Core Viewpoint - The equity market is undergoing a significant rotation in 2026, favoring dividend ETFs and previously underperforming sectors such as small caps, energy, and materials stocks [1][2]. Dividend ETFs Performance - Dividend stocks and ETFs are benefiting from the outperformance of value stocks and those with strong balance sheets, with yields of 3%-4% making dividend ETFs early winners in 2026 [2]. - Not all high-dividend ETFs are the same, and specific funds are highlighted as strong investment options for 2026 [2]. Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF - The Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) has seen a resurgence due to its focus on quality fundamentals, stable dividend growth, and above-average yield, making it a top performer in the U.S. dividend ETF category [4][7]. - The fund currently offers a yield of 3.7% and has a low expense ratio of 0.06%, making it an attractive long-term investment [6]. Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF - The Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) employs a straightforward strategy of selecting the top half of dividend-paying stocks based on yield, which has proven effective for investors seeking higher yields [8][9]. - The fund has a diverse allocation across seven sectors, with a 2.5% yield that positions it well for the current market rotation [10][11]. SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF - The SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF (SPYD) focuses on the 80 highest-yielding securities from the S&P 500 and employs an equal-weighting strategy for diversification [13]. - With a yield of 4.5% and a low expense ratio of 0.07%, this ETF is among the most cost-effective options available, potentially benefiting from expected interest rate cuts in 2026 [15][16].

1. Report Industry Investment Rating No relevant information provided. 2. Core Viewpoints of the Report - As of January 31, 2026, the total number of funds in the market increased by 104 to 13,722, while the total net asset value decreased by 452.4 billion yuan to 37.22 trillion yuan. Growth - type funds outperformed value - type funds in January 2026 [3][7]. - As of January 31, 2026, there were 1,430 ETFs in the Shanghai and Shenzhen stock markets, an increase of 28 from the previous period. The total asset management scale decreased by 555.748 billion yuan to 5.46 trillion yuan, and the total share decreased by 92.652 billion shares to 3.28 trillion shares. Commodity - type ETFs had a higher overall return in January, while bond - type ETFs had the worst performance [4][18]. - The industry ETF rotation strategy based on main funds and the PB - ROE framework both achieved positive excess returns compared to the CSI 300 Index in January 2026 and since 2023 [5][40][50]. 3. Summary According to Relevant Catalogs 3.1 Fund Market Tracking 3.1.1 Market Overview - As of January 31, 2026, the number of funds increased by 104, and the total net asset value decreased by 452.4 billion yuan. Hybrid, bond, and stock - type funds had the highest proportion in terms of quantity, while money - market, bond, and stock - type funds had the highest proportion in terms of scale [7]. - In January 2026, the number of stock - type funds increased by 49, and the scale of stock - type and bond - type funds decreased by 552.001 billion yuan and 88.818 billion yuan respectively [11]. 3.1.2 Fund Performance - From January 1 to 31, 2026, the returns of value, balanced, and growth fund indexes were 3.92%, 6.10%, and 7.02% respectively, all outperforming the CSI 300 Index. Growth - type funds outperformed value - type funds [13]. - The differences among large - cap, mid - cap, and small - cap fund indexes were small in January 2026, with mid - cap funds slightly outperforming large - cap and small - cap funds, and all outperforming the CSI 300 Index [13]. - The median return of all funds in January 2026 was 2.53%, and 94.84% of funds achieved positive returns. The top - performing fund was SDIC UBS Silver Futures A, with a gain of 61.60% in both January and year - to - date [16]. 3.2 ETF Market Tracking 3.2.1 ETF New Products - In January 2026, 33 ETFs were newly listed, including 3 science - and - technology innovation board chip ETFs and 30 other stock - type ETFs. 27 ETFs were newly established, with a total issuance scale of 16.57 billion yuan [20]. 3.2.2 ETF Product Classification Performance - Commodity - type ETFs had a median return of 18.61% in January, bond - type ETFs had the lowest median return of 0.25%, and stock - type ETFs had a median return of 4.74%, outperforming cross - border ETFs. Stock - type ETFs had the highest internal deviation in January [4][24]. - Among stock - type ETFs in January, gold - related and mining ETFs performed well, while bank - related ETFs performed poorly. The average share change of stock - type ETFs was a decrease of 108.9666 million shares, with chemical and software ETFs having significant share increases and CSI 300 and SSE 50 ETFs having significant share decreases [25]. - Among bond - type ETFs in January, the convertible bond ETF had the highest increase of 5.90%, and the science - innovation bond ETF had a decrease of 0.01%. As of January 31, 2026, the Haifutong CSI Short - Term Financing ETF had the largest scale of 70.223 billion yuan [29]. - Among cross - border ETFs in January, the China - South Korea Semiconductor ETF had the highest increase of 45.09%, and the Hong Kong Stock Connect Medical ETF had the highest decrease of 4.20%. The year - to - date performance was similar [31]. - Among commodity - type ETFs in January, the gold ETF had an increase of 19.11%, and the soybean meal ETF had the smallest increase of 1.69%. As of January 31, 2026, the Huaan Gold ETF had the largest scale of 93.985 billion yuan [35]. 3.3 ETF Strategy Tracking 3.3.1 Industry ETF Rotation Based on Main Funds - The strategy focused on non - ferrous metals, non - banking finance, and steel in January 2026. The cumulative return in January 2026 was 9.01%, with an excess return of 7.36% compared to the CSI 300 Index. Since 2023, the cumulative return was 61.84%, with an excess return of 40.28% compared to the CSI 300 Index [5][40][42]. 3.3.2 Industry ETF Rotation under the PB - ROE Framework - The strategy focused on communication, agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry, and fishery, and transportation in January 2026. The cumulative return in January 2026 was 2.83%, with an excess return of 1.18% compared to the CSI 300 Index. Since 2023, the cumulative return was 29.03%, with an excess return of 7.47% compared to the CSI 300 Index [5][50][51]. 3.4 Investment Recommendations - For the industry preference of main funds in February 2026, the steel, coal, and non - ferrous metal industries are favored, and the corresponding ETFs are their industry ETFs. - Based on the industry PB - ROE situation and supplementary indicators, the ETF rotation strategy under the PB - ROE framework recommends paying attention to the non - ferrous metal, transportation, and public utilities industries in February, and the corresponding ETFs are their industry ETFs [6][57].

