Core Viewpoint - The recent legislative developments in the U.S. and Hong Kong regarding stablecoins signify a growing recognition and potential legitimization of stablecoins, primarily dollar-pegged, which may enhance the dollar's dominance in the cryptocurrency space [1][2]. Group 1: Stablecoin Market Overview - Stablecoins are typically pegged to stable assets like fiat currencies (mainly the dollar), precious metals, or other cryptocurrencies to maintain value stability [2]. - Since 2020, the stablecoin market has seen significant growth, with a current market capitalization of nearly $245 billion, driven by factors such as efficiency in payments, increased demand from the expanding cryptocurrency market, and geopolitical risks [2]. - The potential implementation of regulatory frameworks could provide new momentum for market development, enhancing the "social consensus" around stablecoins and attracting more investment [2]. Group 2: Impact on Global Currency System - The expansion of stablecoins, particularly dollar-pegged ones, reinforces the dollar's position in the global currency system, potentially impacting the value of more volatile fiat currencies [3]. - While the growth of the dollar stablecoin market may increase demand for U.S. Treasury bonds, its overall effect on short-term bonds is limited, as short-term rates are primarily influenced by Federal Reserve policies rather than market supply and demand [3]. - The current challenges facing U.S. fiscal policy, including persistent deficits and high interest payments, remain critical issues that stablecoin development cannot resolve [3].

Core Viewpoint - Stablecoins are seen as a potential savior for the US dollar hegemony, possibly leading to a version 3.0 of dollar dominance globally [1][5]. Group 1: Stablecoin Overview - Stablecoins are a type of cryptocurrency that maintain a 1:1 peg to the US dollar, differing from highly volatile cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum [2][4]. - The issuance of stablecoins is strictly regulated, requiring a dollar backing for each stablecoin issued, which simplifies cryptocurrency transactions [2][4]. Group 2: Demand and Market Potential - The demand for stablecoins is rigid, increasing with the number of cryptocurrency traders, and Tether (USDT) has issued over 130 billion coins backed by approximately 130 billion dollars [4]. - Citigroup estimates that the stablecoin market could reach $3.7 trillion by 2030, with 60% of that potentially used to purchase US Treasury bonds, surpassing holdings by China and Japan [4][5]. Group 3: Implications for Dollar Hegemony - Stablecoins could become a core pillar of dollar hegemony 3.0, as they may facilitate global transactions and reinforce the dollar's dominance, especially in regions with limited banking access [5]. - The reliance on stablecoins in regions like Latin America, Southeast Asia, and Africa indicates a trend towards indirect use of the dollar, laying the groundwork for a new version of dollar hegemony [5]. Group 4: Challenges and Risks - The future of stablecoins and their role in dollar hegemony is uncertain, facing challenges such as the need for widespread adoption of cryptocurrencies and potential competition from stablecoins issued by other regions [6][9]. - The risks associated with stablecoins, including their reliance on private companies and the potential for high-risk investments, pose significant uncertainties for the stability of the dollar hegemony [10].

Summary of Conference Call Minutes Industry or Company Involved - Focus on the global market impact of the "reciprocal tariff" policy Core Points and Arguments - The recent tariff reduction from 145% to 10% exceeded expectations, alleviating short-term market concerns, but medium to long-term risks related to trade restrictions need monitoring, particularly around key dates in July and August [1][2] - The U.S. effective tax rate has decreased to 16-17%, indicating a significant shift in market dynamics [2] - The performance of U.S. stocks, particularly in the tech sector, has rebounded quickly, suggesting that previous recession fears may have been overstated [4] - The current market is characterized by limited upward momentum and constrained downside potential, indicating a state of indecision [2] - The liquidity shock is viewed as an occasional event that presents buying opportunities, with central bank interventions typically proving effective [4] Other Important but Possibly Overlooked Content - The recommendation to focus on sectors with strong end-demand and technology innovation, while also capitalizing on short-term trading opportunities in Hong Kong stocks [1] - The expectation that the core Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) inflation rate will decline to 3.5-4% by year-end, with the Federal Reserve potentially lowering rates 1-2 times in Q4 [4] - The suggestion to wait for U.S. Treasury yields to rise to 4.8-5% before making long positions, as the current yield of 4.5% is deemed unattractive [5][8] - The impact of tariff adjustments on China's market is projected to reduce GDP influence from 3% to 1-1.5%, with Hong Kong's earnings being less affected than A-shares [7][9] - Recommendations for gold investment strategies include dollar-cost averaging or grid trading, given the high levels of market congestion [6][9]

