Group 1 - The core mission of the Nishan World Civilization Forum is to promote dialogue among different civilizations to enhance understanding, appreciation, and friendship [1] - The themes of past forums have closely aligned with global challenges, such as conflict resolution and ecological civilization [1][3] - The 11th Nishan World Civilization Forum is particularly significant in the context of rising unilateralism and geopolitical tensions, focusing on the theme of "Beauty in Diversity" [3][4] Group 2 - The forum has introduced innovative topics, such as the dialogue between ancient Chinese and Greek civilizations, highlighting the shared wisdom of different cultures [2] - The 11th forum will explore six subtopics, including the origins of civilization, the global significance of Confucian culture, and the role of artificial intelligence in human civilization [3][4] - The concept of "Beauty in Diversity" emphasizes the respect and coexistence of different cultures, advocating for mutual recognition and equal dialogue [3][4]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes that through equal dialogue and cooperation, China and the U.S. can resolve trade disputes and enhance mutual development, benefiting the global economy [1][2] - The recent China-U.S. trade talks in London have led to positive progress, with both sides agreeing on the framework to implement the consensus reached during the June 5 call between the two leaders [1][2] - China is taking steps to approve export licenses for controlled items, while the U.S. is lifting a series of restrictive measures against China, which has garnered positive reactions from various sectors [1][2] Group 2 - The article highlights that dialogue and cooperation are essential for resolving trade disputes, and unilateral coercion is not a viable path [2][3] - The negative effects of U.S. tariffs are becoming apparent, with organizations like the World Bank and OECD lowering growth forecasts for the U.S. and global economies due to trade policy uncertainties [2] - The article warns that the imposition of tariffs could lead to long-term impacts on global trade liberalization, with rising market uncertainties ultimately affecting consumers [2][3] Group 3 - China advocates for a multilateral trade system centered around the WTO and emphasizes that bilateral negotiations should not harm third-party interests [3] - The article stresses the importance of maintaining international trade order and warns against short-sighted actions that could undermine long-term interests [3][4] - It calls for unity and collaboration among nations to uphold international trade rules and create an open and inclusive trade environment [4]

巴西总统抨击特朗普关税威胁 智通财经7月8日电，据CCTV国际时讯报道，巴西总统卢拉当地时间7月7日在里约热内卢金砖国家峰会 后的记者会上，严词批评美国总统特朗普通过社交媒体威胁加征关税的行为"极不负责任"，并强调各国 有权采取对等措施。特朗普当地时间7月6日通过社交平台指责金砖国家推行所谓"反美政策"，并威胁对 其成员国加征10%的新关税。中国外交部发言人7月7日对此表示，贸易战、关税战没有赢家，保护主义 没有出路。 ...

Core Viewpoint - China has reiterated its stance against tariff increases, emphasizing that trade wars and tariff battles yield no winners and that protectionism is not a viable solution [1][2]. Group 1: China's Position on Tariffs - China has consistently opposed tariff wars and the use of tariffs as tools for coercion, stating that arbitrary tariff increases do not benefit any party involved [2]. - The BRICS mechanism is highlighted as an important platform for cooperation among emerging markets and developing countries, promoting openness and inclusivity without targeting any specific nation [1][2]. Group 2: U.S. Tariff Developments - The U.S. is approaching a deadline for tariff negotiations set for July 9, with President Trump indicating that a combination of letters and agreements will be sent out to various countries [3][4]. - Trump confirmed that the related tariffs are set to take effect on August 1, with potential letters involving different amounts and wording for various economies [4]. - The U.S. has proposed significant "reciprocal tariffs" on allies, with rates as high as 25% for some countries and even higher for Southeast Asian nations [5]. Group 3: Legal and Regulatory Context - The U.S. International Trade Court has ruled that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) does not grant the President unlimited authority to impose tariffs, leading to questions about the legality of unilateral tariff notifications [7][8]. - Legal experts suggest that unilateral tariff imposition may violate international law and could be challenged in the World Trade Organization (WTO) [8].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses China's response to the European Union's restrictions on Chinese medical devices, highlighting the ongoing trade tensions and the implications for both parties in the medical equipment sector [1][12]. Group 1: EU Restrictions and China's Response - On June 20, the European Commission announced that Chinese companies would be excluded from EU public procurement projects exceeding €5 million, with a cap on subcontracting to Chinese entities or components at 50% of the total project value [1]. - This marks the first application of the EU's International Procurement Instrument (IPI) against specific countries since its introduction in June 2022, aimed at addressing perceived discrimination against EU enterprises [1][4]. - In response, China announced on July 6 that it would implement reciprocal measures to protect its enterprises and maintain fair competition [12][13]. Group 2: Growth of Chinese Medical Device Industry - From 2015 to 2023, China's exports of medical devices and equipment to the EU more than doubled, with an expected export value of $9 billion in 2024, reflecting a 12% year-on-year increase [3]. - Chinese companies have begun to enter high-end medical equipment markets, such as CT and MRI systems, demonstrating competitive capabilities through technological innovation [2]. - In the field of in vitro diagnostic reagents, Chinese firms have gained traction in Europe, particularly in grassroots healthcare and third-party testing laboratories, due to their diverse product lines and cost-effective solutions [2]. Group 3: Allegations and Criticism - A report claimed that the Chinese government promotes a "Buy China" policy, which supports domestic products while limiting imports, with a target for domestic medical devices to achieve a 70% market share in county-level hospitals by 2025 [5][6]. - The report also indicated that 87% of sampled Chinese public procurement projects contained direct or indirect restrictions on imported medical devices, with the proportion of tenders explicitly banning imports rising from 36% to 53% from 2022 to 2024 [7]. - The EU-China Chamber of Commerce criticized the IPI investigation's conclusions as unfair, asserting that the findings do not accurately reflect the reality of the Chinese medical procurement market [8].

