Workflow
教育评价改革
icon
Search documents
振兴高中不是追求出更多清北生
Nan Fang Du Shi Bao· 2025-07-26 22:27
Core Viewpoint - The report from the Education Bureau of Maoming City highlights the imbalance in educational resource allocation at a local high school, which has focused excessively on cultivating students for prestigious universities like Tsinghua and Peking University, leading to a decline in overall educational quality [1][2]. Group 1: Issues with Current Educational Practices - The practice of concentrating educational resources on top students contradicts the national push for reforming the evaluation system that moves away from solely focusing on university admissions [2]. - By betting on a few top students, the overall quality of education suffers, as most students express dissatisfaction with the school's management and teaching quality [2]. - Setting the admission rates to prestigious universities as a standard for high school revitalization creates a paradox, as an increase in one school's admissions will lead to a decrease in others due to fixed provincial quotas [2]. Group 2: Changing Student Preferences - There is a growing trend among high-achieving students to choose universities other than Tsinghua and Peking University, indicating a shift towards more diverse educational choices and a move away from the "name school" mentality [2]. Group 3: Recommendations for High School Revitalization - High school revitalization should focus on diverse development and personalized education, allowing each student to plan their academic and personal growth paths [3]. - Local governments and educational departments should avoid imposing admission rate targets and instead promote internal development, focusing on teacher quality and curriculum improvement [3]. - The emphasis should be on process evaluation, value-added evaluation, and comprehensive evaluation to assess high school revitalization effectively [3].
优秀网络文化成果评价认定的价值与路径
Xin Hua Wang· 2025-07-23 06:50
Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of evaluating excellent online cultural achievements in higher education as a crucial measure for promoting ideological and political work, thereby contributing to the development of a strong educational and cultural nation [1][2]. Group 1: Importance of Online Cultural Achievements - Excellent online cultural achievements serve as vital resources for universities' ideological and cultural work, expanding the space for online education and promoting traditional and revolutionary cultures [2]. - These achievements are significant for ideological work, leveraging the internet's characteristics to enhance theoretical discussions and contribute positively to a clear online space [2]. - The evaluation of these achievements is a key consideration in the ideological work of universities, as highlighted by various governmental directives aimed at integrating online cultural products into academic assessments [2][3]. Group 2: Requirements for Educational Evaluation Reform - The reform of educational evaluation should be comprehensive, scientific, and address the issues of "five only" practices, focusing on establishing a correct evaluation philosophy and a scientific evaluation system [3]. - The evaluation of online cultural achievements must align with the political, professional, collaborative, and problem-oriented requirements of educational evaluation reform [3][4]. Group 3: Pathways to Construct a High-Quality Evaluation System - Strengthening organizational leadership is essential, with universities needing to design comprehensive plans that integrate various educational systems and enhance the recognition of online cultural achievements among faculty and students [7]. - Establishing a diversified recognition mechanism is crucial, involving various departments to assess and promote online cultural achievements effectively [8]. - A robust indicator system should be developed, focusing on originality, online influence, educational value, and academic professionalism to ensure a thorough evaluation of online cultural products [9].
炒作高分考生为何“树欲静而风不止”
Ke Ji Ri Bao· 2025-06-26 23:37
Group 1 - The core focus of the articles is the ongoing societal obsession with high-scoring students in the context of China's college entrance examination (Gaokao), despite official efforts to downplay this phenomenon [1][2] - The traditional narrative surrounding Gaokao positions it as a critical turning point in life, leading to public admiration for high scorers as "winners" from whom others seek replicable success paths [1] - Schools view high-scoring students as direct indicators of educational performance, with metrics like "number of high scorers" and "admission rates to top universities" serving as hard indicators of school quality [1] Group 2 - The ongoing high school examination reform aims to break the "score-centric" evaluation system by promoting classification exams, comprehensive evaluations, and diverse admissions [2] - There is a call for deeper educational evaluation reforms to shift societal views on education and success, emphasizing the importance of holistic student development rather than merely producing high scorers [2] - The narrative encourages recognition of all students' efforts, not just high scorers, promoting the idea that every individual should have the opportunity to shine in a lifelong learning society [2]