一天，法外狂徒张三，发行了1个亿的张三币，声称1个张三币可以兑换1美元，可以绕过银行系统进行 各种黑白灰交易以及跨境支付而不被监管，然后让你去买。你大概会觉得他是骗子，也不会去买。心里 想的是，我要是买了张三币，以后要是换不回美元不就瞎了？ 可是，如果发行稳定币的人是马斯克，你信吗？如果发行稳定币的是巴菲特？你可能犹豫。如果发行稳 定币的是美国财政部和特朗普家族呢？你大概就会相信了。现在在美国，发行各种稳定币的，就是马斯 克、央行、总统家族这个级别的机构，是不是就更可信了？ 美国财长贝森特在一次访谈中表示，特朗普政府正全力押注加密货币领域，并正在努力为数字资产企业 提供明确的监管框架。贝森特重申了他的预测，美元稳定币将在短期内为美国国债和票据创造2 万亿美 元需求，远超目前的3000亿美元规模。 通过发行美元稳定币，让其他国家的民众可以借助虚拟币绕开本国的监管，侧面给普通民众开了一条投 资美债的通道，有利于资产的美元化。说的通俗点，你现在手上有20万元人民币，以前你先想买美债， 但国内没有渠道，现在给你提供了一个稳定币的购买渠道。 最近稳定币很火，美国参议院刚刚推进了其有史以来第一份稳定币法案《GENIUS ...

2025年05月23日 国泰君安期货商品研究晨报-贵金属及基本金属 观点与策略 | 黄金：震荡回落 | 2 | | --- | --- | | 白银：跟随上涨 | 2 | | 铜：库存减少，支撑价格 | 4 | | 铝：区间震荡 | 6 | | 氧化铝：小幅下跌 | 6 | | 锌：承压运行 | 8 | | 铅：供需双弱，区间调整 | 9 | | 锡：窄幅震荡 | 10 | | 镍：镍矿矛盾托底，转产经济性或限制上方估值 | 12 | | 不锈钢：成本底部空间清晰，上行缺乏实质驱动 | 12 | 请务必阅读正文之后的免责条款部分 1 国 泰 君 安 期 货 研 究 期货研究 商 品 研 究 所 商 品 研 究 2025 年 5 月 23 日 黄金：震荡回落 白银：跟随上涨 | 王蓉 | 投资咨询从业资格号：Z0002529 | wangrong013179@gtjas.com | | --- | --- | --- | | 刘雨萱 | 投资咨询从业资格号：Z0020476 | liuyuxuan023982@gtjas.com | 【基本面跟踪】 贵金属基本面数据 | | | 昨日收盘价 | 日涨幅 | 昨日 ...

靠着关税，老美4月份赚了一大笔，但特朗普却怎么也高兴不起来。 按照美国财政部的说法，4月份特朗普政府斩获关税总额163亿美元，跟3月份的87.5亿美元相比，增长86%，跟去年同期的71亿美元相比，超了一倍还多。 然而，这跟特朗普的期望值比起来，依旧差得有点远，更严重的问题是，极度缺钱的特朗普政府，可能又又又要关门了。 关税收入翻倍还不够，特朗普的野心有多大？为何白宫再次面临"关门危机"？ 今天我们就来谈谈这些问题，码字不易，欢迎点赞，转发，收藏。 4月2日起，特朗普政府实施"对等关税"政策，对57个贸易伙伴加征10%到49%不等的关税。 一夜之间，特朗普政府的关税收入大增，根据美国财政部的预算结果，每天美国从关税中获得的收入超过5亿美元。 但特朗普是怎么说的？ 当初特朗普曾夸下海口，说"美国靠关税赚了一大笔钱，每天20亿美元"。 每天20亿美元和每天5亿美元，实在差得不少。 而且这背后还存在一个逻辑： 进口的商品少了，关税收入当然也会减少，这就相当于把稳定的长期现金流变成了一波"快财"。 美国现在最大的问题，特朗普最大的烦恼是啥？ 就俩字——缺钱！或者换俩字——太穷！ 这种相当于饮鸩止渴的收入增加方式，特朗普 ...