毛宁对此表示，金砖机制是新兴市场和发展中国家合作的重要平台，倡导开放包容、合作共赢，不搞阵营对 抗，不针对任何国家。关于加征关税，中方已经多次阐明了立场，贸易战、关税战没有赢家，保护主义没有出 路。 违法和不良信息举报电话：0755-83514034 邮箱：bwb@stcn.com 来源：环球时报-环球网报道 责编：汪云鹏 校对： 王锦程 外交部发言人毛宁主持7月7日例行记者会。会上有外媒记者提问称：金砖国家峰会将于今天闭幕，昨天美国总 统特朗普批评金砖国家推行"反美政策"，并威胁对其成员国加征10%的新关税，请问中方对此有何评论？ 百万用户都在看 突发警告！刚刚，美国传出大动作 刚刚！特朗普，签了！ 重大进展！特朗普，传来大消息！ 突发！超10万人爆仓！一则利空，突然引爆！ 午后，突发！直线飙升，发生了什么？ 集体大涨！特朗普，新计划曝光！ ...

Group 1 - The article discusses the necessity of large-scale fiscal spending to support both supply and demand in the economy, emphasizing that without subsidies, production and consumption cannot thrive [1][2][3] - In the West, the principle is to subsidize demand, but this does not directly improve domestic production capacity, necessitating additional subsidies for supply [2][4] - In the East, the focus is on subsidizing supply to meet global demand, but external demand limitations lead to oversupply, requiring a shift towards stimulating domestic demand [3][4] Group 2 - The article highlights that while Eastern production capabilities and technological investments are increasing, the lack of corresponding consumer demand limits the ability to maintain high prices, leading to a situation where even high-tech products may be sold at low prices [4][5] - The resurgence of protectionism is noted as a response to the challenges faced by developed nations, which are reluctant to be outcompeted in a free market [4][5] - The impact of AI on traditional job markets is significant, with software development positions in the U.S. already experiencing severe disruption, indicating a broader trend across various industries [6][7]

来源：央视新闻客户端 7月7日，外交部发言人毛宁主持例行记者会。有记者提问，金砖国家峰会将于今天闭幕，昨天美 国总统特朗普批评金砖国家推行反美政策，并威胁对其成员国加征10%的新关税，请问中方对此 有何评论？ 毛宁表示，金砖机制是新兴市场和发展中国家合作的重要平台，倡导开放包容、合作共赢，不搞 阵营对抗，不针对任何国家。 关于加征关税，中方已经多次阐明了立场，贸易战、关税战没有赢家，保护主义没有出路。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The BRICS mechanism serves as an important platform for cooperation among emerging markets and developing countries, promoting openness, inclusivity, and win-win cooperation, while rejecting camp confrontation and targeting any specific country [1]. Group 1 - The BRICS summit is highlighted as a significant event for emerging markets and developing countries [1]. - The Chinese government emphasizes that there are no winners in trade wars and tariff battles, and that protectionism is not a viable solution [1].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article highlights criticism from former President Trump regarding the BRICS nations' "anti-American policies," with a response from China emphasizing the importance of the BRICS mechanism as a platform for cooperation among emerging markets and developing countries [1] - China's Foreign Ministry spokesperson, Mao Ning, stated that the BRICS mechanism advocates for openness, inclusivity, and win-win cooperation, rejecting camp confrontation and targeting any specific country [1] - Mao Ning reiterated China's stance on tariffs, asserting that trade wars and tariff battles yield no winners and that protectionism is not a viable solution [1]