聚焦于长三角，区域内共有六大都市圈，包括上海大都市圈、南京都市圈、杭州都市圈、合肥都市圈、 苏锡常都市圈和宁波都市圈。其中，南京都市圈、杭州都市圈、合肥都市圈已获批国家级都市圈。 央视新闻消息，记者10月9日从长三角区域合作办公室了解到，《建立健全都市圈同城化发展体制机制 提升长三角城市群一体化发展水平行动方案》已于日前正式印发，围绕实现"七个一"和加强组织实施等 八个方面，提出30项具体任务举措。 "七个一"中排在首位的是共建跨区域协调发展"一个群"，包括四方面创新：一是增强中心城市辐射带动 作用，推进都市圈重要节点建设，强化交通、物流、产业、就业、生态、公共服务等功能配置，更好发 挥综合承载、空间联结、要素流通作用。 二是发挥重点区域战略先导作用，强化长三角一体化示范区综合试验功能，推动跨域重点毗邻区建设一 体化合作先行区。三是推动制度建设一体有效衔接，建立健全规划、政策、立法协调机制。四是放大都 市圈间协同联动效应，加快沿沪宁产业创新带、G60科创走廊等轴带建设，向都市圈间联动要空间效 应。 解读：今年出台的《关于推动城市高质量发展的意见》提出，京津冀、长三角、粤港澳大湾区城市群要 打造世界级城市群。这 ...

每经记者｜杨欢 每经编辑｜刘艳美 央视新闻消息，记者10月9日从长三角区域合作办公室了解到，《建立健全都市圈同城化发展体制机制提升长三角城市群一体化发展水平行动方案》 已于日前正式印发，围绕实现"七个一"和加强组织实施等八个方面，提出30项具体任务举措。 "七个一"中排在首位的是共建跨区域协调发展"一个群"，包括四方面创新：一是增强中心城市辐射带动作用，推进都市圈重要节点建设，强化交 通、物流、产业、就业、生态、公共服务等功能配置，更好发挥综合承载、空间联结、要素流通作用。 二是发挥重点区域战略先导作用，强化长三角一体化示范区综合试验功能，推动跨域重点毗邻区建设一体化合作先行区。三是推动制度建设一体有 效衔接，建立健全规划、政策、立法协调机制。四是放大都市圈间协同联动效应，加快沿沪宁产业创新带、G60科创走廊等轴带建设，向都市圈间 联动要空间效应。 解读：今年出台的《关于推动城市高质量发展的意见》提出，京津冀、长三角、粤港澳大湾区城市群要打造世界级城市群。这并不是一个新概念， 早在上世纪七十年代法国地理经济学家戈特曼定义了世界六大城市群，以上海为中心的长三角城市群就被列入其中。 数据显示，去年长三角GDP突破 ...

在中国区域发展的版图上，长三角与珠三角无疑是最耀眼的两颗明珠，然而，若以世界级城市群的标准衡量，长三角已跻 身纽约、东京、伦敦等世界级城市群之列，而珠三角仍存明显差距。这背后的差异，不仅在于经济总量的高低，更在于发 展格局、产业结构、协同机制与文化底蕴的多维差距。 从经济总量来看，长三角2022年GDP总量逼近30万亿元，占全国比重近四分之一，其经济规模已超越日本太平洋沿岸城市 群，与纽约大都市区相当。反观珠三角，虽以超13万亿的GDP彰显其经济活力，但体量仅约为长三角的45%。 更为关键的是腹地支撑的差异，长三角拥有长江流域作为广阔腹地，通过黄金水道与长江经济带串联，形成了"核心-腹 地"的梯度发展格局。以上海为龙头，苏浙皖为两翼，长三角的辐射半径覆盖整个长江流域，乃至全国。而珠三角虽依托 珠江，但流域联动效应远不如长江，且南岭阻隔限制了其腹地拓展，辐射范围主要集中于华南地区。 这种协同深度体现在多个层面：以上海为龙头的创新链协同，以杭州为代表的数字经济发展，以苏州为基地的制造业升 级，以合肥为中心的基础研究突破，形成了良好的功能互补。长三角的41个城市虽然分属三省一市，但通过不断完善的市 场体系、基础设施 ...

