Group 1 - The article discusses a macro quantitative framework that combines economic, liquidity, credit, and inflation factors for asset allocation and industry/style configuration [1][3] - The framework has been adjusted based on the changing mapping of macro variables to assets, with a focus on economic and liquidity indicators [1][5] - The performance of aggressive portfolios since 2013 shows an annualized return of approximately 8.5%, with a 0.6% excess return compared to the benchmark [3][5] Group 2 - The article highlights the impact of macroeconomic conditions on industry and style configurations, incorporating credit sensitivity into the analysis [5][7] - The macro-sensitive industry configuration has shown varying performance, with a notable decline since 2022, indicating the need for adjustments in selection criteria [7][10] - The article emphasizes the importance of market expectations in influencing macroeconomic indicators and their relationship with asset performance [13][18] Group 3 - The Factor Mimicking model is introduced to capture market expectations regarding macro variables, using a refined stock pool for better representation [19][20] - The construction of the Factor Mimicking portfolio aims to reflect the market's implicit views on economic, liquidity, inflation, and credit variables [19][23] - The article discusses the need for additional micro mappings to enhance the representation of macro variables, particularly in relation to corporate earnings and valuations [28][30] Group 4 - The article outlines the adjustments made to the macro variables based on market expectations, focusing on economic, liquidity, and credit dimensions [34][36] - The revised indicators are expected to improve asset allocation strategies, particularly in the context of equity markets [39][40] - The performance of the revised industry and style configurations indicates a positive impact from incorporating market expectations into the analysis [46][54]

Group 1 - The report emphasizes that growth has become a resonant factor in the current economic environment, with a focus on selecting factors that are insensitive to economic conditions but sensitive to credit [2][7][9] - The report suggests that the current economic indicators are weak, leading to a preference for growth-oriented stocks in the investment strategy, particularly in the CSI 300 and CSI 1000 indices [2][9][10] - The macroeconomic outlook indicates a potential short-term recovery in economic indicators, with a forecasted slight increase in the economic leading indicators in August 2025 [12][13][14] Group 2 - The liquidity environment is described as relatively stable, with interest rates showing slight increases but remaining below historical averages, indicating a slightly loose liquidity condition [19][20][22] - Credit indicators are noted to be weak, with a decline in credit volume and structure, although the overall credit indicators remain positive [23][24] - The report advocates for an increase in stock allocation, reflecting a positive trend in equity markets, while reducing allocations in other asset classes [2][24][25] Group 3 - The report identifies liquidity as the primary focus of market attention, especially following recent market movements driven by liquidity conditions [26][27] - In terms of industry selection, the report recommends focusing on sectors that are less sensitive to economic fluctuations but more responsive to credit conditions, highlighting industries with growth attributes [4][31][28] - The report lists specific industries with high scores for economic insensitivity and credit sensitivity, including electronics, media, and beauty care, indicating a strategic focus on growth-oriented sectors [28][31]

2025 年 07 月 01 日 持续配置反转因子 —— 量化资产配置月报 202507 - 相关研究 证券分析师 沈思逸 A0230521070001 shensy@swsresearch.com 邓虎 A0230520070003 denghu@swsresearch.com 联系人 沈思逸 (8621)23297818× shensy@swsresearch.com 权 益 量 化 研 究 请务必仔细阅读正文之后的各项信息披露与声明 本研究报告仅通过邮件提供给 中庚基金 使用。1 量 化 策 略 证 券 研 究 报 告 ⚫ 持续配置反转因子。按照定量指标的结果，目前经济回落、流动性略偏松，信用指标转好， 微观映射中经济（盈利预期）好转回到中等，信用转好，微观流动性偏紧，因此仅流动性 触发修正，修正后的方向为经济下行、流动性偏紧而信用转好，修正后的方向与上期维持 一致；由于流动性与信用产生明显背离，我们主要按照对经济不敏感、对信用敏感来选择 得分前三的因子，各股票池配置风格仍偏向成长，300、500 的因子选择与上期保持一致， 无共振因子，中证 1000 的因子选择中增加了短期反转因子，低波动率、短期反转 ...