穆迪美国信用降级敲响警钟，美国面临要么减税缩水，要么加重关税的两难局面。 据追风交易台消息，美国银行在最新的报告中表示，市场对美债的担忧已持续一段时间，穆迪的此次降 级的时机也并非巧合，意在提醒美国政府关税收入将无法完全抵消拟减税成本。 尽管如此，但美银表示，美国或可能执意而行： 从我们的观点看，更可能的情况是我们仍将获得一个扩张性的税收方案，长期美债收益率应 该会继续反映对财政前景的担忧。 风险在于：当华盛顿认真对待美国财政问题时，关税可能是唯一能有效减少赤字的手段，而 另一轮大规模关税上调可能比不那么扩张的财政方案对经济造成更大伤害。 但除非出现突然变动，否则风险在于：当华盛顿认真对待美国财政问题时，关税可能是唯一 能有效减少赤字的手段。另一轮大规模关税上调可能比不那么扩张的财政方案对经济造成更 大伤害。 风险提示及免责条款 市场有风险，投资需谨慎。本文不构成个人投资建议，也未考虑到个别用户特殊的投资目标、财务状况或需要。用户应考虑本文中的任何 意见、观点或结论是否符合其特定状况。据此投资，责任自负。 近期，许多客户询问债券市场是否即将到达投资者对债务可持续性担忧爆发的临界点。穆迪 在周五晚间将美国评级从 ...

Core Viewpoint - Trump's new tariff plan aims to address the chaos in the trade system caused by his previous tariff policies, as he is forced to act due to economic pressures and the inability to reach new trade agreements with all countries [1][3]. Group 1: Economic Pressures - The U.S. government is under significant pressure due to high-interest rates maintained by the Federal Reserve, which is affecting the U.S. debt situation, particularly with trillions of dollars in debt maturing in June [3]. - Trump's primary goal is to lower U.S. inflation to compel the Federal Reserve to cut interest rates, thereby reducing the cost of new debt [3][5]. Group 2: Supply Chain and Inflation - The U.S. lacks necessary supply chains to provide sufficient goods, leading to rising prices and indirectly increasing inflation [5]. - High labor costs in the U.S. compared to manufacturing powerhouses contribute to elevated product prices, exacerbating inflationary pressures [5]. Group 3: China’s Role - China has played a pivotal role in the trade dynamics, preparing for a prolonged trade conflict and implementing strategies to mitigate the impact of U.S. tariffs [7]. - The unexpected resilience of China in the trade war has forced Trump to reconsider his approach, leading to a situation where he is now compelled to negotiate [7][9]. Group 4: Global Reactions - Following the U.S.-China joint statement, other countries like India and several EU nations have expressed intentions to retaliate against U.S. tariffs, indicating a shift in global trade dynamics [9][11]. - India's proposal for retaliatory tariffs and the EU's demands for better trade terms highlight the growing discontent with U.S. trade policies [11][13]. Group 5: Urgency for Resolution - The increasing demands from other countries for better trade terms create a challenging negotiation environment for the Trump administration, necessitating a swift resolution to tariff issues [13].

