9月29日，银行间交易商协会发布了修订完善后的《关于非金融企业债务融资工具一般主承销商2025年度主承销业务执业情况市场评价实施方案的通知》 （下称《通知》）。 本次修订完善，重点强化了主承销商对科技金融、普惠金融等领域的资源投入，赋能科技创新与民营经济。明确了主承销商核心功能与执业框架，深化主承 销商全业务链服务能力，促进市场转型发展。 据悉，交易商协会将于2026年初启动2025年度日常评价工作。根据主承销商机构类型和业务范围，按照全国展业银行（含外资银行）、地方展业银行、证券 公司分类评价。 持续优化特色主承销商评价机制 为深入贯彻落实中央金融工作会议精神，深化金融供给侧结构性改革，持续提升主承销商综合执业能力，推动银行间市场高质量发展，银行间市场交易商协 会经充分征求市场成员意见，对主承销商日常评价标准进行了优化完善。 本次完善日常评价机制的总体思路包括多个方面。首先是，落实党中央、国务院关于促进科技企业、民营企业高质量发展的重大决策部署，加强对科技创新 债券、民营企业债券的支持力度，引导金融资源对重点领域的服务与支持。 其次是，进一步完善主承销商的能力建设框架，构建"发行定价—市场化销售 — 存续期 ...

Core Viewpoint - The China Securities Association has recently communicated the evaluation results of securities companies for the 2025 financial "Five Major Articles" initiative, with CITIC Securities ranking first in seven quantitative evaluations [2][3]. Group 1: Evaluation Results - The evaluation period covers the previous year from January 1 to December 31, with 107 participating securities firms submitting data for review [3]. - CITIC Securities led in the underwriting of technology innovation bonds, with an amount of 128.19 billion, followed by CITIC Jiantou, Guotai Junan, CICC, and Huatai Securities [3]. - In terms of financing for technology enterprises, CITIC Securities also ranked first with a financing amount of 27.04 billion, followed by CITIC Jiantou, CICC, Guotai Junan, and Huatai Securities [4]. Group 2: Market Participation - Several firms, including CITIC Securities, CITIC Jiantou, Guotai Junan, and others, have served over 20 technology enterprises, indicating a broad market participation [5]. - For major asset restructuring transactions involving technology enterprises, CITIC Securities again ranked first with a transaction amount of 32.07 billion [5]. Group 3: Green and Private Enterprise Bonds - In the underwriting of green and low-carbon transition bonds, CITIC Securities led with an amount of 16.54 billion, followed by CITIC Jiantou and Guotai Junan [5]. - For private enterprise bonds, the top five underwriters included招商证券, 广发证券, 平安证券, CICC, and Huatai Securities, with amounts ranging from 38.15 billion to 12.57 billion [5]. Group 4: Pension Products - The top five firms in the distribution of personal pension products included 广发证券, 招商证券, 国信证券, 中国银河, and 兴业证券, with amounts ranging from 17.18 million to 11.42 million [6]. Group 5: Evaluation Framework - The evaluation results will be incorporated into the 2025 classification system for securities firms, with a scoring system that emphasizes quantitative indicators [7]. - The evaluation framework includes 14 representative indicators, focusing on contributions and service capabilities in key areas, with technology finance receiving the highest weight [8].

● 本报记者 赵中昊 中国证券报记者日前从业内获悉，中国证券业协会已于近日向各券商一对一通报了2025年度证券公司做 好金融"五篇大文章"专项评价结果及各券商加分分值，并将核心定量指标排名情况在业内进行了公示。 其中，中信证券在七项定量评价中位居榜首。评价结果将直接纳入券商2025年分类评价体系。 多项定量指标排名清晰 头部券商优势明显 记者在采访中了解到，为提高评价工作质效，中证协前期在起草《证券公司做好金融"五篇大文章"专项 评价办法（试行）》时同步启动了试评价工作，组织完成了107家参评券商评价数据的填报与复核，并 已通过数据报送系统向各券商一对一反馈确认了评价数据。 主承销绿色债券和低碳转型债券金额排名前五位的券商依次为中信证券、中信建投、国泰海通、中金公 司、招商证券，主承销金额分别为165.44亿元、122.92亿元、111.40亿元、88.43亿元、54.10亿元。 此外，主承销民营企业债券金额前五位的券商依次为招商证券、广发证券、平安证券、中金公司、华泰 证券，主承销金额分别为381.50亿元、318.86亿元、185.60亿元、130.07亿元、125.73亿元。 上一年度代销个人养老金产品 ...

