台行政机构网站有关台湾地区人口情况介绍中的表述被悄然修改，在地区总人口中占比逾九成五的"汉 人"竟变成所谓"其余人口"，避而不谈以汉族为主体的基本事实。如此荒谬绝伦的政治操作，再次暴露 民进党当局企图斩断两岸血缘亲缘和历史文化联结的险恶用心，尽显"台独"分裂势力"去中国化"已至走 火入魔。 据台媒报道，相关网站内容原表述为"汉人为最大族群，占总人口96.4%"，被替换成了"2.6%为原住民族 群，另外来人口占1.2%，其余人口占96.2%"。酷爱玩弄文字游戏的民进党当局自以为"改编"手法高明， 却立即引发岛内各界群嘲与痛批。把"最大族群"篡改为"其余人口"，违背常识、逻辑不通，突破了正常 人的认知。面对群嘲，台行政机构竟以"为促进族群平权"诡辩。这下倒更让人们看清这一小伎俩背后的 大阴谋，那就是要"反中"就得"去中"，要"去中国化"就得"去祖先化"。为了谋求"台独"，不惜数典忘 祖，连列祖列宗都不认了。如此荒唐的操作，足见"台独"是反人性、邪恶的。 "水有源，故其流不穷；木有根，故其生不穷。"中华民族的漫长历史记载着历代先民迁居台湾、繁衍生 息的足迹，镌刻着两岸同胞血脉相连、同气连枝的史实。立宗祠、修族谱、拜 ...

金十数据5月14日讯，国务院台办14日举行的例行新闻发布会上，有记者问：近日，台行政机构网站有 关台湾人口情况介绍中删除"汉人"表述，改为"其余人口"。岛内舆论批评这是赖清德当局进一步"去中 国化"、"去祖先化"的做法。对此有何评论？国台办发言人陈斌华表示，这种做法荒谬绝伦，可笑至 极。民进党当局做这些事的人，尤其是那些属于所谓"其余人口"的人，不知他们有何颜面面对列祖列 宗！两岸同胞有共同的血脉、共同的文化、共同的历史，同属中华民族、炎黄子孙，都是中国人，这是 谁都无法改变的客观事实。民进党当局出于谋"独"本性和政治私利，花招百出操弄"去中国化"，割裂两 岸历史文化联结，不得人心，不会得逞，必遭唾弃。 （澎湃） 台行政机构网站删除"汉人"改为"其余人口"，国台办回应 ...

Group 1 - India's recent policy limits Chinese companies' stake in joint ventures to 10% and requires technology transfer to local firms, contrasting with the 100% ownership allowed for other foreign companies [3][5] - Despite the push for "de-China" initiatives, 76% of components in India's electronics manufacturing still rely on imports from China, highlighting a contradiction in India's strategy [3][5] - The Indian government's "Production-Linked Incentive" scheme, which invested $26 billion, has not significantly improved the market share of local brands, which remains below 5% [3][5] Group 2 - The U.S. is seen as supporting India's anti-China stance, but India's steel industry faces challenges due to reliance on Chinese coking coal, leading to operational difficulties [6][8] - Recent foreign investment in India has plummeted by 40%, with manufacturing's GDP contribution dropping to 14.3%, indicating economic distress [8][10] - Historical comparisons show that while China has advanced significantly in manufacturing, India struggles to keep pace, suggesting that restrictive foreign investment policies may hinder growth [10]

