Core Viewpoint - The investigation into Zhao Peng, a senior executive at Dajia Insurance Group, highlights significant governance challenges within financial risk management institutions, following the earlier case of Fu Fei, another executive involved in similar misconduct [1][4]. Group 1: Zhao Peng Incident - Zhao Peng, previously a prominent figure in the financial sector, is under investigation for alleged misconduct in deposit operations, including manipulating fund flows and accepting kickbacks [6][4]. - His background includes a law doctorate and roles in regulatory bodies, raising concerns about the integrity of regulatory oversight [4][5]. - As of July 2025, there have been no official updates regarding the investigation's progress, and Zhao remains unaccounted for [1]. Group 2: Fu Fei Case - Fu Fei, former deputy head of the Anbang takeover team, was convicted for corruption, including transferring assets below market value and accepting bribes [2][3]. - The court found that he misused his position to facilitate transactions that benefited specific companies, leading to significant financial losses [2]. Group 3: Governance and Oversight Issues - The dual compensation structure for Zhao Peng, who held positions in both banking and insurance, raises concerns about conflicts of interest and inadequate oversight mechanisms [8][9]. - The transition of regulatory figures into operational roles has exposed weaknesses in self-regulation and market accountability [10][11][12]. Group 4: Regulatory Responses - In April 2025, the Insurance Guarantee Fund implemented measures to enhance oversight, including appointing a special supervisory group to review major financial decisions [13]. - New regulations introduced by the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission aim to address systemic risks and improve governance structures [20][21]. Group 5: Financial Performance and Challenges - Dajia Insurance has faced significant operational challenges, including a six-year gap in annual report disclosures and a high vacancy rate in its healthcare services [16][14]. - Despite some positive indicators in premium income and profitability, the company struggles with investment performance, showing negative returns on certain funds [18]. Group 6: Market Position and Future Outlook - Dajia Insurance's privatization efforts have stalled, with previous attempts to transfer ownership failing and ongoing discussions yielding no substantial results [22][23]. - The company must address historical liabilities and governance issues to attract potential investors and ensure a successful transition to a more robust governance framework [23].

Core Viewpoint - The company has established a risk management plan to effectively prevent, control, and resolve financial business risks associated with its subsidiary, Chengtong Financial Co., Ltd., which is controlled by China Chengtong Group [1][2]. Group 1: Risk Management Structure - A risk prevention and disposal leadership group has been formed, led by the company's chairman, with the general manager and financial leaders as deputy leaders [1][2]. - The leadership group is responsible for organizing risk prevention and disposal efforts, with a dedicated working group under the funding business department for daily supervision and management of Chengtong Financial [2][3]. Group 2: Risk Monitoring and Reporting - The company has established a financial business risk reporting system to regularly or temporarily report to the board of directors [3][4]. - The funding business department is tasked with drafting risk assessment reports and regularly reviewing financial statements of Chengtong Financial to evaluate its operational qualifications and risk status [3][4]. Group 3: Emergency Response Procedures - The risk management plan outlines specific scenarios that would trigger the activation of the risk prevention mechanism, including violations of financial management regulations and significant operational issues [3][4]. - Upon occurrence of financial risks, relevant personnel must report immediately to the leadership group, which will analyze the situation and report to the board [4][5]. Group 4: Post-Incident Measures - After resolving any sudden deposit risks, the leadership group will enhance supervision over Chengtong Financial and reassess deposit risks to improve its financial strength and risk resistance [5][6]. - A thorough analysis of the causes and consequences of any deposit risk incidents will be conducted to derive lessons for better future risk management [5][6].

Group 1 - Minsheng Bank effectively identified and responded to a fraud alert, managing to recover over 4 million yuan for a customer [1][2] - The customer, Ms. Wang, attempted to withdraw 1.44 million yuan and transfer funds to unknown accounts, triggering the bank's monitoring system [1] - The bank's verification team contacted the customer immediately, confirming the suspicious nature of the transactions and halting further transfers [1][2] Group 2 - The Shanghai branch of Minsheng Bank coordinated with local police to report the fraud and assist the customer in filing a police report [2] - The quick response from the bank and law enforcement led to the identification and control of the suspect's account, preventing further loss [2] - The bank's three-tiered alert response mechanism facilitated rapid action, ensuring the protection of customer assets through a closed-loop risk management process [2]

