Key Points - The article discusses the construction and application of chip structure in stock selection, emphasizing the importance of understanding investor behavior and the distribution of funds at different price levels [2][6][19]. - It highlights the dynamic nature of chip costs, which are influenced by both buying and selling behaviors, and the necessity of detailed micro-trading data for accurate calculations [4][7]. - The analysis of chip structure allows for the identification of potential support and resistance levels in stock prices, providing a richer set of information compared to traditional volume-price factors [6][18]. Chip Average Cost Construction and Application - The construction of chip average cost involves calculating the weighted average cost of historical chips to depict the current market's average holding cost [8][9]. - A higher indicator value indicates that the historical average cost is above the current stock price, suggesting a floating loss for the market, while a lower value indicates a floating profit [9][10]. Improvement of Chip Structure Based on Fund Classification - Traditional methods of chip construction do not differentiate between different types of investors, which can obscure important behavioral information [19][20]. - By introducing fund flow data from institutions and retail investors, the article proposes a more nuanced approach to constructing chip distribution and weighted cost indicators for different investor types [19][21]. - The method shows slight improvements in factor IC and monotonicity of grouped returns, although the overall enhancement is limited [20][22]. Factor Synthesis and Performance Analysis - The article discusses the complementary relationship between the institutional-retail chip cost difference factor and traditional chip cost factors, suggesting that one contributes to predictive strength while the other enhances ranking stability [31][32]. - The synthesized chip factor achieves an IC mean of 4.35%, outperforming traditional volume-based chip factors and showing improved stability in multi-group performance [32][35]. - The performance of the synthesized factor varies significantly across different market capitalization segments, with better results observed in small to mid-cap stocks compared to large-cap stocks [41][42]. Market Capitalization Domain Results - The synthesized factor demonstrates stronger predictive capabilities in small-cap stocks, where investor behavior is more aligned with trading strategies that involve high turnover and profit-taking [45][46]. - Adjustments to the factor application in the mid-cap segment have led to improved performance, indicating the importance of tailoring strategies to specific market conditions [43][44].

Group 1: Chip Structure and Cost Analysis - The chip structure reflects the distribution of investor holdings at different price levels, which can help identify potential support and resistance levels for stock prices[5] - The average holding price can be calculated to assess the overall profit or loss status of the market, indicating whether investors are in a profit or loss position[10] - The chip cost factor shows similar return characteristics to reversal factors, suggesting a historical smoothing effect in the A-share market[12] Group 2: Investor Classification and Chip Cost Improvement - The report introduces a classification of funds to separately analyze institutional and retail investor behaviors, enhancing the understanding of market dynamics[25] - The average Rank IC for the institutional buy volume chip cost is 4.36%, slightly higher than the traditional volume-based chip cost of 4.31%[32] - The institutional-retail chip cost difference factor shows a Rank IC of 1.58%, indicating its potential for capturing unique market insights[41] Group 3: Factor Synthesis and Performance - The synthesized chip factor achieves an IC mean of 4.35%, outperforming traditional volume-based factors and showing improved stability in predictions[56] - The market capitalization domain analysis reveals that the synthesized factor performs better in smaller-cap stocks, with a Rank IC mean of 5.66% for the Ex-CZ800 category[58] - The optimized application of the synthesized factor in the CZ800 segment leads to a significant improvement in performance, with a stable positive IC[70]