你有没有发现一个很有意思的现象：五大国家级城市群，可在国际上被公认为"世界级"的，只有一个长三角。GDP不差，城市名气不小的珠三角，为啥总差 临门一脚？ 想象一下，摆在你面前两张棋盘，一张是大号的，另一张小一半。下同样的棋，哪张更能容得下更多变化？这就是长三角和珠三角的差别。 长三角囊括江苏、浙江、安徽、上海，35.8万平方公里，27座城市。以上海为核心，南京、杭州、合肥、苏州等城市环绕，棋局庞大。 珠三角呢？香港、澳门加上广东9市，合计才5.6万平方公里。腹地小了不止一点点。长三角的面积是珠三角的6倍，这意味着更广阔的经济纵深和人口资源 支撑。 在我看来，判断城市群实力，不光看总量，还要看分布均衡度。 2022年，长三角有8座万亿GDP城市：上海、南京、杭州、苏州、宁波、无锡、合肥、南通。 珠三角只有广州、深圳、佛山、东莞4座，加上香港才5个。 差距不算天壤之别，但长三角是"群星闪耀"，珠三角更像"头重脚轻"。深圳、广州很亮眼，可腰部城市支撑力不足。 换句话说，长三角像一支多点开花的球队，而珠三角更依赖明星球员。一旦少了"巨星"，整体战斗力就会下降。 走过长江口的人会明白，这里真的是中国最黄金的地段。长江作 ...

转自：北京日报客户端 又一条浙江高铁，引发全国关注。 9月29日，温福高铁开工。这是一条沿着海岸线延伸的铁路，连接的是两座铁路网末梢的城市。不论是 铁路投资金额，还是沿线城市能级，它在众多铁路项目中看似并不突出，但为何被列入国家"十四五"规 划确定的102项重大工程项目之一？ 翻开地图，答案逐渐清晰。温福高铁地处长三角、粤港澳大湾区相向辐射的中间地带，不仅是连接两 大"世界级城市群"的重大交通基础设施，更是贯穿东南沿海高速铁路通道的关键一段。 这条高铁，将给温州和浙江，乃至长三角，带来什么？ 从边缘节点到区域中心枢纽 "以后到福州只要1个小时，比现在快了1倍。"小吴是一家化妆品企业的市场拓展经理，常年在温州和福 州两地跑业务。得知温福高铁即将开工的消息，他立刻算出了节省的时间。 温福高铁跨越浙闽两省，是国家"八纵八横"高速铁路网沿海通道的重要组成部分。该线路起于温州的乐 清站，向南经洞头区、龙湾区、瑞安市、平阳县、龙港市、苍南县后进入福建省境内，经福鼎、柘荣、 福安后引入宁德站，最终沿杭深铁路通道抵达福州南站，与福厦高铁贯通。设计速度350公里/小时，温 福高铁正线全长302.4公里、总投资约734.5亿元。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The recent policies aimed at promoting high-quality urban development in China emphasize the importance of urban agglomerations as a foundation for building a unified national market, addressing issues such as uneven development and barriers to resource flow [1][2]. Group 1: Policy Initiatives - The "Opinions on Promoting High-Quality Urban Development" and the "Comprehensive Reform Pilot Program for Market-oriented Resource Allocation" have been introduced to enhance urban integration and resource allocation efficiency [1]. - The policies specifically target key urban clusters, including the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei, Yangtze River Delta, and Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macau Greater Bay Area, to foster world-class urban agglomerations [2]. Group 2: Regional Development Structure - China's regional development is characterized by a "diamond-shaped" structure comprising five major urban clusters, with the Yangtze River Delta being a pivotal area for national coordination and development [2][3]. - The concept of a "dual diamond" spatial structure highlights the importance of both coastal and inland cities in driving economic growth and regional collaboration [2]. Group 3: Historical Context and Future Outlook - The development of the Yangtze River Delta as a world-class urban cluster is seen as a historical inevitability, rooted in the region's economic and cultural significance [3]. - The shift from a maritime-centric economy to a balanced "land-sea" approach is anticipated to reshape global urban competition, with inland cities like Wuhan and Chengdu emerging as key players [4][5]. Group 4: Infrastructure and Connectivity - Enhanced infrastructure connectivity, such as high-speed rail links between major cities, is crucial for facilitating regional collaboration and economic integration [5]. - The establishment of a "land port" model for global cities is proposed, leveraging multi-modal transport advantages to strengthen China's position in global trade [4][5]. Group 5: Collaborative Economic Models - The "1+1>2" synergy effect is highlighted, where cross-regional resource flow optimizes efficiency and maximizes benefits, particularly in the Yangtze River Delta [6]. - The "Colorful Growth Model" proposed by experts emphasizes the importance of regional collaboration and the interplay of various growth drivers, including safety, innovation, and cultural factors [7].

