——7月大小盘轮动观点 报告日期：2025年7月4日 n 分析师：吕思江 n SAC编号：S1050522030001 n 联系人：武文静 n SAC编号：S1050123070007 证 券 研 究 报 告 金融工程月报 小微盘胜率占优，赔率改善 数据来源：wind，华鑫证券研究 | 业绩统计 | 中证2000 | 沪深300 | 基准:等权配置 | 轮动策略 | 轮动策略/基准 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 累计收益 | -7.21% | 12.73% | 6.60% | 121.87% | 101.66% | | 年化收益 | -0.81% | 1.31% | 0.70% | 9.04% | 7.92% | | 最大回撤 | 56.49% | 45.60% | 37.97% | 32.46% | 14.94% | | 年化波动率 | 26.35% | 19.00% | 20.95% | 21.10% | 8.63% | | 年化sharpe | -0.03 | 0.07 | 0.03 | 0.43 | 0.92 | | calmar | -0.01 ...

Group 1: Monthly Strategy Insights - The report indicates that in July, small-cap stocks are likely to outperform, supported by a monthly quantitative model signal of 0.83, suggesting an overweight position in small-cap stocks [1] - The long-term outlook favors small-cap stocks over the next one to two years, with the current market capitalization factor valuation spread at 1.15, which is lower than historical highs of 1.7 to 2.6 [1] - The report acknowledges a previous misjudgment in June regarding style allocation, where the expected excess return was 0%, and emphasizes a strategy of favoring small-cap stocks unless strong signals for large-cap stocks are present [1] Group 2: Value and Growth Style Rotation - The monthly quantitative model signal for value and growth style rotation is 0.33, indicating a preference for growth stocks in July, which historically tend to outperform during this month [2] - Year-to-date, the value-growth style rotation strategy has achieved an excess return of 6.2% compared to an equal-weight benchmark [2] Group 3: Factor Performance Tracking - Among eight major factors, volatility and value factors showed positive returns this month, while large-cap and liquidity factors exhibited negative returns [2] - Year-to-date, volatility and momentum factors have also shown positive returns, with large-cap and liquidity factors remaining negative [2] - In the analysis of 24 style factors, beta, industry momentum, and short-term reversal factors performed well this month, while large-cap, mid-cap, and liquidity factors did not [2]

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of understanding accounts receivable in the property management industry, particularly in the context of cash flow management and dividend sustainability. It highlights the significant changes in accounts receivable due to recent industry downturns and the need for a balanced development model focusing on scale, quality, and profit [3][4]. Accounts Receivable Analysis - The total accounts receivable for 30 tracked listed property companies increased from 29.18 billion to 75.37 billion from 2020 to 2024, with growth rates of +42.6%, +65.6%, +41.4%, +8.7%, and +1.5% respectively. Notably, from 2023 onwards, the growth rate of accounts receivable is lower than that of operating income, indicating a significant slowdown [3]. - The proportion of accounts receivable from related parties has decreased from 47% to 39% over the past five years, while third-party receivables have increased from 53% to 61%. This trend suggests a gradual reduction in related party risks as the industry stabilizes [4]. - The aging of accounts receivable has worsened, with the proportion of receivables due within one year dropping from 89% in 2019 to 58% in 2024. Consequently, the provision for bad debts has risen sharply from 4% to 26% during the same period, reflecting increased collection difficulties [4]. Investment Recommendations - Companies that demonstrate independent business competitiveness and can effectively reduce related party transactions are deemed favorable. Additionally, firms with strong parent company backgrounds and high rankings in property sales are likely to provide performance support while mitigating related party risks [5]. - Property management companies with natural advantages in merchant payment collection, low long-term arrears, controlled accounts receivable growth, adequate provisions, healthy aging structures, and high collection rates are recommended for investment [5].