Group 1 - The performance of the CSI 300 index enhanced portfolio showed an excess return of 0.24% this week and 3.21% year-to-date [6][18] - The CSI 500 index enhanced portfolio had an excess return of 0.53% this week but a negative return of -0.27% year-to-date [6][18] - The CSI 1000 index enhanced portfolio achieved an excess return of 1.63% this week and 3.92% year-to-date [6][18] - The CSI A500 index enhanced portfolio recorded an excess return of 0.40% this week and 3.28% year-to-date [6][18] Group 2 - In the CSI 300 component stocks, factors such as single-season SP, SPTTM, and single-season EP performed well [7][9] - For CSI 500 component stocks, factors like one-month volatility, three-month reversal, and one-month reversal showed strong performance [9][11] - In the CSI 1000 component stocks, one-month reversal, three-month reversal, and non-liquidity shock factors performed well [9][13] - The CSI A500 index component stocks saw good performance from one-month volatility, single-season EP, and three-month turnover factors [9][15] Group 3 - The CSI 300 index enhanced products had a maximum excess return of 1.24% and a minimum of -1.45% this week, with a median of 0.11% [22] - The CSI 500 index enhanced products had a maximum excess return of 1.27% and a minimum of -0.80% this week, with a median of 0.24% [23] - The CSI 1000 index enhanced products had a maximum excess return of 1.54% and a minimum of -0.91% this week, with a median of 0.22% [25] - The CSI A500 index enhanced products had a maximum excess return of 1.28% and a minimum of -1.99% this week, with a median of 0.14% [29]

- The report tracks the performance of Guosen Financial Engineering's index enhancement portfolios, which are constructed based on benchmarks such as CSI 300, CSI 500, CSI 1000, and CSI A500 indices, aiming to consistently outperform their respective benchmarks [11][12][14] - The construction process of the index enhancement portfolios includes three main components: return prediction, risk control, and portfolio optimization [12] - The report monitors the performance of common stock selection factors across different stock selection spaces, including CSI 300, CSI 500, CSI 1000, CSI A500, and public fund heavy-holding indices, by constructing single-factor Maximized Factor Exposure (MFE) portfolios and tracking their relative excess returns [11][15][42] - The MFE portfolio construction process involves optimizing the portfolio to maximize single-factor exposure while controlling for various constraints such as industry exposure, style exposure, stock weight deviation, turnover rate, and component stock weight proportion [42][43][44] - The optimization model for MFE portfolios is expressed as follows: $\begin{array}{ll}max&f^{T}\ w\\ s.t.&s_{l}\leq X(w-w_{b})\leq s_{h}\\ &h_{l}\leq H(w-w_{b})\leq h_{h}\\ &w_{l}\leq w-w_{b}\leq w_{h}\\ &b_{l}\leq B_{b}w\leq b_{h}\\ &\mathbf{0}\leq w\leq l\\ &\mathbf{1}^{T}\ w=1\end{array}$ where `f` represents factor values, `w` is the stock weight vector, and constraints include style factor deviation, industry deviation, stock weight deviation, component stock weight proportion, and stock weight limits [42][43] - The report provides detailed performance tracking of single-factor MFE portfolios across different stock selection spaces, highlighting factors such as SP, SPTTM, EP, and others that performed well in specific indices like CSI 300, CSI 500, CSI 1000, CSI A500, and public fund heavy-holding indices [15][18][20][22][24][26] - The report also tracks the excess returns of public fund index enhancement products, including CSI 300, CSI 500, CSI 1000, and CSI A500, with detailed statistics on maximum, minimum, and median excess returns over different time periods [28][32][35][38][41]

