Core Viewpoint - The Dalian Municipal Market Supervision Administration has announced the results of food safety inspections, revealing that out of 499 batches tested across 11 categories, 10 batches were found to be non-compliant with food safety standards [2][3]. Group 1: Inspection Overview - The inspection covered 11 categories including grain products, edible oils, dairy products, snacks, and health foods, totaling 499 batches [2]. - A total of 10 batches were identified as non-compliant, prompting further investigation and action by local market supervision authorities [2][3]. Group 2: Standards and Testing - The inspections were conducted based on various national food safety standards, including GB 2762-2022 for contaminant limits and GB 2760-2014 for food additives [3]. - Specific testing parameters included peroxide value, benzo[a]pyrene, and various pesticide residues, among others [3]. Group 3: Non-compliant Products - The non-compliant products included items from two production enterprises and involved 10 sampling units [3]. - Examples of non-compliant findings included pesticide residues exceeding allowable limits in agricultural products, such as 0.041 mg/kg of dichlorvos in ginger, which exceeds the limit of 0.02 mg/kg [4].

全国上下喝不上一口干净的水， 吃不上一口无毒的饭？ 文 ｜ 那日苏 编辑 ｜ Alicia 来源｜ 地球知识局（ID： diqiuzhishiju ） 封面来源 ｜ 壹图网 最近， 印度 进入了食物中毒爆发期。 南亚次大陆的大部分都位于热带季风气候区。每年6月份开始，西南季风裹挟着湿润的印度洋水汽北上，席卷印度半岛。 雨季丰沛的降水滋养了植被、补充了地表的河流和地下水、缓解了印度的极端高温和干旱。但对于印度人来说， 雨季 还可能带来一个严重的健康问题—— 食物中毒。 （图：壹图网） 据估计，印度每年都会发生 数百万例食源性疾病病例， 超过40万人因食物中毒而死亡。这些病例集中 爆发于6~9月的夏季， 而且数量在一年一年地增加。 这是为什么呢？ 印度中毒，众生平等 在印度，食物中毒是一个重大公共卫生问题， 事故率高得吓人。 远了不说，就看这两年有过的状况： 据印度媒体报道，2024年5月22日，印度卡纳塔克邦贝尔高姆县胡利卡蒂村，46人在比勒什瓦尔和卡雷玛神庙的年度集市上吃了祭祀供品"帕萨达 姆"（prasadam）后，出现 不适和腹泻 的症状； 今年二月份，印度又发生了一起，在寺庙宴会上进食后出现集体食物中毒 ...

Core Viewpoint - The Beijing Chaoyang District Market Supervision Administration has released a notice regarding the inspection of restaurants, listing 14 establishments that failed to meet food safety standards and were placed on a "blacklist" for various violations of the Food Safety Law of the People's Republic of China [1][2][3]. Summary by Category - **Violations Related to Environmental Hygiene** - Multiple restaurants, including Beijing Weidao Catering Management Co., and Beijing Chengbei Miaomiao Catering Management Co., were found to have issues with unsanitary conditions, violating Article 33 of the Food Safety Law [1][2][3][4][5][10][11]. - **Violations Related to Food Equipment and Facilities** - Beijing Guowei Rongxiang Catering Co. was cited for improper cleaning and disinfection of food utensils, violating Article 56 of the Food Safety Law [6]. - Beijing Lazy Chef Trading Co. was noted for failing to maintain pest control measures in food service areas, also violating Article 33 of the Food Safety Law [8]. - **Violations Related to Personnel Health** - Beijing Yihuiyuan Catering Co. was found to have food production personnel without health certificates, violating Article 45 of the Food Safety Law [9]. - **General Non-compliance** - Other establishments, such as Beijing Taishuxi Catering Management Co. and Beijing Shishang Huijing Catering Management Co., were issued correction notices for various operational non-compliance issues [10][11][12].

