美国总统特朗普表示，他将于周五签署一项命令，根据一项不同的授权征收10%的全球关税，"在已征 收的正常关税基础上额外加征"。 美国总统特朗普表示，他将于周五签署一项命令，根据一项不同的授权征收10%的全球关税，"在已征 收的正常关税基础上额外加征"。 特朗普表示，所有根据第232条款征收的国家安全关税以及现有的第301条款关税将维持不变。 责任编辑：李桐 特朗普表示，所有根据第232条款征收的国家安全关税以及现有的第301条款关税将维持不变。 责任编辑：李桐 ...

专题：美最高法院裁定特朗普全球关税违法 特朗普回应裁决是"耻辱" 在最高法院周五推翻美国总统唐纳德·特朗普在全球实施全面关税的决定后，若想说服国会恢复这些关 税，他将面临极为艰巨的阻力。 由于共和党在参众两院仅占微弱多数，且关税对经济的影响引发高度担忧，将这些关税写入法律将面临 挑战。 白宫表示将迅速动用其他法律工具替代这些关税，但尚不明确特朗普是否会施压议员将遭法院否决的关 税立法化。 特朗普可援引其他权限，对被认定威胁特定美国产业或国家安全的进口商品征收关税。然而，一些替代 方案需事先进行冗长调查，或对惩罚性措施的额度与时限设限。 特朗普与众议院议长迈 克·约翰逊及国会参众两院其他共和党议员共同出席2月3日的法案签署仪式并发表讲话 众议院议长迈克·约翰逊在社交媒体发文称，白宫与国会领袖"将在未来几周确定最佳前进路径"。 尽管关税是总统经济议程的核心内容，但若无民主党支持，国会可能无法通过贸易立法。 共和党在国会仅保持微弱多数优势，且部分共和党议员反对进口关税。众议院本月早些时候通过了一项 旨在终止特朗普对加拿大加征关税的法案，参议院也在象征性的全院表决中对特朗普的多项关税决定表 示反对。 就连一些共和党议 ...

最高法院裁定美国总统特朗普的全球关税非法，农产品期货对此的反应在短暂的交投激增后已趋于平 静，目前期货价格涨跌互现。Allendale的Rich Nelson称："鉴于政府此前曾评论称还有其他征收关税的 途径，市场在做出即时反应后，担忧情绪已有所缓解。"芝加哥期货交易所玉米期货上涨0.3%，大豆期 货下跌0.4%，小麦期货上涨1.3%。 ...

该判决被视为今年最受市场关注的司法事件之一。若法院裁定相关关税缺乏合法依据，可能引发进口商 退税安排，并对美国此前达成的一些临时贸易协议带来法律层面的不确定性，同时也可能重新点燃市场 对联邦财政赤字前景的担忧。 美国最高法院已将本周五定为裁决公布日，外界普遍预期，法院可能就总统特朗普依据《国际紧急经济 权力法》(IEEPA)实施的全球关税是否合法作出关键判决。 按惯例，最高法院不会提前披露具体将在某一裁决日公布哪些案件的结果。相关裁决通常于美东时间上 午10点(北京时间晚上11点)发布。多位分析人士此前判断，关税案的裁决时间窗口最迟将在1月底之 前。 根据美国国会预算办公室的最新估算，这些关税在未来10年内预计将使联邦财政赤字减少约3万亿美 元。而耶鲁大学预算实验室的测算显示，新增关税收入中约有一半来源于依据IEEPA征收的关税。 最高法院已于去年11月初就该案举行口头辩论。此前，特朗普政府就下级法院的裁决提起上诉。相关下 级法院在由玩具制造商Learning Resources和葡萄酒进口商V.O.S.Selections提起的诉讼中认定，总统援引 IEEPA单方面加征关税的做法不具合法性。 特朗普政府方面 ...

来源：滚动播报 特朗普在推出全球关税增加了部分国内制造商的成本，并对受影响企业的生产力、就业、销售和利润产 生了负面影响，如果2026年企业盈利在历史高位的股市中集体走弱，可能导致灾难性后果。人工智能可 为全球经济增加超过15万亿美元。目前企业尚未优化AI技术，也未从AI投资中获得正回报，历史先例 预示这可能成为另一个泡沫。美联储缺乏透明度和一致性，增加了2026年股市崩盘或熊市的可能性。 ...

