中国青年报社的一份调查显示，超过八成的受访者表示喜欢刷短视频，且受访者年龄段越低，刷短视频 兴趣越高；近七成受访者感到自己过度刷短视频。 飞旋的温烙歌 碎片信息凑不出未来，年轻人亟需提升"文化体力" 我们并非不爱阅读，而是"电量"告急——那股支撑我们读完长篇的"文化体力"，正在悄悄流失。打卡式 阅读、碎片化分享已然成为常态。 你是否有过这样的体验，从图书馆借回厚厚的研究专著，但现实是，只看完前两页就感到疲惫，转而选 择在网上搜索具体的知识点，直接获取"现成答案"，跳过了原本需要的深度学习和整体理解过程。高考 前最大的愿望就是：上大学后有更多属于自己的时间，阅读自己喜欢的书。然而进入大学后，却发现现 实与想象之间存在巨大落差。即便在课程不紧张、时间相对自由的情况下，也很难再像过去那样静下心 来读书。 如今，我们获取信息的方式比以往任何时候都更加便捷——搜索引擎、短视频、社交媒体几乎可以在几 秒钟之内满足我们的需求。越来越多的内容被压缩为几秒钟的视频、几百字的推文，或者是可以直接检 索到的"现成答案"。 这种高效率、低门槛的获取方式，使我们习惯于"浅尝辄止"，却逐渐失去了面对长文本、长时间阅读时 所需要的耐力。我 ...

Core Viewpoint - A mature society should accommodate lives that are "not so ambitious" [3] Group 1: Diversity of Social Needs - A healthy society is composed of diverse individuals, not just "elites" who thrive in competitive environments [5] - Howard Gardner's theory of multiple intelligences suggests that human abilities are varied, indicating that not everyone is suited for high-pressure urban jobs [5][6] - Economic theories, such as David Ricardo's comparative advantage, support the idea that different types of individuals contribute uniquely to society, with no one type being more important than another [6] Group 2: The Danger of a Single Standard - The narrow definition of "success" in society creates a form of "social violence," limiting individuals' life choices [8][9] - The dominance of instrumental rationality over value rationality leads to a focus on efficiency and results, often at the expense of personal fulfillment [8] - Many essential jobs are undervalued due to a narrow understanding of success, which simplifies individual worth [9] Group 3: Supportive Systems and Culture - A supportive system and culture are necessary for individuals to choose a slower-paced life in smaller cities [11][12] - Japan's "regional revitalization" strategy illustrates how government initiatives can encourage young people to move to smaller cities [12] - Cultural shifts are needed to respect diverse lifestyles, moving away from the notion that only urban success is valid [13] Group 4: Young People Returning to Self - There is a noticeable trend of young people choosing to stay in their hometowns or smaller cities, reflecting a shift in values towards quality of life [14][15] - This choice is seen as a sign of social progress, as it indicates a focus on personal desires over societal expectations [15][16] - The current generation is challenging the illusion of a single path to success, advocating for a broader range of life choices [17]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the trend of first-year university students seeking internships earlier than before, driven by a desire to gain practical experience and a perceived disconnect between academic learning and job market requirements [4][14]. Group 1: Early Internship Trends - An increasing number of first-year students are applying for internships right after starting university, with some believing that early experience will give them an advantage over peers [5][13]. - According to a report by Zhaopin, 78.4% of graduates have had at least one internship experience, up from 72.5% the previous year, with nearly 70% of those with internship experience starting in their first year [13][14]. Group 2: Student Perspectives - Students like Lu Yaqi and Li Tong express dissatisfaction with the relevance of their academic courses, prompting them to seek internships to better understand their chosen fields and gain practical skills [15][17]. - Li Tong completed five internships during her first year, which she views as essential for enhancing her employability and gaining real-world experience [17][18]. Group 3: Disconnect Between Education and Employment - Many students feel that university education is increasingly disconnected from the skills needed in the job market, leading them to pursue internships to fill this gap [24][28]. - The article highlights that outdated teaching materials and methods in universities contribute to this disconnect, with over 22% of textbooks in use being more than ten years old [28]. Group 4: Challenges Faced by Interns - First-year interns often find themselves performing basic tasks and feeling like outsiders in the workplace, as they are not fully integrated into the professional environment [44][49]. - The experience of early interns can lead to disillusionment, as they may not find the work fulfilling or aligned with their career aspirations [52][53].

Group 1 - The article discusses the shift in decision-making processes due to AI, where individuals now often rely on AI-generated suggestions before making judgments [2][3][4] - AI is reshaping how information is processed, prioritizing certain data and guiding users on what to explore further [3][4][11] - There is a growing concern about "cognitive outsourcing," where reliance on AI reduces critical thinking and independent analysis [4][5][11] Group 2 - Research indicates that increased trust in AI tools leads to a decline in deep processing of information, which can diminish confidence in independent analysis [11][12] - The article highlights a personal observation of decreased cognitive engagement and a tendency to wait for AI-generated answers [9][13] - Companies are systematically integrating AI into workflows, which may enhance efficiency but also weaken critical thinking skills [14][15] Group 3 - The article raises questions about the boundaries of cognitive outsourcing and the potential long-term effects on human judgment and creativity [20][30] - It emphasizes the importance of maintaining a balance between using AI tools and preserving the ability to think critically and creatively [46][56] - The discussion includes the notion that while AI can assist in various tasks, certain experiences and intuitive judgments cannot be replaced by AI [43][44]

Group 1 - The concept of "objectification" refers to the process of transforming individuals or subjectivity into objects or commodities, stripping away autonomy and dignity [2][4][6] - Objectification manifests in contemporary society through consumerism, where individuals are defined as consumers and their value is determined by possessions [5][6] - The core of objectification lies in the distortion of relationships, leading to a lack of empathy and understanding, and contributing to environmental crises and personal alienation [9][10] Group 2 - Objectification is not entirely negative; it is necessary for scientific objectivity and societal functioning, but awareness is crucial to prevent it from becoming the sole mode of existence [11][27] - The relationship between objectification and control versus creativity is a fundamental tension in modern organizations, where control mechanisms like KPIs can stifle innovation [64][66] - The emergence of AI and large models presents opportunities for new organizational forms that balance control and creativity, potentially transforming how value is created and measured [68][70][71]