Quantitative Models and Construction Methods Model Name: Quantitative Market Trend Analysis Framework - **Model Construction Idea**: The model aims to solve the systematic rotation problem of styles by conducting a bottom-up quantitative market trend analysis. It identifies the dominant asset characteristics that represent the future market's mainstream style through a comprehensive comparison of assets[1][5] - **Model Construction Process**: - The model considers five style stages based on the asset's industry lifecycle: external growth, quality growth, quality dividend, value dividend, and bankruptcy value[1][5] - The priority for asset comparison is based on the sequence: growth (g) > return on equity (ROE) > dividend (D)[1][5] - The model uses the spread of asset advantage differences to capture the trend changes of top assets, similar to factor timing[20] - **Model Evaluation**: The framework has shown good explanatory power for past A-share style rotations, achieving an annualized return of 27.25% since 2009[15] Model Backtesting Results - **Quantitative Market Trend Analysis Framework**: - 2009: Asset Comparison Strategy 133%, Wind All A 82%, Excess Return 51%[18] - 2010: Asset Comparison Strategy 7%, Wind All A -7%, Excess Return 14%[18] - 2011: Asset Comparison Strategy -33%, Wind All A -22%, Excess Return -11%[18] - 2012: Asset Comparison Strategy 5%, Wind All A 5%, Excess Return 0%[18] - 2013: Asset Comparison Strategy 41%, Wind All A 5%, Excess Return 36%[18] - 2014: Asset Comparison Strategy 48%, Wind All A 52%, Excess Return -4%[18] - 2015: Asset Comparison Strategy 55%, Wind All A 38%, Excess Return 16%[18] - 2016: Asset Comparison Strategy -14%, Wind All A -13%, Excess Return -1%[18] - 2017: Asset Comparison Strategy 32%, Wind All A 5%, Excess Return 27%[18] - 2018: Asset Comparison Strategy -21%, Wind All A -28%, Excess Return 7%[18] - 2019: Asset Comparison Strategy 41%, Wind All A 33%, Excess Return 8%[18] - 2020: Asset Comparison Strategy 69%, Wind All A 26%, Excess Return 44%[18] - 2021: Asset Comparison Strategy 47%, Wind All A 9%, Excess Return 38%[18] - 2022: Asset Comparison Strategy 44%, Wind All A -19%, Excess Return 62%[18] - 2023: Asset Comparison Strategy 5%, Wind All A -5%, Excess Return 10%[18] - 2024: Asset Comparison Strategy 62%, Wind All A 10%, Excess Return 52%[18] - 2025 (Aug): Asset Comparison Strategy 27%, Wind All A 23%, Excess Return 4%[18] Quantitative Factors and Construction Methods Factor Name: Expected Growth (gf) - **Factor Construction Idea**: The factor focuses on the highest analyst forecasted growth rates, regardless of the cycle stage[6] - **Factor Construction Process**: - The factor is constructed by selecting industries with the highest expected growth rates as forecasted by analysts[6] - The spread of expected growth advantage differences (Δgf) is used to capture the trend changes in top assets[20] - **Factor Evaluation**: The factor has shown significant excess returns since 2019, with notable performance in 2014-2015[34] Factor Name: Actual Growth (g) - **Factor Construction Idea**: The factor focuses on industries with the highest actual growth rates, particularly during transition and growth periods[6] - **Factor Construction Process**: - The factor is constructed by selecting industries with the highest actual growth rates (Δg)[6] - The spread of actual growth advantage differences (Δg) is used to capture the trend changes in top assets[24] - **Factor Evaluation**: The factor has shown significant excess returns in growth-dominant environments[36] Factor Name: Profitability (ROE) - **Factor Construction Idea**: The factor focuses on industries with high ROE and low valuation under the PB-ROE framework, concentrated in mature periods[6] - **Factor Construction Process**: - The factor is constructed by selecting industries with high ROE and low PB-ROE residuals[6] - The spread of ROE advantage differences is used to capture the trend changes in top assets[26] - **Factor Evaluation**: The factor has shown significant excess returns from 2016 to 2020, with weaker performance since 2021[39] Factor Name: Quality Dividend (DP+ROE) - **Factor Construction Idea**: The factor focuses on industries with the highest DP+ROE scores, concentrated in mature periods[6] - **Factor Construction Process**: - The factor is constructed by selecting industries with the highest DP+ROE scores[6] - The spread of DP+ROE advantage differences is used to capture the trend changes in top assets[42] - **Factor Evaluation**: The factor has shown significant excess returns in 2016, 2017, and 2023[43] Factor Name: Value Dividend (DP+BP) - **Factor Construction Idea**: The factor focuses on industries with the highest DP+BP scores, concentrated in mature periods[6] - **Factor Construction Process**: - The factor is constructed by selecting industries with the highest DP+BP scores[6] - The spread of DP+BP advantage differences is used to capture the trend changes in top assets[45] - **Factor Evaluation**: The factor has shown significant excess returns in 2009, 2017, and 2021-2023[46] Factor Name: Bankruptcy Value (PB+SIZE) - **Factor Construction Idea**: The factor focuses on industries with the lowest PB+SIZE scores, concentrated in stagnation and recession periods[6] - **Factor Construction Process**: - The factor is constructed by selecting industries with the lowest PB+SIZE scores[6] - The spread of PB+SIZE advantage differences is used to capture the trend changes in top assets[48] - **Factor Evaluation**: The factor has shown significant excess returns in 2015-2016 and 2021-2023[49] Factor Backtesting Results - **Expected Growth (gf)**: - Cable: 12 stocks, largest weight stock Zhongtian Technology, average market cap 21.791 billion yuan, 3-month performance 49.62%[34] - Cement: 19 stocks, largest weight stock Conch Cement, average market cap 17.929 billion yuan, 3-month performance 12.71%[34] - Glass Fiber: 6 stocks, largest weight stock China Jushi, average market cap 26.657 billion yuan, 3-month performance 63.67%[34] - Rare Earth and Magnetic Materials: 17 stocks, largest weight stock Northern Rare Earth, average market cap 31.018 billion yuan, 3-month performance 98.77%[34] - White Goods III: 10 stocks, largest weight stock Midea Group, average market cap 113.675 billion yuan, 3-month performance -1.21%[34] - **Actual Growth (g)**: - Integrated Circuits: 104 stocks, largest weight stock Cambricon-U, average market cap 45.058 billion yuan, 3-month performance 42.93%[37] - PCB: 38 stocks, largest weight stock Shenghong Technology, average market cap 27.163 billion yuan, 3-month performance 112.10%[37] - Tungsten: 4 stocks, largest weight stock Xiamen Tungsten, average market cap 30.523 billion yuan, 3-month performance 69.26%[37] - Lithium Battery Equipment: 12 stocks, largest weight stock Lead Intelligent, average market cap 11.731 billion yuan, 3-month performance 60.15%[37] - Weapons and Equipment III: 12 stocks, largest weight stock Great Wall Military Industry, average market cap 21.307 billion yuan, 3-month performance 80.22%[37] - **Profitability (ROE)**: - Beer: 7 stocks, largest weight stock Tsingtao Brewery, average market cap 26.758 billion yuan, 3-month performance -3.94%[39] - Liquor: 20 stocks, largest weight stock Kweichow Moutai, average market cap 162.722 billion yuan, 3-month performance 4.12%[39] - Non-dairy Beverages: 7 stocks, largest weight stock Eastroc Beverage, average market cap 32.754 billion yuan, 3-month performance -4.45%[39] - Network Connection and Tower Setup: 19 stocks, largest weight stock Zhongji Xuchuang, average market cap 64.299 billion yuan, 3-month performance 202.29%[39] - Building Decoration III: 28 stocks, largest weight stock Gold Mantis, average market cap 3.436 billion yuan, 3-month performance 4.42%[39] - **Quality Dividend (DP+ROE)**: - Automotive Motor Control: 15

