11月24日，抖音官方宣布将试行《抖音社区法律行业公约》，从账号资质规范、内容管理规范两大方 面，明确平台治理规则，以及对违规行为的处置措施，以提升平台法律内容质量、规范涉法律内容传 播、维护法律短视频科普良好生态。 《抖音社区法律行业公约》显示： 未经平台资质认证的账号信息中明暗示自身具有法律执业背景、可提供专业法律服务; 仿冒法律行业专家、执业律师、司法机关及其工作人员宣称可以提供法律服务; 通过租用、买卖、伪造、篡改律师执业证、律师事务所执业许可证等资质文件的手段申请注册或升级账 号。 平台倡导法律领域创作者在发布专业法律服务内容前，完成平台法律专业资质认证，禁止: 未经平台资质认证的账号发布法律专业服务类内容; ...

11月24日，抖音官方宣布将试行《抖音社区法律行业公约》，从账号资质规范、内容管理规范两大 方面，明确平台治理规则，以及对违规行为的处置措施，以提升平台法律内容质量、规范涉法律内 容传播、维护法律短视频科普良好生态。 《抖音社区法律行业公约》显示： 平台倡导法律领域创作者在发布专业法律服务内容前，完成平台法律专业资质认证，禁止: 未经平台资质认证的账号发布法律专业服务类内容; 未经平台资质认证的账号信息中明暗示自身具有法律执业背景、可提供专业法律服务; 仿冒法律行业专家、执业律师、司法机关及其工作人员宣称可以提供法律服务; · 仿冒法律行业专家、执业律师、司法机关及其工作 人员宣称可以提供法律服务; · 通过租用、买卖、伪造、篡改律师执业证、律师事务 所执业许可证等资质文件的手段申请注册或升级账号。 内容管理规范 平台鼓励 鼓励法律创作者发布客观、中立的法律专业知 识,通过科晋法律常识,为平台用户持续提供 专业、优质的法律内容。 ★ 以客观事实为根基,让内容真实可信赖 ★ ★ 精准解读现行法规,让法律适用更清晰 ★ B JU ★ 提供合规法律建议,让行动指引更有用 * , 分子出世界的地之一。日本最后的三十八 ...

内容治理的破局不仅仅在于责任分配和技术优化，更在于塑造 一个健康的舆论生态。平台不应只是消极防守的"删帖机器"， 而应积极引导优质内容的生产与传播。通过激励原创、提升内 容质量、扶持正向价值，平台才能让用户感受到"好内容更容 易被看到"而非仅仅"坏内容会被删除"。 作者：宋玉茹 封图：图虫创意 今年以来，中央网信办持续部署开展"清朗"系列专项行动，重点针对"自媒体"发布不实信息、短 视频领域恶意营销、AI技术滥用乱象、恶意挑动负面情绪等乱象集中时间、集中力量进行打击。 专项行动剑指网络空间乱象，也让平台内容审查的责任边界问题愈发凸显。平台已成为信息传播、 社交互动的核心载体，但电商平台与内容平台的责任逻辑差异显著，个人用户违规成本低、平台权 责不对等、社会期待与治理能力落差等问题交织，都让审查工作陷入多重困境。 厘清责任归属、探索破局之道，既是落实"清朗"行动要求的关键，也是构建健康网络生态的必然 之举。 责任主体难确认 在数字社会中，平台作为"看门人"，已成为信息获取与交流的核心渠道。但不同类型平台的责任 归属存在显著差异，尤其在内容审查领域，需结合其运作逻辑明确第一责任主体。 近期，多家知名互联网平台因热 ...

