Core Insights - The article provides an objective ranking of mutual fund net asset values, highlighting the top-performing and bottom-performing funds without any subjective bias [1] Fund Performance Summary Top 10 Performing Funds - The top 10 funds based on net asset value growth as of November 14, 2025, include: 1. 汇安量化优选A with a net value of 1.0436 and a growth of 7.11% 2. 汇安量化优选C with a net value of 0.9931 and a growth of 7.11% 3. 永赢新材料智选混合发起C with a net value of 1.3099 and a growth of 5.42% 4. 永赢新材料智选混合发起A with a net value of 1.3120 and a growth of 5.42% 5. 华泰柏瑞新兴产业混合A with a net value of 2.1076 and a growth of 4.39% 6. 南华瑞盈混合发起A with a net value of 1.5058 and a growth of 4.38% 7. 华泰柏瑞新兴产业混合C with a net value of 2.0212 and a growth of 4.38% 8. 南华瑞盈混合发起C with a net value of 1.5227 and a growth of 4.37% 9. 工银新经济混合(QDII)人民币C with a net value of 1.5724 and a growth of 4.25% 10. 工银新经济混合(QDII)人民币A with a net value of 1.5736 and a growth of 4.25% [2] Bottom 10 Performing Funds - The bottom 10 funds based on net asset value decline as of November 14, 2025, include: 1. 方正富邦核心优势混合A with a net value of 1.1798 and a decline of 6.76% 2. 方正富邦核心优势混合C with a net value of 1.1655 and a decline of 6.76% 3. 永赢先锋半导体智选混合发起C with a net value of 1.3679 and a decline of 6.72% 4. 永赢先锋半导体智选混合发起A with a net value of 1.3691 and a decline of 6.71% 5. 东方阿尔法科技智选混合发起A with a net value of 1.0813 and a decline of 6.59% 6. 东方阿尔法科技智选混合发起C with a net value of 1.0811 and a decline of 6.58% 7. 鹏华高端装备一年持有期混合C with a net value of 1.5518 and a decline of 6.20% 8. 鹏华高端装备一年持有期混合A with a net value of 1.5739 and a decline of 6.19% 9. 国融融信消费严选混合C with a net value of 0.8307 and a decline of 6.19% 10. 国融融信消费严选混合A with a net value of 0.8435 and a decline of 6.18% [3] Market Analysis - The Shanghai Composite Index opened lower and experienced a downward trend, closing with a significant drop, while the ChiNext Index also followed a similar pattern. The total trading volume reached 1.98 trillion, with a market breadth of 1961 gainers to 3323 losers. The leading sectors included gas and heating, which rose over 3%, while communication equipment and semiconductors fell over 3% [5] Fund Holdings Analysis - The top holdings of the funds indicate a concentration in specific sectors, with the top 10 holdings accounting for 65.71% of the total holdings in one fund, showing a preference for the new energy sector. Conversely, another fund's top 10 holdings accounted for 73.57%, indicating a shift towards storage chip technology, despite being classified under military industry funds [6]

Core Insights - The article provides an overview of the performance of various mutual funds, highlighting the top and bottom performers based on net asset value updates as of October 20, 2025 [3][4]. Fund Performance Summary Top Performing Funds - The top 10 funds with the highest net value growth include: 1. Rongtong New Energy Vehicle Theme Selected A: 2.6994 (up from 2.5757) [3] 2. Rongtong New Energy Vehicle Theme Selected C: 2.6303 (up from 2.5099) [3] 3. Huian Growth Preferred Mixed A: 2.0799 (up from 1.9847) [3] 4. Huian Growth Preferred Mixed C: 1.9519 (up from 1.8626) [3] 5. Manulife Growth Mixed: 3.3419 (up from 3.1896) [3] 6. Zhongjia Core Intelligent Manufacturing Mixed A: 1.8700 (up from 1.7852) [3] 7. Zhongjia Core Intelligent Manufacturing Mixed C: 1.8291 (up from 1.7462) [3] 8. Manulife Performance Mixed A: 2.1059 (up from 2.0108) [3] 9. Manulife Performance Mixed C: 2.0781 (up from 1.9843) [3] 10. Manulife Economic Leading Two-Year Holding Mixed: 1.1704 (up from 1.1185) [3] Bottom Performing Funds - The bottom 10 funds with the lowest net value growth include: 1. Qianhai Kaiyuan Gold and Silver Jewelry Mixed A: 2.4620 (down from 2.6090) [4] 2. Qianhai Kaiyuan Gold and Silver Jewelry Mixed C: 2.4060 (down from 2.5490) [4] 3. Huafu Yongxin Flexible Allocation Mixed C: 1.6901 (down from 1.7884) [4] 4. Huafu Yongxin Flexible Allocation Mixed A: 1.7397 (down from 1.8407) [4] 5. Wanjia Cycle Vision Stock Initiation C: 1.0294 (down from 1.0806) [4] 6. Wanjia Cycle Vision Stock Initiation A: 1.0298 (down from 1.0810) [4] 7. Yinhua Domestic Demand Selected Mixed (LOF): 3.8010 (down from 3.9700) [4] 8. Yinhua Tongli Selected Mixed: 1.2138 (down from 1.2662) [4] 9. Yinhua Growth Pioneer Mixed: 1.4650 (down from 1.5270) [4] 10. Gold Stock ETF: 1.9938 (down from 2.0742) [4] Market Overview - The Shanghai Composite Index opened high and experienced horizontal fluctuations, closing slightly up, while the ChiNext Index showed a similar trend with a slight increase [6]. - The total trading volume was 1.75 trillion (down by 200 billion from the previous trading day) [6]. - The number of advancing stocks was 4064, while declining stocks numbered 1253 [6]. - Leading sectors included communication equipment and gas supply, both rising over 3% [6].