Group 1 - The event aimed to enhance food safety awareness among students by integrating legal knowledge into their daily dining experiences [1][2] - Staff explained the safety requirements for campus food, how to identify problematic food, and the avenues for rights protection, using simple language and real-life cases [2] - The school’s food safety supervisor emphasized the importance of student involvement in monitoring food safety and the school's commitment to providing safe and nutritious meals [2] Group 2 - The local market supervision bureau highlighted the critical role of food safety in children's health and the need for community involvement in ensuring food safety in schools [2] - The bureau's leadership stressed the importance of strict management and control of food safety risks in educational institutions [2]

Summary of Key Points Core Viewpoint The recent food safety inspection conducted by the Chibi City Market Supervision Administration revealed that out of 281 batches of various food products tested, 274 were found to be compliant, while 7 batches were deemed non-compliant, highlighting ongoing concerns regarding food safety standards in the region [2]. Group 1: Inspection Results - A total of 281 batches from 25 categories of food products were sampled [2]. - 274 batches were compliant, resulting in a compliance rate of approximately 97.5% [2]. - Non-compliant samples included: - 1 out of 4 batches of convenience foods - 1 out of 9 batches of vegetable products - 1 out of 18 batches of pastries - 3 out of 38 batches of catering foods - 1 out of 62 batches of edible agricultural products [2]. Group 2: Categories of Non-Compliant Products - Non-compliance was noted in various categories, including: - Convenience foods: 1 non-compliant out of 4 tested - Vegetable products: 1 non-compliant out of 9 tested - Pastries: 1 non-compliant out of 18 tested - Catering foods: 3 non-compliant out of 38 tested - Edible agricultural products: 1 non-compliant out of 62 tested [2]. - Other categories such as grain processing products, edible oils, and dairy products showed no non-compliant samples [2]. Group 3: Specific Non-Compliant Cases - Specific non-compliant cases included: - A convenience food product with a peroxide value exceeding the standard limit [3]. - A vegetable product containing pesticide residues above permissible levels [3]. - The detailed list of non-compliant products and their respective issues is available in the attached documentation [2][3].

Core Viewpoint - The conference focused on the high-quality development of the meat products industry, emphasizing food safety and industry standards, with DeLis Group sharing its practices and commitments in this area [1][2]. Group 1: Food Safety Practices - DeLis Group implements a rigorous food safety management system through daily control, weekly inspections, and monthly assessments to ensure risk management throughout the production process [1]. - The company has upgraded its production facilities and optimized processes, establishing a comprehensive food safety traceability system that accurately records every step from raw material procurement to sales [1]. - DeLis Group strictly adheres to regulations regarding raw material sourcing, collaborating only with reputable suppliers to ensure product quality [1]. Group 2: Commitment to Quality and Transparency - The company emphasizes its commitment to integrity in operations, accepting supervision from government, media, and consumers, and proactively disclosing production information to uphold consumer rights [2]. - DeLis Group is responding to the China Meat Association's initiative to enhance meat safety, committing to full-process quality control and technological innovation to provide safe and nutritious meat products [2]. - The company calls for collaboration within the industry to build a more robust food safety assurance system, aiming to elevate the meat products sector to a new stage of high-quality development [2].

最近天水一个幼儿园出现了血铅严重超标的事。 官方发通报说是园方为扩大生源、增加收益，就同意后厨们制作彩色糕点的，只是他们用彩绘颜料来做。 彩绘颜料不能拿来食用，这点我们都知道。 但放着更便宜和安全的食用色素不用，是厨师没事干吗；还是另有隐情，最后让厨师背锅呢？ 对通报的质疑到今天还在持续。 这时候有人就提出问题了，做个实验不就知道颜料能不能做面点了吗？ 二 试试就试试。 一位大哥买了彩绘颜料，他先从罐子里挖出丙烯，再用水稀释，再倒入面粉。 拌一拌，做一个饼，然后把三个饼叠起来，放进锅里煮。 他说入口时味道没那么大。 大哥最后还发表了一个小结，他觉得用这一罐丙烯做糕点不划算，因为一罐只能做30个馒头。 当然他的操作跟涉事幼儿园不太一样，他们用的是粉状颜料。而大哥用的丙烯凝固会变硬，制作不出馒头那种松弛感。 那我们就暂时略过这个试吃，看下一个。 最后成品时，每个饼的颜色不一，因为丙烯和水的比例不一样。 这时候他开始尝了。 闻完味说，像极了家里刚刷完乳胶漆的感觉，有点酸。 再闻又说里面的味道有点像牙膏。 然后吃了。 第二位大哥做了四个面点，分别用丙烯、水粉和水彩、人体彩绘。 因为没有加酵母，所以发起来的样子不太好看 ...