Performance of Index Enhancement Portfolios - The CSI 300 index enhancement portfolio achieved an excess return of 0.24% this week and 17.58% year-to-date [1][7] - The CSI 500 index enhancement portfolio recorded an excess return of 0.17% this week and 8.16% year-to-date [1][7] - The CSI 1000 index enhancement portfolio had an excess return of 0.39% this week and 17.94% year-to-date [1][7] - The CSI A500 index enhancement portfolio experienced an excess return of -1.77% this week and 8.45% year-to-date [1][7] Stock Selection Factor Performance Tracking - In the CSI 300 component stocks, factors such as one-month reversal, three-month reversal, and EPTTM one-year percentile performed well [1][10] - In the CSI 500 component stocks, factors like three-month volatility, three-month reversal, and EPTTM one-year percentile showed strong performance [1][10] - For the CSI 1000 component stocks, factors including one-month volatility, one-month turnover, and three-month reversal performed well [1][10] - In the CSI A500 index component stocks, factors such as one-month reversal, EPTTM one-year percentile, and one-month volatility were notable [1][10] - Among public fund heavy stocks, factors like dividend yield, three-month reversal, and EPTTM performed well [1][10] Public Fund Index Enhancement Products Performance Tracking - The CSI 300 index enhancement products had a maximum excess return of 0.92%, a minimum of -3.08%, and a median of 0.01% this week [1][23] - The CSI 500 index enhancement products achieved a maximum excess return of 3.20%, a minimum of -0.48%, and a median of 0.49% this week [1][25] - The CSI 1000 index enhancement products recorded a maximum excess return of 1.58%, a minimum of -0.82%, and a median of 0.37% this week [1][28] - The CSI A500 index enhancement products had a maximum excess return of 1.20%, a minimum of -0.84%, and a median of 0.23% this week [1][29]

- The report tracks the performance of Guosen Financial Engineering's index enhancement portfolios, which are constructed based on multi-factor stock selection models targeting benchmarks such as CSI 300, CSI 500, CSI 1000, and CSI A500 indices. The goal is to consistently outperform the respective benchmarks [11][12][14] - The construction process of the index enhancement portfolios includes three main components: return prediction, risk control, and portfolio optimization. The optimization model maximizes single-factor exposure while controlling for constraints such as industry exposure, style exposure, stock weight deviation, turnover rate, and component stock weight ratio [12][41][42] - The Maximized Factor Exposure (MFE) portfolio is used to test the effectiveness of individual factors under real-world constraints. The optimization model is expressed as follows: $\begin{array}{ll}max&f^{T}\ w\\ s.t.&s_{l}\leq X(w-w_{b})\leq s_{h}\\ &h_{l}\leq H(w-w_{b})\leq h_{h}\\ &w_{l}\leq w-w_{b}\leq w_{h}\\ &b_{l}\leq B_{b}w\leq b_{h}\\ &\mathbf{0}\leq w\leq l\\ &\mathbf{1}^{T}\ w=1\end{array}$ where \(f\) represents factor values, \(w\) is the stock weight vector, and constraints include style exposure (\(X\)), industry exposure (\(H\)), stock weight deviation (\(w_b\)), and component stock weight ratio (\(B_b\)) [41][42][43] - The report monitors the performance of common stock selection factors across different sample spaces, including CSI 300, CSI 500, CSI 1000, CSI A500, and public fund heavy-holding indices. Factors are tested using MFE portfolios to evaluate their excess return relative to benchmarks [11][15][18] - The factor library includes over 30 factors categorized into valuation, reversal, growth, profitability, liquidity, volatility, corporate governance, and analyst-related factors. Examples include BP (Book-to-Price), EPTTM (Earnings-to-Price TTM), one-month reversal, three-month