Investment Rating - The investment rating for the company is maintained at "Buy" [1] Core Views - The company has shown continuous improvement in orders, indicating a turning point in operations. The revenue for 1H25 reached 9.528 billion RMB, a year-on-year increase of 2.49%, with a net profit attributable to shareholders of 358 million RMB, up 3.95% year-on-year [1] - The company’s decoration business revenue grew, with a notable recovery in the scale of income, attributed to a continuous increase in order growth over the past nine quarters [2] - The company achieved new signed orders of 12.46 billion RMB in 1H25, marking a year-on-year increase of 2.5%, with significant growth in orders from Guangdong and Sichuan regions [4] - The company maintains a target price of 4.31 RMB, reflecting a 20x PE valuation for 2025, with projected net profits of 574 million RMB for 2025 [5] Summary by Sections Financial Performance - In 1H25, the company reported a total revenue of 95.28 billion RMB, with a net profit of 3.58 billion RMB and a non-recurring net profit of 3.31 billion RMB, showing a year-on-year increase of 14.19% [1][2] - The comprehensive gross margin for 1H25 was 13.71%, a slight increase of 0.04 percentage points year-on-year, with the decoration and design business gross margins at 12.52% and 31.26%, respectively [2] Cost and Efficiency - The expense ratio for 1H25 was 7.68%, a decrease of 0.20 percentage points year-on-year, with improvements in accounts receivable turnover ratio to 0.74 times [3] - The company reported a net cash flow from operating activities of -1.023 billion RMB, which was a reduction in outflow by 167 million RMB year-on-year [3] Order and Market Dynamics - The company has signed new orders for nine consecutive quarters, with a significant increase in overseas revenue by nearly 29% year-on-year [4] - The company’s order growth is driven by enhanced regional focus and optimization of business structure, including urban renewal and clean technology development [4] Profit Forecast and Valuation - The company’s projected net profits for 2025-2027 are 574 million, 602 million, and 624 million RMB, respectively, with a CAGR of 4.28% [5] - The company is valued at a PE of 20x for 2025, with a target price set at 4.31 RMB, indicating a potential upside from the current market price [5]

