Workflow
隐私保护
icon
Search documents
卡地亚、迪奥、阿迪达斯接连曝出数据泄露,用户隐私咋保护?
Nan Fang Du Shi Bao· 2025-06-05 07:13
Core Points - Cartier, a luxury jewelry brand under Richemont, has confirmed a data breach involving unauthorized access to customer personal information, raising industry concerns [1] - The leaked data includes customer names and birth dates but does not involve sensitive financial information such as bank account or credit card details [1] - The breach affects customers globally, not just in the Chinese market, and comes amid a broader trend of luxury brands facing privacy issues [1][2] Group 1: Data Breach Details - Cartier's official communication revealed that the breach was due to a cyber attack, with affected customer information being accessed [1] - The parent company Richemont has not disclosed the number of affected users or provided an official statement regarding the incident [1] - Similar incidents have occurred with other luxury brands, including Dior and Adidas, highlighting a growing trend of data breaches in the luxury sector [2][3] Group 2: Financial Performance - Richemont reported a 4% year-on-year sales increase to €21.399 billion for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2025, with all regions except Asia-Pacific showing double-digit growth [1] - The jewelry division, which includes Cartier, experienced an 8% sales increase to €15.33 billion, with Cartier contributing over half of Richemont's sales revenue and more than 70% of its profits [1] Group 3: Legal and Regulatory Implications - Legal experts indicate that brands may face strict liability for data breaches under current laws, emphasizing the need for compliance with data protection regulations [4][5] - Brands are responsible for ensuring the security of customer data, even when third-party vendors are involved, and cannot use third-party negligence as a defense [5] Group 4: Recommendations for Brands - Brands should establish a comprehensive data security framework, focusing on third-party risk management and regular audits of suppliers [7] - Immediate notification to affected customers and offering services like free credit monitoring are recommended actions following a data breach [7]
苹果广告又整活了!岳云鹏从手机后「探」出的这一眼,藏着 iPhone 最安心的隐私密码
Jing Ji Guan Cha Bao· 2025-06-05 05:39
《开锁大师》里,岳云鹏与 Apple 专家向开锁匠展示了 iPhone 先进的面容 ID 功能。它不仅可以解锁手 机,更是全方位的隐私保护锁,能有效锁住 app、账户信息、密码等重要隐私数据。 在《爱老虎油》中,岳云鹏请小朋友帮忙拍摄合影,不料小朋友调皮点开聊天记录,意外曝光了他与妻 子的甜蜜短信,场面一度尴尬。关键时刻,Apple 专家现身,为岳云鹏介绍了如何使用面容 ID 锁定或 隐藏 app,有效避免此类尴尬再次发生。 《高价回收》则讲述了岳云鹏积攒半辈子密码的小本子,不慎被废品回收车收走。焦急追赶途中, Apple 专家为他推荐了 iPhone 密码 App。该 App 借助面容 ID,提供安全便捷的一站式密码管理方案, 既能安全保存密码,又能防止丢失风险。 (原标题:苹果广告又整活了!岳云鹏从手机后「探」出的这一眼,藏着 iPhone 最安心的隐私密码) 除了正片,本次广告系列还精心制作了两条幕后彩蛋,观众在欣赏岳云鹏与导演有趣互动的同时,还能 学到实用的隐私保护小技巧。此外,岳云鹏首次亮相 Apple 户外广告牌,以独特的 "探头" 形象打破传 统,既保留了隐私广告中遮挡面部的元素,又增添了个人独 ...