reversal, one-year momentum, and others [16][17] - The report highlights the performance of specific factors in different sample spaces: - **CSI 300**: One-month reversal, three-month reversal, and EPTTM one-year percentile performed well recently, while three-month institutional coverage and standardized unexpected earnings performed poorly [1][18] - **CSI 500**: Three-month volatility, three-month reversal, and EPTTM one-year percentile performed well recently, while one-year momentum and standardized unexpected revenue performed poorly [1][20] - **CSI 1000**: One-month volatility, one-month turnover, and three-month reversal performed well recently, while executive compensation and three-month earnings revisions performed poorly [1][22] - **CSI A500**: One-month reversal, EPTTM one-year percentile, and one-month volatility performed well recently, while three-month institutional coverage and one-year momentum performed poorly [1][24] - **Public fund heavy-holding index**: Dividend yield, three-month reversal, and EPTTM performed well recently, while standardized unexpected revenue and three-month earnings revisions performed poorly [1][26][27] - The report tracks the excess returns of public fund index enhancement products, including CSI 300, CSI 500, CSI 1000, and CSI A500. For CSI 300 products, the highest weekly excess return was 0.92%, while the lowest was -3.08%, with a median of 0.01% [3][32][31] - For CSI 500 products, the highest weekly excess return was 3.20%, while the lowest was -0.48%, with a median of 0.49% [3][35][34] - For CSI 1000 products, the highest weekly excess return was 1.58%, while the lowest was -0.82%, with a median of 0.37% [3][37][36] - For CSI A500 products, the highest weekly excess return was 1.20%, while the lowest was -0.84%, with a median of 0.23% [3][40][39]

- The reversal factor performed relatively well, with the GARP portfolio achieving a weekly return of 3.28% from August 1, 2025, to August 8, 2025[1] - The cumulative return of the GARP portfolio in 2025 was 28.2%[1] - The PB-profit combination had a weekly return of 2.86%, with a cumulative return of 20.53% in 2025[5][9] - The small-cap growth portfolio had a weekly return of 4.87%, with a cumulative return of 56.37% in 2025[5][9] - The small-cap value preferred portfolio 1 had a weekly return of 3.67%, with a cumulative return of 48.10% in 2025[5][9] - The small-cap value preferred portfolio 2 had a weekly return of 5.00%, with a cumulative return of 56.61% in 2025[5][9] - The performance of the multi-factor portfolios showed that the aggressive portfolio and the balanced portfolio had weekly returns of 3.37% and 3.19%, respectively[10][11] - The aggressive portfolio and the balanced portfolio had cumulative returns of 61.10% and 49.08% in 2025, respectively[11] - The enhanced CSI 300 portfolio had a weekly return of 1.43%, with a cumulative return of 11.18% in 2025[14][15] - The enhanced CSI 500 portfolio had a weekly return of 2.17%, with a cumulative return of 14.96% in 2025[14][15] - The enhanced CSI 1000 portfolio had a weekly return of 2.01%, with a cumulative return of 22.07% in 2025[14][15] - The performance of the style factors showed that small-cap stocks outperformed large-cap stocks, and high-valuation stocks outperformed low-valuation stocks[5][43] - The performance of the technical factors showed that the reversal factor contributed positive returns, with a weekly long-short return of 0.98%[5][46][48] - The performance of the fundamental factors showed that the SUE factor and the expected net profit adjustment factor contributed positive returns, with weekly long-short returns of 0.51% and 0.34%, respectively[5][50][52]