Economic Policy & Trade - Nearly 50 prominent economists, including former Federal Reserve chairs, are urging the Supreme Court to overturn most of the Trump administration's global tariffs [1] - Economists argue that the Trump administration's tariff policies are based on a misunderstanding of the global economy [1] - Economists believe trade deficits are common historically and globally, not an "unusual and special" threat to US national security or economy [1] - Trade deficits are essentially the same as foreign investment surpluses and not necessarily harmful [1] - Tariffs are ineffective at addressing overall trade deficits, primarily affecting trade flows rather than the deficit itself, which is determined by macroeconomic factors like national savings and domestic investment [1] - The scale of these generally applicable tariffs could trigger the "major questions principle," requiring clear authorization from Congress, which the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) does not provide [1]

Core Viewpoint - Mattel's third-quarter results fell short of analysts' expectations, primarily due to ongoing global tariffs impacting sales in North America, leading to a 4% drop in shares after hours [1][3]. Financial Performance - For the quarter ended September 30, net income was reported at $278 million, or 88 cents per share, down from $372 million, or $1.09 per share, a year earlier [2]. - Adjusted earnings per share were 89 cents, compared to the expected $1.07 [8]. - Net sales decreased by 6% to $1.74 billion, missing Wall Street's expectations of $1.83 billion [3][8]. Sales Breakdown - North American sales fell by 12%, with the most significant declines in the infant, toddler, and preschool categories [5]. - Global sales for Barbie decreased by 17%, and Fisher-Price sales dropped by 19%, while Hot Wheels sales increased by 8% [5]. Future Guidance - The company provided full-year guidance, projecting net sales growth between 1% and 3% and earnings per share between $1.54 and $1.66 [4]. - CEO Ynon Kreiz noted that orders from U.S. retailers have significantly accelerated since the beginning of the fourth quarter [4]. Strategic Initiatives - Mattel is focusing on expanding its entertainment offerings and leveraging new technology, including a partnership with Hasbro and Netflix to launch products tied to the movie "KPop Demon Hunters" [6][7].

Core Viewpoint - The impact of global tariffs on U.S. inflation and Federal Reserve policy remains unclear, complicating predictions for future monetary policy adjustments [1] Group 1: Economic Outlook - UBS's Sergio Ermotti expresses confidence in continued U.S. economic growth despite uncertainties surrounding inflation and its effects on Federal Reserve policy [1] - There is speculation that the Federal Reserve may lower interest rates during the meeting on September 16-17, with changing investor expectations regarding the extent of policy adjustments [1] Group 2: Tariff Implications - Ermotti highlights that the real impact of tariffs will be felt by consumers, emphasizing the need for clarity on whether tariffs will trigger inflation in the U.S., which is currently uncertain [1] Group 3: Market Dynamics - The global economy is exhibiting a bifurcation, driven by technology and AI on one side, and more traditional sectors on the other, with noticeable effects in regions like Hong Kong's thriving IPO market [1] - Overall, Ermotti describes the current market situation as positive, but notes the complexity of various influencing factors and the intricate geopolitical environment [1]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the implications of a U.S. appellate court ruling that deemed most of the global tariffs imposed by the Trump administration illegal, and Trump's intention to appeal to the Supreme Court to overturn this decision [1][4][10]. Group 1: Legal and Economic Implications - Trump plans to appeal the appellate court's ruling to the Supreme Court, emphasizing the urgency of a quick resolution due to the tariffs' impact on the nation's financial structure [3][4]. - The appellate court's decision indicates that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) does not grant the President the authority to impose tariffs, which could significantly affect U.S. trade policy [4][10]. - If the Supreme Court upholds the lower court's ruling, it would severely limit Trump's ability to impose tariffs, undermining his economic strategy to compel companies to invest in the U.S. [10][11]. Group 2: Market Reactions - Following the announcement of the appellate court's ruling, U.S. stock markets experienced declines, with the S&P 500 down approximately 1% and the Dow Jones Industrial Average dropping over 380 points [1][4]. - Trump attributes the market downturn to uncertainty surrounding the tariff situation, suggesting that a favorable ruling could lead to a significant market rally [1][4]. Group 3: Alternative Legal Strategies - The U.S. Treasury Secretary expressed confidence that the Supreme Court would support Trump's use of IEEPA for imposing tariffs but is also preparing alternative legal strategies in case of a loss [9][10]. - If the Supreme Court rules against Trump, the administration may resort to other legal frameworks, such as the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act, to impose tariffs, albeit with less efficiency [9][10]. Group 4: Potential Consequences of Ruling - Legal experts warn that a Supreme Court ruling against the tariffs could lead to significant economic repercussions, including potential financial collapse due to the loss of tariff revenue, which totaled $159 billion as of July [10][11]. - The ruling could also set a precedent affecting the balance of power between the executive branch and Congress regarding trade policy [10][11].

