以下文章来源于36氪汽车 ，作者徐蔡钰 36氪汽车 . 看懂汽车产业新百年。36氪旗下智能电动车产业报道公号。 纯电子结构有风险，物理结构不可或缺。 文 ｜ 徐蔡钰 编辑 ｜ 李勤 来源｜ 36氪汽车（ID：EV36Kr） 封面来源 ｜ 视觉中国 新能源车门安全性究竟如何？消费者的疑虑从未消散。 近日，成都一起小米SU7 Ultra碰撞事故引发关注。据官方通报，事故车发生碰撞后，越过道路中央绿化带，起火燃烧。 从围观群众拍摄的视频中可以看到，事故发生后，曾有热心群众尝试营救，但数名成年男性用力拉动门把手，都无法打开事故车门。 汽车门锁出现的初衷，是为了防止汽车不会随便别人开走、车内人员可以选择锁门保护自己。所以车门锁不锁，绝大部分情况下都是交由车主和车内人员 控制。 但碰撞事故后，车内人员很有可能陷入昏迷。如果车门锁依然只能由车内人员控制，救援难度便会大大增加。发生事故便要切割车门救人，车辆的财产价 值也将有所损失。 所以汽车厂商设计了一套精巧的应急自动上下锁机制：以安全气囊点火，作为车门锁应急程序的启动条件。 安全气囊是整车安全中最高等级的程序。 碰撞传感器、安全气囊这一套结构，通常拥有最高等级的运行权，传 ...

新能源车门安全性究竟如何？消费者的疑虑从未消散。 近日，成都一起小米SU7 Ultra碰撞事故引发关注。据官方通报，事故车发生碰撞后，越过道路中央绿 化带，起火燃烧。 从围观群众拍摄的视频中可以看到，事故发生后，曾有热心群众尝试营救，但数名成年男性用力拉动门 把手，都无法打开事故车门。 该事故目前仍在调查中，许多细节尚不明朗。但新能源汽车的安全问题，再次成为万千消费者关注的焦 点。 36氪此前曾对车门锁、隐藏式车门把手等进行过多篇报道，但安全话题永远值得更多关注。本篇文章， 我们继续探讨：应急情况下，新能源汽车门如何打开？ 气囊弹出，汽车会自动解锁车门 汽车门锁是一套复杂且精密的物理结构，主要由两部分构成。一部分是门锁，钥匙、遥控、手机远程、 车内中控屏开关锁，操作的均是门锁部分。而另一部分是锁扣，拉动车门把手，便是解开锁扣、打开车 门。 也就是说，想要顺利打开一扇车门，一共需要两个关键步骤：第一步解开车锁，第二步打开锁扣。 所以汽车厂商设计了一套精巧的应急自动上下锁机制：以安全气囊点火，作为车门锁应急程序的启动条 件。 安全气囊是整车安全中最高等级的程序。 碰撞传感器、安全气囊这一套结构，通常拥有最高等级的 ...

加入轩辕同学 ， 成就新汽车人! 撰文 / 常 笑 编辑 / 张 南 设计 / 甄 尤 美 2025年10月13日凌晨，四川成都天府大道主干道发生的一起严重交通事故，再次将小米汽车推上了舆论的风口浪尖。 涉事车辆为一台小米SU7，事发时天府大道路面车流较少，该车在以较快速度超越前方车辆时发生碰撞并失控，随后越过中央绿化带，车身翻滚至 对向车道并瞬间燃起明火，火势在短时间内迅速蔓延至全车。 一段现场视频显示，消防救援人员赶到现场后立即进行灭火操作，但明火扑灭后，车辆已仅剩车架，救援人员只能使用锤子、电锯等破拆车门。 从后续现场图片可见，涉事车辆车身主体已严重焚毁，初步判断其疑似为小米SU7 Ultra量产车型，该车型售价52.99万元，主打极速性能与赛道级 操控。 事发当日下午，成都市公安局交通管理局发布相关警情通报。根据通报内容：2025年10月13日凌晨3时18分许，成都市天府大道南段发生一起道路 交通事故。接警后，公安、消防、医疗救援等部门迅速到场处置。 事发后，驾驶人员被困车内，其间，有多名路人主动参与救援，徒手或用工具猛砸车窗，但因车门无法打开且火势迅猛救援失败，最终驾驶员不 幸遇难。 对于此次事故， ...