Core Viewpoint - A-shares experienced a decline in the morning session, with all three major indices falling, indicating a bearish market sentiment [1] Market Performance - The Shanghai Composite Index fell by 0.51% - The Shenzhen Component Index decreased by 1.85% - The ChiNext Index dropped by 3.4% [1] Sector Analysis - The gas and heating supply sector showed strength, with Dazhong Public Utilities achieving a consecutive trading limit increase - Cultivated diamonds and superhard materials concepts were active, with Huanghe Xuanfeng hitting the trading limit - The semiconductor sector faced adjustments, with Huahong Semiconductor declining over 10% - The lithium battery concept weakened, with CATL dropping over 6% - Coal, building materials, textile and apparel, and food and beverage sectors saw significant gains, while solid-state battery concepts, CPO concepts, and non-ferrous metals sectors experienced notable declines [1] Market Statistics - Over 2,300 stocks in the market declined - The total trading volume exceeded 1.6 trillion yuan [1]

Group 1 - The gas and heating sector has shown signs of recovery, with notable increases in stock prices [2] - Shengtong Energy has risen over 8%, while Shimao Energy previously hit the daily limit [2] - Other companies such as Delong Huineng, Furen Energy, Xinjiang Torch, and Changchun Gas also experienced significant gains [2]

人民财讯9月26日电，9月26日，三大指数集体低开，沪指跌0.35%，深证成指跌0.38%，创业板指跌 0.42%。盘面上，石油、矿物制品、多元金融等板块涨幅居前；供气供热、半导体、医药、建材等板块 跌幅居前。 ...

Group 1 - The gas and heating supply sector experienced a significant surge, with Shengtong Energy hitting the daily limit up [1] - Other companies such as Meneng Energy, Xinjiang Torch, Changchun Gas, and Hongtong Gas also saw increases in their stock prices [1]

1. Report Industry Investment Rating - Not provided in the content 2. Core Viewpoints of the Report - In the context of a volatile bond market and a passive widening of credit spreads, investors should prioritize high - coupon assets for certain returns and prepare in advance for the spread compression market driven by the seasonal inflow of wealth management funds in July [1][5]. - The current core contradiction in the credit bond market is the co - existence of weakening allocation demand and a passive widening of spreads in a volatile environment. Investors should seize pricing deviation opportunities under the protection of coupon safety cushions [5]. - The volatile market pattern caused by the interplay of multiple factors will continue, providing tactical opportunities for layout during market adjustments [6]. - The coupon strategy is the optimal solution in a volatile market, and portfolios should be constructed in a stratified manner according to the characteristics of liabilities [7]. - Investors should "pre - position" for the seasonal spread compression market in July and seize structural opportunities in specific bond varieties [8]. 3. Summary by Relevant Catalog 3.1 Yield and Spread Overview 3.1.1 Yields and Changes of Each Tenor - Yields of various types of bonds at different tenors are presented, along with their weekly changes and historical percentiles. For example, the 0.5 - year Treasury yield is 1.41%, down 4.0bp from last week, with a historical percentile of 8.4% [14]. 3.1.2 Spreads and Changes of Each Tenor - Credit spreads of various types of bonds at different tenors are shown, including their weekly changes and historical percentiles. For instance, the 0.5 - year credit spread of public non - perpetual urban investment bonds is 25bp, up 2.1bp from last week, with a historical percentile of 12.7% [16]. 3.2 Yields and Spreads of Credit Bonds by Category (Hermite Algorithm) 3.2.1 Yields and Spreads of Urban Investment Bonds by Region - **Yields and Changes of Each Tenor**: Yields of public non - perpetual urban investment bonds in different provinces at key tenors, their weekly changes, and historical percentiles are provided. For example, the 0.5 - year yield of Anhui's public non - perpetual urban investment bonds is 1.77%, up 2.6bp from last week, with a historical percentile of 1.1% [19]. - **Spreads and Changes of Each Tenor**: Credit spreads of public non - perpetual urban investment bonds in different provinces at key tenors, their weekly changes, and historical percentiles are given. For example, the 0.5 - year credit spread of Anhui's public non - perpetual urban investment bonds is 30.41bp, up 4.6bp from last week, with a historical percentile of 7.2% [22]. - **Yields and Changes of Each Implied Rating**: Yields of public non - perpetual urban investment bonds in different provinces for each implied rating, their weekly changes, and historical percentiles are presented. For example, the AAA - rated yield of Anhui's public non - perpetual urban investment bonds is 1.80%, up 3.8bp from last week, with a historical percentile of 5.1% [26]. - **Spreads and Changes of Each Implied Rating**: Credit spreads of public non - perpetual urban investment bonds in different provinces for each implied rating, their weekly changes, and historical percentiles are shown. For example, the AAA - rated credit spread of Anhui's public non - perpetual urban investment bonds is 28.96bp, up 4.8bp from last week, with a historical percentile of 32.2% [31]. - **Yields and Changes of Each Administrative Level**: Yields of public non - perpetual urban investment bonds in different provinces at each administrative level, their weekly changes, and historical percentiles are provided. For example, the provincial - level yield of Anhui's public non - perpetual urban investment bonds is 1.80%, up 3.5bp from last week, with a historical percentile of 3.7% [35].