Froneri融资46亿启示:XBIT去中心化平台如何重塑投资信任
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-06-04 10:13
Group 1 - The core purpose of Froneri's financing is to support PAI Partners in retaining a 50% stake in its joint venture with Nestlé and to pay dividends, through a debt of €4 billion (approximately $4.6 billion) [2] - Froneri's total debt will reach €9 billion when combined with existing liabilities, while its valuation was estimated at $10 billion for 2024, highlighting the complexity of capital maneuvering and the importance of transparency in assessing true debt structure and market outlook [2][9] - The financing event reflects a broader challenge faced by investors in navigating information asymmetry, particularly in the context of traditional enterprises [1][2] Group 2 - XBIT decentralized exchange platform employs three core technologies to build a trust framework for investors, including cross-chain technology that ensures transaction continuity [4] - The "Poly Link" cross-chain protocol allows users to seamlessly transfer assets across six mainstream public chains, maintaining order processing delays within 200ms, which is crucial during extreme market conditions [5] - XBIT's smart contracts automate all trading rules, ensuring that transaction records are immutable and verifiable on the blockchain, thus preventing fund misappropriation [5][7] - The platform balances privacy and transparency through a mechanism that anonymizes user identities while maintaining transaction visibility, addressing privacy concerns associated with centralized platforms [7] - XBIT's zero-knowledge proof technology enhances privacy protection, allowing users to conduct cross-chain asset exchanges anonymously, aligning with regulatory data security requirements [7] Group 3 - The financing event of Froneri and the volatility of Bitcoin underscore the significance of information authenticity and platform security as critical lifelines for investors [9] - XBIT's technological framework redefines investment rules by eliminating the potential for manipulation and ensuring that all transactions are verifiable on-chain, thus fostering a more secure trading environment [9] - The growing user base and trading volume of XBIT, which ranked among the top five global BTC exchanges in 2025, reflects market confidence in its technological capabilities [9]
微信坚决不推 “已读”:80% 用户反对的背后,是对社交生态的守护
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-05-31 12:54
腾讯公关总监张军再次就 "微信是否上线已读功能" 公开表态:"从产品设计之初就坚定不移地拒绝,未 来亦不会改变"。这一回应看似 "固执",实则折射出微信对用户心理的精准洞察 —— 超 80% 的网友在 一、已读功能:撕开社交体面的 "双刃剑" 在社交场景中,"已读不回" 常被解读为冷漠或冒犯。当你收到不熟同事的周末邀约、久未联系的朋友 突然借钱,"未读" 状态能让你从容选择应对方式,避免陷入 "必须回复" 的道德绑架。 反观已读功能泛滥的平台,焦虑感无处不在。某职场调查显示,72% 的员工曾因 "领导已读不回" 而反 复检查消息,45% 的人承认 "已读未及时回复" 导致职场关系紧张。更讽刺的是,即便企业微信推出了 已读功能,仍有超 60% 的用户选择关闭,因为 "工作与生活的界限正在被技术侵蚀"。 二、隐私保护:微信刻在基因里的产品哲学 微信对 "已读" 的拒绝,本质是对用户隐私的深度守护。心理学研究表明,隐私需求是人类的基本心理 诉求。当微信用户可以自由决定是否暴露阅读状态,这种 "控制权" 本身就能缓解社交压力。正如东伦 敦大学教授托尼・桑普森指出的:"社交媒体的已读回执,本质是通过制造焦虑来增加用户粘 ...
全面分析2025年加密闪存驱动器市场
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-05-25 02:48
来源:弈赫市场咨询 2025年加密| 北京弈赫国际信息咨询有限公司是一家业务覆盖全球的利基市场信息咨询公司,研究涉及了21个主要行业和1200个利基市场,覆盖了70多个国 家,一直致力于产出专业严谨的行业趋势分析,数据洞察,市场研究和解决方案。百度搜索yiheconsult或者弈赫咨询,访问官网获得免费报告样 本。 复合年增长率 (2025-2030) $XX(申请免费样本获得市场规 模数据) 2025 北京弈赫市场咨询最新发布的关于加密闪存驱动器2025市场深度分析报告已经正式上线,报告涵盖了全球市场与中国市场的详细数据与趋势分析。作为行业 内领先的市场研究机构,弈赫咨询多年来专注于技术行业的研究,积累了丰富的数据和洞察,能够根据客户的需求提供量身定制的报告。感兴趣的读者可以 申请获取免费样本,以进一步了解市场动态。 本报告的目标受众包括技术行业的投资者、制造商、分销商、终端用户及政策制定者。特别是面向那些希望深入了解加密闪存驱动器市场动向的企业和机 构,报告内容为他们提供了丰富的参考资料。投资者能够利用本报告评估市场潜力,并制定相应的投资策略;而制造商则可以通过对竞争对手和市场趋势的 深入分析,优化其产品 ...