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article highlights the launch of Xiaomi's first SUV model, YU7, priced at 253,500 yuan, emphasizing its competitive features and safety standards [3][6]. - Xiaomi's CEO Lei Jun stated that safety is the foundation of their vehicle design, and the YU7 outperforms competitors like Model Y and Cayenne in various space metrics [6]. - The YU7 has undergone extensive testing over 539 days, covering 296 cities and accumulating 6.49 million kilometers, demonstrating its performance in extreme weather conditions [7]. Group 2 - Xiaomi reported a 47% year-on-year revenue growth in Q1 2025, with total revenue reaching 111.3 billion yuan, indicating strong market performance [7]. - The company has maintained its position among the top three smartphone manufacturers globally for 19 consecutive quarters [7]. - Xiaomi plans to invest an additional 200 billion yuan in research and development over the next five years, aiming for significant advancements by its 20th anniversary [7].

Core Viewpoint - The recent revision of the "GB 38031—2025" standard by the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology aims to incorporate existing safety technologies from mainstream automakers and battery suppliers into mandatory standards, effectively eliminating low-quality products from the market. This is expected to have minimal impact on brands that prioritize quality and safety [1] Group 1: Nissan N7 - The Nissan N7, priced between 119,900 and 149,900 yuan, has undergone over 7,400 R&D tests and more than 5,500 quality confirmations, ensuring a solid quality guarantee [2] - It features a four-needle puncture multi-cell ultra-safe battery that has passed 146 high-standard tests and meets the upcoming 2026 national standard requirements [2] - The vehicle is equipped with 16 active safety systems, including forward and rear collision warnings, and advanced intelligent driving features provided by Momenta, enhancing safety and convenience during travel [2] Group 2: Dongfeng Yipai eπ007 - The Dongfeng Yipai eπ007 boasts a cage-type ultra-high-strength structure with a high-strength steel ratio of 71.5% and a hot-formed steel ratio of 20.3%, achieving a score of 93.78% in C-NCAP evaluations [3][4] - Its Mah battery has passed extreme condition tests, demonstrating safety features such as resistance to punctures and drops, with no fire or explosion during a multi-needle puncture test [3] - The vehicle is priced between 115,900 and 149,900 yuan and offers various promotional benefits, enhancing its cost-performance ratio [4] Group 3: Xiaopeng MONA M03 - The Xiaopeng MONA M03 starts at 119,800 yuan and includes over 20 hardware perception devices, providing strong environmental awareness [5] - It features 12 active safety systems, including collision warnings and emergency braking assistance, along with the XNGP full-scene intelligent driving system [5] - The vehicle's body composition includes 73% high-strength steel and aluminum alloy, improving handling and safety during collisions, while its new generation lithium iron phosphate battery enhances overall safety [6] Group 4: Summary of Models - Each model has unique advantages: the Nissan N7 excels in overall quality and safety for family users; the Xiaopeng MONA M03 stands out in active safety features for tech-savvy young consumers; and the Dongfeng Yipai eπ007 offers comprehensive safety systems and high cost-performance for practical consumers [7] - All three models are considered reliable and safe options within the 100,000 to 150,000 yuan price range, allowing consumers to choose based on their specific needs [7]