Report Title - "The Divergence of Long - Short Term Spreads - Credit Spread Weekly Report (5/4)" [1][6] Report Industry Investment Rating - Not provided in the given content Core Viewpoints - From April 27th to April 30th, most bond yields declined. For 0.5 - 1Y industrial bonds, commercial bank second - tier capital bonds, securities company subordinated bonds, and securities company perpetual bonds, most yields dropped by over 2bp; for 0.5 - 1Y urban investment bonds and commercial financial bonds, most yields decreased by over 1bp; for 2Y industrial bonds and commercial financial bonds, most yields declined by over 1bp; the 2Y securities company subordinated bond yield rose by over 2bp; and the 3 - 5Y commercial financial bond yield dropped by over 2bp. Regarding credit spreads, the 0.5Y industrial bonds and commercial bank second - tier capital bond credit spreads mostly narrowed by over 5bp; the 1Y commercial bank second - tier capital bond credit spread narrowed by over 3bp; the 2Y securities company subordinated bonds and securities company perpetual bond credit spreads widened by over 3bp; and the 5Y urban investment bonds and industrial bond credit spreads mostly widened by over 2bp [2][6] Summary by Relevant Catalogs Yield and Spread Overview Yield and Spread of Each Maturity - Treasury bond yields at 0.5Y, 1Y, 2Y, 3Y, and 5Y were 1.47%, 1.46%, 1.45%, 1.48%, and 1.52% respectively, with weekly changes of - 3.5bp, 0.9bp, - 2.2bp, - 2.5bp, and - 2.2bp. Their historical quantiles were 11.9%, 13.2%, 8.7%, 6.2%, and 3.9% respectively. Similar data for other bond types such as national development bonds, local government bonds, etc., are also presented in detail [14] Credit Spread and Its Changes for Each Maturity - The 0.5Y, 1Y, 2Y, 3Y, and 5Y credit spreads of local government bonds were -, 12.01bp, 13.93bp, 14.34bp, and 14.37bp respectively, with weekly changes of -, 0.1bp, 0.2bp, - 1.5bp, and - 2.8bp. Their historical quantiles were -, 44.9%, 43.7%, 45.1%, and 38.6% respectively. Similar data for other bond types are also provided [16] Credit Bond Yields and Spreads by Category (Hermite Algorithm) Urban Investment Bonds by Region - In terms of yields, from April 27th to April 30th, most provincial urban investment bond yields declined. For example, the 5Y Guizhou urban investment bond yield dropped by about 35bp. In terms of credit spreads, the 0.5 - 1Y urban investment bond credit spreads mostly narrowed; the 2Y urban investment bond credit spreads mostly widened; the 3 - 5Y urban investment bond credit spreads showed differentiation, with the 3 - 5Y Guizhou urban investment bond credit spreads narrowing significantly [7] Industrial Bonds by Industry - From April 27th to April 30th, industrial bond yields generally declined. The 0.5 - 1Y industrial bond credit spreads generally narrowed, the 2 - 3Y industrial bond credit spreads showed differentiation, and the 5Y industrial bond credit spreads generally widened [7] Financial Bonds by Subject - From April 27th to April 30th, financial bond yields generally declined, with the 5Y city commercial bank second - tier capital bond yield dropping by about 55bp. The 0.5 - 1Y financial bond credit spreads generally narrowed, and the 2 - 5Y financial bond credit spreads showed differentiation [7] Credit Bond Yields and Spreads by Category (Balance Average Algorithm) Urban Investment Bonds by Region - Based on the balance average algorithm, from April 27th to April 30th, the 5Y Yunnan urban investment bond could target a return of over 3.2%, and the 5Y Qinghai urban investment bond could target a return of 3.0% or more. The 5Y Yunnan urban investment bond credit spread was significantly higher than that of medium - and short - term bonds, with high riding returns [8] Real Estate Private Enterprise Bonds - From April 27th to April 30th, the yields of real estate private enterprise bonds at all maturities were higher than those of other bond types, and the 0.5 - 1Y real estate private enterprise bond yields dropped by over 17bp [8] Financial Bonds - From April 27th to April 30th, the financial bond credit spreads generally narrowed, and the 3 - 5Y private securities company subordinated bonds could target a return of 4.7% or more [8]