登录新浪财经APP 搜索【信披】查看更多考评等级 早在2024年8月，*ST鹏博就因信披违规收到证监会出具的《行政处罚决定书》。经查明，公司存在未 按规定披露关联交易、重大合同等违法事实，导致2022年年报存在重大遗漏。2024年11月，青岛证监局 针对公司2023年年度业绩预告披露不准确等违规事项，对公司及公司时任董事长杨学平、时任总经理吕 卫团、财务总监徐战岗、时任董秘吴文涛采取出具警示函措施。 6月9日晚间，*ST鹏博发布公告，公司于5月30日收到上海证券交易所出具的自律监管决定书《关于鹏 博士电信传媒集团股份有限公司股票终止上市的决定》，上海证券交易所决定终止公司股票上市。根据 《上海证券交易所股票上市规则》的相关规定，公司股票于6月10日进入退市整理期交易。 新浪股民维权平台提醒，根据《民法典》、《证券法》及最高人民法院的关于虚假陈述民事赔偿司法解 释的规定，上市公司、控股股东、实际控制人、董监高人员及其中介机构等因虚假陈述等的证券欺诈行 为导致证券投资者权益受损的，应承担民事赔偿责任，赔偿范围包括：投资差额、佣金、印花税和利息 损失等。权益受损的证券投资者可以向有管辖权的法院提起民事赔偿诉讼。 6 ...

Core Viewpoint - Zhejiang Zhongtuo (000906.SZ) faces regulatory scrutiny due to accounting policy miscalculations, leading to warnings issued to top executives and potential impacts on the company's refinancing capabilities [1][2][3] Accounting Issues - The company failed to properly account for credit impairment losses related to clients that have gone bankrupt or become untrustworthy, affecting the accuracy of financial disclosures [1][2] - Specific clients involved include Ningxia Shengyan, Ningxia Yitong, and Jiangsu Delong, with the latter undergoing bankruptcy restructuring [2][3] - Misclassification of receivables as prepayments has led to significant impacts on reported earnings, with net profit adjustments of 33.74 million yuan in 2023 and 54.59 million yuan in the first three quarters of 2024, representing nearly 10% of total net profit [3][4] Financial Performance - Despite annual revenues exceeding 200 billion yuan, the company's total assets and net profits are relatively low, with total assets of 34.45 billion yuan and 34.94 billion yuan at the end of 2023 and 2024, respectively [5] - The company reported credit losses of approximately 160 million yuan in 2023, accounting for 23.43% of net profit, and 335 million yuan in 2024, which constituted 90% of net profit [5][6] Operational Challenges - The company's business model involves high receivables and significant cash outflows, with net cash flow from operating activities being negative for three consecutive years [6] - As of March 2024, the company's liabilities surged, with a debt ratio nearing 81%, up from 73.3% at the beginning of the year [6]

记者萧峰 2025年4月29日，*ST锦港股份有限公司（以下简称"*ST锦港"或"*ST锦港B"，代码600190或900952）发 布公告称，公司收到中国证监会辽宁监管局下发的《行政处罚及市场禁入事先告知书》【2025】1号。 *ST锦港股份有限公司股票2025年5月20日收盘价已连续11个交易日低于1元，其中A股收盘价为0.97元/ 股，B股收盘价为0.049美元/股。根据《上海证券交易所股票上市规则》第9.2.1条第一款第三项规定， 在上海证券交易所（以下简称"上交所"）既发行A股股票又发行B股股票的上市公司，如果A、B股股票 连续20个交易日的每日股票收盘价均低于1元，公司股票可能被上交所终止上市交易，属于交易类强制 退市。根据《股票上市规则》第9.6.1条第二款规定，交易类强制退市公司股票不进入退市整理期交易。 从逾期披露到虚假记载 （一）法定期限内未披露《2024年半年度报告》 （三）关联交易未及时披露，报告存在重大遗漏 2022-2024年，刘辉实际控制的公司通过虚假贸易占用*ST锦港资金，未披露的资金占用发生额分别为： 2022年321,841.78万元（占净资产47.63%）；2023年55 ...