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese new energy vehicle (NEV) market is experiencing rapid growth amidst the trends of electrification and intelligence, but safety concerns are increasingly affecting consumer purchasing decisions and the development of the entire NEV industry chain [1][2]. Group 1: Safety Concerns and Responsibilities - Each NEV carries an undeniable safety responsibility, and while pursuing core parameters like range and battery energy density, safety design should not be sacrificed for cost reduction [1]. - The intense competition among automakers accelerates the pace of technological iteration, necessitating that safety validation and testing keep up accordingly [1]. - The maturity of intelligent driving systems must align with marketing claims to prevent drivers from becoming overly reliant on these systems, which could impair their emergency response capabilities [1]. Group 2: Three Dimensions for Building a Technological Moat - In the area of fundamental research, the thermal runaway risk of lithium-ion batteries is a core cause of NEV fire incidents, prompting companies to accelerate the development of all-solid-state batteries to fundamentally address this issue [2]. - The policy framework has prioritized all-solid-state batteries as a key focus area, requiring enhanced collaboration among industry, academia, and research institutions [2]. - Companies should develop high-stability anode and cathode materials to address electrolyte leakage issues post-collision, while also ensuring that vehicle lightweighting does not compromise safety [2]. Group 3: Intelligent Safety and Testing Innovations - For intelligent safety, companies need to establish a triple redundancy mechanism to address the "critical takeover" flaw in L2-level assisted driving, including heterogeneous fusion of laser radar and millimeter-wave radar, dual independent computing units in the decision layer, and mechanical or electronic dual braking systems in the execution layer [2]. - Strengthening driver monitoring systems through infrared cameras and capacitive steering wheels to monitor attention in real-time is essential, with the ability to enforce speed reduction or stopping when necessary [2]. - Companies should actively promote vehicle-to-infrastructure data communication through IoT technology to enhance safety [2]. Group 4: Transparency and Consumer Confidence - Companies must establish stricter and more efficient testing mechanisms to allow consumers to tangibly perceive driving safety [2]. - An accident data disclosure mechanism should be implemented to reduce information asymmetry and enhance consumer confidence in NEV safety [2]. - The ultimate mission of NEVs is not to disrupt traditional vehicles but to provide safer transportation options, necessitating a balance between technological innovation and respect for life [2].

Core Viewpoint - Xiaomi is facing a significant trust crisis in its automotive division, stemming from safety concerns and quality issues related to its SU7 model, which has led to public criticism and calls for accountability from the company [1][4][5]. Group 1: Safety and Quality Issues - The SU7 model has been involved in incidents such as self-ignition after a collision, raising safety concerns among consumers [1]. - There are allegations of exaggerated claims regarding the NOA intelligent driving system and performance specifications, with the SU7 Ultra's horsepower being limited from 1548 to 900 [1][4]. - Customers have reported issues with the SU7's design, including problems with the headlight frame and fender, contributing to a broader perception of quality control failures [1][19]. Group 2: Consumer Reactions and Legal Challenges - Many customers are demanding refunds and compensation due to perceived false advertising, particularly regarding the SU7 Ultra's carbon fiber hood, which was marketed with misleading claims about its design [7][8]. - A group of dissatisfied customers has formed a legal action group, seeking to sue Xiaomi for false advertising and demanding refunds [8][11]. - Xiaomi's response to customer complaints has been criticized as inadequate, with some customers feeling that the company's attitude is dismissive [11][15]. Group 3: Company Response and Future Outlook - Xiaomi's CEO, Lei Jun, acknowledged the company's responsibility and the need for higher standards following the recent crisis [4]. - A strategic product launch event is scheduled for May 22, where Xiaomi plans to unveil new products, including its first SUV, the YU7, amidst ongoing scrutiny [1][23]. - Recent sales data indicates a decline in Xiaomi's automotive sales, with weekly sales dropping from 7000 to 5200 units over a few weeks, reflecting the impact of the current crisis on consumer confidence [24].

