Core Insights - Wang Mingxu, a fund manager at GF Fund, has delivered the worst performance in the industry this year, with 6 out of 8 funds under his management reporting losses [3][6][12] - The average return for 4,408 actively managed equity funds this year is 30.82%, with 39 funds exceeding 100% returns [3][4] - Despite the overall market rally, Wang's funds have consistently underperformed, leading to investor dissatisfaction [11][12] Fund Performance - Wang Mingxu manages 8 funds, of which 6 have recorded negative returns this year, with the worst performer, GF Balanced Preferred A, showing a return of -9.98% [5][10] - As of November 7, 2023, 11 actively managed equity funds have seen a net value decline of over 10%, with 5 of these funds managed by Wang [4][8] - The total management fee collected from the 6 underperforming funds in the first half of the year was over 55 million yuan [2][17] Market Context - The A-share market has been steadily rising, yet Wang's funds have not benefited, with investors expressing frustration over the lack of recovery [11][12] - The wine sector, heavily weighted in Wang's funds, has underperformed this year, contributing to the overall losses [14] Future Outlook - Despite the poor performance this year, the same 6 funds have shown promising returns in 2024, with returns ranging from 17.88% to 20.39%, outperforming their benchmarks [12][13] - Wang's funds have a high overlap in their top holdings, which may have contributed to their collective underperformance [13][14] Fund Management and Strategy - Wang Mingxu has over 20 years of experience in the securities industry, with more than 7 years in public fund management [15] - The funds managed by Wang have seen a significant decline in scale, dropping below 10 billion yuan for the first time [6][16] - The management scale of Wang's funds decreased by 26.31% to 8.26 billion yuan as of the third quarter of 2023 [16]

Core Viewpoint - The A-share market experienced a volatile upward trend in the first three quarters of 2025, with many actively managed equity funds achieving significant performance. However, several funds managed by Wang Mingxu from GF Fund suffered losses, with declines exceeding 10% [1][4]. Group 1: Fund Performance - Wang Mingxu's fund, GF Value Advantage, recorded a net value decline of -15.37%, ranking last among actively managed equity funds [4]. - Six funds managed by Wang Mingxu reported losses exceeding 10% in the year, with GF Inner Demand Growth A also performing poorly with a -14.77% decline [6][9]. - The majority of the underperforming funds were established during the market peak in 2020-2021, raising questions about the fund's research and risk control capabilities [9]. Group 2: Investment Strategy - Wang Mingxu's investment style focuses on undervalued and large-cap blue-chip stocks, with significant allocations in sectors like liquor and city commercial banks as of the end of Q2 2025 [7]. - In Q2 2025, adjustments were made to the portfolio, reducing exposure to real estate and brokerage sectors while increasing holdings in city commercial banks and high-end liquor companies [7]. - Despite these adjustments, the market in 2025 favored growth stocks, particularly in the pharmaceutical and technology sectors, which Wang Mingxu's strategy failed to align with, leading to substantial underperformance [8]. Group 3: Company Overview - GF Fund Management Co., established in August 2003, aims to create long-term sustainable returns for clients while maintaining a commitment to professionalism and client interests [11]. - The significant losses in several funds raise concerns about the alignment of interests between the fund management company and its investors, as well as the effectiveness of its research capabilities [11].

Core Viewpoint - The A-share and Hong Kong stock markets have shown a continuous upward trend since mid-April, achieving new highs in the third quarter, with equity funds yielding significant returns [1] Group 1: Active Equity Funds - A total of 37 funds have doubled their returns this year as of September 26, with 31 active equity funds in A-shares achieving over 100% returns [2][4] - The average return for active equity funds is 30.32%, with over 98% of these funds reporting positive returns [4] - The top-performing fund, Yongying Technology Smart Selection A, has a return rate of 189.58%, significantly boosted by its focus on AI concept stocks [4][6] Group 2: Passive Index Funds - Nearly 98% of index funds have achieved positive returns, with an average return of 27.53% [7] - Funds tracking innovative drugs, communications, and artificial intelligence have outperformed, with the top two funds yielding returns of 103.96% and 100.59% [7] - Underperforming index funds are primarily those tracking energy, food and beverage, and coal sectors, with losses exceeding 5% [7] Group 3: QDII Funds - QDII funds focused on the Hong Kong market, particularly in innovative drug assets, have performed well, with four funds exceeding 100% returns [3][8] - The top-performing QDII fund, Huatai Bairui Hang Seng Innovation Drug ETF, has a return of 152.25% [8] - Other notable funds in this category have also shown strong performance, with several exceeding 90% returns [8]

Core Insights - The article highlights the performance of active equity funds in the A-share market one year after the "924 market" began, showing significant returns for many funds [1] - A total of 458 active equity funds doubled their returns, with the top performer, Debon Xinxing Value A, achieving a return of 282% [1][3] - The performance disparity among active equity funds is notable, with the best-performing fund outpacing the worst by 290% [1] Fund Performance Summary - Debon Xinxing Value A achieved a return of 282.09%, significantly exceeding its benchmark by 280.58% [3] - CITIC Construction Investment North Exchange Selected Two-Year Open A followed closely with a return of 271.48%, outperforming its benchmark by 224.56% [3] - China Europe Digital Economy A recorded a return of 262.27%, surpassing its benchmark by 181.61% [4] - Other notable funds include Huaxia North Exchange Innovation Small and Medium Enterprises Selected (260.68%) and Xin'ao Performance Driven A (255.70%) [4] Underperforming Funds - Dongcai Value Start A reported a loss of 8.13%, making it the worst performer [5][6] - Other underperformers include GF Value Advantage with a loss of 3.26% and GF Domestic Demand Growth A with a loss of 2.55% [5][6] - The performance of these underperforming funds indicates a significant gap in returns compared to the top performers [1]

