Core Viewpoint - The Liuzhou Rongshui Tobacco Monopoly Bureau in Guangxi has established a comprehensive market supervision model focusing on "collaborative operations, precise regulation, and distinctive legal education," which has positively impacted local economic development [1] Group 1: Collaborative Operations - The bureau has implemented a "1+N" collaborative mechanism, promoting data sharing and joint law enforcement with public security and market supervision departments, utilizing big data platforms for precise targeting [2] - A significant case was resolved this year, involving over 4 million yuan in illegal tobacco activities, leading to the arrest of 7 suspects and the seizure of 225,400 illegal cigarettes and 1.34 tons of tobacco leaves [2] Group 2: Precise Regulation - The bureau employs a strategy of "service-oriented, non-intrusive regulation" for compliant businesses while intensifying enforcement against historical violators and high-risk entities [3] - A 24-hour regulatory model has been adopted, including dynamic inspections and a full-chain regulatory loop to track leads, verify on-site, and enforce penalties [3] - Two cases of selling tobacco to minors have been addressed this year, enhancing the protection of the environment around schools [3] Group 3: Distinctive Legal Education - The bureau has formed a bilingual legal education team to disseminate tobacco-related legal knowledge through engaging community outreach and online platforms [4] - Over 500 legal education bags and 50 promotional aprons have been distributed this year, alongside initiatives in local schools to educate students about the dangers of electronic cigarettes [4] - Future plans include continued collaboration with public security and market supervision departments to strengthen regulation in key areas and ensure the tobacco market's high-quality development [4]

Core Points - The article highlights the successful implementation of a modern governance model for construction waste management in Lixia District, which integrates cross-department collaboration, full-process traceability, and multi-dimensional penalties [1][7] - The case serves as a template for urban governance modernization, showcasing the effectiveness of the "one case, three investigations" mechanism [8] Group 1: Incident Overview - A violation involving the unregistered transportation of 30 cubic meters of construction waste was reported, revealing issues with project responsibility and inadequate qualification checks for transport companies [2] - The enforcement team initiated the "one case, three investigations" procedure, completing evidence collection within 48 hours [2] Group 2: Collaborative Mechanisms - The case faced challenges in tracking the involved transport company due to its lack of location and cooperation, leading to the establishment of a "three-dimensional collaboration mechanism" [4] - Collaboration with traffic police and market regulation departments helped identify the transport company and confirm illegal operations, achieving a complete evidence chain from waste generation to disposal [4] Group 3: Regulatory Innovations - The introduction of a dual notification mechanism for illegal cases allowed for simultaneous administrative penalties and industry oversight, resulting in credit deductions for the involved construction company [6] - The case prompted the development of a long-term governance mechanism, utilizing a unified management platform for data sharing and real-time monitoring [6][7] Group 4: Systematic Upgrades - The successful handling of the case signifies a shift from single enforcement to comprehensive governance, addressing issues of multi-agency management and integrating new technologies like AI and blockchain into administrative processes [7] - A standardized case handling process was established, emphasizing timely departmental collaboration and evidence conversion rules [7]