2025年下半年首个交易日，小微盘风格持续强势，中证2000增强ETF（159552）、1000ETF增强 （159680）双双刷新上市新高。 其中，中证2000增强ETF（159552）上半年净值增长率29.18%，涨幅位居宽基ETF第一，半年超额收益 率近14%。 【小盘风格为何强势？】 另一方面，宏观经济运行方向。大小盘风格与经济周期的关系虽不完全线性，但总体来看，经济预期平 淡或缓和阶段，小盘风格偏强；经济企稳回升期，大盘风格占优。 展望后市，该机构认为，当前环境或仍有利于偏小盘风格演绎。 产业趋势上，AI、半导体等产业仍处于景气阶段，重要会议继续注重"发展新质生产力"，多维度支持科 创领域发展。 宏观环境上，我国结构性问题依然突出，外部不确定性也对增长带来挑战，稳增长政策下半年仍有加码 需求及空间。 从拥挤度水平看，截至6月27日，小盘指数换手率为2.1%，处于2015年以来77%分位数，交易拥挤度相 对偏高；但从小盘指数/大盘指数换手率比值来看，大约为4.1倍，位于历史均值附近。 从估值层面看，当前小盘指数/大盘指数PE(TTM)比值为2.2倍，处于2015年以来72.5%分位数。从资本 市场建设 ...

Core Viewpoint - The small-cap style has outperformed large and mid-cap styles in the A-share market year-to-date, with expectations for continued superiority despite potential volatility in the second half of the year [1][6]. Group 1: Analysis Framework - The analysis framework for judging A-share style rotation includes major signals such as macroeconomic direction, industrial upgrade trends, and market sentiment, with small-cap stocks favored during innovation-driven phases [2][3]. - Auxiliary signals include capital market construction direction, investor structure, valuation levels, and liquidity, which can influence the rotation between small and large-cap stocks [3][4]. Group 2: Recent Performance and Factors - Since late September, a series of policies aimed at stabilizing growth have emerged, contributing to the relative strength of small-cap stocks, particularly in sectors like AI and technology [5][6]. - The investor structure has shifted, with increased activity from individual investors, as evidenced by a rise in financing balances from approximately 1.3 trillion yuan to around 1.8 trillion yuan [5]. Group 3: Future Outlook - The small-cap style is expected to face increased volatility in the second half of the year but is likely to continue outperforming large-cap stocks due to favorable macroeconomic conditions and ongoing industrial trends [6]. - Current valuation and trading metrics indicate that small-cap stocks have not yet reached extreme levels, suggesting room for further performance [6].

文章来源 本文摘自：2025年5月15日发布的 5月小盘、价值风格有望占优 郑雅斌 ，资格证书编号： S0880525040105 张雪杰 ，资格证书编号： S0880522040001 更多国泰海通研究和服务 亦可联系对口销售获取 大小盘风格轮动月度策略。 最新观点（模型数据截止至 2025/4/30 ）：月度量化模型最新信号转向小 盘；月度观点上，结合月度效应（历史上 5 月小盘风格大概率占优），我们认为 5 月小盘风格有望占 优。中长期，未来一两年，我们更看好小盘风格。目前市值因子最新估值价差为 1.05 ，相对历史高点区 域 1.7~2.6 ，估值价差当前位置不高。本年以来大小盘风格轮动月度策略相对于等权（沪深 300 和中证 2000 ）基准的超额收益 2.94% 。策略构建详见报告《 量化视角多维度构建大小盘风格轮动策略 》。 价值成长风格轮动月度策略。 最新观点（模型数据截止至 2025/4/30 ）：月度量化模型最新信号继续指 向价值风格；月度观点上，我们认为 5 月价值风格有望继续占优；月度配置策略，继续超配价值风格。相 对于等权（国证成长和国证价值）基准，本年以来价值成长风格轮动策略超额收 ...

证 券 研 究 报 告 金融工程月报 看好小盘风格回归 ——5月大小盘轮动观点 报告日期：2025年5月8日 n 分析师：吕思江 n SAC编号：S1050522030001 n 联系人：武文静 n SAC编号：S1050123070007 | 业绩统计 | 中证2000 | 沪深300 | 基准:等权配置 | 轮动策略 | 轮动策略/基准 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 累计收益 | -14.95% | 8.39% | 0.04% | 115.48% | 108.71% | | 年化收益 | -1.77% | 0.89% | 0.00% | 8.85% | 8.46% | | 最大回撤 | 56.49% | 45.60% | 37.97% | 32.46% | 14.94% | | 年化波动率 | 26.45% | 19.12% | 21.05% | 21.19% | 8.66% | | 年化sharpe | -0.07 | 0.05 | 0.00 | 0.42 | 0.98 | | calmar | -0.03 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 0.27 ...