Group 1 - The report emphasizes the continuous allocation of reversal factors, indicating that the current economic downturn, slightly loose liquidity, and improved credit indicators suggest a preference for growth-oriented stocks in the investment strategy [2][5][7] - The macro asset allocation viewpoint suggests a slight increase in US stock allocation by 5%, maintaining the equity position unchanged due to the current economic conditions [2][24][26] - Economic leading indicators are in the early stages of a decline, with predictions indicating a continued downward trend through July 2025 [13][14][16] Group 2 - Liquidity conditions are improving, with monetary supply rebounding and interest rates remaining below the 12-month average, indicating a slightly loose liquidity environment [20][21][23] - Credit indicators show a mixed picture, with overall credit metrics remaining high despite some structural weaknesses, suggesting a cautious but optimistic outlook [24][25] - The report highlights that liquidity remains the most closely monitored variable in the market, especially following recent market fluctuations driven by liquidity changes [28][30] Group 3 - The industry selection is focused on sectors that are less sensitive to economic fluctuations but more sensitive to credit conditions, with a high growth attribute across selected industries [32][29] - The top industries identified for investment based on their sensitivity to credit and economic conditions include electronics, media, and power equipment, indicating a strategic focus on growth-oriented sectors [29][32]

Quantitative Factors and Construction Methods 1. Factor Name: **bp** - **Factor Construction Idea**: Measures the valuation level of a stock based on its book-to-price ratio [13] - **Factor Construction Process**: Calculated as the current net asset divided by the current total market value $ bp = \frac{\text{Current Net Asset}}{\text{Current Total Market Value}} $ [13] 2. Factor Name: **bp Three-Year Percentile** - **Factor Construction Idea**: Evaluates the relative valuation of a stock over the past three years [13] - **Factor Construction Process**: Represents the percentile rank of the current bp value within the stock's bp distribution over the last three years [13] 3. Factor Name: **Quarterly EP** - **Factor Construction Idea**: Reflects the profitability of a stock relative to its equity [13] - **Factor Construction Process**: Calculated as the quarterly net profit divided by the net asset $ \text{Quarterly EP} = \frac{\text{Quarterly Net Profit}}{\text{Net Asset}} $ [13] 4. Factor Name: **Quarterly EP One-Year Percentile** - **Factor Construction Idea**: Measures the relative profitability of a stock over the past year [13] - **Factor Construction Process**: Represents the percentile rank of the current quarterly EP value within the stock's EP distribution over the last year [13] 5. Factor Name: **Quarterly SP** - **Factor Construction Idea**: Indicates the revenue generation efficiency of a stock relative to its equity [13] - **Factor Construction Process**: Calculated as the quarterly operating revenue divided by the net asset $ \text{Quarterly SP} = \frac{\text{Quarterly Operating Revenue}}{\text{Net Asset}} $ [13] 6. Factor Name: **Quarterly SP One-Year Percentile** - **Factor Construction Idea**: Evaluates the relative revenue efficiency of a stock over the past year [13] - **Factor Construction Process**: Represents the percentile rank of the current quarterly SP value within the stock's SP distribution over the last year [13] 7. Factor Name: **Fama-French Three-Factor One-Month Residual Volatility** - **Factor Construction Idea**: Measures the idiosyncratic risk of a stock based on its residual volatility after regressing against the Fama-French three-factor model [13] - **Factor Construction Process**: Calculated as the standard deviation of the residuals from the regression of daily returns over the past 20 trading days on the Fama-French three factors $ \text{Residual Volatility} = \sqrt{\frac{\sum (\text{Actual Return} - \text{Predicted Return})^2}{n}} $ where "Predicted Return" is derived from the Fama-French three-factor model [13] 8. Factor Name: **One-Month Excess Return Volatility** - **Factor Construction