1. Report Industry Investment Rating - No relevant content provided in the report 2. Core Views of the Report - Overseas macro: The US economic fundamentals remain stable in the short - term, but there are employment and inflation pressures in the medium - term. High - interest rates impact consumption, there is a differentiation in CPI and PPI expectations, and inflation may rebound in autumn, affecting the Fed's decision - making. In the short - term, market risk appetite is expected to remain strong [6]. - Domestic macro: In July, the growth rate of economic data slowed down, with consumption, investment, and credit demand weakening. Exports were the main support for the domestic economy. August exports may remain resilient, but there may be pressure starting from September [6]. - Asset views: In late August, China enters the verification period of the seasonal peak of fixed - asset investment and consumption, and the global central bank summit is a game window for Fed policy. The rise of risk assets is driven by tariff and geopolitical risk mitigation and loose liquidity expectations. As economic growth slows, short - term market volatility may increase [6]. 3. Summary by Relevant Catalogs 3.1 Macro Essentials - Overseas: The US economic fundamentals are stable in the short - term, with pressure in the medium - term. High - interest rates affect consumption, CPI and PPI expectations are different, and inflation may rebound in autumn [6]. - Domestic: July economic data growth slowed, with exports as the main support. August exports may be resilient, but September may face pressure [6]. - Assets: Late August is a key period for investment, consumption, and Fed policy. Risk assets are driven by positive factors, and short - term market volatility may increase as the economy slows [6]. 3.2 Viewpoint Highlights 3.2.1 Financial - Stock index futures: Growth opportunities are spreading, and the short - term judgment is a volatile upward trend [7]. - Stock index options: An offensive strategy is recommended, with a short - term judgment of a volatile upward trend [7]. - Treasury bond futures: The bond market is still under pressure, with a short - term judgment of a volatile trend [7]. 3.2.2 Precious Metals - Gold/Silver: Precious metals are expected to strengthen with volatility, with a short - term judgment of a volatile upward trend [7]. 3.2.3 Shipping - Container shipping to Europe: Attention is paid to the game between peak - season expectations and price - increase implementation, with a short - term judgment of a volatile trend [7]. 3.2.4 Black Building Materials - Steel products: Inventory is accumulating, and prices are falling from high levels, with a short - term judgment of a volatile trend [7]. - Iron ore: Fundamentals are healthy, and prices are slightly回调 after sentiment cools, with a short - term judgment of a volatile trend [7]. - Other products (such as coke, coking coal, etc.): All are expected to show a volatile trend in the short - term [7]. 3.2.5 Non - ferrous Metals and New Materials - Copper, aluminum, etc.: Most metals are expected to show a volatile trend in the short - term, with factors such as supply, demand, and policies affecting prices [7]. - Industrial silicon: It is expected to show a volatile upward trend in the short - term [7]. - Lithium carbonate: It is expected to show a wide - range volatile trend in the short - term [7]. 3.2.6 Energy and Chemicals - Crude oil: Supply pressure exists, and the short - term judgment is a volatile downward trend [9]. - Other chemicals: Most are expected to show a volatile trend in the short - term, affected by factors such as supply, demand, and cost [9]. 3.2.7 Agriculture - Oils and fats: Palm oil is leading the rise, with a short - term judgment of a volatile upward trend [9]. - Other agricultural products: Most are expected to show a volatile trend in the short - term, affected by factors such as weather, supply, and demand [9].