（文章来源：经济日报） 无论何时，不要放弃"深阅读"和"慢思考"。将传统阅读与数字阅读相结合，可在数字阅读高效泛读的同 时，寻找希望深度了解的领域，定期留出时间再选择纸质书籍、长报道、学术论文等进行沉浸式阅读， 提高文化素养。也可以主动拓展社交圈，与观点各异的人进行深度交流，较长时间地反复思考和探讨一 个问题，通过输入和输出锻炼认知和思维。 在信息爆炸的今天，阅读的价值早已不局限于知识积累，而在于捍卫思想疆域、拓展思维边界。我们要 把阅读选择权牢牢握在"人"的手中、有温度的手心里，听多元的声音、看不同的风景。 如今，电子阅读器、阅读类手机应用以及新闻聚合平台等数字阅读途径，丰富了人们的选择，有力推动 了全民阅读的普及与发展。但同时，在所谓"知你""懂你"的智能算法作用下，读者往往接触到内容与观 点趋于同质化的信息。这种"信息茧房"效应让许多人困惑：为什么科技发展带来了数字阅读的山高海 阔，自己反而被困在了信息孤岛。 心理学有个词叫"证实性偏差"，指的是人们在搜集信息或作出判断时，常常有意识或无意识地关注与自 己既有观念和态度相一致的信息，忽视或排斥与之相矛盾或不同立场的内容。为了让读者有"更好"的阅 读体验， ...

题图｜AI生成 很多人记住任泉是"演员"，但他的人生转折始于一段深夜独处。 收工回城的车上，仪表盘的微光映出他内心的三问："我愿意长期投入的是什么？持续学习的路径在 哪里？十年后我希望身处何处？" 没有灵光乍现的答案，只有反复的自我校准。这种"十年一复盘"的 习惯，让他始终能以旁观者的视角审视人生，在即时反馈的时代里，先想对问题，再走稳方向。 站在上海戏剧学院门口，他常想起学生时代那个"不务正业"的决定——在安福路开第一家餐厅。房东 不看好这个学生模样的年轻人，但他清楚，这是无数个夜晚思考的结果："我需要一份踏实，在没有 戏演的时候也能保持清醒。"从演员到投资人，他的每次转型都有一段沉淀期。开车漫游上海街道 时，他刻意放空自己，学习新行业需要思考的空间，就像演戏需要揣摩角色的时间。 在信息密度呈指数级膨胀的当下，真正拉开人和人差距的往往不是外部资源，而是能否抓住那些思考 的"慢变量"——专注力、深度思考能力与长期主义。 当社交媒体算法把注意力切割得支离破碎，"效率"与"即时反馈"成为职场人的隐性 KPI；我们在数据 洪流中高速奔跑，却难以判断方向。宏观经济的不确定、科技浪潮的叠加、职涯路径的多岔口， 让"节奏 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the phenomenon of "cognitive outsourcing" due to the increasing reliance on AI for information processing and decision-making, which may lead to a decline in critical thinking and independent analysis skills. Group 1: Cognitive Outsourcing - The reliance on AI tools is creating a dependency on "cognitive outsourcing," where individuals are encouraged to think less and rely more on AI for information processing [2][3][4]. - AI's ability to reduce cognitive load through features like one-click summaries and intelligent recommendations is leading to a decrease in active information filtering and judgment [3][4][5]. - The trend of cognitive outsourcing is evident as more people trust AI tools, resulting in diminished confidence in independent analysis when faced with complex problems [4][5][6]. Group 2: Impact on Critical Thinking - Frequent reliance on AI has been linked to difficulties in independent reasoning, with users experiencing a decline in cognitive sharpness compared to periods without AI assistance [5][6][9]. - Companies are systematically integrating AI into workflows, which, while seemingly increasing efficiency, may also weaken critical thinking abilities among employees [6][7]. - The article highlights a shift in academic environments, where students increasingly use AI for research and analysis, leading to a passive learning approach [7][8]. Group 3: The Role of Experience and Understanding - The article argues that experience is becoming a "compressed capsule," with individuals relying on AI to generate solutions rather than internalizing knowledge through experience [17][18]. - Certain types of knowledge and experience, particularly those requiring intuition and hands-on practice, cannot be replaced by AI, emphasizing the need for a balance between AI tools and human judgment [18][19]. - The understanding of complex concepts requires a foundational knowledge that cannot solely depend on AI, as true comprehension involves active engagement and critical thinking [15][16]. Group 4: The Future of Human-AI Interaction - The article suggests that as AI becomes more integrated into daily tasks, individuals must find their role in this evolving landscape, transitioning from creators to users of AI technology [25][26]. - There is a call for individuals to maintain their judgment and creativity in the face of increasing AI influence, ensuring that technology serves as a tool rather than a replacement for human thought [26][27]. - The ultimate boundary of AI's role is proposed to be in processing "what" and "how," while the "why" must remain a human domain, highlighting the importance of maintaining human agency in decision-making [23][24].

Group 1 - The article discusses the shift in decision-making processes due to AI, where individuals now often rely on AI-generated suggestions before making judgments [2][3][4] - AI is reshaping how information is processed, prioritizing certain data and guiding users on what to explore further [3][4][11] - There is a growing concern about "cognitive outsourcing," where reliance on AI reduces critical thinking and independent analysis [4][5][11] Group 2 - Research indicates that increased trust in AI tools leads to a decline in deep processing of information, which can diminish confidence in independent analysis [11][12] - The article highlights a personal observation of decreased cognitive engagement and a tendency to wait for AI-generated answers [9][13] - Companies are systematically integrating AI into workflows, which may enhance efficiency but also weaken critical thinking skills [14][15] Group 3 - The article raises questions about the boundaries of cognitive outsourcing and the potential long-term effects on human judgment and creativity [20][30] - It emphasizes the importance of maintaining a balance between using AI tools and preserving the ability to think critically and creatively [46][56] - The discussion includes the notion that while AI can assist in various tasks, certain experiences and intuitive judgments cannot be replaced by AI [43][44]