新华社东京11月17日电 日本防卫省17日向山口县岩国市方面通报称，部署在当地美军基地的"堤丰"中 程导弹系统已完成撤离。这一时间较原计划大幅延后。 日本自卫队和美军于9月11日至25日在日本九州等地举行"坚毅之龙"大规模联合演习，其间美军在日本 首次部署"堤丰"中导系统。 日本共同社10日援引岩国市方面消息报道说，防卫省曾表示会在演习结束后一周左右撤走该系统。 日本广岛县和山口县的市民团体10日提交请求书，要求日本政府敦促美军撤走部署在山口县岩国市 的"堤丰"中程导弹系统，担心这一以联合演习之名进行的临时部署成为常态。（记者李子越 陈泽安） ...

Core Points - The recent high-level trade talks between the US and Japan were unexpectedly canceled, highlighting a significant diplomatic tension over sensitive agricultural issues, particularly regarding rice imports [1][3] - The US government's push for Japan to purchase American rice has been perceived as an infringement on Japan's domestic policies and cultural values, leading to a strong backlash from Japanese officials [3][4] - Japan's decision to cancel the visit signals a shift towards a more assertive stance in defending its national interests against perceived US unilateralism [4][6] Trade Negotiations - The breakdown of the trade talks is rooted in Japan's sensitivity to rice, which is not just an agricultural product but also a cultural and political symbol [3] - The US has employed aggressive negotiation tactics, including the introduction of a "reciprocal tariff" policy, which has left Japan in a defensive position [3][6] - Despite the cancellation of high-level talks, working-level discussions between the two countries will continue, indicating Japan's desire to maintain bilateral relations while reassessing its strategy [4][7] Geopolitical Context - The US's military deployment plans in Japan, including the introduction of the "Aegis" missile system, have raised concerns about Japan's geopolitical positioning and its implications for regional stability [6] - The US's actions reflect a broader "America First" strategy, prioritizing its own interests over those of its allies, which complicates Japan's efforts to assert its own national interests [6][7] - The ongoing trade dispute over rice has become a litmus test for the strength and dynamics of the US-Japan alliance, with potential for further unexpected developments in future negotiations [7]

Group 1 - The US military plans to deploy the "Typhoon" medium-range missile system in Japan during joint exercises in September, with the system to be withdrawn after the training [1] - Russian officials view this deployment as a destabilizing action by Washington, aimed at enhancing ground-based short and medium-range missile capabilities globally [3] - The deployment of such missile systems near Russia is perceived as a direct strategic threat, potentially leading to severe consequences for regional and global stability [3] Group 2 - Russia has noted Japan's acceleration of militarization, including expanded training activities and military technology cooperation with the US, which is seen as a hostile move disregarding Russian national interests [3] - Russian officials have called on the Japanese government to reconsider the decision to deploy the "Typhoon" system, warning that failure to do so would place the responsibility for escalating tensions in the region on Japan [3]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses China's strong opposition to the deployment of the U.S. "THAAD" missile system in Japan, emphasizing the potential threats to regional security and urging both the U.S. and Japan to respect the security concerns of other nations [3][4]. Group 1: U.S. and Japan Military Actions - The U.S. plans to deploy the "THAAD" missile system in Japan during joint military exercises in September, which will be removed after the training [3]. - China expresses serious concerns regarding the deployment, stating it will harm the legitimate security interests of other countries and pose a substantial threat to regional strategic security [3]. Group 2: Historical Context and Regional Stability - The article highlights the historical context of Japan's militaristic past, noting that Japan's military security movements are closely watched by neighboring Asian countries and the international community [3]. - It calls for Japan to reflect on its history of aggression and to adhere to a path of peace, urging caution in military security matters to avoid further loss of trust from Asian neighbors and the international community [3]. Group 3: U.S. Recommendations - The article urges the U.S. to learn from historical lessons and to focus its energy and resources on constructive actions rather than provocative military deployments [4].

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes China's strong opposition to the deployment of the "Intermediate-Range Missile System" by the U.S. in Japan, highlighting concerns over regional security and the potential threat to other countries' legitimate security interests [1][2]. Group 1 - The U.S. plans to deploy the "Intermediate-Range Missile System" in Japan during joint exercises in September, which will be removed after the training [1]. - China has repeatedly expressed serious concerns regarding the deployment, stating it will further harm the legitimate security interests of other countries and pose a substantial threat to regional strategic security [1]. - The article calls for the U.S. and Japan to respect the security concerns of other nations and to refrain from introducing the missile system, urging them to contribute positively to regional peace and stability [2]. Group 2 - The article highlights Japan's militaristic history, which raises significant concerns among neighboring Asian countries and the international community [2]. - It marks the 80th anniversary of the victory in the Chinese People's War of Resistance against Japanese Aggression and the global anti-fascist war, urging Japan to reflect on its history of invasion and to adhere to a peaceful path in military security [2]. - The article also urges the U.S. to learn from historical lessons and to focus its energy and resources on constructive actions rather than contrary ones [3].