Group 1 - The recent punitive tariffs imposed by the Trump administration on Chinese electric vehicles, batteries, photovoltaics, and semiconductors have reached a high of 245%, but their impact is limited compared to the initial tariffs introduced in 2018 [3][6] - The U.S. has lost its ability to control China's trajectory, as China has become less reliant on the U.S. market and is now focusing on "re-globalization" [3][6] - The tariffs, initially intended to disrupt supply chains and increase manufacturing costs, have turned into a political show for the U.S., resulting in limited effectiveness and self-harm [3][5] Group 2 - The U.S. has not successfully brought manufacturing jobs back to the Rust Belt states; instead, inflation has increased, consumer costs have risen, and corporate investments have slowed down [5][9] - Chinese companies have proactively diversified their markets, targeting Southeast Asia, Latin America, and Africa, with no U.S. presence among the top five export destinations for Chinese electric vehicles [5][10] - The U.S. strategy of "decoupling" has failed, as it underestimated China's resilience and overestimated the willingness of allies to comply with U.S. directives [6][12] Group 3 - The essence of the tariff war is a struggle for control and dominance, with the U.S. attempting to exclude China from its technology, trade, and financial systems [6][9] - As the U.S. attempts to decouple, China is enhancing its internal circulation and innovation, developing self-reliant technologies in semiconductors and batteries [7][9] - The U.S. has transitioned from being a "rule-maker" to a "rule-disruptor," undermining the global systems it once established, while China continues to expand its influence within these systems [15][16] Group 4 - The recent tariffs are more of a political signal than a strategic tool, indicating a loss of control by the U.S. over its policies and objectives [13][16] - The competition between the U.S. and China is evolving from a simple power struggle to a contest of institutional resilience, economic endurance, and industrial strategy [15][18] - The U.S. has reached a point where its actions no longer dictate China's future, and the transfer of dominance is occurring subtly through repeated tariff increases [18]

新华社台北4月29日电 题：追寻郑成功收复台湾的英雄足迹 新华社记者杨晓静、刘斐 1661年4月末，郑成功登陆台湾。在台湾，郑成功兼具民族英雄、开垦台湾先祖、地方神明与神话人物的特质，以他名字或封号命名的学校、街 道、地名数不胜数，彰显他在台湾民众心目中的崇高地位。尤其在台南市，郑成功登陆宝岛初期的众多文物古迹构成了台湾社会的特殊记忆场 域，也见证了两岸同根同源的历史联结。 这是台南安平古堡内的"民族英雄郑成功"雕像（3月19日摄）。新华社记者 刘斐 摄 郑成功祖籍福建南安，出生于1624年，同年荷兰殖民者占据台湾南部。1661年至1662年初，郑成功挥师东征，驱逐荷兰殖民者，收复台湾，为中 华民族立下不朽功勋。 台南市中西区的赤崁楼是郑成功踏足宝岛的"始迹楼"。这里前身为荷兰人所建的"普罗民遮城"，是控扼台江内海的战略要冲。364年前，郑成功率 军从台湾西南沿海进入台江内海，"先克此城"。清代，这里增建了海神庙、文昌阁、蓬壶书院等中式建筑，与残剩的荷兰式基座交织成独特的历 史拼图。 如今,地处闹市的赤崁楼已不见昔日"登临眺远，波光辉映，云影徘徊"的夕照美景。2022年动工的两阶段修复工程尚未完工，院内散落着 ...

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article emphasizes the U.S. government's efforts to reduce dependence on China for critical minerals essential for automotive batteries and military products, particularly through the invocation of the Defense Production Act [1][2]. - The Trump administration's executive order aims to expand domestic production of critical minerals, which are largely sourced from China, highlighting a national security concern regarding reliance on foreign adversaries [1][2]. - Approximately 80% of critical minerals globally are produced in China, prompting the Biden administration to seek alternative sourcing from Southeast Asia and Africa, although environmental concerns have led to a cautious approach towards expanding domestic production [1][2]. Group 2 - The Trump administration is focused on increasing the extraction of fossil fuels domestically, showing a lack of interest in climate change measures [2]. - The executive order states that excessive federal regulation has led to the decline of the U.S. as a leading mineral producer, posing a serious threat to national security and the economy due to reliance on foreign sources [2]. - China has implemented export controls on critical minerals, using them as leverage in trade negotiations with the U.S., which includes restrictions on gallium and germanium in 2023 and antimony in September 2024 [2].