Core Viewpoint - The food safety inspection report from Liu'an City indicates that out of 108 food samples tested, 104 passed while 4 were found to be non-compliant with national food safety standards, highlighting ongoing concerns regarding food safety in the region [3][4][5][6]. Summary by Category Food Safety Inspection Results - A total of 108 food samples were tested, including categories such as edible agricultural products, grain processing products, tea, nuts, pastries, starch, alcoholic beverages, and honey products [3]. - 104 samples were compliant with food safety standards, while 4 samples were identified as non-compliant [3]. Non-Compliant Products - The following non-compliant products were reported: - Yellow eel sold by Liu'an Jin'an District Sanxipudajun Aquatic Store contained Enrofloxacin at 938 µg/kg, exceeding the limit of 100 µg/kg [3]. - Premium bananas sold by Huoqiu County Ruihong Fruit Store contained Thiacloprid at 0.13 mg/kg, exceeding the limit of 0.02 mg/kg [4]. - Mangoes sold by Liu'an Yu'an District Yangguo Orchard Fruit Store contained Pyraclostrobin at 0.19 mg/kg, exceeding the limit of 0.05 mg/kg [5]. - Spiral pepper sold at Qilizhanzai Market by Zhang Youbao contained Thiacloprid at 0.081 mg/kg, exceeding the limit of 0.05 mg/kg [6]. Regulatory Actions - Local market supervision departments have mandated the recall and removal of the non-compliant products from the market, and are conducting investigations to identify the source of the issues and implement corrective measures [3][6].

Summary of Key Points Core Viewpoint The recent food safety inspection conducted by the Huzhou Nanxun District Market Supervision Administration revealed that out of 201 food samples tested, 194 passed while 7 were found to be non-compliant due to pesticide residue exceeding standards and illegal additives. Group 1: Inspection Results - A total of 201 food samples from 26 categories were tested, including agricultural products, seasonings, frozen foods, beverages, and more [1][3] - Out of the 201 samples, 194 were compliant with national food safety standards, while 7 samples failed the inspection [1][3] - The non-compliant samples were primarily due to pesticide residues exceeding permissible limits and illegal additives [1][3] Group 2: Specific Non-Compliant Products - Non-compliant products included yam from Huzhou Baiderun Supermarket, which contained excessive levels of the pesticide residues, including mefenoxam and manganese salt [3][4] - Line pepper from the same supermarket was found to have excessive levels of thiamethoxam [4] - Celery from Nanxun Xizi Vegetable Store also failed due to thiamethoxam levels exceeding the standard [5] - Other non-compliant products included ginger and scallions from various vendors, with multiple pesticide residues exceeding the allowed limits [6][7] Group 3: Illegal Additives - A product from Huzhou Baiderun Supermarket, specifically glutinous rice cake, was found to contain illegal additives, specifically dehydroacetic acid and its sodium salt [6]

Core Point - The recent food safety inspection in Shenyang's Huanggu District reported that all 112 batches of food products tested were compliant with safety standards [2]. Group 1: Inspection Results - A total of 112 batches of food products were tested, covering 19 categories including grain products, condiments, dairy products, beverages, fruit products, and catering foods [2]. - All tested food items were found to be qualified, indicating a positive outcome for food safety in the region [2]. Group 2: Sample Details - The inspection included various local food establishments, such as "Yonghe Tofu Workshop" and "Xintianxiang Restaurant," with products like homemade dumplings and fried peanuts being tested [3][4]. - Specific products tested included items like "oil-fried peanuts," "flower rolls," and "sea jelly," all of which were self-made by the respective establishments [3][4].