据央视新闻，7月9日，外交部发言人毛宁主持例行记者会。有记者问：日前，美国总统特朗普就中 美关系表态。外交部如何看待？ 毛宁表示，关于中美关系，中方一贯按照相互尊重、和平共处、合作共赢的原则看待和处理中美关 系。 ...

Group 1 - The core viewpoint is that China views and handles Sino-U.S. relations based on the principles of mutual respect, peaceful coexistence, and win-win cooperation [1]

人民日报发表署名为"钟声"的评论文章称，中美关系取得的成就，首要归功于两国人民的共同努力；中 美关系继续向前发展，更加需要依靠两国人民。不论形势如何变化，中美和平共处的历史逻辑不会变， 两国人民交流合作的根本愿望不会变，世界人民对中美关系稳定发展的普遍期待不会变。从历史上 的"乒乓外交"打破冷战坚冰，到如今匹克球交流架起友谊新桥，人民之间的真诚互动总能为中美两国关 系增添暖意。当前，中美关系处于关键历史节点。越是这个时候，越需要以人民友好为纽带，夯实两国 关系的基础。中美双方要为两国人员往来和人文交流架桥铺路，也要排除干扰和障碍。中国始终以开放 的胸怀欢迎美国人民，愿通过交流合作增进相互理解。中美人民多走动、多交流，共同续写两国人民友 好故事，将不断为中美关系发展作出新贡献。中方愿同美方一道努力，汇聚起两国人民的力量，赓续传 统友谊，推动中美关系稳定、健康、可持续发展，为两国人民谋求更多福祉。 ...

中美关系的未来在青年，青年交流为中美关系发展注入源源不断的力量。匹克球，这项充满活力的运 动，成为连接两国青少年的崭新纽带。从赛场上的默契配合，到文化交流中的思想碰撞，中美青年用青 春的热情和真诚的友谊，书写着友好交往的新篇章。他们在交流中增进相互了解，在互动中消弭文化隔 阂，展现了青年一代对和平、合作、共赢的共同追求。中美两国青年在交流中结下的友谊，不仅是个人 成长的宝贵记忆，更是两国关系未来的希望之光。越来越多中美青年相知相亲、携手同行，成为两国友 好的新一代使者，将为中美关系发展接续注入动力。 中美人民多走动、多交流，共同续写两国人民友好故事，将不断为中美关系发展作出新贡献 近日，习近平主席向参加未来5年邀请5万名美国青少年来华交流学习倡议访华的美国马里兰州蒙哥马利 郡青少年匹克球文化交流访华团师生回复口信，祝贺他们访华取得成功，寄语他们做两国友好的新一代 使者，为增进两国人民友谊作出更大贡献。习近平主席的殷切期望，让访华团师生深受鼓舞，为中美两 国加强人民友好交往注入暖流。 任何一项伟大事业要成功都必须从人民中找到根基、从人民中集聚力量、由人民来共同完成。中美友好 就是这样一项伟大事业。多年来，习近平 ...

Group 1 - The article discusses the potential for a conflict between the US and China, suggesting that if a war were to occur, it might take place in the US rather than in Asia or the Middle East [1][8][10] - It highlights the strategic maneuvers of the US, including the transfer of military resources to Asia and the portrayal of China as a threat to Taiwan, indicating a deliberate attempt to create a battleground in China’s vicinity [5][6][12] - The article points out that the US has historically avoided bringing conflict to its own territory, which could change if a direct confrontation with China occurs [3][8][10] Group 2 - The article emphasizes China's growing military capabilities and the recognition of this strength by other nations, including the US, which has led to increased caution from the US regarding direct military engagement [10][16] - It discusses the economic interdependence between the US and China, particularly in terms of market access and the importance of Chinese rare earth materials to US military technology [14][18] - The article concludes that despite the tensions, both nations need to address their issues through dialogue rather than conflict, as the current situation is largely a result of US actions [20][22]