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese electric vehicle (EV) market is experiencing rapid growth amidst the trends of electrification and intelligent technology, but safety incidents are raising public concerns about the safety of EVs [1] Group 1: Industry Challenges - Safety incidents, such as the "Copper Mine Xiaomi SU7 explosion," have significantly impacted consumer purchasing decisions and the overall development of the EV industry [1] - The intense competition among automakers is accelerating technological iterations, necessitating that safety validation and testing keep pace with advancements [1][2] - The maturity of intelligent driving systems must align with marketing claims to prevent drivers from becoming overly reliant on these technologies, which could impair their emergency response capabilities [1] Group 2: Recommendations for EV Companies - Companies should focus on three dimensions to build a technological moat: foundational research, proactive intelligent safety layout, and innovative testing and validation systems [1] - In foundational research, addressing the thermal runaway risks of lithium-ion batteries is crucial, with a push towards solid-state battery development to fundamentally resolve these issues [2] - For proactive intelligent safety, companies need to establish a triple redundancy mechanism for L2-level assisted driving, including enhanced sensor fusion and driver monitoring systems [2] - Companies should implement stricter and more efficient testing mechanisms to enhance consumer perception of driving safety and establish a transparent accident data disclosure system to build consumer confidence [2] Group 3: Industry Mission - The ultimate mission of the EV industry is to provide safer transportation solutions rather than merely disrupting traditional automotive practices [3] - Companies should avoid misleading marketing tactics regarding technological capabilities and clearly define the boundaries of intelligent driving technology to maintain healthy industry development [3]

Core Viewpoint - The recent announcement by the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (MIIT) regarding the safety standards for car door handles in electric vehicles highlights the need for a balance between innovative design and user safety, addressing critical safety issues exposed by past accidents [1][2] Group 1: Safety Concerns - The hidden door handles, initially praised for their aesthetic and aerodynamic benefits, have been linked to severe safety risks during emergencies, such as power failures and collisions, which hinder escape and rescue efforts [1] - A specific incident illustrated the danger when a vehicle's door could not be opened after a collision due to electrical failure, forcing rescuers to break windows, thus wasting precious time [1] Group 2: New Regulations - The proposed national standards include three key regulations: 1. Safety redundancy design, requiring door handles to function independently after power loss or collision 2. Enhanced visibility of operational indicators to reduce misjudgment in emergencies 3. Establishing a comprehensive safety barrier to prevent issues like pinching or accidental activation [2] - These regulations prioritize passenger safety and correct the trend of prioritizing flashy technology over safety in vehicle design [2] Group 3: Industry Implications - The MIIT's initiative reflects a respect for life rights and a necessary adjustment to the logic of sustainable industry development, emphasizing that true technological innovation should not compromise safety [2] - The automotive industry must find a balance between aerodynamic efficiency and escape effectiveness to transition from reckless growth to a new phase of high-quality development centered on safety [2]

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the successful high-standard testing of the SPS battery pack by Funeng Technology, demonstrating its superior safety performance and advanced technology foundation [3][8]. Group 1: Testing and Safety Performance - Funeng Technology's SPS battery pack has passed the stringent C-NCAP vehicle-level scraping safety test, showcasing its high safety performance [3]. - The C-NCAP has introduced an innovative scraping test for electric vehicles, making it the first NCAP system globally to include such a project, aimed at identifying potential hazards like battery fires and leaks [4]. - The SPS battery pack underwent a comprehensive scraping safety test, which included both forward and reverse scraping tests at specified speeds [6]. Group 2: Technical Features and Market Expansion - The SPS battery pack was tested without a vehicle underbody protection plate, simulating extreme conditions where the vehicle encounters large obstacles [8]. - Post-testing, the battery pack showed only minor scratches with no significant deformation, indicating its excellent safety performance [8]. - The SPS battery pack utilizes inherently safe chemical materials and a high-strength aluminum alloy structure, providing 360° safety protection and significantly reducing risks of thermal runaway and short circuits [8]. - Funeng Technology has officially commenced mass production of the SPS large soft pack product and has secured project designations from major automotive companies such as GAC, Geely, Dongfeng, and Jiangling, aiding in the expansion of its scale effects [8].