Group 1 - The U.S. has temporarily suspended most tariffs on China due to domestic economic pressures, while simultaneously accelerating military deployments in the Philippines, indicating a dual strategy of economic and military maneuvers [1][3]. - The imposition of tariffs as high as 145% has led to significant domestic economic issues in the U.S., including a 30% increase in e-commerce product prices and a 40% drop in agricultural exports, causing severe inventory problems for farmers [3]. - The U.S. military is deploying the NMESIS anti-ship missile system in the Philippines, which has a range of 185-260 kilometers, to enhance its military presence in the region, particularly near critical maritime routes [4]. Group 2 - Philippine President Marcos is playing a crucial role by rejecting Chinese demands and aligning with the U.S., indicating a strategic partnership that ties economic cooperation to military support [6]. - The Philippines has increased provocative actions in the South China Sea, including incursions into Chinese territorial waters, which heightens regional tensions and risks conflict [6]. - China is responding to the dual pressures of the tariff war and military encirclement by reducing its economic dependence on the U.S., with exports to the U.S. dropping to 14.7% of its total, while increasing trade with ASEAN and Africa by 25% [7].

Group 1: Meeting and Diplomatic Tensions - The meeting between US President Trump and Russian President Putin is scheduled for August 15 in Alaska to discuss the Ukraine crisis, marking their first face-to-face meeting since 2019 [1] - Trump has expressed disappointment in Putin and indicated that the deadline for a peace agreement between Russia and Ukraine remains valid, with a potential shortening of the 50-day timeline [3][4] - The ongoing verbal exchanges between the US and Russia have escalated, with both sides making strong statements regarding nuclear capabilities and treaties [2][6] Group 2: Nuclear Threats and Military Posturing - The current tensions between the US and Russia are described as the most explicit nuclear threat since the Cuban Missile Crisis, with both nations engaging in military posturing [8][20] - Trump announced the deployment of two US nuclear submarines to "appropriate areas," likely near Russian waters, emphasizing the seriousness of nuclear threats [7][9] - The US Navy operates 71 nuclear submarines, including 14 Ohio-class submarines, which can carry up to 24 Trident II missiles, each with a yield of 475 kilotons [11] Group 3: Arms Control and Treaty Developments - Russia has announced it will no longer adhere to the self-imposed restrictions of the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty, which previously limited the deployment of land-based missiles [14][15] - The last remaining nuclear arms treaty between the US and Russia, the New START treaty, is set to expire on February 5, 2024, raising concerns about a new arms race [22] - The US has been expanding its intermediate-range missile capabilities since its withdrawal from the INF Treaty in 2019, with deployments planned in various allied countries [16][17]

Group 1 - The military cooperation between the Philippines and the United States is undergoing significant changes, with the number of US military bases in the Philippines expanding from 5 to 9 in a short period, raising concerns about the underlying intentions behind this expansion [1][3][5] - The recent trade agreement, which appears to offer minor tariff reductions, is overshadowed by military conditions that suggest a deeper strategic partnership, with the US aiming to enhance its military presence in the region [3][5] - The strategic locations of the new military bases, particularly near contested areas in the South China Sea, indicate a shift towards establishing military outposts rather than mere defense cooperation [5][11] Group 2 - The deployment of the "堤丰" missile system, capable of covering both the South China Sea and Taiwan Strait, poses a significant risk of turning the Philippines into a military staging ground for the US [5][11] - The Philippines' defense spending is increasing sharply due to military purchases from the US, which may lead to long-term financial burdens for the country [7][11] - The military exercises between the US and the Philippines are becoming more extensive and targeted, suggesting preparations for potential military actions in the region [7][11] Group 3 - The Philippines is at risk of following a path similar to Ukraine, where external military support leads to increased dependency and potential conflict, with the local population bearing the brunt of geopolitical struggles [9][13] - The internal divisions within the Philippines regarding military cooperation with the US are becoming more pronounced, with some officials expressing concerns about national sovereignty while others advocate for deeper ties [15][17] - The economic implications of the Philippines' reliance on the US for security are complicated by its significant trade relationship with China, which could be jeopardized by escalating tensions [18][23] Group 4 - The Philippines has a critical opportunity to reassess its strategic choices before fully committing to US military alignment, which could limit its diplomatic flexibility in the future [25][30] - Learning from the experiences of other Southeast Asian nations, the Philippines could benefit from maintaining a balanced approach between major powers rather than leaning too heavily towards one [21][34] - The need for political reform and a more transparent decision-making process is essential for the Philippines to navigate its foreign policy effectively and avoid being trapped in a dependency cycle [33][34]

Core Points - The "Blade Shield-2025" joint military exercise, involving over 35,000 personnel from the US, Australia, and 17 other countries, aims to enhance political trust and military interoperability among allies in the Asia-Pacific region [1][4] - This exercise is the largest and most complex of its kind ever held in Australia, expanding its scope to include new areas and additional participating nations [4][5] Group 1 - The exercise will take place from July 13 to August 4, 2025, with activities occurring in various locations including Queensland, Western Australia, New South Wales, and Christmas Island [4] - A total of 19 countries are participating, an increase of 6 compared to 2023, with notable participants including Canada, Germany, India, and the UK [4][5] - The exercise will cover a wide range of military operations, including amphibious landings, air combat, and live-fire exercises involving various military assets [4][5] Group 2 - The exercise will incorporate new elements such as cyber warfare and AI military applications, reflecting modern warfare trends [5] - The US Army plans to test a new capability for pre-positioning equipment and supplies in the Pacific theater during the exercise [6] - The "Blade Shield" exercise is linked to the ongoing "Return of Forces to the Pacific" exercise, which involves nearly 300 aircraft and thousands of personnel [6] Group 3 - The US Army will conduct the first live-fire test of the "Typhon" medium-range missile system in the Pacific region during this exercise [9] - The "Typhon" system is part of the US Army's Long Range Precision Fires program, capable of launching various missiles with significant ranges [9] - The US military is progressively enhancing its medium-range missile capabilities in the Western Pacific, with potential future deployments of additional missile systems [10][11]