Core Viewpoint - The China Securities Association has released a trial evaluation method for securities companies to enhance their contributions to the financial "Five Major Articles," focusing on both quantitative and qualitative indicators to promote high-quality development in the securities industry [1][5]. Group 1: Evaluation Methodology - The evaluation method includes both quantitative and qualitative indicators, reflecting the contribution and capabilities of companies in key areas of the financial "Five Major Articles" [2][3]. - Quantitative indicators cover various sectors, including technology finance, green finance, inclusive finance, pension finance, and digital finance, with specific metrics such as bond underwriting amounts and equity financing for technology enterprises [2][3]. - Qualitative indicators assess the establishment of mechanisms and continuous investment in business resources, including whether companies incorporate the financial "Five Major Articles" into their strategic development [3][5]. Group 2: Scoring and Incentives - The scoring system assigns higher points to technology finance, with a total of 50 points available, while other sectors like green finance and digital finance are assigned 10 points each [4]. - The evaluation encourages participation from various types of companies by providing a broad range of scoring and minimizing score differences among the top 50 ranked companies [4]. - A baseline score is established to prevent significant score disparities, promoting differentiated development and specialized operations among industry players [4]. Group 3: Implementation Principles - The evaluation method adheres to three main principles: focusing on key areas, enhancing coordination, and ensuring comprehensive and fair assessments [5]. - It aims to streamline the evaluation process by integrating with existing assessments related to social responsibility, bond practice quality, and digital capability, thereby reducing the reporting burden on companies [5].

Core Viewpoint - The China Securities Association has released a trial evaluation method for securities companies to enhance their contributions to the financial "Five Major Articles" and promote high-quality development in the securities industry [1][2]. Group 1: Evaluation Methodology - The evaluation method incorporates both quantitative and qualitative indicators, focusing on the contributions and capabilities of companies in key areas of the financial "Five Major Articles" [3][4]. - Quantitative indicators include metrics related to technology finance, green finance, inclusive finance, pension finance, and digital finance, with a significant emphasis on technology finance [3][4]. - Qualitative indicators assess the establishment of mechanisms and the continuous investment of business resources in the financial "Five Major Articles" [4]. Group 2: Scoring and Incentives - The evaluation method assigns higher scores to technology finance, with a total of 50 points allocated across various subcategories, while other areas like green finance, inclusive finance, pension finance, and digital finance each receive 10 points [5]. - The scoring system allows for a broad range of additional points, encouraging companies to actively participate based on their resource endowments [5]. - A foundational score is established to prevent excessive score disparities among companies, promoting differentiated development and specialized operations [5]. Group 3: Implementation and Principles - The evaluation is conducted annually, covering the previous year's performance, and aligns with existing evaluation methods of the China Securities Association [6]. - The evaluation method adheres to three main principles: focusing on key areas, enhancing coordination with existing evaluations, and ensuring a comprehensive and fair assessment [6].