2020年7月被原银保监会接管的天安财险、天安人寿近日正式迎来了自己的终局。 2025.06. 15 本文字数：1105，阅读时长大约2分钟 作者 | 第一财经 杨倩雯 其中，有多人曾担任上述两家保险公司的高管。公开信息显示，郭予丰曾任天安财险董事长兼法定代 表人，高焕利曾任天安财险总裁，奚星华曾任天安财险资产管理部总经理；王伟曾任天安人寿董事会 秘书，吉喆曾任天安人寿董事。由于天安财险是西水股份（已摘牌）的核心业务，因此郭予丰及高焕 利等天安财险原高管也曾在2024年8月被内蒙古证监局给予警告并罚款，上述两人当时被采取5年市 场禁入措施。 行政处罚信息显示，这两家保险公司另有多人被处以3年~10年的禁业、撤销任职资格、警告并罚款 等措施。 除了天安财险、天安人寿之外，同一批被监管接管的风险机构华夏人寿、易安财险6月6日也受到了 严厉的处罚。其中，易安财险的13名相关责任人员因违规资金运用损害公司利益、委托无保险中介 资质机构从事保险销售活动等违法违规行为，被警告并罚款171万元，曾任易安财险总经理的曹海菁 被禁止进入保险业5年。华夏人寿旗下资管公司华夏久盈则因关联方报告中存在虚假记载和重大遗 漏、协助其他机 ...

2025年6月11日，中国人民银行副行长陆磊出席在西班牙马德里召开的金融稳定理事会全体会议。会议 审议通过英格兰银行行长安德鲁.贝利接任金融稳定理事会主席，并讨论了全球金融体系脆弱性、非银 行金融中介、加密资产、气候相关金融风险、风险处置等议题。会议期间，陆磊向金融稳定理事会拟离 任主席克拉斯.诺特表达了对其有效领导和突出贡献的赞赏和感谢，向安德鲁.贝利当选主席致以祝贺。 此外，陆磊与金融稳定理事会下设标准执行委员会主席、日本央行副行长冰见野良三会谈，就国际金融 监管标准执行、国别同行评估等议题交换了意见。(中国人民银行) ...

关于与中国节能环保（香港）财资管理有限公司 开展金融合作的应急风险处置预案 第一章 总则 第一条 为有效防范、及时控制和化解中节能铁汉生态环境股份有限公 司（以下简称"本公司或公司"）及下属分子公司在中国节能环保（香港） 财资管理有限公司（以下简称"财资公司"） 开展存、贷款等金融业务的 风险，保证资金的安全性、流动性，制定本应急处置预案。 第二章 应急处置组织机构及职责 第二条 公司成立存款风险预防处置领导小组（以下简称"领导小 组"），由公司董事长任组长，公司财务总监（总会计师）任副组长，领导 小组成员包括财务管理部、证券与法务部（董事会办公室）、审计部等部门 负责人等。领导小组负责组织开展存款风险的防范和处置工作，对存款风险， 任何单位、个人不得隐瞒、缓报、谎报或者授意他人隐瞒、缓报、谎报。 第三条 公司风险预防处置领导小组作为风险应急处置机构，一旦财资 公司发生风险，应立即启动应急预案，并按照规定程序开展工作。 第四条 对存款风险的应急处置应遵循以下原则： （一）统一领导，分级负责。存款风险的应急处置工作由领导小组统一 领导，对公司董事会负责，具体负责存款风险的防范和处置工作； （二）各司其职，协调合 ...

Core Points - The company held its 24th meeting of the 5th Board of Directors on May 30, 2025, where several resolutions were passed regarding transactions with China Energy Conservation and Environmental Protection (Hong Kong) Treasury Management Co., Ltd [1][2][3] - The board approved a financial service agreement and related transactions, which will be submitted for shareholder approval at the upcoming extraordinary general meeting [1][2] - The board also approved a risk assessment report concerning the aforementioned company and an emergency risk disposal plan for financial cooperation [2][3] - The company has scheduled its first extraordinary general meeting of 2025 for June 16, 2025, at 15:00 [4] Summary by Categories Board Meeting Resolutions - The board meeting was attended by all 9 directors, and resolutions were passed with a voting result of 3 in favor and 6 abstentions regarding the financial service agreement [1][2] - The risk assessment report was also approved with the same voting results [2][3] - An emergency risk disposal plan was approved with identical voting results [3] Upcoming Shareholder Meeting - The company will hold its first extraordinary general meeting on June 16, 2025, with all 9 votes in favor of the meeting [4]