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the development of the Yangtze River Delta (YRD) urban agglomeration as a world-class city cluster, highlighting its strategic importance in China's economic landscape and its potential for high-quality growth in various industries, including low-altitude economy and advanced manufacturing [1][6][15]. Group 1: Urban Agglomeration Development - The YRD urban agglomeration, centered around Shanghai, includes 27 cities across Jiangsu, Zhejiang, and Anhui provinces, showcasing a tightly connected network that enhances regional collaboration and competitiveness [5][7]. - Recent policies, such as the "Opinions on Promoting High-Quality Urban Development," support the YRD's goal of becoming a world-class city cluster, emphasizing integrated planning and cooperation among cities [1][7]. - The YRD has been recognized as a leading example of urban agglomeration development in China, with a focus on creating a unique model for city cluster growth [6][7]. Group 2: Transportation and Connectivity - The completion of the Jiaxing Airport and the expansion of high-speed rail significantly improve connectivity within the YRD, facilitating easier travel and fostering economic integration [1][12]. - By the end of 2024, the YRD's railway operating mileage is expected to exceed 15,000 kilometers, with over 7,700 kilometers dedicated to high-speed rail, enhancing daily passenger flow [12]. - The "Yangtze River Delta Super Ring High-Speed Railway" has commenced operations, further linking key cities and promoting regional economic collaboration [12]. Group 3: Industrial Collaboration - The YRD is home to multiple industrial clusters, particularly in sectors like new energy vehicles and aerospace, where cities collaborate rather than compete, creating interdependent supply chains [13][17]. - The region's focus on high-tech industries and strategic emerging sectors is evident, with significant investments in areas such as low-altitude economy and large aircraft manufacturing [16][17]. - The establishment of frameworks for cooperation, such as the "Yangtze River Delta Large Aircraft Industry Cluster Cooperation Framework Agreement," aims to enhance the region's competitiveness in global markets [17]. Group 4: Global Competitiveness - The YRD urban agglomeration is positioned as a key player in the global economy, with its development trajectory compared to other world-class city clusters like New York and Tokyo [15][16]. - The region's geographical advantages, including access to major ports like Shanghai and Ningbo-Zhoushan, facilitate international trade and economic interactions [16]. - The YRD's potential for growth is bolstered by China's vast consumer market and manufacturing capabilities, making it a critical area for future investment and development [15][16].