马斯克在效率部扩大对Grok的使用 引发隐私担忧
news flash· 2025-05-23 10:21
马斯克在效率部扩大对Grok的使用 引发隐私担忧 金十数据5月23日讯,据三位知情人士透露,马斯克的政府效率部(DOGE)团队正在美国联邦政府中 扩大使用他的人工智能聊天机器人Grok来分析数据,这可能违反了利益冲突法,并将数百万美国人的 敏感信息置于危险之中。这种对Grok的使用可能会加剧隐私倡导者和其他人的担忧,即随着特朗普改 组美国官僚机构,马斯克的政府效率部团似乎正在抛弃长期以来对敏感数据处理的保护。三位知情人士 中的一位了解DOGE的活动,他说马斯克的团队正在使用定制版的Grok聊天机器人。这位知情人士说, 此举显然是为了让DOGE更有效地筛选数据。"他们提出问题,让它准备报告,给出数据分析。"第二名 和第三名知情人士表示,尽管Grok尚未在国土安全部内部获得批准,但DOGE的工作人员也告诉国土安 全部官员使用它。 ...
做美国本土电商为什么选择特拉华州作为公司所在地?
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-05-22 13:08
Core Insights - Delaware is a highly favored state for company registration in the U.S., particularly for large enterprises and multinational corporations due to its legal environment, tax flexibility, and corporate governance advantages [2]. Legal Framework - Delaware General Corporation Law (DGCL) is the most mature and case-rich corporate law system in the U.S., providing clear legal provisions and efficient dispute resolution through specialized judges [2]. - The governance structure is flexible, allowing for single shareholders and directors, and decisions can be made through written consent without the need for in-person meetings [2]. Tax Advantages - No state sales tax for companies without a physical presence in Delaware, and no personal income tax for non-resident shareholders [2]. - Companies without business operations in the state only pay an annual franchise tax, starting at $175, depending on company type and capital [2]. - Many companies use Delaware as a "shell company" to allocate income to other states, thereby reducing overall tax burdens [2]. Privacy Protection - Delaware does not require the disclosure of shareholder or director information during registration, only necessitating the name and address of one executive in annual reports [2]. - This anonymity is beneficial for investors seeking to protect the privacy of actual controllers [2]. Capital Market Friendliness - Companies registered in Delaware are highly accepted by major exchanges like NYSE and NASDAQ due to lower legal risks and investor familiarity with the legal framework [2]. - Venture capital and private equity firms often prefer investments in Delaware-registered entities due to the flexibility in terms like preferred stock and equity structure [2]. Efficient Registration and Maintenance - The registration process is quick, typically completed within 1-2 business days, with expedited options available [5]. - The annual franchise tax is low, starting at $175, and there are many local registered agent services offering comprehensive support [5]. Suitable Business Types - Startups, particularly tech companies planning to raise funds or go public, shell companies for asset holding, and subsidiaries of multinational corporations entering the U.S. market are ideal candidates for Delaware registration [4]. International Recognition - Delaware serves as a U.S. alternative for offshore company registration, balancing compliance and tax optimization [5]. - The predictability of legal rulings in Delaware reduces commercial uncertainty, making it an attractive jurisdiction for businesses [5].
为什么苹果和微信在AI上的节奏快不起来?
3 6 Ke· 2025-05-15 23:46
很多人看到标题估计要吐槽了—— 苹果不是热火朝天推"Apple Intelligence"了么,微信不是快速接入DeepSeek和元宝了么,怎么能说它们慢呢? 看事情不能只看表面,如果我们仔细琢磨,就能发现二者在AI层面的节奏其实和大多数人想象的要慢。 废话少说,咱们掰开了来聊—— 1 先看苹果—— 去年WWDC,苹果高调推出"Apple Intelligence",试图告诉公众它没有在AI浪潮中掉队,而且还要用雄心勃勃地"苹果的方式"重新定义AI。 的确,苹果的风格一直是这样—— 不抢第一枪,但一旦出手往往能重新定义游戏规则,教其他同类产品做人。 但库克的意气风发并没有持续多久,在今年财报会上亲口承认AI版Siri延期,一年前画的很多饼都成了期货,"稍后推出"成了官方口径中的高频词。 而且细心的观众和科技媒体们发现,上线后Apple Intelligence第一个版本很多功能都非常鸡肋—— Genmoji这种低频需求聊胜于无,而"写作建议"实用性被批评为"噱头大于实质",图片消除的效果甚至和美图秀秀相比都存在肉眼可见的差距。 稍微复杂一点的问题就得用户确认"是否访问ChatGPT",而且仅支持iPhone1 ...