供销大集集团股份有限公司 在供销集团财务有限公司开展金融业务 的风险处置预案 (2025年5月29日公司第十一届董事会第十二次会议审议通过) 第一章 总则 第一条 为有效防范、及时控制和化解 供销大集集团股份有限公司 ( 以下简称公司) 及全资子公司和控股子公司在供销集团财务有限公司 ( 以下简称财务公司) 开展金融业务的风险，保障公司资金 安全，根据 中国证券监督管理委员会和中国银行保险监督管理委员会《关于规范上 市公司与企业集团财务公司业务往来的通知》(证监发〔2022〕48号)、 《深圳证券交易所上市公司自律监管指引第 7 号——交易与关联交易（ 第二章 风险处置组织机构及职责 第二条 公司 成 立财 务 公 司 金融 业 务风 险 预 防 处置 领 导小 组 ( 以下 简称领导小组),由公司总裁任组长，为领导小组风险处置第一责任人， 由公司财务总监任副组长，领导小组成员包括综合管理部、计划财务 部、董事会办公室、合规法务部等相关部门及企业负责人。领导小组 下设办公室，办公室设在公司计划财务部，由公司计划财务部总经理 兼任办公室主任，办公室成员包括领导小组成员部门的相关人员。 领导小组负责组织开展公司与 ...

天津天保基建股份有限公司及控股子公司在天津天保财务 有限公司办理存、贷款等金融业务的风险处置预案 为有效防范、及时控制和化解天津天保基建股份有限公司 （以下简称"公司"）及控股子公司在天津天保财务有限公司（以 下简称"财务公司"）办理存、贷款等金融业务的资金风险、维 护资金安全，特制定本预案。 第一章 风险处置机构的设置及职责 第一条 公司成立风险处置领导小组（以下简称"领导小组"）， 由公司总经理任组长，由公司财务总监任副组长，领导小组成员 包括财务管理部、审计风控部、成本管理部、证券事务部等相关 部门人员。领导小组负责组织开展存、贷款等金融业务的风险防 范及处置工作，财务管理部负责风险处置预案的具体实施工作。 第二条 存、贷款等金融业务的风险处置应遵循以下原则办 理： 领导小组统一领导风险的防范、和处置工作，判断风险的严 重程度，对董事会负责。财务管理部负责风险的防范和处置的具 体实施。 公司财务管理部、审计风控部、成本管理部、证券事务部等 相关部门按照职责分工，积极筹划、落实各项防范、化解风险的 措施，相互协调，共同实施。 公司财务管理部、审计风控部、成本管理部、证券事务部等 相关部门应加强对风险的监测 ...

华北制药股份有限公司 在冀中能源集团财务有限责任公司存款风险处置预案 第一章 总则 第一条 为有效防范、及时控制和化解华北制药股份有限公司及 下属分、子公司(以下简称"公司")在冀中能源集团有限责任公司（以 下简称"冀中集团"）控制的冀中能源集团财务有限责任公司（以下 简称"财务公司"）存款业务的风险，维护资金安全，根据《上市公 司监管指引第 8 号—上市公司资金往来、对外担保的监管要求》 《关 于规范上市公司与企业集团财务公司业务往来的通知》《上海证券交 易所上市公司自律监管指引第 5 号—交易与关联交易》等有关规定， 特制定本预案。 第二章 组织机构职责及风险处置原则 （三）各司其职,协调合作。相关部门按照职责分工,积极筹划、 落实各项防范化解风险的措施,相互协调,共同控制和化解风险。 （四）防化结合,重在防范。加强对风险的监测,督促财务公司及 时提供相关信息,关注其经营情况,测试其资金流动性,并从控股股东 及其成员单位或监管部门处及时了解相关信息,做到信息监控到位, 风险防范有效。 第三章 风险信息报告与披露 第二条 成立存款风险预防处置领导小组(以下简称"领导小组"), 由公司董事长任组长，为风险预防 ...