Market Performance - The Shanghai Composite Index fell by 0.96%, while the ChiNext Index rose by 1.38% [1] - There was a significant decline in gold and base metal stocks, with several hitting the daily limit down [1] - Sectors such as liquor, real estate, brokerage, and oil & gas experienced notable declines [1] Sector Highlights - Commercial aerospace, fintech, photovoltaic, and AI application sectors underwent adjustments [1] - CPO and Yushu robotics concept stocks were active, while agricultural stocks strengthened [1] ETF Movements - The A500 ETF saw a notable increase of 5.6% [1] - AI hardware showed strength, with CPO concept stocks rising during the session [1] - The Guotai Fund's communication ETF and Guangfa communication ETF both increased by 3% [1] - The chip design sector was active, with the Guolianan Fund's Sci-Tech chip design ETF rising by 2.3% [1] Commodity and Metal Sector - The metal sector experienced a deep correction, with gold stock ETFs and related stocks hitting the daily limit down [1] - The non-ferrous metal sector also saw a decline, with the industrial non-ferrous ETF from Wanji hitting the daily limit down [1]

创业板人工智能ETF华夏（159381）跟踪指数CPO权重近50%，同时覆盖国产软件+AI应用企业，具备 较高弹性。其中前三大权重股为中际旭创（15.64%）、新易盛（15.57%）、天孚通信（6.85%）。场内 综合费率仅0.20%，位居同类最低。场外联接（A类：025505；C类：025506）； 通信ETF华夏（515050）深度聚焦电子（芯片、PCB、消费电子）+通信（光模块、服务器）算力硬 件。前五大持仓股：中际旭创、新易盛、立讯精密、工业富联、兆易创新。场外联接(A类：008086；C 类：008087) 中信证券研报称，近期，海外推理和训练算力需求旺盛，亚马逊云和谷歌云双双涨价。推理侧， MoltBot（原ClawdBot）、Claude Code等Agent产品加速落地，对于云计算资源的需求显著增加，2026 年年初以来Token调用量已经连续2—3周高速增长。训练侧，Grok-5、Veo4等模型仍然在持续迭代，工 业界持续探索Scaling上限，从而支撑训练算力需求。尽管当前AI应用大规模商业化落地能见度仍然不 足，但展望未来3—6个月，随着推理端AI应用落地的密集催化叠加训练端模型的持续迭 ...

