分值。这些调整使得合规监管的标准更为统一，减轻了期 货公司的合规负担。 《规定》对加分体系进行了结构性重塑。其中，突出服务实体经济本源，显著增强了服务实体经济能力 的指标权重，特别是新增了"产业客户日均持仓"指标 ...

与此同时，《报告》显示，信托业在乡村振兴、公益慈善、消保护航中也展现了行业的社会责任担当。 2024年，信托业在乡村全面振兴中投入帮扶资金43.04亿元，实施项目289个；信托业新增慈善信托备案 单数539单，新增备案规模16.61亿元，双双创历史新高。截至2024年末，慈善信托累计备案数量达到 2244单，累计备案规模为85.07亿元。 加速转型并服务实体经济过程中，行业人才队伍和"基础设施"也不断优化。 上证报中国证券网讯（记者 马嘉悦）9月29日，中国信托业协会发布《2024—2025中国信托业社会责任 报告》（简称"《报告》"）称，2024年，信托业精准发力，将更多金融资源配置到经济发展的重点领域 和薄弱环节，为经济社会的稳健发展提供了支持。 《报告》显示，截至2024年末，信托业管理的22.25万亿元资金信托中，有28.81%直接投向实体经济领 域，另有46.17%通过资本市场间接支持实体经济，二者合计规模达16.68万亿元，基本涵盖了实体经济 各个行业，体现了信托业服务实体经济的力度和广度。 在服务国家战略、重大项目建设方面，2024年信托业为"一带一路"项目提供资金支持1.12万亿元， 为"京津 ...

金融是实体经济的血脉，为实体经济服务是金融的天职。党的十八大以来，习近平总书记高度重视金融 工作，在多个重要场合就金融发展问题发表重要讲话，阐明了金融服务实体经济的根本宗旨，就是要完 整、准确、全面的贯彻落实党中央决策部署，深刻把握金融工作的政治性、人民性，坚定不移走中国特 色金融发展之路，把为实体经济服务作为出发点和落脚点，积极服务国家重大战略实施和培育新质生产 力，推进金融高质量发展，牢牢守住不发生系统性风险的底线。 《推动公募基金高质量发展行动方案》明确提出，坚持党对金融工作的全面领导，坚定不移走好中国特 色金融发展之路，建设符合中国式现代化本质要求的公募基金行业。 "受人之托、忠人之事"是公募基金行业的基本特征，将投资者资金汇集起来投向资本市场，在有效管理 风险的基础上，通过对宏观经济、产业趋势、投资标的的跟踪分析，为实体企业提供精准适合的金融资 源，一方面达到支持企业、发展经济的目标，另一方面也为投资者实现资产保值增值。 公募基金服务实体经济，实践上主要体现为三个方面。 专题：北京公募基金高质量发展系列活动 新时代、新基金、新价值 国寿安保基金作为中管金融央企下属企业和中国人寿系统内唯一的公募基金管 ...

Core Insights - The classification evaluation results for securities companies in 2025 have been released, with 107 companies evaluated, including 53 classified as A, 43 as B, and 11 as C, with 14 companies rated as AA within the A category [1][2] Group 1: Evaluation Framework - The classification evaluation system has been a foundational regulatory arrangement since its inception in 2007, maintaining a stable distribution of A, B, and C category companies, approximately 50%, 40%, and 10% respectively [2] - The evaluation criteria are based on four main components: penalties for regulatory measures, performance indicators such as major business income and return on net assets, a set of 47 specific indicators across six categories, and evaluations of industry culture and social responsibility [3][4] Group 2: Regulatory Focus - The evaluation process emphasizes enhancing the service quality of securities companies to the real economy, aligning with the directives from the 20th National Congress and the Central Financial Work Conference [5][6] - New indicators have been introduced to encourage securities companies to attract long-term capital, enhance their professional capabilities, and support the financing of private and small enterprises [6][7] Group 3: Compliance and Risk Management - The evaluation underscores strict compliance and risk management, incorporating a comprehensive assessment of various entities and their adherence to regulations, with a zero-tolerance approach to violations [7] - Companies are encouraged to engage in self-assessment and correction, with provisions for reducing penalties for proactive identification and resolution of issues [7]