Idea**: Captures the volatility of a stock's excess return over the past month [13] - **Factor Construction Process**: Calculated as the standard deviation of the excess returns over the past 20 trading days $ \text{Excess Return Volatility} = \sqrt{\frac{\sum (\text{Excess Return} - \text{Mean Excess Return})^2}{n}} $ [13] --- Factor Backtesting Results IC Performance - **bp**: Weekly IC = 9.73%, Monthly IC = 2.21%, Yearly IC = 1.64%, Historical IC = 2.27% [9] - **bp Three-Year Percentile**: Weekly IC = 14.75%, Monthly IC = 3.36%, Yearly IC = 2.85%, Historical IC = 1.69% [9] - **Quarterly EP**: Weekly IC = -4.31%, Monthly IC = 0.38%, Yearly IC = -0.58%, Historical IC = 1.13% [9] - **Quarterly EP One-Year Percentile**: Weekly IC = 7.25%, Monthly IC = 3.57%, Yearly IC = 0.94%, Historical IC = 1.73% [9] - **Quarterly SP**: Weekly IC = -0.92%, Monthly IC = 0.38%, Yearly IC = 0.23%, Historical IC = 0.71% [9] - **Quarterly SP One-Year Percentile**: Weekly IC = 11.79%, Monthly IC = 4.40%, Yearly IC = 3.08%, Historical IC = 1.86% [9] - **Fama-French Three-Factor One-Month Residual Volatility**: Weekly IC = 14.50%, Monthly IC = 5.11%, Yearly IC = 3.29%, Historical IC = 2.54% [9] - **One-Month Excess Return Volatility**: Weekly IC = 14.87%, Monthly IC = 5.14%, Yearly IC = 3.26%, Historical IC = 2.22% [9] Long-Only Portfolio Excess Returns - **bp**: Weekly Excess Return = 0.52%, Monthly Excess Return = -0.36%, Yearly Excess Return = 1.57%, Historical Cumulative Excess Return = 30.39% [11] - **bp Three-Year Percentile**: Weekly Excess Return = 0.75%, Monthly Excess Return = -0.59%, Yearly Excess Return = 3.19%, Historical Cumulative Excess Return = -1.63% [11] - **Quarterly EP**: Weekly Excess Return = 0.13%, Monthly Excess Return = 1.56%, Yearly Excess Return = 1.05%, Historical Cumulative Excess Return = 30.66% [11] - **Quarterly EP One-Year Percentile**: Weekly Excess Return = 0.81%, Monthly Excess Return = 0.32%, Yearly Excess Return = 3.53%, Historical Cumulative Excess Return = 33.78% [11] - **Quarterly SP**: Weekly Excess Return = -0.30%, Monthly Excess Return = 0.33%, Yearly Excess Return = 0.34%, Historical Cumulative Excess Return = -2.98% [11] - **Quarterly SP One-Year Percentile**: Weekly Excess Return = 0.56%, Monthly Excess Return = 1.09%, Yearly Excess Return = 9.91%, Historical Cumulative Excess Return = 1.99% [11] - **Fama-French Three-Factor One-Month Residual Volatility**: Weekly Excess Return = 1.33%, Monthly Excess Return = 1.68%, Yearly Excess Return = 8.97%, Historical Cumulative Excess Return = 19.84% [11] - **One-Month Excess Return Volatility**: Weekly Excess Return = 1.34%, Monthly Excess Return = 1.55%, Yearly Excess Return = 10.29%, Historical Cumulative Excess Return = 11.42% [11]

Quantitative Factors and Construction Methods Factor Name: BP (Book-to-Price Ratio) - **Construction Idea**: Measures the valuation of a stock by comparing its book value to its market value [13] - **Construction Process**: - Formula: $ BP = \frac{\text{Current Book Value}}{\text{Current Market Value}} $ [13] Factor Name: BP Three-Year Percentile - **Construction Idea**: Evaluates the relative valuation of a stock over the past three years [13] - **Construction Process**: - Formula: BP Three-Year Percentile = Percentile rank of the current BP within the last three years [13] Factor Name: Quarterly EP (Earnings-to-Price Ratio) - **Construction Idea**: Measures the profitability of a stock relative to its market price [13] - **Construction Process**: - Formula: $ \text{Quarterly EP} = \frac{\text{Quarterly Net Profit}}{\text{Net Assets}} $ [13] Factor Name: Quarterly EP One-Year Percentile - **Construction Idea**: Tracks the relative profitability of a stock over the past year [13] - **Construction Process**: - Formula: Quarterly EP One-Year Percentile = Percentile rank of the current Quarterly EP within the last year [13] Factor Name: Quarterly SP (Sales-to-Price Ratio) - **Construction Idea**: Measures the revenue generation