Market Performance - The Shanghai Composite Index fell by 0.1% at midday, while the ChiNext Index decreased by 0.05% [1] - AI application themes rebounded, with short drama games and e-commerce leading the gains [1] - The non-ferrous metals sector continued its strong performance, with gold and copper showing significant increases [1] - Real estate, liquor, and agriculture sectors performed well [1] - Semiconductor, AI computing, robotics, and consumer electronics concept stocks experienced adjustments [1] ETF Movements - Two Brazilian ETFs continued to rise, with the Huaxia Fund Brazilian ETF increasing by 7.74% [1] - Gold prices reached a new historical high, with the Fidelity Fund Gold ETF, Bosera Gold ETF, and GF Fund Shanghai Gold ETF all rising by 5.15% [1] - AI applications rebounded, with the online consumption ETF from ICBC and GF Fund Media ETF increasing by 4.88% and 4.5%, respectively [1] - The semiconductor sector declined, with the semiconductor equipment ETFs from E Fund dropping by 2.8% [1] - The consumer electronics sector adjusted, with consumer electronics ETFs from E Fund falling by 2.15% [1]

Tesla's fourth quarter real, they're just crossing the wire. Let's get those numbers. Tesla Q4 just EPS50s.It looks like consensus was closer to 45 cents. So, we got a beat there. Uh Q4 revenue clocking in at 24.90% billion.Estimate was 25.11% billion. Uh Q4 gross margins, there it is, 20.1%, the estimate was 17.1%. Q4 free cash flow 1.42% 42 billion was closer to 1.59% billion.Let's get your take on this, Adam, because this is another one you own and the stock's popping about 4%. >> Love it. As it should.U ...

Quick Read Defiance Nasdaq 100 ETF (QQQY) returned 37% through late January 2026 versus QQQ’s 22% by selling same-day expiring options. QQQY’s options strategy exchanges capital appreciation for income. The fund gained 19% versus QQQ’s 22% over the past year. QQQY’s exposure to NVIDIA, Apple and Microsoft creates concentrated tech risk. The options overlay caps upside participation when these mega-cap names rally. Investors rethink ‘hands off’ investing and decide to start making real money The D ...

Small-Cap Investing: Time for a Fundamental Approach?ETF Trends is now VettaFi. Read More -- Macroeconomic conditions for 2026 may seem a little bit shaky, but one area where advisors and investors might find great opportunities is actually within small-caps.Sure, this is likely not the first year that folks are hearing that small-caps might start threatening to outperform their large-cap counterparts. However, we're starting to see the pieces fall into place to help make that theory a reality.While the Fed ...

Market Performance - Wall Street regained momentum with the S&P 500 reaching all-time highs, briefly touching 6,990 during midday trading, driven by strong corporate earnings, particularly in technology and utilities [1] - SPY, the largest ETF with nearly $700 billion in assets, has gained about 16% over the past year despite $10 billion in net outflows in 2025, reflecting market appreciation rather than new investor inflows [2] Sector Analysis - The performance of the S&P 500 is heavily influenced by a small group of mega-cap technology stocks, which account for a significant portion of the index's gains, raising concerns about concentration risk [3][4] - Health care stocks experienced sharp losses due to a proposed Medicare Advantage payment update, impacting major insurers like UnitedHealth Group, Humana, and CVS Health, which fell between 15% and 20% [4] Investment Strategies - The concentration of mega-cap tech stocks has led some investors to explore alternative S&P 500 strategies, such as the Tema S&P 500 Historical Weight ETF Strategy, which has outperformed SPY with a 20% gain over the past year [7] - Other funds like the Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF focus on reducing downside risk, while the Technology Select SPDR ETF offers targeted exposure to the tech sector, which has surged over 30% in the past year [8] Investor Considerations - For long-term, diversified investors, SPY remains a solid choice due to its broad market exposure and historical performance, but risk-sensitive investors may find the concentration risk too high [9][10] - The growing dominance of mega-cap tech stocks has prompted a reassessment of traditional cap-weighted exposure among investors, particularly as valuations for these stocks exceed historical averages [6]

Group 1: Market Overview - The rise of the artificial intelligence (AI) boom is leading some passive investors to consider contrarian positions in sectors that are being overlooked [1] - Valuations of various AI stocks are becoming frothy, and a market correction could disproportionately affect the tech sector [1] Group 2: Energy Sector Performance - The energy sector has shown solid gains, with the Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLE) and Vanguard Energy Index Fund ETF (VDE) increasing by 17.55% and 18.80% respectively over the past two years [2] - Although these returns are lower than the S&P 500's 41.7% gain, the energy sector has provided lower volatility, making it a defensive investment option [2] Group 3: Future Outlook for Energy Sector - The energy sector may continue to gain under the Trump administration's "Drill, Baby, Drill" policies, supported by regulatory tailwinds and increased drilling permits [3] - If the market declines due to a downturn in AI stocks, energy stocks may maintain their steady performance and potentially gain amidst stock market volatility [4] Group 4: ETF Comparison - The XLE ETF has a lower expense ratio of 0.09% compared to VDE's 0.10%, making it a cost-effective option for investors [8] - XLE offers a higher dividend yield in the 3% range, appealing to investors interested in large oil companies and their cash flows [8] - Over two years, both XLE and VDE returned approximately 18%, significantly lower than the S&P 500's performance, but with much lower volatility [9]