出口下行

Search documents
浙商证券浙商早知道-20250717
ZHESHANG SECURITIES· 2025-07-16 23:31
证券研究报告 | 浙商早知道 :王禾 执业证书编号:S1230512110001 :021-80105901 :wanghe@stocke.com.cn 市场总览 重要观点 报告日期:2025 年 07 月 17 日 浙商早知道 2025 年 07 月 17 日 2、行业 http://www.stocke.com.cn 1/4 请务必阅读正文之后的免责条款部分 大势:7 月 16 日上证指数下跌 0.03%,沪深 300 下跌 0.3%,科创 50 上涨 0.14%,中证 1000 上涨 0.3%,创业板 指下跌 0.22%,恒生指数下跌 0.29%。 行业:7 月 16 日表现最好的行业分别是社会服务(+1.13%)、汽车(+1.07%)、医药生物(+0.95%)、轻工制造 (+0.94%)、农林牧渔(+0.85%),表现最差的行业分别是钢铁(-1.28%)、银行(-0.74%)、有色金属(-0.45%)、 非银金融(-0.43%)、建筑装饰(-0.42%)。 资金:7 月 16 日全 A 总成交额为 14617.34 亿元,南下资金净流入 16.03 亿港元。 【浙商宏观 李超/林成炜/陈冀/祁星】宏观 ...
2025年6月进出口数据传递的信号:6月出口维持高增,下行拐点将近
ZHESHANG SECURITIES· 2025-07-15 10:54
证券研究报告 | 宏观专题研究 | 中国宏观 6 月出口维持高增,下行拐点将近 ──2025 年 6 月进出口数据传递的信号 核心观点 6 月出口表现强势,关税豁免期内"转口抢出口"是重要拉动。中美瑞士谈判后互相 调降关税,6 月中国对美出口同比降 15%,较 5 月-33.6%边际改善。从美国数据看, 上半年需求透支已较为明显。伴随关税渐进生效抬升,预计外需逐步走弱,出口下行 拐点将近。关注关税冲突下,企业建立海外仓跨境囤货对出口节奏的扰动。 ❑ 6 月出口表现维持强势,关税豁免期内"转口抢出口"是重要拉动 2025 年 6 月人民币计价出口 2.34 万亿元,同比增长 7.2%,前值 6.3%。1-6 月人 民币计价累计出口 13 万亿元,同比增长 7.2%,较前值 7.2%不变。1-6 月,我国对 共建"一带一路"国家合计出口 6.56 万亿元,增长 10.8%。 6 月出口数据表现延续强势,我们认为"转口抢出口"是重要拉动,一是从总需求 角度来看 6 月全球制造业 PMI 上行,由前值 49.5 升至 50.3;二是 6 月对非美经济 体如东盟、欧盟、非洲等经济体出口分别达到 4186 亿元、3538 ...
策略周报:出口下行期的配置思路-20250427
Guohai Securities· 2025-04-27 12:33
Group 1 - The report identifies three significant export downturn periods in China: 2009-2014, 2016-2018, and 2023, with varying internal demand drivers such as infrastructure and consumption [4][12][14] - During the 2009-2014 downturn, the primary internal demand sectors were infrastructure and manufacturing, influenced by global economic crises [12] - The 2016-2018 period saw real estate and consumption as key internal demand sectors, impacted by trade protectionism and economic adjustments [13] - In 2023, the internal demand sectors shifted to consumption and infrastructure, driven by global economic slowdown and trade tensions [14] Group 2 - The report outlines structural policy responses during the three export downturns, emphasizing the need for export facilitation, infrastructure investment, and consumption stimulation [5][17] - Export policies evolved from short-term measures to stabilize trade to long-term structural optimization, focusing on enhancing trade facilitation and exploring new markets [18] - Infrastructure policies transitioned from traditional projects to major engineering and new infrastructure initiatives, particularly in response to economic challenges [18] - Real estate policies shifted from strict controls to significant relaxations, reflecting the changing economic landscape [20] Group 3 - The performance of the stock market during these downturns shows that the technology sector often outperformed, while the export chain struggled, particularly during the 2016-2018 period [22][24] - In the first downturn (2009-2014), the technology sector benefited from the smartphone boom, while the export chain lagged significantly by 26.08% in 2014 [23] - The second downturn (2016-2018) saw the red chip and internal demand chains perform relatively well, while the technology sector faced a downturn due to high valuations [24][28] - In 2023, the technology sector led the market, driven by innovations in artificial intelligence and digital economy, while the export chain remained under pressure [29][30]