capability of a stock relative to its market price [13] - **Construction Process**: - Formula: $ \text{Quarterly SP} = \frac{\text{Quarterly Revenue}}{\text{Net Assets}} $ [13] Factor Name: Quarterly SP One-Year Percentile - **Construction Idea**: Tracks the relative revenue generation capability of a stock over the past year [13] - **Construction Process**: - Formula: Quarterly SP One-Year Percentile = Percentile rank of the current Quarterly SP within the last year [13] Factor Name: Small Market Cap - **Construction Idea**: Captures the size effect by focusing on smaller companies [13] - **Construction Process**: - Formula: $ \text{Small Market Cap} = \log(\text{Market Capitalization}) $ [13] Factor Name: 1-Month Reversal - **Construction Idea**: Captures the short-term reversal effect in stock prices [13] - **Construction Process**: - Formula: $ \text{1-Month Reversal} = \text{Cumulative Return over the Last 20 Trading Days} $ [13] Factor Name: Fama-French Three-Factor 1-Month Residual Volatility - **Construction Idea**: Measures the idiosyncratic risk of a stock based on the Fama-French three-factor model [13] - **Construction Process**: - Formula: $ \text{Residual Volatility} = \text{Standard Deviation of Residuals from Fama-French Three-Factor Regression over the Last 20 Trading Days} $ [13] --- Factor Backtesting Results IC Performance - **BP**: Weekly IC = -4.17%, Monthly IC = 0.88%, Yearly IC = 1.86%, Historical IC = 2.19% [9] - **BP Three-Year Percentile**: Weekly IC = -1.08%, Monthly IC = -0.99%, Yearly IC = 2.58%, Historical IC = 1.58% [9] - **Quarterly EP**: Weekly IC = 2.10%, Monthly IC = -0.48%, Yearly IC = -0.46%, Historical IC = 1.18% [9] - **Quarterly EP One-Year Percentile**: Weekly IC = 4.23%, Monthly IC = 3.81%, Yearly IC = 0.98%, Historical IC = 1.73% [9] - **Quarterly SP**: Weekly IC = 0.79%, Monthly IC = 0.93%, Yearly IC = 0.53%, Historical IC = 0.74% [9] - **Quarterly SP One-Year Percentile**: Weekly IC = 4.80%, Monthly IC = 2.82%, Yearly IC = 2.87%, Historical IC = 1.83% [9] - **Small Market Cap**: Weekly IC = 10.49%, Monthly IC = 8.17%, Yearly IC = 3.61%, Historical IC = 2.05% [9] - **1-Month Reversal**: Weekly IC = 7.22%, Monthly IC = 1.22%, Yearly IC = 3.40%, Historical IC = 2.22% [9] - **Fama-French Three-Factor 1-Month Residual Volatility**: Weekly IC = 3.60%, Monthly IC = 1.11%, Yearly IC = 3.49%, Historical IC = 2.48% [9] Excess Return Performance (Long-Only Portfolio) - **BP**: Weekly Excess Return = -0.83%, Monthly Excess Return = -1.04%, Yearly Excess Return = 3.02%, Historical Cumulative Excess Return = 28.90% [11] - **BP Three-Year Percentile**: Weekly Excess Return = -0.58%, Monthly Excess Return = -1.51%, Yearly Excess Return = 0.97%, Historical Cumulative Excess Return = -3.21% [11] - **Quarterly EP**: Weekly Excess Return = 0.57%, Monthly Excess Return = 1.10%, Yearly Excess Return = 1.44%, Historical Cumulative Excess Return = 30.83% [11] - **Quarterly EP One-Year Percentile**: Weekly Excess Return = -0.01%, Monthly Excess Return = 0.51%, Yearly Excess Return = 3.23%, Historical Cumulative Excess Return = 34.69% [11] - **Quarterly SP**: Weekly Excess Return = -0.01%, Monthly Excess Return = 0.49%, Yearly Excess Return = 0.70%, Historical Cumulative Excess Return = -2.69% [11] - **Quarterly SP One-Year Percentile**: Weekly Excess Return = 0.09%, Monthly Excess Return = 1.25%, Yearly Excess Return = 7.91%, Historical Cumulative Excess Return = 2.23% [11] - **Small Market Cap**: Weekly Excess Return = 0.96%, Monthly Excess Return = 2.76%, Yearly Excess Return = 18.31%, Historical Cumulative Excess Return = 62.57% [11] - **1-Month Reversal**: Weekly Excess Return = 0.83%, Monthly Excess Return = 0.76%, Yearly Excess Return = 3.54%, Historical Cumulative Excess Return = 1.57% [11] - **Fama-French Three-Factor 1-Month Residual Volatility**: Weekly Excess Return = 0.28%, Monthly Excess Return = 0.75%, Yearly Excess Return = 8.69%, Historical Cumulative Excess Return = 18.67% [11]