公告称，部分达人通过使用变形词、主播话术暗示、评论区引导、背景板传递相关信息等方式绕过平台 监管，在直播间违规推广"英伦大提升""水光针""光子嫩肤""洗眉毛""激光祛除色素"等禁限售商品或服 务。此类行为不仅违反相关法律法规，也严重违反平台规则，对消费者体验造成了不良影响。今年上半 年，针对部分医美商家违规售卖禁限售商品等行为，平台搭建风险识别系统并开展专项整治，处置违规 机构1517家。 新京报贝壳财经讯(记者罗亦丹)新京报贝壳财经记者11月17日获悉，抖音生活服务公示"打击医疗医美 直播间违规宣传禁限售商品"专项行动的阶段治理成果。截至10月，超2.3万个违规达人被封禁直播团购 权限30天以上，其中605个达人因严重违规被封禁180天；超10.6万个直播间因违规宣传被中断处置。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the ongoing "Clear and Bright" campaign by the Central Cyberspace Administration of China, which targets misinformation, malicious marketing in short videos, and the misuse of AI technology, highlighting the challenges of content regulation on digital platforms [2][3]. Group 1: Responsibility and Governance - The article emphasizes the need to clarify responsibility attribution in digital spaces, particularly in content review, where different platforms have varying responsibilities [4][5]. - Major internet platforms have faced legal scrutiny for allowing false information and inflammatory content to proliferate, indicating a need for stricter content governance [4][6]. - The distinction between e-commerce platforms and content platforms is highlighted, with e-commerce platforms having clearer responsibility structures compared to content platforms, which face challenges due to the decentralized nature of user-generated content [6][7]. Group 2: Challenges in Content Regulation - Content platforms struggle with the sheer volume and diversity of information, making it nearly impossible to pre-screen all content effectively [9][10]. - The low cost of individual user violations leads to a lack of accountability, as users can easily create new accounts to continue posting harmful content after being banned [10][11]. - There is a significant asymmetry between the responsibilities placed on platforms and the powers they possess to enforce compliance, leading to platforms often being blamed for user misconduct [11][12]. Group 3: The Dilemma of Content Review - Platforms face a dilemma in content review, where overly strict measures may alienate users, while lenient policies can lead to the spread of harmful information [13][14]. - Public expectations for platforms to swiftly identify and remove harmful content often exceed the technical capabilities of these platforms, creating a gap between societal demands and operational realities [14][15]. Group 4: Pathways to Resolution - The article suggests a shift from a model of "single-point accountability" to a "layered responsibility" approach, distributing accountability among individuals, platforms, and society [17][18]. - Increasing the cost of individual violations and enhancing traceability of user actions are proposed as methods to improve accountability [18][19]. - The need for algorithmic transparency and the development of multi-objective algorithms that balance user engagement with social responsibility is emphasized [20]. - A proactive approach to content regulation, focusing on prevention rather than reaction, is recommended to mitigate the spread of harmful content [21][22]. - Finally, fostering a healthy discourse ecosystem where platforms actively promote quality content rather than merely reacting to violations is deemed essential for long-term governance success [22].

为维护健康的创作环境，保障创作者和商家的合法权益，近半年内，平台已累计处置超5万条违规运营技巧教学相关的内容，并将继续加大治理力度。平台 将继续加强对不正当运营技巧和违规工具的监控与治理，确保创作者和商家的合法权益不受侵害。 今日抖音电商发文称，近期，平台在巡查过程中发现，部分创作者和商家在平台上传播"视频拍摄技巧"和"店铺经营攻略"类内容，这些内容普遍存在真伪难 辨、效果存疑的问题。部分内容通过夸大宣传、虚构案例，误导创作者和商家，可能导致其走偏运营方向，浪费时间成本，也影响平台整体内容质量。 ...

Core Points - Douban announced on August 7, 2025, that it has addressed issues related to fake accounts and AI-generated spam content on its platform [1] - The platform identified a significant number of accounts engaging in "account farming" behavior, which resulted in the posting of a large volume of spam content across various film and book entries [1] - A total of 2,272 accounts were processed for violations, leading to the removal of 348,674 short reviews and 5,701 long reviews deemed as spam [1] Company Actions - Douban emphasized its commitment to maintaining the authenticity of ratings and reviews by combining technology and manual oversight [1] - The company encouraged users to report any misuse of platform features or spam content to enhance community integrity [1] - Douban reiterated that the credibility of user accounts in film ratings is based on real user data, and spam content will be identified and removed by algorithms, with violators facing penalties [1]

Core Viewpoint - Douyin is actively addressing the issue of malicious marketing accounts that distort information and disrupt the platform's content ecosystem and algorithm recommendations [1] Group 1: Regulatory Measures - Douyin has established new regulations targeting ten types of violations by marketing accounts [1] - A health score mechanism for accounts has been introduced, which will influence content recommendation and monetization rights based on the account's health score [1] - The platform is implementing a tiered penalty system that includes reduced content recommendations and restrictions on monetization rights [1] Group 2: Community Engagement - Douyin encourages user feedback and suggestions during the trial phase of these governance regulations [1]