2025年中国房地产信息化行业概述、产业链图谱、发展现状、重点企业及发展趋势研判:信息化技术将渗透到房地产更多环节,市场规模进一步扩大 [图]
Chan Ye Xin Xi Wang· 2025-05-12 01:16
Core Insights - The Chinese real estate information technology industry is experiencing rapid growth, with the market size reaching 199.88 billion yuan in 2023 and projected to grow to approximately 238.69 billion yuan in 2024 [1][11]. Industry Definition and Classification - Real estate information technology refers to the use of information technologies such as the internet, big data, cloud computing, IoT, and AI to digitize, network, and automate various aspects of the real estate industry, enhancing resource allocation and service quality [2][4]. Industry Development History - The development of the real estate information technology industry in China has gone through four key stages: initial attempts at data processing, the rise of internet technology, rapid development with mature information systems, and deep integration with emerging technologies like AI and IoT [6][7]. Current Industry Status - The market size of the real estate information technology industry in China has been expanding rapidly, with significant penetration into project planning, design, construction, sales, and operations. Technologies like BIM and smart community solutions are increasingly being adopted [11]. Upstream Analysis - The software business revenue in China has shown steady growth, with a projected revenue of 13.73 trillion yuan in 2024, reflecting a 10% year-on-year increase. This growth supports the real estate information technology sector by providing advanced software solutions [9]. Downstream Analysis - Real estate development investment is significant in fixed asset investment, with a projected amount of 10,028 billion yuan in 2024, down 10.6% year-on-year. The information technology sector must innovate continuously to meet the evolving needs of real estate developers [13]. Key Companies Analysis - The competitive landscape of the real estate information technology industry is diverse and intense, with key players like Neusoft Group, Wandainfo, Vanke, and E-House leveraging their strengths in technology and services to drive industry growth [15][20]. Future Development Trends - The future of the real estate information technology industry includes trends such as full-chain digitization, industry integration and collaboration, and enhanced privacy protection measures to ensure data security and compliance [22][23][25].
谷歌放弃淘汰第三方Cookie,隐私保护也得让位反垄断
3 6 Ke· 2025-05-06 03:36
Core Viewpoint - The termination of Google's Privacy Sandbox project, which aimed to phase out third-party cookies in Chrome, reflects significant industry resistance and regulatory pressures, highlighting the complexities of balancing user privacy with advertising business models [3][12]. Group 1: Background and Context - The "Facebook data scandal" in 2018 marked a pivotal moment for internet privacy, leading to a consensus on the importance of privacy security across the industry [1]. - Apple's introduction of intelligent tracking prevention in Safari in 2020 and Google's initial commitment to eliminate third-party cookies in 2021 were significant steps towards enhancing user privacy [1]. Group 2: Technical Aspects of Cookies - Cookies, developed by Netscape in 1994, serve as a means of information exchange between browsers and servers, primarily used to record user identities [5]. - First-party cookies enhance user experience by remembering login states and preferences, while third-party cookies allow advertisers to track user behavior across different websites [5][6]. Group 3: Industry Reactions and Implications - Google's decision to abandon the Privacy Sandbox project faced opposition from various stakeholders, including GitHub, the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), and Microsoft, indicating widespread concern over the implications of such a move [3][9]. - The potential implementation of the Privacy Sandbox could have fundamentally restructured digital advertising by limiting advertisers' access to specific user data, thereby consolidating Google's control over user behavior insights [11]. Group 4: Regulatory Influence - The U.S. Department of Justice's antitrust actions against Google have intensified scrutiny on the company's practices, leading to concerns that the Privacy Sandbox could reinforce Chrome's market dominance under the guise of privacy protection [12].