Core Points - The annual classification evaluation results for securities companies have been released, with 107 companies evaluated, resulting in 53 classified as A, 43 as B, and 11 as C, with 14 companies rated as AA within the A category [1][2] - The classification evaluation system has become a fundamental regulatory arrangement, guiding compliance, risk management, and service to the real economy [1][2] - The evaluation is based on the revised "Securities Company Classification Evaluation Regulations" released in August, which emphasizes high-quality development and encourages differentiated operations for small and medium-sized institutions [2][4] Evaluation Categories - The classification evaluation indicators are divided into four parts: compliance status, business development status, risk management capability, and special work conditions [3] - Compliance status is assessed based on regulatory measures or administrative penalties, while business development is evaluated through operational indicators like revenue and return on equity [3] - Risk management includes 47 specific indicators across six categories, and special work conditions consider contributions to industry culture and social responsibility [3][6] Regulatory Focus - The evaluation aims to enhance the functionality of securities companies in serving the real economy, with new indicators added to promote long-term capital market participation and wealth management services [4][5] - The focus is on improving professional capabilities in mergers and acquisitions, underwriting quality, and supporting small and medium enterprises [5][6] - The regulatory approach emphasizes strict compliance and risk management, incorporating various entities and actions into the evaluation process [7] Future Directions - The China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) plans to enhance the transparency and fairness of the evaluation process for 2025, providing guidance through regulatory updates and training [8]

近日，证监会向证券公司通报了2025年分类评价结果，全行业参评公司共107家(母子公司合并评价)， 其中评价结果为A类的公司53家，B类公司43家，C类公司11家，A类公司中，AA级公司14家。近年来 证券公司各类别的数量总体保持稳定，A、B、C类公司数量占比分别约为50%、40%、10%，AA级公司 在A类公司中占比约25%。 据介绍，相关部门下一步将重点做好2025年证券公司分类评价工作的解读，通过编发监管动态、专题培 训等多种方式，引导行业准确理解监管导向和重点要求，提升评价标准的透明度、导向性和公平性，充 分发挥好分类评价"指挥棒"的机制作用。 要 点速览 引导证券公司发挥好自身功能，维护市场稳定健康运行，服务中长期资金入市 自2007年启动以来，分类评价制度已经成为证券公司监管的基础性制度安排之一，是传递监管导向、发 挥监管"指挥棒"作用的重要途径，在有效实施审慎监管、提高监管效能，引导证券公司强化合规风控、 服务实体经济等方面发挥了重要作用。 今年8月，证监会修订发布《证券公司分类评价规定》，进一步完善分类评价制度体系，突出了促进证 券公司功能发挥、引导证券公司聚焦高质量发展、鼓励中小机构差异化发 ...

Core Insights - The annual classification evaluation results for securities companies have been released, with 107 companies evaluated, resulting in 53 classified as A, 43 as B, and 11 as C, with 14 of the A-class companies rated as AA [1][2] Summary by Sections Classification Results - A total of 107 securities companies participated in the evaluation, with 53 classified as A, 43 as B, and 11 as C. Among the A-class companies, 14 are rated as AA, representing approximately 25% of A-class companies [2] Evaluation Framework - The classification evaluation system consists of four main parts: compliance status, business development status, risk management capability, and special work conditions. Each part has specific indicators that can lead to points being added or deducted based on performance [3] Regulatory Focus - The evaluation process is dynamic and adjusts according to economic and industry needs. This year, the focus is on risk prevention, strong regulation, and promoting high-quality development, aligning with the directives from the 20th National Congress and the Central Financial Work Conference [4] Professional Capability Enhancement - The evaluation encourages securities companies to enhance their professional capabilities, particularly in mergers and acquisitions, investment banking quality, and direct financing services. It emphasizes the importance of serving the real economy and maintaining market stability [5][6] Compliance and Risk Management - The evaluation underscores strict compliance and risk management, incorporating various entities and potential risks into the assessment. It aims to reflect the overall compliance and risk management capabilities of the companies accurately [7] Future Directions - The China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) plans to enhance the transparency and fairness of the evaluation process for 2025, providing guidance to the industry on regulatory directions and key requirements [8]