Core Viewpoint - The recent publication of the "Opinions on Promoting High-Quality Urban Development" emphasizes the support for world-class urban agglomerations in China, particularly the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei, Yangtze River Delta, and Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area, while also promoting the Chengdu-Chongqing economic circle and the central Yangtze River urban agglomeration as growth poles for high-quality development [1][12]. Economic Dimensions - In terms of GDP total for 2024, the ranking is as follows: Yangtze River Delta (33.16 trillion) > Greater Bay Area (14.84 trillion) > Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei (11.5 trillion) [4][5]. - China will have 27 cities with GDP exceeding 1 trillion, with the Yangtze River Delta contributing 9 cities, the Greater Bay Area 4 cities, and Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei 3 cities [4]. - The Yangtze River Delta has a higher number of cities and population compared to the other two urban clusters, but when considering per capita GDP, the ranking changes: Greater Bay Area (170,000) > Yangtze River Delta (139,000) > Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei (105,000) [4][5]. Innovation and Technology - Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei leads in R&D investment intensity at 4.27%, followed by Greater Bay Area at 3.54% and Yangtze River Delta at 3.33% [5]. - In the 2025 Global Innovation Index, the Shenzhen-Hong Kong-Guangzhou cluster ranks first, with Beijing fourth, and Shanghai-Suzhou sixth [6]. Trade and Port Activity - The three major urban clusters have significant port activities, with major ports like Shenzhen, Guangzhou, Shanghai, and Ningbo-Zhoushan facilitating substantial trade [7][8]. - In the first half of this year, the top 10 ports in China by container throughput included several from these urban clusters, with Shanghai and Ningbo-Zhoushan leading [9]. - Shenzhen has recently surpassed Shanghai to become the "foreign trade capital" of China, with notable export growth from Guangzhou in the Greater Bay Area and impressive trade performance from Jinhua in the Yangtze River Delta [11] [12]. Strategic Complementarity - The three urban clusters are not in competition but rather functionally complementary, each with unique strengths: Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei has political significance, Yangtze River Delta excels in comprehensive development, and the Greater Bay Area benefits from its open resources [12].

Core Viewpoint - The Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region has entered a deep collaborative development phase, with a focus on enhancing technological and industrial innovation integration during the new round of non-capital function relocation [1][4]. Group 1: Non-Capital Function Relocation - The new round of non-capital function relocation aims to strengthen industrial cluster cultivation, with a focus on relocating central enterprise headquarters and their subsidiaries to Tianjin and Hebei [4]. - The construction of urban agglomerations in Beijing, Tianjin, and Shijiazhuang is emphasized to optimize spatial structure and promote the integration of technological and industrial innovation [4][5]. Group 2: Technological and Industrial Innovation Integration - There is a need to enhance the integration of technological innovation and industrial innovation, as current advantages in technological innovation have not been effectively transformed into industrial innovation advantages [7]. - Recommendations include accelerating the construction of the Beijing International Science and Technology Innovation Center and optimizing the collaborative innovation spatial layout in the region [7][12]. Group 3: World-Class City Cluster Development - The overall positioning of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei collaborative development is to build a world-class city cluster centered around the capital [12]. - Suggestions include focusing on advanced manufacturing clusters and addressing the innovation capability shortfalls in Hebei [12][13]. Group 4: Higher Education and Talent Development - Xiong'an New Area is becoming a significant hub for high-level open international higher education through the relocation of Beijing's universities [18]. - The development of a modern industrial system necessitates a large number of high-quality new talents, which can be supported by enhancing higher education collaboration and industry-education integration [20]. Group 5: Policy Recommendations - Recommendations for Xiong'an New Area include applying for the establishment of a national comprehensive innovation reform pilot zone and exploring new financing methods suitable for technological innovation [22].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the articles emphasizes the collaborative development of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region, focusing on deepening industrial cooperation and enhancing regional innovation capabilities to build a world-class city cluster [1][2][4] - The Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei collaborative development index increased from 0.38 in 2018 to 0.58 in 2023, indicating a transition from extensive growth to high-quality development [1] - The region aims to address urban challenges through the relocation of non-capital functions, with a focus on central enterprise headquarters and service institutions [2] Group 2 - Experts suggest that industrial collaboration is shifting from single project undertakings to full-chain cooperation, requiring broader and deeper engagement [4] - The region's GDP growth rate is projected to exceed the national average in 2024, reaching a total of 11.5 trillion yuan, which is 2.1 times that of 2013 [2] - The development of an international technology innovation center in Beijing is crucial for enhancing innovation resources and driving collaboration with Tianjin and Hebei [4]