Core Viewpoint - The China Securities Association has released a trial evaluation method for securities companies to enhance their service capabilities in the financial sector, particularly focusing on technology finance indicators [1][2]. Group 1: Evaluation Method Overview - The evaluation method includes 25 articles that focus on the core business of securities firms and highlight their functional roles, considering factors such as industry representation, indicator maturity, and data verifiability [1]. - The evaluation will summarize experiences and continuously improve the indicator system and evaluation work [1]. Group 2: Quantitative Indicators - Technology finance indicators include amounts and numbers related to technology innovation bond underwriting, equity financing for technology enterprises, major asset restructuring transactions, direct investments in unlisted technology firms, and private equity fund investments in technology companies [2]. - Green finance indicators cover amounts and numbers for green bonds and low-carbon transition bonds, while inclusive finance indicators include amounts for bonds supporting small and micro enterprises and private enterprises [2]. - Pension finance indicators focus on the scale of personal pension product sales, and digital finance indicators assess the maturity of digital capabilities and awards in securities technology [2]. Group 3: Qualitative Indicators - Qualitative indicators include mechanism construction, continuous resource investment, and additional indicators reflecting the functional roles of securities firms and their implementation of key policies [2]. - Mechanism construction indicators assess whether the financial "five major articles" are included in the business development strategy and whether a professional organizational structure and incentive mechanisms are established [2]. Group 4: Scoring Methodology - The scoring system allocates a total of 50 points for technology finance, with specific points assigned to various categories such as bond financing, equity financing, mergers and acquisitions, and equity investments [3]. - Additional points are available for companies ranked in the top 50, with a small point difference between tiers to encourage participation [3]. - The evaluation method sets both monetary and numerical scoring standards to balance the impact of absolute scale on the results, promoting differentiated development among industry institutions [3].

Core Insights - The China Securities Association (CSA) has released the results of a trial evaluation for securities firms, indicating that the scores will be used as the main basis for formal evaluations [1] - The evaluation system has shifted to a quantitative focus, with 90 points allocated to quantitative indicators and 10 points to qualitative indicators, along with an additional 5 points for specific contributions [2] Group 1: Evaluation Metrics - The quantitative evaluation measures performance in five key areas, including technology finance (50 points), green finance, inclusive finance, pension finance, and digital finance [2] - Specific metrics under technology finance include bond financing, equity financing, mergers and acquisitions, equity investment, and private equity investment [2] Group 2: Leading Firms - Major securities firms dominate the rankings in various categories related to the "Five Major Articles" in finance, with CITIC Securities and CITIC Construction dominating in technology bond underwriting and equity financing for tech companies [3][4] - In the ranking for underwriting technology innovation bonds, the top five firms are CITIC Securities (128.19 billion), CITIC Construction (89.86 billion), Guotai Junan Securities (63.68 billion), CICC (58.80 billion), and Huatai Securities (34.22 billion) [3] Group 3: Specific Rankings - In the ranking for serving technology companies in major asset restructuring transactions, the top five firms are CITIC Securities (32.07 billion), CITIC Construction (15.39 billion), China Galaxy Securities (11.50 billion), CICC (7.62 billion), and Huatai Securities (7.31 billion) [4] - For underwriting green bonds and low-carbon transition bonds, the leading firms are CITIC Securities (16.54 billion), CITIC Construction (12.29 billion), Guotai Junan Securities (11.14 billion), CICC (8.84 billion), and招商证券 (5.41 billion) [4] Group 4: Pension Products and Awards - In the ranking for selling personal pension products, the top five firms are CICC (24.83 million), China Galaxy Securities (18.06 million), Guotai Junan Securities (17.18 million),招商证券 (13.91 million), and Guosen Securities (13.78 million) [5] - The CSA also announced awards for financial technology development, with Guotai Junan Securities and CITIC Securities receiving first prizes for their respective projects [5]