Core Viewpoint - The company, Hanchuan Intelligent (688022.SH), faces significant risks due to undisclosed share pledges and defaults by its controlling shareholder, leading to regulatory warnings and potential instability in control [1][5][6]. Group 1: Share Pledge and Default Risks - The controlling shareholder, Cai Changwei, pledged 52.43% of his shares in Hanchuan Investment to Huaneng Guicheng Trust, which represents 14.64% of the company's total shares [1]. - Hanchuan Investment pledged 13.1343 million shares, accounting for 7.47% of the total shares, with provisions for immediate registration of share pledges in case of debt defaults [2]. - The company reported a significant risk of control instability due to overdue debts and potential enforcement actions by Huaneng Guicheng Trust [2][5]. Group 2: Legal Disputes and Share Freezes - A lawsuit was initiated by Jiang Haidong against the controlling shareholder for a total of 44.9721 million yuan due to a differential compensation agreement, resulting in the freezing of shares [3][4]. - The controlling shareholder failed to disclose the signing of the agreement and the share freeze until February 2025, indicating a lack of timely communication [4]. Group 3: Financial Performance and Market Impact - Hanchuan Intelligent reported a significant decline in revenue, with a 64.61% drop to 474 million yuan in 2024, and a net loss of 1.103 billion yuan [6][7]. - The company's stock price has plummeted by 80% since March 2023, with a closing price of 13.71 yuan as of May 16, reflecting a more than 60% decline from its previous high [7].

Core Viewpoint - Tongde Chemical has significantly revised its 2024 earnings forecast from a profit of 30 million to 42 million yuan to a loss of 40 million to 75 million yuan, leading to a sharp decline in its stock price and market value [1][4]. Group 1: Earnings Forecast Revision - The company announced a major earnings forecast revision due to three main factors: interest capitalization, losses from trading financial assets related to Beijing Jinse Century, and long-aged accounts receivable [3][4]. - Interest expenses of 35.93 million yuan will be expensed rather than capitalized, as the funds were used for the PBAT integration project [3]. - The trading financial assets related to Jinse Century, valued at 11.84 million yuan, will be adjusted for fair value losses due to unchanged operational conditions [3]. Group 2: Business Performance - Tongde Chemical's main business includes the research, production, and sales of civil explosives, with a stable historical performance maintaining net profits above 100 million yuan [2][5]. - In 2023, the company achieved a record net profit of 438 million yuan, a 138.10% increase year-on-year, primarily due to significant investment gains from subsidiary sales [6]. - However, in 2024, the company faced a decline in performance, with a projected revenue drop of 31.66% and a net profit decrease of 73.82% compared to the previous year [6]. Group 3: Regulatory Issues - The company faced penalties for information disclosure violations related to a significant equity transfer transaction in 2023, which was not disclosed in a timely manner [7][8]. - The penalties included a fine of 1 million yuan and warnings for the company's executives, raising concerns about the company's governance and transparency [8].

Core Viewpoint - The Eastsun Group and its founder Li Zhaoting have faced severe penalties from regulatory authorities due to systemic violations in the securities market, including a total fine of 1.7 billion yuan and lifetime bans for key individuals [1][4][10]. Summary by Relevant Sections Regulatory Actions - The Hebei and Shenzhen Securities Regulatory Bureaus announced administrative penalties against Eastsun Group, Eastsun Blue Sky, and Eastsun Photovoltaics, totaling 1.7 billion yuan for 43 responsible parties [1][4]. - Li Zhaoting was fined 588.54 million yuan, while Eastsun Group was fined 583.24 million yuan, with additional penalties for other executives [5]. Violations Identified - Four major violations were identified: 1. Fraudulent issuance of stocks and bonds, raising 7.565 billion yuan and 3.5 billion yuan respectively through falsified business activities [2]. 2. Financial fraud from 2015 to 2019, inflating revenues by 64.585 billion yuan and profits by 18.628 billion yuan [2]. 3. Misappropriation of funds, with a total of 16.959 billion yuan in non-operational fund occupation [2]. 4. Failure to disclose annual reports on time for Eastsun Photovoltaics and Eastsun Blue Sky [2]. Company Status and Risks - Eastsun Blue Sky has issued warnings about potential delisting due to its stock price being below 1 yuan for 19 consecutive trading days and non-operational fund occupation of 7.527 billion yuan [6][9]. - Eastsun Photovoltaics has already been delisted, and Eastsun Blue Sky is at risk of following suit if corrective actions are not taken [6][9]. Historical Context - Li Zhaoting, once the richest man in Shijiazhuang, built a capital empire with assets exceeding 200 billion yuan, but the group has faced significant financial losses and operational issues since 2019 [7][9]. - The group has been accused of using its listed companies as tools for financial exploitation, leading to continuous losses and a collapse of its capital structure [9]. Ongoing Investigations - The China Securities Regulatory Commission is investigating the illegal practices of related intermediary institutions and will pursue recovery of misappropriated funds [10]. - The case serves as a warning for the capital market, emphasizing strict enforcement of delisting regulations to protect investors and maintain market integrity [10].