Group 1: Trade Relations - China has not imported any U.S. oil for three consecutive months (March, April, May), marking the longest period since 2018 without purchases [1][6] - This cessation of oil imports is seen as a significant blow to U.S. oil companies, which are already facing fierce competition in global markets [6] - The U.S. had hoped to leverage tariffs to gain concessions from other countries, but the strategy has backfired, damaging its international trade image and negatively impacting domestic industries [3][10] Group 2: Diplomatic Stance - China's Foreign Affairs Minister emphasized the country's commitment to peace while also asserting that it will not renounce the use of force for national unification, signaling a firm stance on sovereignty issues [4][10] - The U.S. is exhibiting contradictory behavior, aiming for military deterrence while simultaneously expressing a desire to avoid direct conflict with China due to its own industrial shortcomings [7][10] - Recent reports indicate a potential thaw in U.S.-China trade relations, with the U.S. planning to lift some export restrictions on products like chip design software and aircraft engines [7][8] Group 3: Future Outlook - The evolving dynamics between the two largest economies in the world will significantly impact global peace and stability, with the potential for either cooperation or increased confrontation [10] - The historical inconsistency of U.S. export policies towards China raises concerns about future relations, suggesting that any current easing of restrictions may be temporary and driven by negotiation tactics [8][10]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the articles highlights the ongoing tensions in Sino-U.S. relations since the Trump administration, emphasizing the need for bilateral cooperation to improve the situation [1][3][4] - Experts attribute the strained relationship to multiple factors, including domestic political dynamics in the U.S. and the evolving nature of both countries' policies [3][4] - The Trump administration's "America First" policy and its trade war are seen as attempts to address domestic fiscal issues and revitalize U.S. manufacturing, rather than a direct intention to harm other nations [4] Group 2 - Scholars suggest that despite current difficulties, there are still opportunities for cooperation in various fields, and rebuilding trust is essential [5][6] - Historical examples, such as the 1971 invitation of the U.S. table tennis team to China, are cited as potential models for improving relations through smaller, symbolic gestures [5] - The need for the U.S. to recognize the interconnectedness of trade, investment, technology, and finance is emphasized, as well as the importance of addressing economic challenges collaboratively [6]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint presented is that the United States is unwilling to accept China's rise as a global leader, reflecting deep-seated fears about losing its dominant position [1][3][14] - The competition between the US and China has intensified, characterized by trade friction, tariffs, and high-tech restrictions, indicating a struggle over global influence rather than a simple desire to maintain leadership [3][7] - China's advancements in traditional industries like steel and automotive, as well as emerging sectors, demonstrate its growing global market share, contradicting US efforts to contain its rise [3][12] Group 2 - China emphasizes peaceful development and fair cooperation, contrasting with the US's unilateral approach and imposition of its standards on other nations [5][11] - The article critiques the US's "zero-sum game" mentality, suggesting that such an approach is outdated and counterproductive in a complex global landscape [7][9] - The narrative suggests that China's rise should be viewed as an opportunity for international order building rather than a threat, promoting a vision of mutual respect and win-win cooperation [11][14]

Core Insights - The article emphasizes that without novelty and expectation differences, there will be no explosive growth in the market [1] Group 1: Market Conditions - The central bank conducted a 572 billion yuan 7-day reverse repurchase operation, with 5,093 billion yuan of reverse repos maturing today, resulting in a net withdrawal of 4,521 billion yuan [3] - The interbank funding environment remains balanced and loose, with DR001 around 1.32% and DR007 around 1.47% [4] - The Caixin Services PMI for June dropped to 50.6, the lowest since October 2024, indicating a weakening in the services sector [5] Group 2: Economic Indicators - The 10-year government bond yield fluctuated around 1.639%, with a slight decrease to 1.635% during the day [5][6] - The article notes that 78% of U.S. weapon systems rely on critical minerals from China, highlighting the interdependence in U.S.-China relations [6]

Core Viewpoint - The 13th World Peace Forum held in Beijing emphasizes the importance of cooperation between China and the United States, suggesting that mutual benefits can be achieved through collaboration rather than isolationist policies [1] Group 1: Cooperation and Mutual Benefits - Liu Jianchao, Minister of the International Liaison Department, highlighted that if both countries view each other as opportunities and work together, they can expand their economic "cake" [1] - The historical context of China-U.S. relations shows that both nations have benefited from cooperation, indicating a win-win scenario [1] - The current trend of protectionism and setting barriers is detrimental to both countries, suggesting that such actions ultimately harm their own interests [1]