Group 1 - The company has won multiple projects in the Middle East for its curtain wall business and is exploring opportunities for its renovation business in the region [2] - Currently, the renovation business has not secured any significant projects in the Middle East, and efforts are still in the market research and opportunity expansion phase [2] - The company aims to leverage its experience and resources from the curtain wall business to create synergies and expand its renovation business based on regional market demand [2]

Core Viewpoint - Zhongtian Jingzhuang (002989) holds a 27.99% indirect stake in Coreis Semiconductor Technology (Dongyang) Co., Ltd. through Dongyang Zhongjing Xinjie Enterprise Management Partnership (Limited Partnership) [1] Company Information - Coreis Semiconductor has not yet commenced formal production and has not achieved profitability [1] - The company is listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange and will continue to monitor the operational development of the invested entity [1] - Any significant developments regarding external investments or capital operation plans will be disclosed in a timely manner [1]

Core Viewpoint - The company, Weiye Co., Ltd. (300621), has announced that its wholly-owned subsidiary, Zhuhai Hualong Decoration Co., Ltd., has won a bid for the decoration and supporting works of the Huafa Xiangshan Lakeside project, with a contract value of approximately 522 million RMB [1] Group 1 - The contract amount for the project is approximately 522 million RMB [1] - The scope of the contract includes interior decoration, landscape engineering, and intelligent engineering [1] - The contract duration is set for 365 calendar days [1]

Group 1 - The China Infrastructure Engineering Index (399995) has seen a strong increase of 4.24%, with constituent stocks such as China Energy Engineering (601868), Tunnel Co. (600820), and China Power Construction (601669) hitting the 10% daily limit up [1] - The Infrastructure 50 ETF (516970) has risen by 5.05%, marking its fourth consecutive increase, with a trading volume of 7.32 billion yuan and a turnover rate of 23.73% [1] - As of July 21, the Infrastructure 50 ETF has achieved a net inflow of 5.98 billion yuan, with its latest scale reaching 2.978 billion yuan, a six-month high [1] Group 2 - The Infrastructure 50 ETF closely tracks the China Infrastructure Engineering Index, which includes listed companies in the construction and engineering sectors, reflecting the overall performance of these companies [2] - The top ten weighted stocks in the China Infrastructure Engineering Index account for 61.81% of the index, with major companies including China State Construction (601668) and China Railway (601390) [2] - The commencement of the Yarlung Tsangpo River downstream hydropower project, with a total investment of approximately 1.2 trillion yuan, is expected to boost demand for construction materials and services in the hydropower sector [2] Group 3 - In the first half of the year, infrastructure investment in China grew by 4.6%, outpacing overall investment growth by 1.8 percentage points, contributing to a 1.0 percentage point increase in total investment [3] - The ongoing construction of major regional projects is anticipated to further stimulate infrastructure investment growth in China [3] - Investors can access the infrastructure sector through various off-market connection products linked to the Infrastructure 50 ETF [3]