Core Insights - The active management equity funds are experiencing a strong recovery in returns, with 95% achieving positive returns and an average return exceeding 15% as of August 7, 2025 [1][2] - The pharmaceutical sector has emerged as the biggest winner, with four funds doubling their returns, all focused on this industry [3] Fund Performance - As of August 7, 2025, the average return for over 4,500 active equity funds is 15.03%, while more than 93% of over 2,500 stock index funds have positive returns averaging 11.8% [2] - Active equity funds have outperformed major indices like CSI 300 (4.6%) and CSI 500 (10.6%) after three years of underperformance [2] Fund Manager Dynamics - There are 90 active equity fund managers managing over 10 billion yuan, with Zhang Kun from E Fund leading at over 50 billion yuan [5][6] - Among these managers, 86 have achieved positive returns, with the average return for those managing over 30 billion yuan being 9.8%, which is lower than the average of the top 90 managers [6] Sector Focus - The four funds that doubled their returns are primarily invested in the pharmaceutical sector, including Changcheng Pharmaceutical Industry Selection and Huashan Pharmaceutical Biotechnology [3] - The top-performing managers, Zhang Wei and Zhang Lu, have focused on themes like innovative drugs and robotics, contributing to their high returns of 65.8% and 53.4% respectively [8] Underperforming Funds - Despite the overall positive trend, 228 active equity funds reported negative returns, with the worst performer, Qianhai Kaiyuan AI A, showing a return of -18.5% [3] - Wang Mingxu from GF Fund has seen 7 out of 8 funds underperform, with a bottom return of -7.4% [8][9] Investor Sentiment - Although the A-share market has been rising, investor confidence in active equity funds remains low, with a significant reduction in total shares of active equity funds by approximately 198.24 billion shares in the first half of 2025 [3]

Core Viewpoint - The interview with Wang Mingxu, a fund manager at Guangfa Fund, highlights his unique investment philosophy and approach, emphasizing the importance of patience and understanding market dynamics over the past five years [1][17]. Group 1: Investment Philosophy - Wang Mingxu believes that investment requires both self-awareness and an understanding of the broader market, stating that patience and persistence are key to navigating market changes [1][18]. - His investment style is characterized by a balanced approach, allowing him to identify opportunities across various market conditions while avoiding significant risks [9][11]. - Wang's investment philosophy is influenced by Charlie Munger's ideas, focusing on integrating diverse knowledge rather than adhering to rigid methodologies [10][11]. Group 2: Performance Metrics - Wang's longest-managed fund, Guangfa Inner Demand Growth A, has achieved a cumulative return of over 136% and an annualized return of 13.84% as of May 30 [4]. - His funds consistently rank among the top in their category over a three-year period, reflecting a long-term performance strategy akin to a marathon runner [3][4]. Group 3: Sector Focus and Strategy - Wang has maintained a significant allocation of 15-30% in bank stocks within his portfolio, which he views as effective assets despite conventional wisdom suggesting otherwise [5][6]. - Over the past four years, the banking sector has outperformed the CSI 300 index by a cumulative 30 percentage points, validating Wang's investment strategy [6]. - His investment coverage spans various sectors, including food and beverage, retail, banking, real estate, electricity, pharmaceuticals, and new energy, demonstrating a broad industry understanding [13][36]. Group 4: Market Outlook and Adjustments - Wang expresses optimism about the mid-term equity market, indicating a shift in his portfolio from defensive to more aggressive positions in sectors like real estate and brokerage [55][56]. - He strategically adjusted his holdings in 2021, moving away from consumer stocks to sectors he believed offered better value, such as banking and energy [25][26]. - Wang's approach to cyclical industries is rooted in supply-demand dynamics, which he considers crucial for making informed investment decisions [44][46].

Core Viewpoint - The FOF (Fund of Funds) portfolios reveal a preference for low-cost, clearly defined index funds and strong-performing active equity funds, indicating a trend in investment strategies among FOFs [1] Group 1: FOF Holdings Overview - As of the end of 2024, there are 1,257 active equity funds held by FOFs, with 121 funds having holdings exceeding 50 million shares [1] - In terms of market value, 100 funds have a holding value exceeding 100 million yuan [1] - Large fund companies with comprehensive product offerings, such as GF Fund, have multiple funds in FOF portfolios, indicating recognition of their active stock investment capabilities [1] Group 2: GF Fund Performance - GF Fund has five funds that meet both the criteria of FOF holdings exceeding 50 million shares and a market value exceeding 100 million yuan [2] - The top fund, GF Industry Leading A, has the highest FOF holdings and market value, with 180 million shares held by 15 FOFs, totaling a market value of 310 million yuan [2] - The fund manager, Cheng Kun, has achieved a return of 51.49% since taking over the fund on May 31, 2019, with a benchmark outperformance of 38.59% [2] Group 3: Investment Style of Cheng Kun - Cheng Kun is characterized as a classic value investor, focusing on undervalued assets with a long-term perspective [3] - His investment strategy includes a high stock position, typically maintaining over 90%, with a balanced industry allocation across various sectors [3] - As of the end of 2024, nine of his top holdings have been held for at least four quarters, with four held for over two and a half years, reflecting a preference for long-term investments [3]