关税成本传导

Search documents
美国关税战的十点观察
Huachuang Securities· 2025-08-19 12:16
Group 1: Tariff Increases - The new reciprocal tariff rates effective from August 7, 2025, set a minimum of 10% for trade deficit economies and 15% for trade surplus economies[4] - The overall U.S. tariff rate may rise to over 15%, with estimates suggesting it could reach 17.1% or even 21.2% if key industry tariffs are implemented[5][28] - The effective tariff rate in June 2025 was 8.9%, with a projected increase of 2.4% due to recent tariff changes[26][28] Group 2: Trade Agreement Characteristics - Direct investment and procurement agreements can lead to lower tariffs, with Japan, the EU, and South Korea securing a minimum tariff of 15% in exchange for significant investment commitments[6][34] - Current trade agreements lack formal legal texts, leading to uncertainty in execution and compliance[7][38] Group 3: Impact of Existing Tariffs - U.S. import growth decreased by 2.8% for every 1% increase in tariff rates, with projections indicating a potential decline in import growth to -10.5% in the second half of 2025[8][43] - The majority of tariff costs are borne by U.S. importers, with 40% to 74% of the tariff price increase already reflected in the U.S. Consumer Price Index (CPI)[11][50] - The "import rush" observed in April 2025 has likely ended, with June imports showing signs of a demand pullback[12] Group 4: Price Competitiveness - As of May 2025, approximately 61.4% of Chinese goods still maintain a price advantage despite increased tariffs, down from 76.1% in 2024[12] - The narrowing of tariff differentials between China and other countries may reduce the risk of export share loss for China[32]
关税成本传导效应显现 美国中小企业或现倒闭潮
Zhong Guo Xin Wen Wang· 2025-08-16 14:37
Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the significant impact of rising tariffs and producer price index (PPI) on U.S. small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), suggesting a potential wave of bankruptcies as these businesses struggle to absorb increased costs [1][6]. Economic Indicators - The U.S. PPI rose by 0.9% month-on-month in July, significantly higher than June's zero growth and market expectations of 0.2%, marking the largest increase since June 2022 [2][3]. - Year-on-year, the PPI increased by 3.3% in July, up from 2.3% in June and exceeding the market forecast of 2.6% [2][3]. - The core PPI, excluding volatile food and energy prices, also saw a month-on-month increase of 0.9% and a year-on-year increase of 3.7%, compared to 2.6% in the previous month [2][3]. Tariff Cost Distribution - As of June, U.S. businesses bore 64% of the tariff costs, consumers 22%, and foreign exporters 14%. Projections indicate that by October, consumers may bear 67% of the costs, while foreign companies and U.S. firms would bear 25% and 8%, respectively [5][6]. - Analysts from Goldman Sachs and JPMorgan Chase predict that tariffs could lead to a 1% decline in U.S. GDP and an inflation increase of 1% to 1.5% [5][6]. Impact on Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises - SMEs are particularly vulnerable to the rising costs associated with tariffs, with experts estimating a 90% chance of the U.S. economy contracting for two consecutive quarters, potentially leading to a 4% decline in GDP [6]. - The lack of operational capital in SMEs makes it difficult for them to absorb additional costs, leading to warnings of widespread bankruptcies among retailers if current tariff policies persist [6].
深观察丨关税成本传导效应显现 美国中小企业或现倒闭潮
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-08-16 12:35
Group 1 - The Producer Price Index (PPI) in the U.S. rose significantly in July, with a month-on-month increase of 0.9%, the largest since June 2022, and a year-on-year increase of 3.3%, the highest since February of this year, indicating upward inflation pressure in the supply chain [3][6][11] - The increase in PPI is primarily driven by the service sector, which saw a month-on-month rise of 1.1%, the largest since March 2022 [6] - Analysts believe that the rising PPI will lead to increased costs for businesses, which may eventually be passed on to consumers, indicating a potential rise in consumer price inflation [9][16] Group 2 - Economic experts predict that the U.S. is likely to enter a recession this year, with small and medium-sized enterprises facing a potential wave of bankruptcies due to rising costs and insufficient operating capital [2][28] - Goldman Sachs estimates that by October, U.S. consumers will bear 67% of the tariff costs, while foreign exporters will bear 25% and U.S. companies only 8% [19][21] - The imposition of tariffs is expected to lead to a decline in U.S. GDP by 1% and an increase in inflation rates by 1% to 1.5%, with significant uncertainty regarding the transmission of these costs to consumer prices [23][26]
高盛测算美国关税成本:截至6月“美国企业承担64%、消费者22%,出口商14%”,到10月“消费者将承担67%”
美股IPO· 2025-08-11 11:39
Core Insights - Goldman Sachs indicates a significant shift in the cost-sharing structure of tariffs in the U.S., with consumers expected to bear 67% of the costs by October, while businesses' share will drop to less than 10% [1][2][9] - This transition is anticipated to exert upward pressure on inflation, with the core PCE inflation rate projected to reach 3.2% by the end of the year [1][10] Cost Distribution Changes - As of June, U.S. businesses absorbed 64% of the tariff costs, while consumers and foreign exporters bore 22% and 14%, respectively [2][6] - The delay in cost transmission means that businesses initially absorbed the tariff impacts to maintain market share, but these costs will eventually be passed on to consumers through higher prices [2][7] Impact on Import Prices - The report notes a slight decrease in import prices post-tariff implementation, suggesting that foreign exporters are lowering their prices to absorb some of the tariff costs [3] - Goldman Sachs estimates that foreign exporters will bear 25% of the tariff costs by October, with a potential overall decrease in U.S. import prices of 3.7% by the end of 2025 due to a cumulative effective tariff rate increase of 14 percentage points [5] Inflationary Pressure - The analysis predicts that the majority of tariff costs will be transferred to U.S. consumers in the coming months, significantly impacting inflation [7] - By October, the share of tariff costs borne by consumers is expected to rise sharply from 22% to 67%, while the share for businesses will plummet from 64% to 8% [9] Specific Product Impact - The report highlights that companies heavily reliant on imported components may face greater cost pressures, while domestic producers protected from import competition may benefit from raising their prices [8]
特朗普关税时代 零售行业的两种活法:塔吉特收缩“比价防线” 沃尔玛背负关税抢市
智通财经网· 2025-07-23 07:12
Core Viewpoint - Target Corporation plans to terminate its price matching guarantee with Amazon and Walmart starting July 28, 2023, focusing solely on matching prices within its own stores and Target.com [1][2] Group 1: Policy Changes - The new policy allows Target to match prices only when its own prices drop, rather than matching lower prices from Amazon and Walmart [1][2] - This shift reflects a strategic move to maintain profitability amid rising tariff costs, allowing Target more flexibility in pricing strategies [3][4] Group 2: Market Context - Target's previous policy was seen as a defensive measure in a price war, but the new approach narrows the focus to internal pricing [2][3] - Walmart's strategy contrasts with Target's, as it aims to absorb tariff costs to gain market share, while Target is more inclined to pass on costs to consumers [4] Group 3: Stock Market Reaction - Following the announcement, Target's stock rose over 4%, although it has declined more than 20% this year due to tariff pressures [3] - In comparison, Walmart's stock has increased nearly 7% this year, benefiting from strong consumer spending on essentials [3]