Core Viewpoint - The annual classification evaluation results for securities companies have been released, indicating a stable distribution among categories A, B, and C, with a focus on compliance, risk management, and service to the real economy [1][3]. Summary by Sections Classification Results - A total of 107 securities companies participated in the evaluation, with 53 classified as A, 43 as B, and 11 as C. Among A-class companies, 14 achieved AA-level status, representing approximately 25% of A-class companies [2][3]. Evaluation Framework - The classification evaluation system consists of four main parts: compliance status, business development status, risk management capability, and special work conditions. Each part has specific indicators that can lead to points being added or deducted based on performance [4]. Regulatory Focus - The evaluation emphasizes the importance of compliance and risk management, with a zero-tolerance approach to violations. It includes a comprehensive assessment of various entities within securities companies, including branches and key personnel [10]. Encouraging High-Quality Development - The evaluation aims to guide securities companies in enhancing their functions and professional capabilities, particularly in areas such as mergers and acquisitions, investment banking quality, and social responsibility [6][7][8]. Dynamic Adjustment of Evaluation Criteria - The evaluation criteria are not static; they are adjusted based on economic and industry developments. This year, the focus is on risk prevention, strong regulation, and promoting high-quality development in line with national financial policies [6][8]. Enhancing Service to the Real Economy - The evaluation encourages securities companies to improve their service to the real economy by adding indicators related to long-term capital market participation and wealth management services [5][6]. Transparency and Guidance - The regulatory body plans to enhance the transparency and guidance of the evaluation process, ensuring that the industry understands the regulatory direction and requirements [10].

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the significant progress made in China's futures market, particularly in expanding the variety of products available to support high-quality economic development and risk management in various industries [1][2][3]. Group 1: Product Development and Market Expansion - As of now, China has listed 157 futures and options products, covering major sectors of the national economy, including agriculture, metals, energy, chemicals, and finance [1]. - New products such as casting aluminum alloy futures and options, pure benzene futures and options, and various other derivatives have been launched, reflecting a proactive approach to meet the risk management needs of the real economy [2][3]. - The introduction of new futures products is seen as a response to the volatility in commodity prices and aims to enhance the resilience of industrial chains [2][3]. Group 2: Alignment with National Strategies - The development of futures products is closely aligned with national strategies, including the "dual carbon" goals, which aim to promote green transformation in industries [4][6]. - The futures market is expected to play a crucial role in supporting the transition to a low-carbon economy by providing market-based tools for risk management [4][6]. - The focus on developing products related to renewable resources and key materials for new energy industries indicates a strategic direction towards sustainable economic growth [6]. Group 3: Market Functionality and Participation - The continuous improvement of the product structure in the futures market has led to a steady increase in market funds, which have surpassed 1.9 trillion yuan [3]. - The participation of industrial clients in the futures market has been steadily increasing, indicating a growing recognition of the market's role in risk management [3]. - The introduction of options and average price futures is aimed at meeting the diverse and refined risk management needs of the real economy [3][6]. Group 4: Future Directions - Future developments in the futures market will focus on expanding derivatives related to recycled resources, key materials for new energy, and green energy tools [6]. - The market is expected to introduce products such as lithium hydroxide and electricity futures, which will align with the needs of the renewable energy sector [6]. - The establishment of a comprehensive futures and options product system covering energy, resources, and environmental aspects is anticipated to enhance the market's effectiveness in supporting national economic goals [6].