来自证监会官网的消息显示，为贯彻党中央、国务院决策部署，落实全国稳住经济大盘电视会议精 神和《国务院关于印发扎实稳住经济一揽子政策措施的通知》要求，证监会决定进一步降低交易所债券 市场交易成本，对民营企业债券融资交易费用应免尽免，持续提升服务实体经济能力。 今年3月，证监会就表示将推出一系列政策措施，进一步拓宽民营企业债券融资渠道，增强服务民 营经济发展质效。随后，多项举措陆续推出，交易所债券市场推出了民营企业债券融资专项支持计划， 同时证监会指导沪深交易所在前期试点基础上正式推出科技创新公司债券。 【纠错】 【责任编辑:任想】 同日，中国结算发布通知，决定自2022年7月1日起至2025年6月30日，暂免收取部分债券登记结算 费用。包括：暂免收取上述期间债券、资产支持证券现券交易及约定购回式交易的结算费；暂免收取上 述期间民营企业债券（不含可转换公司债券）证券登记费、派息兑付手续费、赎回回售手续费。民营企 业债券发行人应当向证券交易所申报企业性质。 证监会表示，下一步将继续贯彻落实党中央、国务院决策部署，持续完善民营企业债券融资支持机 制，凝聚各方合力，充分发挥资本市场支持民营企业发展、稳定宏观经济大盘的积 ...

Core Insights - The China Securities Association released the bond underwriting statistics for the first half of 2025, highlighting significant growth in technology innovation bonds, rural revitalization bonds, and private enterprise bonds [1][2]. Group 1: Bond Underwriting Performance - The total underwriting amount for rural revitalization bonds reached 26.624 billion yuan, marking a year-on-year increase of 134.32% [3]. - In the technology innovation bond sector, 68 securities firms underwrote 380 bonds, totaling 381.391 billion yuan, which is a 56.48% increase compared to the previous year [2][3]. - The leading underwriters for technology innovation bonds were CITIC Securities, CITIC Jiantou, and Guotai Junan, with underwriting amounts of 3.598 billion yuan, 2.684 billion yuan, and 1.914 billion yuan respectively [3]. Group 2: Performance of Smaller Firms - Smaller securities firms have shown strong performance in niche areas, with Caixin Securities leading in low-carbon transition bonds and Wenkang Securities excelling in small and micro-enterprise support bonds [4]. - In the low-carbon transition bond sector, 17 firms underwrote 14 bonds, totaling 8.35 billion yuan [4]. - For small and micro-enterprise support bonds, 32 firms underwrote 30 bonds, amounting to 11.82 billion yuan, with Wenkang Securities ranking first in both number and amount of underwritings [4]. Group 3: Other Bond Categories - In the "Belt and Road" bond category, 18 firms underwrote 10 bonds, with a total amount of 7.9 billion yuan [5]. - For private enterprise bonds, 48 firms underwrote 229 bonds, totaling 239.394 billion yuan, which is a 30% increase year-on-year [5]. - A total of 68 firms participated in issuing local government bonds, with a combined winning bid amount of 140.459 billion yuan [6].

Group 1 - The core point of the article highlights the significant growth in the bond market, particularly in the technology innovation bond sector, with a total underwriting amount of 381.39 billion yuan, representing a year-on-year increase of 56.48% [2][4] - A total of 68 securities firms participated as lead underwriters for 380 technology innovation bonds, continuing the explosive growth trend that began in 2020 [2][4] - The top three firms, CITIC Securities, CITIC Construction Investment, and Guotai Junan, captured over 47% of the market share in technology innovation bond underwriting [2][4] Group 2 - The performance of small and medium-sized securities firms has been notable, particularly in niche markets such as support bonds for small and micro enterprises and "Belt and Road" bonds, where they have made significant inroads [2][8] - In the "Belt and Road" bond sector, three small securities firms ranked among the top five underwriters, a significant increase from the previous year [2][8] - The underwriting amount for private enterprise bonds reached 239.39 billion yuan, showing a substantial increase from the previous year's 183.70 billion yuan [7] Group 3 - The regulatory environment has played a crucial role in the growth of the technology innovation bond market, with policies encouraging securities firms to enhance their capabilities in this area [6] - The merger of Guotai Junan and Haitong Securities has significantly impacted the rankings, with their combined underwriting amount surpassing that of other major firms [5] - The rural revitalization bond market saw a doubling in scale, driven primarily by the strong performance of leading securities firms [9]