1. Report Industry Investment Ratings - The report does not explicitly provide overall industry - wide investment ratings. However, it gives individual commodity trend intensities, which can be used as a reference for investment judgment. For example, the trend intensity of gold and silver is - 1, indicating a bearish view; copper has a trend intensity of 0, suggesting a neutral stance [2][9][13]. 2. Core Views of the Report - Each commodity has its own market situation and price trend. Generally, factors such as supply - demand relationship, macro - news, and cost changes affect commodity prices. For example, the cost curve of lithium carbonate is moving down, and its trend may remain weak; copper lacks driving forces and its price is in a volatile state [2][11][33]. 3. Summary by Commodity Precious Metals - **Gold**: It broke below the support level, with a trend intensity of - 1. The prices of domestic and international gold futures and spot showed different degrees of change. For example, the daily increase of Shanghai Gold 2506 was 1.65%, and the overnight decline was - 0.38% [2][6][9]. - **Silver**: It oscillated and declined, with a trend intensity of - 1. The prices of silver futures and spot also fluctuated. For instance, the daily increase of Shanghai Silver 2506 was 1.13%, and the overnight decline was - 0.15% [2][6][9]. Base Metals - **Copper**: It lacked driving forces and the price was in a volatile state, with a trend intensity of 0. The prices of domestic and international copper futures and spot changed, and there were also news about copper mines' production and cooperation [11][13]. - **Aluminum**: It was in a range - bound oscillation, with a trend intensity of 0. The prices of aluminum futures and spot, as well as related costs and inventories, showed certain changes. For example, the closing price of the Shanghai Aluminum main contract decreased by 55 compared with the previous day [14][16]. - **Alumina**: It rebounded significantly, with a trend intensity of 0. The trading volume and price of alumina futures increased, and there were changes in export data [14][16]. - **Zinc**: There was a surplus in the long - term, and the price was under pressure, with a trend intensity of - 1. The prices of zinc futures and spot, as well as inventory and other data, changed [17][18]. - **Lead**: There was a weak supply - demand situation, and it was in an oscillating state, with a trend intensity of 0. The prices of lead futures and spot, as well as inventory and other data, changed [20][21]. - **Tin**: It was in a narrow - range oscillation, with a trend intensity of - 1. The prices of tin futures and spot, as well as inventory and other data, changed [23][25]. - **Nickel**: The contradiction in nickel ore provided a bottom - support, and the conversion economy might limit the upside valuation, with a trend intensity of 0. The prices of nickel futures and spot, as well as related costs and inventories, changed [27][32]. - **Stainless Steel**: The cost bottom space was clear, but there was a lack of substantial driving forces for upward movement, with a trend intensity of 0. The prices of stainless - steel futures and spot changed [27][32]. Energy and Chemicals - **Lithium Carbonate**: The cost curve continued to move down, and the trend might remain weak, with a trend intensity of - 1. The prices of lithium - carbonate futures and spot, as well as related costs and inventories, changed [33][35]. - **Industrial Silicon**: It was in a weak pattern, and attention should be paid to upstream supply changes, with a trend intensity of - 1. The prices of industrial - silicon futures and spot, as well as related costs and inventories, changed [36][38]. - **Polysilicon**: The demand declined, and the market also maintained a downward trend, with a trend intensity of - 1. The prices of polysilicon futures and spot, as well as related costs and inventories, changed [36][38]. - **Rebar and Hot - Rolled Coil**: The raw materials continued to decline, and they were in a weak - oscillating state, with a trend intensity of 0. The prices of rebar and hot - rolled coil futures and spot, as well as related costs and inventories, changed [39][41]. - **Silicon Iron and Manganese Silicon**: They were in a wide - range oscillation, with a trend intensity of 0. The prices of silicon - iron and manganese - silicon futures and spot, as well as related costs and inventories, changed [42][44]. - **Coke and Coking Coal**: With the decline of hot metal, they were in a wide - range oscillation, with a trend intensity of 0. The prices of coke and coking - coal futures and spot, as well as related costs and inventories, changed [46][47][50]. - **Steam Coal**: The coal - mine inventory increased, and it was in a weak - oscillating state, with a trend intensity of 0. The prices of steam - coal futures and spot, as well as related costs and inventories, changed [51][53]. - **Para - Xylene**: It was in a single - sided oscillating market, with a trend intensity of 1. The prices of para - xylene futures and spot, as well as related costs and inventories, changed [55][56][59]. - **PTA**: The strategy was to go long on PX and short on PTA, with a trend intensity of 1. The prices of PTA futures and spot, as well as related costs and inventories, changed [56][59][60]. - **MEG**: It was still strong on a single - sided basis, with a trend intensity of 1. The prices of MEG futures and spot, as well as related costs and inventories, changed [55][59][61]. - **Rubber**: It was in a weak - oscillating state, with a trend intensity of - 1. The prices of rubber futures and spot, as well as related costs and inventories, changed [2][63][65]. Agricultural Products - The report also briefly mentions some agricultural products such as palm oil, soybean oil, etc., but does not provide detailed analysis. For example, palm oil is under pressure and looking for support at the bottom, and soybean oil has increased short - term risks due to the fluctuation of US biodiesel policy [4].

2025年05月19日 国泰君安期货商品研究晨报-贵金属及基本金属 | 黄金：下破支撑位 | 2 | | --- | --- | | 白银：震荡回落 | 2 | | 铜：缺乏驱动，价格震荡 | 4 | | 铝：区间震荡 | 6 | | 氧化铝：大幅反弹 | 6 | | 锌：远端过剩，价格承压 | 8 | | 铅：供需双弱，震荡运行 | 9 | | 锡：窄幅震荡 | 10 | 国 泰 君 安 期 货 研 究 请务必阅读正文之后的免责条款部分 1 商 品 研 究 所 观点与策略 商 品 研 究 2025 年 5 月 19 日 | 业 | | --- | | 服 | | 务 | | 研 | | 究 | | 所 | | 王蓉 | 投资咨询从业资格号：Z0002529 | wangrong013179@gtjas.com | | --- | --- | --- | | 刘雨萱 | 投资咨询从业资格号：Z0020476 | liuyuxuan023982@gtjas.com | 【基本面跟踪】 贵金属基本面数据 期货研究 请务必阅读正文之后的免责条款部分 1 2 期货研究 黄金：下破支撑位 白银：震荡回落 | | | 昨 ...